KPP - Kinetic Power Plant (Long Animation), Ki-TECH.Global/Save The Planet AG

Рет қаралды 83,366

4 жыл бұрын

Ki-TECH KPP Animation of a Kinetic Power Plant.
Save The Planet AG (IP owner) and Ki-TECH Global AS (distribution partner) is introducing the emission-free Kinetic power plant (KPP). The KPP is a breakthrough energy solution that produces cheap and clean energy.
See more: www.ki-tech.global
With our knowledge, we are making an invaluable contribution to solving energy problems!
Our revolutionary Kinetic Power Plant (KPP®) technology is capable to be installed at any location in the world - as may be required - and to provide the required electrical energy without the use and consumption of fossil fuels.
The result thereof is 100% green and thus clean energy. By switching current energy generating methods to our kinetic power plant technology worldwide, our biosphere will in due course automatically regenerate itself completely.
In addition to the environmental benefits of our Kinetic Power Plant (KPP®), there are certainly also financial benefits: The change over to our Kinetic Power Plant (KPP®) over the long term, is expected to cost significantly less than sustaining traditional sources.

Пікірлер: 68

@vincemorgan9640 2 жыл бұрын

If I may offer a correction. Cavitation has nothing to do with air bubbles. It is the transition of a liquid into gas when pressure drops below a certain point. It does produce bubbles, but they are vapor rather than air. When there are air bubbles in a liquid the apparent density of the liquid is reduced, thereby reducing buoyancy.

@shafqutabc Жыл бұрын

Deeper the water the more pressure it is at the bottom . More power it will take to pump air to displace high pressure water.

@olehpodunai8718 3 ай бұрын

THE TORQUE DIFFERENCE IS MORE THAN A TON....THIS IS A VERY HIGH FORCE...ABOUT 10 PERCENT IS NEEDED FOR THE COMPRESSOR PRODUCING AIR

@kurtdobson 5 ай бұрын

The nice thing about simulations is you can get any answer you want, even if they're wrong.

@user-hv9me1th9k 3 жыл бұрын

ВЕЛИКОЛЕПНО!!!🤗🤗🤗

@mundymorningreport3137 3 жыл бұрын

Hi, really appreciate the simplicity of this design. But I am curious why the more compact use of shifting the mass on a spinning rotor was not considered? Viktor Schauberger and Richard Clem both had unique designs that demonstrated the practical application of high school physics in the conservation of momentum that is also frequently demonstrated by an ice skater who speeds up when spinning as they pull their hands into their body? Party on Dudes, be good to each other.

@user-ih2nn5nb6x 3 жыл бұрын

Well animation but the energy required to introduce air into the bottom of the bucket and start buoyancy is as much as the benefit of buoyancy itself. Who will bear the mechanical losses in order to benefit from the production of electricity?

@pixmooo1 3 жыл бұрын

This device can be considered as a means of reproducing of power from stored compressed air, after storing this copressed air by the use of green sources, as like wide, or sun ray power

@olehpodunai8718 3 ай бұрын

THE TORQUE DIFFERENCE IS MORE THAN A TON....THIS IS A VERY HIGH FORCE...ABOUT 10 PERCENT IS NEEDED FOR THE COMPRESSOR PRODUCING AIR

@user-ih2nn5nb6x 3 ай бұрын

@@olehpodunai8718"Nothing is created from nothing and nothing is destroyed to become nothing" taught Democritus, we must learn these simple things. If your system works then you can do a small pilot model to confirm the visa error.

@tpt9028 3 жыл бұрын

May be one more guy who has not yet read the 1st law of Thermodynamics !!! This law is taught in 9th or 10th grade in schools.

@ploupable Жыл бұрын

Free energy ! Come on guys, be serious, climate and energy crisis deserve better than that

@user-qj9qw9fd5q Жыл бұрын

부력발전기 더 효율적이고 간단한 원리로 만들수 있다

@user-mo7qw3md5v Жыл бұрын

간단하게 설명을 해보세요?

@user-qj9qw9fd5q Жыл бұрын

@@user-mo7qw3md5v 구(공)을이용한 회전체로 수조에서의 부력상승으로 운동에너지 창출 자세한 내용은 제가그린 그림보면 간단히 설명이 될텐데 첨부사진오는 방법을 몰라 아쉽네요 따로 연락주시면 보내드릴께요

@wajant1421 Жыл бұрын

10 MW of KPP delivery to Jakarta Indonesia, how long is delivery time? . Thanks

@maxfrisco10 4 ай бұрын

why all are negative comments / inputs? In this world nothing is impossible. We should encourage the innovation, improvise or correct the flaws, if any. Instead of so discouraging remarks. I am not physicist, I am a business man. If an innovation can improvise economic benefit, why not perfect it.

@d.moedig4676 2 ай бұрын

Think about it Max. Read again what you wrote. Come on you can do it. Come on! .....Do you see it? ......no?

@mabe8682 4 жыл бұрын

Are there any of those plants in service anywhere?

@bjrnmathiasen9800 4 жыл бұрын

hi yes there are one in Thialand.

@preppertechnicianee6013 4 жыл бұрын

No it does not work

@flytech01 3 жыл бұрын

@@preppertechnicianee6013 Why not?

@preppertechnicianee6013 3 жыл бұрын

@@flytech01 multiple layers here 1 Micro bubbles If you inject air into the tank without letting water out you will lift the water level in that tank by the volume of the bubble The math to do so is 1 for 1 so no gain Get it? 1 bubble at 100 feet deep Means that air pressure has to match the water pressure plus some so at best its equal minus fiction in pump So it actually a net loss This is actually the same issue for the right tanks filling them with air would require pumping in the air which raises th water level and the pressure of the air is equa to the pressure of the depth so it keeps a 1 to 1 at best minus heat So no energy

@flytech01 3 жыл бұрын

@@preppertechnicianee6013 in a tank smaller than 10 liters there will be no extra performance try a larger tank in your simulation

@valveman12 2 жыл бұрын

*Why this can't work!* The energy required to empty the cylinders using compressed air will require more energy than you can get out of this.

@racenemo Жыл бұрын

I'm making a unit now to check this

@valveman12 Жыл бұрын

@@racenemo I wouldn't waste my time... We know, based on the Natural Laws described by Physics, and more generally Science, have debunked claims of free energy. The 1st Law of Thermodynamics describes the problem. *Energy cannot be created nor destroyed*

@racenemo Жыл бұрын

A guy I know paid 4.500000 Euro in 2016 for a licence to build them in NL still nothing build yet

@noanwer 9 ай бұрын

@@racenemo did you make it?

@racenemo 9 ай бұрын

@@noanwer yes I made it, with less water resistant and compressing the air it needs itsself without an extra compressor>> Guess what, It doesn't work YOU NEED MORE ENERGY to compress THAN the unit can deliver

@sterlingpound1490 2 жыл бұрын

how much to purchase and how many KW

@icraftcrafts8685 Жыл бұрын

Why not just wore a mini compressor in each buoy?

@cptwhite 3 жыл бұрын

How does the generator overcome so much resistive bullshit?

@preppertechnicianee6013 3 жыл бұрын

Doesn't wont work

@johnblacker9230 4 ай бұрын

We ALL live in a gravitational field - you may ask - What is it? Newton would tell you Gravity is a force, Einstein would tell you Gravity is a warp in the fabric of Space-Time, and I would tell you we live in a programmable hyperdymentional Superfluid and that you can use Submarine technology to power ALL of your energy requirements. jb (physicist) November 2023.

@neurosc7707 3 жыл бұрын

How do bubbles of any size or quantity make something sink they are less dense than the surrounding matter Second how is the air being injected? where is this rotational energy coming from?

@neurosc7707 3 жыл бұрын

What pressurized the air

@Robert08010 3 жыл бұрын

First question: I saw a different diagram of a similar unit. Assuming it is the same, the sideways cylinders have large holes on one side so only cylinders on one side will will fill with air becoming lighter than the other side. Its kind of like a reverse application of the concept from the wheel at a water mill. Second question: Aha! In the diagram they show an air tank and what looks like an air compressor. Compressors take a lot of power to run. So how they claim "NO INPUT NEEDED" is beyond me. This is clearly converting the energy stored as compressed air into electricity. Nothing more. The amount of energy wasted to push all that water around must be enormous. As a kid I remember getting the water running in a circle in a circular swimming pool ( just 4' deep x 15' across ). It stopped in minutes after we stopped pushing it. With the shape of this device, lots of energy must be wasted by friction of the water. It would be interesting to know if this could work in other less dense liquids or would that change the buoyancy.

@sankhasubhrabhowmik2574 3 жыл бұрын

Ya i understand that but putting presurized air to the depth need equal amount of energy ya we can use it as a bettery by storing air in tank nd realise when urgent electricity required just like grabaty pulled batery