6:31 "This way is a little safer" He says while on an 80° incline
@devilliersmolefe38513 жыл бұрын
It better then the idea NASA had 😅😅
@HalNordmann3 жыл бұрын
A couple of fun facts: Originally, the Space Shuttle had a two-stage fully-reusable flyback design, but that was too expensive to develop on NASA's shoestring budget. Later, there were plans for liquid fuel boosters and an ejectable crew deck on the Shuttle, but that was also too expensive. NASA has less than 0.5% of the US budget anyway (it had 4% during the days of Apollo), so no wonder they can't afford anything cool - they deserve more money.
@iembot81043 жыл бұрын
Very useful. NASA could have used it for challenger
@catdealer11443 жыл бұрын
Not necessarily there are many things that make these not work irl like aerodynamics, technology, safety, weight, and structure
@tutorialsforidiots79873 жыл бұрын
Those SRB on the heatshield wouldn't affect reentry? The heat could even ignite them
@SlovakDiplomat3 жыл бұрын
I think it gets detached
@adrianruiz41443 жыл бұрын
I don't think saving the whole Orbiter could work as those SRBs will certainly blow the ET and cause more more issue. Not to mention the G forces experience. The Pod idea was much more likely if they could do it but it require major redesign, reason why they didn't do it.
@r4gaming7443 жыл бұрын
If the Space Shuttle had the abort system and it's reusable with low cost, the Space Shuttle would have never retired.
@Atlantis1253 жыл бұрын
It still would of retired because of new company’s coming in to play such as space x
@brianchan83 жыл бұрын
@@Atlantis125 Actually spacex came in after it was cancelled to fill the void
@TheColourOfFear3 жыл бұрын
@@Atlantis125 the only reason the US Gov looked for alternatives to the Space Shuttle (EX CRS/CXP/CCP) is because the shuttle was over cost, high danger. had the shuttle been safer (and better managed (see: challenger)) spaceX never would've gained as much traction as it did
@dennyrulos48473 жыл бұрын
That's a lot of 'if's
@thunderbird19213 жыл бұрын
Honestly, the shuttle could have been used to put lunar or Mars transfer equipment into orbit, as well as crews for them. Think how much money they'd save rather than needing massive rockets for every single mission.
@litebeansontoast3 жыл бұрын
The Shuttle for the time you put solid rocket boosters at 4:48 look like a futuristic escape pod!
@dodleboper3 жыл бұрын
You should make one that would work on rentery (so just come in from like jool to simulate overheating) and also I don’t think that last one would work if ur to far down range
@KnightoftheSorryFace3 жыл бұрын
Why would you need an abort for re-entry?
@dodleboper3 жыл бұрын
@@KnightoftheSorryFace Colombia
@KnightoftheSorryFace3 жыл бұрын
@@dodleboper yeah but I don't see what an abort does there, if anything I think that would make it worse
@dodleboper3 жыл бұрын
@@KnightoftheSorryFace if there was a classic ablative heat shield behind the crew module and if it was detached the same way the 1st 2 systems in this video and using the same parachute it could work
@h1gh_end1343 жыл бұрын
Imagine a starship with abort system in real life
@HeidenLam3 жыл бұрын
He already made a video about it in case you don’t know
@david_eldios_3 жыл бұрын
this could be the best idea
@SuperPietro09best2 жыл бұрын
Or the worst
@TaurusSpace3 жыл бұрын
I like that abort system I wish nasa used something like that it would have avoided the death of the challenger crew
@space103213 жыл бұрын
The space shuttle did have an abort plan. It wasnt good because it was just extending a long pole and ziplining off of it. The pole was used to not hit the wing when jumping.
@WouldDieForChomusuke3 жыл бұрын
i think there was a plan to do this like have them sit in a pod in the cargo bay or somethin
@catdealer11443 жыл бұрын
Damn guess no more payload
@WouldDieForChomusuke3 жыл бұрын
@@catdealer1144 I belive it wasn't the entire payload Bay, just off the tip of my memory tho idk
@catdealer11443 жыл бұрын
@@WouldDieForChomusuke still, the shuttle payload bay dimensions were set for specific payloads, so there just wouldn't be room.
@chesterwang30703 жыл бұрын
None of these designs are practical in actual spaceflight (but very practical in Kerbal spaceflight). The numerous SRB's would add a large amount of weight, and would need to be jettisoned, or shielded to prevent them from disintegrating on reentry. Both of these would require a major redesign of the shuttle. The midflight abort system would almost certainly ignite the external fuel tank, which would lead to shrapnel and debris being ejected at high velocities, as well as a powerful shockwave. Coupled with holes in the structure caused by the debris, this would've led to a structural failure of the cockpit, and thus death of the crew.
@parkerhaggerty67393 жыл бұрын
If only he was the NASA administer back then
@monk46613 жыл бұрын
If he was the administer he will build star ship.
@alecboi7773 жыл бұрын
@@monk4661 that’s spacex not nasa
@parkerhaggerty67393 жыл бұрын
@@monk4661 true
@HalNordmann3 жыл бұрын
A couple of fun facts: Originally, the Space Shuttle had a two-stage fully-reusable flyback design, but that was too expensive to develop on NASA's shoestring budget. Later, there were plans for liquid fuel boosters and an ejectable crew deck on the Shuttle, but that was also too expensive.
@AD_SPACE_2024_...Aditya...3 жыл бұрын
Texture replacer replaces the hairs of kerbals just delete the skin of kerbals in the folder
@Barbarabarbarabarbara2 жыл бұрын
7:10 add parachutes when it lands
@Barbarabarbarabarbara2 жыл бұрын
Also the gear would probably be damaged by the srb
@chazium40793 жыл бұрын
I wish NASA would have done this when they made the Space Shuttle. Rip Challenger and Columbia
@MrSpudz423 жыл бұрын
5:05 its texture replacer
@Sneakyturtle12543 жыл бұрын
i don't think NASA would like if the shuttle dropped fully fueled SRB'S on the launch pad but it looked cool.
@NoobSharkYT2 жыл бұрын
But it already has, its on the launch pad, its like a zipline
@wernhervonkerman23823 жыл бұрын
Great idea.
@switzerland11402 жыл бұрын
The challenger could have been saved is they had a abort for the crew module (not the nose area, but still you did a great job)
@Doorsdiego283 жыл бұрын
Remember piolet to use firework sparklers for the exes fuel burners for the shuttle and sls
@JimbotheGymbro3 жыл бұрын
Somebody get this man a mic
@technowarriorstv2 жыл бұрын
carrie fisher would have loved this abort feature sts 225
@davidhunter67063 жыл бұрын
Thing is, most of these would be impossible irl because from the mid deck and the payload bay there is a hatch / airlock and if it were to separate there would be a huge hole in the back of the cock pit and the mid deck. NASA would have to create a new design for the forward part of the Orbiter.
@TBone-bz9mp3 жыл бұрын
Could some kind of plug hatch be designed? I.e a hatch that gets pushed into the bulkhead by the air pressure in the cabin
@AngelGarcia-wl5pb3 жыл бұрын
hahahaha the name that appeared "DAVID DE LOS PANQUEQUES that is in Spanish aunque yo hablo español
@SheepyKSP3 жыл бұрын
The shuttle is now safer, kerbal style!
@parkerhaggerty67393 жыл бұрын
The rtls abort motors penetrate the heat sheld
@MrHichammohsen13 жыл бұрын
Well this is kinda nice.
@loganbaileysfunwithtrains6062 жыл бұрын
The shuttle’s abort system is the shuttle itself, kick the tank and boosters and just glide to safety
@davidtoledotremblay79623 жыл бұрын
You forgot that SRBs aren't rated for long stays in orbit due to the temperature changes
@HK9_FCB3 жыл бұрын
*destroyed blimp in the backround still waiting for recovery*
@dangerzonegaming51873 жыл бұрын
starship*
@destroyergameryt10283 жыл бұрын
Please make indian space station and do flights of gaganyan.
@Dmitry_Yazov73 жыл бұрын
Why nasa not build this this work for failure launch
@_-ALASKA-_3 жыл бұрын
*mustard and mayonnaise awaiting eating*
@imanalfarizi62143 жыл бұрын
would that mid-flight abort mode work in FAR environment?
@gb_stknds Жыл бұрын
Heya uhm… The space shuttle already does… It goes on emergency landing mode or smth I forgot whats it called 😅
@gb_stknds Жыл бұрын
But apart from that, This looks cool not gonna Quite good detail.
@SSK-ws2gl3 жыл бұрын
im not joking i was doing this exact thing just last week
@AF_2673 жыл бұрын
oh, I thought you were going to add the shuttle nose on top of the External Tank in replacement of the Orion!
@Arae_13 жыл бұрын
"It kind of needs one" like mf that thing last flew 10 years ago
@MrCrazyman-tm1jn3 жыл бұрын
pog moment
@myself67453 жыл бұрын
When the first stage abort system failed and you used the second one It's big brain time
@KnightoftheSorryFace3 жыл бұрын
I hate the idea of detaching the cockpit
@user-ze4bn8zs3s2 жыл бұрын
Shuttle. Why? Why! Why are you killing kids
@eagletastic093 жыл бұрын
When I did the shuttle tutorial you did the Srbs deployed when I ignited them Edit I did make sure the action groups were correct
@Kasmuller3 жыл бұрын
You screwed up your staging
@eagletastic093 жыл бұрын
@@Kasmuller I checked that
@Kasmuller3 жыл бұрын
@@eagletastic09 check again because there is no other explanation than incorrect staging, hover over the parts in the staging list to make sure you put the right part in the right place
@CollinDunker3 жыл бұрын
epik vid
@GumballAstronaut72063 жыл бұрын
Hey do you know what the song playing at the start of the video is called
@r4gaming7443 жыл бұрын
Twisted Bandits All Around Me by NoMBe I used that song in my videos before
@GumballAstronaut72063 жыл бұрын
@@r4gaming744 Thank you sir, your doing the world proud
@ronakpatel79193 жыл бұрын
didn't the space shuttle have an abort system where you literally yeet yourself out of the shuttle and hope your parachutes deploys
@NSG-kc6zl3 жыл бұрын
Yup It’s the dumbest freaking think I’ve heard of but yes
@gamesonly403 жыл бұрын
Decoupler scuffed
@dorinaprifti83093 жыл бұрын
Whats the mod of the kerbals
@inf1nity_yt3 жыл бұрын
NASA should have done this
@brianchan83 жыл бұрын
Or built the x 33 but dumb politicians just had to cancel something
@OneApollo3 жыл бұрын
insert me being a channel mod
@minifroggamez19633 жыл бұрын
How did I get here?
@stevefont_3 жыл бұрын
If that happened irl Colombia and challenger would ve be still flying
@cauldron9383 жыл бұрын
hello i have a WIERD request for you. swap the apollo lunar and command modules. basically you will land the apollo csm and return to earth with te apollo lm.
@jfrog54403 жыл бұрын
What is a goog gaming laptop that can run ksp?
@grantwells44913 жыл бұрын
Craft files?
@ussdaedalus50583 жыл бұрын
you sound like young VAOS
@Italveloper3 жыл бұрын
Come on it was my idea 😂😂😂
@Dontwatchthischannel3 жыл бұрын
I made this video a month ago
@Semper_Iratus Жыл бұрын
Ah no.
@shannanritchie17123 жыл бұрын
DOOR
@trashyplayer693 жыл бұрын
Hi
@sfsrocketengineer24923 жыл бұрын
pog
@no_name28823 жыл бұрын
Discord squad
@Turt3zyKSP3 жыл бұрын
oi! you copied my vid smh (JK) cool video!
@grzybomir81263 жыл бұрын
Very epik 10 hours after posted, 210th like, 61st comment