Very well said,

Jm

Thank you :-)

Thank you:-)

Mine too!! 👍

Pretty darn good

@@isaacengelmusic And so so moving, playing Gershwin, towards the end 34:30 mins. Viva the West, warts n all.

I have understood your point and I agree with you...

Fortunately, it's not the music that's being judged.

If you can't tell the difference between the playing of professional guitarists and that of first-year guitarists hitting random notes you probably shouldn't be commenting on music and drawing misguided metaphors. The music this guitar duo is playing in this video is not atonal at any point. And it most certainly is NOT noise. Piazzolla noise? Granados noise? God forbid! Granted, the Bogdanovic piece is modern and somewhat avant-garde but it is not atonal and it is definitely not noise. 20th century composers are often experimental and their music may at times sound odd, but it may also be very interesting. It just might need some getting used to on your part. And by the way, the playing of the guitarists is superb. I am a guitarist myself and I know what I am talking about.

And, to answer your point about the finger painting, there does not exist one musical critic in the world who would not recognize a couple of first-year guitarists playing random notes as a couple of first-year guitarists playing random notes. Your art metaphor does not apply in any way whatsoever to music. It takes a great amount of skill, which you can only acquire by many years of practice, to play a musical instrument.

@@sofiagaliotou7328 It is difficult to get the tone of someone's comments when it is written. You seem to put a great deal of emphasis on who is producing the sound rather than the sound itself. So it is Piazolla, big deal. Grandos? good for Grandos. What are these people, gods? They produce a sound and we must all bow down and call it music because they say it is? Really doesn't make sense. I also find your statement "there is not one musical critic in the world" as simple hyperbole. Recently a Pineapple and a pair of sunglasses were mistaken as works of art in a museum. They weren't. In the case of the pineapple, it was left there for just that purpose, to see if people would think it was art. More importantly, there have been a number of experiments that show that often who and where someone is doing something influences how it is evaluated more so than the actual thing. For example, one study took concert violinists and put them in a subway station and they were ignored, except by the people who recognized them. I suspect that this sound is considered music because of who is playing it and not the artistic value in it. As you demonstrated in your own response, it is Grandos. It is Piazolla. It must be music. I'd rather question than simply accept what I am told.

Who cares about mistakes anyway? Just enjoy music...

@@alexisrivera6238 Well, that is kind of my point. It is hard for me to think of that as "music" much less something that is enjoyable. Have people just given up on trying to write something that sounds good and just randomly bang on their instrument?

@@williamgiovinazzo8523 not that I agree with your view however you deserve my respect. I ends as a matter of personal preference as to how anyone enjoys music or not. And I guess that is the beauty of it all, different perspectives.

No mistakes, the evolution of music is the integration of dissonance that keeps the music fresh, but it requires evolution of taste. It's why they said Beethoven had lost his mind and would never be able to make music, he incorporated more dissonance than they had developed a taste for.

trying to understand your comment.... is it more addressed to inaccuracy while playing? and who looks for mistakes in an interpretation of the music anyway.....?