Krippenstein rule following paradox, answered by Chomsky

No video

Krippenstein rule following paradox, answered by Chomsky

Рет қаралды 2,267

Күн бұрын

Original video (full): • Will Chomsky publicly ...
Original channel: / theoriesofeverything
Patreon for conversations on Theories of Everything, Consciousness, Free Will, and God: / curtjaimungal
Help support conversations on "when does the left go too far?": bit.ly/2EOR0M4
iTunes: podcasts.apple...
Subscribe if you want more conversations on Theories of Everything, Consciousness, Free Will, God, and the mathematics / physics of each.

Пікірлер: 9

@die_schlechtere_Milch 6 ай бұрын

seems like someone didn't like footnote 77 on p. 97

@amourdesoipittie2621 Ай бұрын

Some have find the argument bad and misconstrued.

@rosanacruz5133 6 ай бұрын

Prof. Chomsky, mente brilhante.

@Dystisis 2 жыл бұрын

Uh... Only problem with this is that human beings form sentences themselves and are responsible for doing so, and can go wrong in doing so. Chomsky is completely off the deep end here. Language is not some natural phenomenon (like sight) occurring irrespective of what we do and what standards we lay down for how to do it. The rules of language are genuine rules that people can choose to follow. Sure, individuals must follow the rules in order to produce understandable sentences, but it does not follow that (on the public level) the rules are natural phenomena. In fact, language consists in language-games, and only relative to the language-games do we say it consists of rules. It does not, ultimately, consist of rules.

@rand5 Жыл бұрын

so, languages do not consist of rules........that kinda sounds like a rule

@OmnivorousPancake Жыл бұрын

I think you can say that language has both the rules that are like the rules of sight and the rules that the Wittgenstein and Kripke talk about

@oioi9372 Жыл бұрын

"In fact, language bla bla" Get of Wittgenstein cck you fool😂😂

@shaunkerr8721 10 ай бұрын

There's rules to language they simply live within the game being played. Outside the game they're are no rules. This is not a rule but an empirical observation, the same as the speed of light in space being c is not a rule, it's an observation.

@amourdesoipittie2621 Ай бұрын

Language is a natural phenomenon like vision. What Kripke and Wittgenstein are interested in is how human beings use the natural phenomena for various purposes. If there was no natural phenomena of language and it was all intentional orchestrating or practice then the conclusion that all language is non sense would be true.