I grew up in Modesto, I went to school with Laci you shouldn’t be letting people bully people that went to school with her. Check your comments its happening.

If innocence project thinks there is something to be investigated, then i support them. thats it.

But justice already found him guilty. What right does Innocence Project have to question a whole justice system: prosecutor, judge, jury and defense attorney and plaintiff attorney. So this non profit organization has the last say on a case that the court has already given a sentence? I am asking, maybe I am missing something

0:48 I'm sticking with him being the only one and was found guilty.

of course he did it omg DOGOODERS ARE A PAIN IN THE YOU KNOW WHAT

💯

That jury was correct. Like it or not, the prosecution did not prove their case. I am assuming you did not watch the trial and probably too much Nancy Grace

Omg absolutely agree

@@carch7243wrong. They did prove their case. The dumb jurors just considered the defenses really crazy story of the father possibly being guilty. Casey lied to the police over and over again. The body was found a few blocks away from the home she was staying at. Casey’s car smelled like a dead body. Casey waited for so long to report the missing daughter. Partied through this time. There is ample evidence but jurors in FL are weird. Popcorn shooter walked free too. Not sure how popcorn equals threat but that’s FL.

Casey was as innocent as a clam.... Zanny the nanny was real

Truth be told, The Innocence Project already lost its credibility a long time ago.

That may have been the intention. Many good things seem to be being infiltrated, tainted etc.

I concur.

Why? Because through evidence they have found, they have a good idea that he’s innocent. I don’t know if he’s guilty, but this project is inundated with requests. They must know much more. Again, I don’t know what happened. But because you don’t agree doesn’t mean it’s not possible

I think it’s this fact alone that many people are now saying that The Innocence Project has lost it’s credibility leads me to believe they might actually have something to prove Scott Peterson’s innocence. Think about it. What does The Innocence Project have to gain from representing Scott Peterson? The backlash alone would be good reason enough to deny representing Scott Peterson unless they felt that they had strong evidence to prove Scott Peterson’s innocence.

Right! By coincidence, he told his mistress his wife and unborn baby had died the year before. And by coincidence, went fishing the day she went missing where her and baby washed up.. Yeah right!!!

'Los Angeles Innocence Project' do not seem to be the same as Innocence Project. It's sad that they dragging the name into this

Sorry but you haven't actually looked into this case it seems. Everything you just mentioned is easily dispelled. There is nothing that connects Scott with Lacy's murder. Take a step back and be fair about it. The jury foreman had to recuse himself from the deliberations because everyone rushed to judgment thanks to strawberry shortcake. And let's not forget the infamous press conference by the other women. Something never seen before or since that landmark and catastrophic fail by law enforcement

This group doesn't just take up cases that are 100% certain of the verdict.

So buying a boat makes him guilty ?? Two strands of her hair, which could easily have been transferred from him two strands !! so tell me what other things are there ??? They convicted this guy on a theory they had zip zero no evidence no DNA no forensics nothing !!! They said he killed her in the house, carried him in broad daylight into his truck, carry her out of the truck into his warehouse in broad daylight, carried out from the truck again onto the boat in broad daylight, and nobody saw it !!! Why were the fireman told not to tell anyone about the van ?? You know the van that was used to burglarize the house across the street the day she went missing with the three men that she confronted according to six witnesses that weren’t allowed to testify in the trial !!! How does a Juror who is a victim of domestic violence, and lied to the judge, and the attorneys about being a victim get on the jury ?? Then she was gloating outside the courthouse during the press conference, saying some things that were not normal for a juror to say did you see it????? That is grounds for the conviction to be dismissed and a retrial!! why was that not addressed ?? Listen, I don’t know if he did it. I can tell you this they had zero evidence to convict him of murder. ! I’m sure you know he was convicted long before the trial started ! The prosecution proved one thing he’s a scumbag. I won’t argue with that. Also, he’s an adulterer no argument there, but neither make you a murderer.

Oh…ok.

Yep. If she says he is NOT, he is NOT, right? 😂That's all we need to take a person's life away. What if it was your son, brother, father?? Even if it is 0.001% of a chance to prove his innocence, it should be taken!! @@brucemunro7499

@@brucemunro7499😂

He is guiltily

🎯🎯

EXACTLY!!!!! But if you remember his attorney was on the OJ case with the now head of the Innocence Project!!!!

@@janeg8274 Noooo I didn't have any idea 😳

​@@janeg8274✨Yup. So disappointing...

What if they find some sort of DNA evidence or other evidence to prove that the man is actually innocent I think we should all keep an open mind here and see what comes of it before we rush to judgment.

@@dro2real836While I agree with you; this case was on everyones tv and he def looked very guilty

To have a girl and lying to everybody doesn't mean that you must be a murder!

and told her that laci died even before laci ever went missing

Maybe Amber lied

@@KreativeKonnection lied about what?!? ....Scott killed Laci and after he sold her car because he knew she was not coming back!!! You need to go back and learn about this case

@@KreativeKonnection her body was found in the area where he was. 80 miles away from his house.

Thank Janie for this nonsense, she has done any and everything to free him, it's truly pathetic.

Too many coincidences for me🤷🏼‍♂️

The innocence project don’t take cases they can’t win. So, we will see.

​@@BronnyJames2025MVP then why do they only have a 43% success rate?

Time to boycott the Innocence Project 😂

@sitilca 😉👏✨

clown

Right? So now we can’t trust “The Innocence Project” ??? Ugh 😑

His narcissism knows no bounds. Disgusting!

There is a damn good reason he was taken off death row years ago. No doubt Scot was a douche bag cheater BUT that's not illegal.

2, 3 500% unbelievable

On January 18, 2024, the Los Angeles Innocence Project filed motions seeking DNA testing and post-conviction discovery on behalf of its client, Scott Peterson. Any and all inquiries about Mr. Peterson’s case should be directed to the Los Angeles Innocence Project, a non-profit organization wholly independent of the Innocence Project.

If someone has nothing to lose, then why maintain innocence? You didn’t think that one through

@@georgefromdownthehall3334 because he even said to his sister who thought he was guilty as sin that he would get out one day. I read her book. Everything points to him. He happened to be fishing on the day of her murder in the bay, he had boat that nobody knew about. He made anchors that were used for her body. He ordered porn the day after she disappeared. He never looked for her. He murdered her and there was insurmountable circumstantial evidence. People that rob people don’t drive to the bay to get rid of the body. He needs to rot in jail where he belongs. Did you see his interviews. He was so sociopathic. No emotion not a care in the world. Then when they found the body he made a run for it. That is a guilty mind.

​@@georgefromdownthehall3334I think you're the one who hasn't thought it through.

That is such a not-smart thing to say, saying it mildly. Wow. Are you 12 years old? Your brain is. Think what you are saying.

Haven’t you heard? There are prisons full of “innocent” people. 🫤

@@shabbykat273 Emmm... There is a saying - never say never about being poor or in prison.... That can happen to anyone. Guilty or not.

They take cases where there is sufficient evidence to possibly prove innocence. There was never any evidence proving he killed her in the first place.

It's only a matter of time but I feel he'll eventually be released.

I agree, imprisoning an innocent person is very sickening. The Innocence Project doesn't take on just any case that comes around.

I'd sooner believe that the sun and the moon are going to trade places in the sky before I believed that Scott Peterson is innocent.

@@EM-mw2qr The timeline doesnt line up

I Did Not Kill Lacey

If he is innocent than he doesn’t need to be in prison!

You should be ashamed.

waste

I hope this impacts their funding.

Not your money

if we need to put in jail everybody that has an affair, 50% of Americans will be jailed

Did you watch the video or read their motions? They don’t choose cases based on the character of the person incarcerated, they do so based on the evidence they find during a case review. If anything, this just shows that they are completely unbiased and that they look at all cases equally.

For the record, I’m not saying he’s innocent. I’m saying that if there’s a scintilla of a chance he is, then the evidence needs to be tested. If he’s guilty the results will prove that.

This is the same innocence project that exonerated many many innocent people! I am sure they know what they are doing

100% Kudos to them for not succumbing to the crowd's opinion!@@salomelall6932

It’s California

LA innocence project, independent of the innocence project

The La Innocence project is new. only 2 years old and not affiliated with the national innocence project that refused to take on scott peterson's case.

Actually it proves nothing.

@@brucemunro7499 Even if it doesn’t, it was still insanely narcissistic for him to chat on the phone w/his mistress during Laci’s vigil.

Millions of americans are cheating on their spouses right now.

He was on the phone because he already knew what happened to Laci…

He told Amber his wife was dead before she was missing. Her body was found 80 miles away from home, in the area where he was fishing.

Do you think those people are just stupid and want to waste their time and money?? You heard about new evidence, did you?

Seriously 😢😢😢😢

Exactly

There are a lot of crazies out there doing just that.

I wouldn’t be surprised 😤

Watts confessed, no comparison

If memory serves me, he was on the phone with Amber while at Lacy’s vigil, but he told her he was in Paris.

Consciousness of guilt.

Do you consider that serious evidence?? Oh, my...

@@VB-lc4xz Yes, I do🙄

What about that horrendous Diane Sawyer interview, which should have earned him an Oscar for Worst Performance In A Real Life True Crime Drama?

I did not know that!! Thank you for your comment. This adds an even deeper level of disgust.

It’s DNA evidence. Just let them test it and see if he’s really guilty.

What is that book called

@@jamiefrank1957 I think it was Blood Brother by Anne Bird. As a heads up, I would only rate the book 3/5 stars. It was interesting enough to finish in a single sitting, but I could not shake the feeling that it was written to soothe the author's ego.

It’s an awesome book.

Thank you for that clarification!

Waste of resources

You do realize that the Innocence Project doesn’t get involved in a case unless they are sure of innocence? They might know about new evidence that you are unaware of.

@@77tinaja it’s private resources and no tax dollars are used for his defense. So let them try and see what the tests show.

Are we really inclined to believe Scott was looking at $20.99 umbrella stand decorated in sunflowers, and a $6.99 fleece scarf from the Gap. And don't say say this was Scott. He didn't mention any of this to police. Over a dozen eyewitnesses had seen Laci that day. Most of them described her and her dog. And NO, police did not find a pregnant woman that walked that day that could have been mistaken for Laci. Then there is Russell Graybill, who told officers on 12-27-02 that the gate was open and McKenzie was not on the property when he delivered mail to their house between 10:35 and 10:50 that morning. The MPD claimed that Laci had gone missing before Karen Servas put the dog back in the yard and closed the gate. That information alone shows that Laci was walking McKenzie when Graybill devered the mail. Otherwise, the gate would have been closed, and McKenzie would have been barking at him.

Are we really inclined to believe Scott was looking at $20.99 umbrella stand decorated in sunflowers, and a $6.99 fleece scarf from the Gap. And don't say say this was Scott. He didn't mention any of this to police. Over a dozen eyewitnesses had seen Laci that day. Most of them described her and her dog. And NO, police did not find a pregnant woman that walked that day that could have been mistaken for Laci. Then there is Russell Graybill, who told officers on 12-27-02 that the gate was open and McKenzie was not on the property when he delivered mail to their house between 10:35 and 10:50 that morning. The MPD claimed that Laci had gone missing before Karen Servas put the dog back in the yard and closed the gate. That information alone shows that Laci was walking McKenzie when Graybill devered the mail. Otherwise, the gate would have been closed, and McKenzie would have been barking at him.

he was such a great genius to stage and think of everything, the curling iron in the bathroom, the google search on her computer for sunflowers, the martha stewart recipe, not leave any evidence no dna non prints, no anchors found yet stupid enough to tell a woman he barely knew that his wife was dead if he was planning on killing her?

Are we really inclined to believe Scott was looking at $20.99 umbrella stand decorated in sunflowers, and a $6.99 fleece scarf from the Gap. And don't say say this was Scott. He didn't mention any of this to police. Over a dozen eyewitnesses had seen Laci that day. Most of them described her and her dog. And NO, police did not find a pregnant woman that walked that day that could have been mistaken for Laci. Then there is Russell Graybill, who told officers on 12-27-02 that the gate was open and McKenzie was not on the property when he delivered mail to their house between 10:35 and 10:50 that morning. The MPD claimed that Laci had gone missing before Karen Servas put the dog back in the yard and closed the gate. That information alone shows that Laci was walking McKenzie when Graybill devered the mail. Otherwise, the gate would have been closed, and McKenzie would have been barking at him.

He said he lost his wife. He made it up because he was confronted with Amber's friend and she knew he was married. She told him he has to tell Amber or she would. So he made that up. He used the excuse that his wife had passed, and he could then use his traveling work as an alibi as to why he'd be gone most of the time. It's not uncommon for someone cheating to lie. Telling the truth to Amber wouldn't be a priority. The same women we know for a fact he lied to over and over again. He cheated and lied, but there is no evidence he killed anyone.

@@aok4418 Amen

Umm… that’s not how that works. At all.

Shame on you! They are not less smart than you. They know what they are doing. Pray not to be in a situation where you are blamed for something you didn't do.

How does it work then? Genuinely interested. I obviously don't understand.@@AustinThinker79

I think “funding” is exactly why they’re doing it. This looks monetarily inspired imo….

And any Fisherman would NEVER go fish at the Berkeley Marina, especially on xmas eve day. The water is polluted and the fishing sucks. There are many Lake and rivers near Modesto where a Fisherman can go.

And the kind of fish he said he was fishing for wasn't even in season.

@@raygordon3728 good point… why take that little boat with the body of a pregnant woman, wrapped in plastic taking up over half the area of the small boat to a busy marina with hundreds of boats that could easily see inside your boat as you motored by, instead of a lake where no one could see.

Scott knew the Berkley Marina Parking lot had a time stamp when you arrive. 2002 was a different time, not many Secuity cameras like today, and not many time stamp parking tickets were to be had. Scott needed proof he was there. Scott never planned for her body to resurface. Ever. @@sisterinchrist8312

@@raygordon3728well guess what, her stepfather also went fishing at the same marina on the same day, maybe he should be in jail too...

me too , my heart goes to sharon and Brett

@@aparnarajesh ❤️‍🩹

He is guilty,there is even more evidence against him,but both are guilty!!!

Exactly...just because he is a cheater doesnt mean he is a murderer. The justice system is a joke since emotions convict rather than hard evidence.

@@vincentromano187 😂 thanks. No worries.

@@vincentromano187you're not

@@samstan4462 There is LOT more evidence than him being a cheater---you don't honestly think that it's the sole reason he was convicted? That makes no sense.

🤣🤣🤣🤣

But if there is enough circumstantial evidence and it's corroberated, that can be enough and it was.

IF her blood is found in the burned out van...well....there goes their case.

No, I can't imagine that. It's just not going to happen. What a senseless waste of money and resources. There are actual innocent people in prison but Scott isn't one of them. And why wait two decades for this charade?

👏👏👏

Fishing on Dec 24th odd? Sure. But I can’t wrap my head around the fact Laci & Connor washed up on shore AFTER law enforcement publicly announced Scott’s whereabouts that day. It’s not impossible for the real murderer to plant her there to frame Scott. A long shot for sure but not impossible!

@@pretty393 Makes more sense for the burglars to kill her to shut her up, then a husband that just wanted to screw a woman he only saw 4 times. He cheated before , no need to murder your wife for that.

What,with the detectives watching the area ? ​@@pretty393

Maybe he did maybe he didn't, but the prosecution didn't prove their case, I guess we will just have to wait and see, if it turns out he si innocent I would love the see the faces on all these haters that believe they can't be wrong.

Testimony says otherwise. Okay. Now, did you also say, in your response to Mr. Distaso's questions, that you'd never seen him hysterical, but you had seen him cry, you had seem him being emotional after Laci was missing, isn't that right? GRANTSKI: Yes, I had. GERAGOS: On more than one occasion? GRANTSKI: Yes. GERAGOS: He was extremely emotional, especially for him, because you had never seen him emotional at all before that? GRANTSKI: That's true. . .GERAGOS: The comment was, if I've got it right, he's in the driveway, is he standing with a police officer? GRANTSKI: He came walking up as I was talking to the police, to where I was standing. GERAGOS: Okay. And you say, How was golfing? GRANTSKI: Yeah. GERAGOS: Okay. And he said, GRANTSKI: He said I didn't go golfing, I went fishing. Officer Spurlock: Officer Spurlock: I saw Mr. Peterson. He seemed concerned. He had a look of concern on his face. I think he maybe even had some tears in his eyes. But as far as a frantic behavior, I wouldn't claim. Just frantic concern. … Mark Mark Geragos: Did he appear to be upset to you? Officer Spurlock: Yes. I would say so. Officer Evers: Mark Mark Geragos: When you saw them, you saw that Laci's mom Sharon, you know who Sharon is; is that correct? Officer Evers: Yes, I do. Mark Mark Geragos: She was crying, and she was very, very upset, correct? Officer Evers: That's correct. Mark Mark Geragos: When so Scott, when he walked up, he appeared to be very upset; is that correct? Officer Evers: That's correct. Mark Geragaos: And the other family members, you described them as just concerned, correct? Officer Evers: Yes. Detective Grogan: Mark Geragos: Now the, did you look at any of the interviews that Ms. Rocha had given, for example, to the Today Show on December 30th in which she says mom, that she said that Scott said, "Mom, is Laci there"? Craig Grogan: No, I have never seen that before. Mark Geragos: Did you ever look at the January 14th Today's Show where she said "I just immediately, I knew she was missing"? Craig Grogan: No, I have never seen that before. Mark Geragos: Okay. That would have been the January 14th show would have been two days before she was told about the existence of Amber Frey, is that correct, or the day before? Craig Grogan: It would have been the day before, yes. Mark Geragos: And that, at least if the transcript's accurate, she's the one who said that she knew Laci was missing just by the panic rising in Scott's voice, correct? Craig Grogan: Yes, that's what it says. Amie Krigbaum (neighbor): Amie Krigbaum: So I mean he, he was distraught; it kind of made me a little distraught, so I didn't really know how to handle the situation, so Prosecutor Distaso: Okay. Amie Krigbaum: I just kind of took bits and pieces of it and didn't really know what to do. I shut the door and kind of asked Terra, Help him look, or, you know? Greg Reed (Scott’s friend): Prosecutor Distaso: Okay. What, let me, before I show you the report and refresh your memory, what did, what was Mr. Peterson's, how did he sound on the message? Greg Reed: The perfect word would be frantic. Stacey Boyers (Laci’s friend): Mark Mark Geragos: You got a call from Scott approximately what time? Stacey Boyers: 5:26. Mark Mark Geragos: Okay. You know that now because you looked at cell phone records? Stacey Boyers: My cell phone records, yes. Mark Mark Geragos: You didn't just, Stacey Boyers: Didn't just pull that out, no. Mark Mark Geragos: Okay. Now, you get the call at 5:26. Was he upset? Stacey Boyers: Uh, yes. Lori Ellsworth (Laci’s friend): Lori Ellsworth: He had a different tone in his voice, yes. Pat Harris: He was panicked, wasn't he? Lori Ellsworth: Panic, maybe

He was already living in Southern California with friends and family. There was constant traffic driving by their home, media was camped out there, their home had been stripped of many items during the search warrants (none of which had any evidentiary value), radio DJs called out to him with bullhorns while airing their show live from in front of his house, his house had been broken into, and the volunteer center had shut down. So he was living essentially out his car and with family and friends in Southern California. The defense played the wire tapped recording from police where Scott specifically told John his brother that it's best he didn't play golf because the media were following him, and he didn't want another picture of him in the papers. You think he was fleeing to Mexico with his brothers ID in the bright red Mercedes without cashing his pay, checks, after filing his tax returns, with books for his neices and nephews in the car for the Easter Sunday the following week. He was already living with family and friends in Southern California due to the media presence at his house. His brothers ID gives him the green fee discount just like his father confirmed. Police were already aware that Scott was in southern California, and there is no testimony that he ever attempted to run off to Mexico. His father had planned for the four of them to get together that day to play golf. There was no attempt to evade police. Officers Quick and Limon testified that as soon as they put up their sirens, He immediately pulled over. Since when is getting pulled over at Torrey Pines in San Diego equate to fleeing to Mexico? Pwc "On April 13th, the body of a baby was found on the Richmond shoreline. On April 14th, the remains of a woman were found on the shore at East Bay Regional Park. There was widespread speculation that these were the bodies of Laci and Conner. The media presence at our homes in San Diego returned. At any given time, at least six media vans and satellite trucks were camped out at Scott's parent's house and at least three vans were at his brother Joe's house. Each arrival and departure was met with constant questions regarding Scott's whereabouts and the identity of the bodies. During that week, Scott had stayed with friends in San Diego, and with his sister, Susan, and her family in the Escondido area (also in San Diego County). On Wednesday, April 16th, Scott wrote down one partial and three complete license numbers of vehicles that were following him. Based on the media presence at our homes, Scott believed them to be private investigators hired by the media and indicated so in a fax to his attorney, Kirk McAllister. This fax was entered as exhibit D6W-5."

PWC. SCOTT PETERSON "When Scott was arrested, he had over $14,000 cash with him. Following is the series of events that lead to Scott having so much cash with him. This was testified to in court and bank records confirm it to be true. Most of these exhibits were not made public because they contain personal banking information. Scott’s pickup was in police custody and he wasn’t going to get it back anytime soon, so about a month after Laci went missing, Scott bought a Dodge Dakota pickup. Scott was still making a car payment on the truck that was in police custody and now had to make a payment on the Dodge. He soon realized this was not ideal, so Scott arranged to sell the Dodge to his brother John. Scott's mom, Jackie, was going to loan John $8,000 to buy Scott out of the Dodge. John was then going to take over the payments to the bank. Scott was then going to buy a cheaper car for cash and eliminate having a second car payment. On April 8, 2003, Jackie went to Bank of America to withdraw $10,000 from an old account she rarely used. She did not know her account number, so she gave them her social security number to look it up. Unbeknownst to Jackie, she was listed on Scott and Laci's checking account as well. (Jackie had opened that account with Scott in 1991. Scott added Laci when they were married and never removed his mother.) The bank gave Jackie $10,000 from Scott's checking account. The withdrawal receipt was entered as Exhibit D8Y1. Jackie paid Scott $8000 cash for his equity in the Dodge pickup. She paid him cash so he could better negotiate while shopping for a car. On April 12, 2003, Scott purchased a Mercedes from Michael Griffin. He paid him with 36 $100 bills. Scott had $4400 left of the $8000 his mother had given him. Scott then discovers the $10,000 withdrawal from his bank account. He sees the withdrawal ticket signed by his mom and calls her. Jackie realizes she mistakenly withdrew the money out of Scott’s account. Jackie then goes to Washington Mutual on April 17th and withdraws $10,000 cash out of her account. She gives the money to Scott that day to replace the money she took out of his account. She paid him in cash so that the bank would not put a hold on the funds. Scott now has roughly $14,400 in cash. Scott is arrested on the morning of April 18th. He had yet to deposit the money his mother had given him the day before. Scott also had some "foreign currency" with him when he was arrested. The 2 bills were photographed with other items and entered as People's Exhibit 293-29. One bill is worth 50 pesos and the other is worth 20 pesos. This is roughly worth $6.40 US. This is not an unreasonable amount of pocket change for someone who had recently returned from Mexico. This exhibit is sealed due to a personal check shown in the photo."

Who did all the witnesses independently report seeing? She was seen walking in the neighborhood along the same route and during the same time period. Sightings were corroborated in the same location by McKenzie's aggressive barking and the McKenzie sighting in the park. Amie Krigbaum also testified she heard what she recognized as Sage and McKenzie barking aggressively after Scott had left. Enough so, it had woken her up.

Yeah, so obviously you have a Scotty Peterson poster taped above your bed next to your Ted Bundy poster. Put a new set of batteries in your rabbit and have fun…

The only thing I can think of is the few different people that supposedly saw Laci walking her dog after Scott had left...? That seems like a *major* stretch. 🤔

​@@k_spatsit's a break-in, in the area and something about a van mattress that had blood in the area not tested for DNA. Can't believe they left it untested.

@@k_spatsI’ve read the new evidence regards a burglary across the street, with a videotape of the burglar saying Laci saw him during the robbery. Also missed evidences neighbors saw Laci walking her dog a specific moments. And analysis of blood samples in a van owned by the burglar. No direct proof linked Scott Peterson, only circumstantial evidence. Obviously, the most damning being his horrificly cold personnality. So I do think it’s good that this evidence gets analyzed, even if it leads nowhere. It will help prove or refute him even more.

@@k_spatsit’s been proven the eye witness testimony was not reliable… the person walking the dog was not wearing what Lacy was wearing when she disappeared or when she was found.

They are just grasping

Didn’t for me at all. Cheating doesn’t make you a murderer. The cheating didn’t sway my decision either way

?? I would not make that statement.

@@Solitude47152 not sure why not. She killed his alibi. She recorded his lies . She literally was the motive. Clearly you’re not familiar with the case. There is no question about Scott’s guilt.

@@karinaz8756 There is huge questions about his guilt since law enforcement failed to properly investigate. That’s why the Innocence Project took the case over.

@@Solitude47152 you clearly don’t know anything about this case if you’re saying the cops didn’t investigate. Their was a Mountain of evidence. Scott’s own words did him in. He was having an affair and lied about it. It was a rock solid case from beginning to end.

Because he’s a lying narcissistic sociopath

Don't tell me you never lie

And no more child support obligation, hope he let's that sink in .

Do a lot of you Americans have erroding faith in your justice system? This over-publicized case is a glaring example that perhaps you are far ahead of many countries in many ways, but when it comes to matters of crime and punishment, you are sorely lagging behind. Take your pervasive death penalty, for example. Every other civilized country, except Somalia, has abolished capital punishment. Why do so many of you support this archaic practice? Those of you who are clamouring to get SP a new trial have to face the reality that, had he not been released from death row, he'd likely have been executed by now.

What the F is wrong with you? Every single murderer behind bars was convicted according to the state, all found guilty, based on what criteria do you choose which one was wrongly convicted? Anyone except for Scott? Don't you realized how dumb your comment sounds?

🤣The IP won't risk their reputation just for attention

Before I decide, they’ve lost all credibility. I would like to see if they actually have anything tangible or if it turns out to be nothing more than a witch hunt or publicity stunt. After all, we really don’t know if they have found some very good evidence to the contrary of his guilt.

@@dro2real836 you do that, let me know how that turns out. I was in Martinez the day the body was found. I was there when he changed his identity and got a fake ID and tried to run to Mexico. I was there when the lady he was cheating with told the court that he told her that she didn't have to worry about the wife or kid anymore. I watched the trial when they showed letters proving he said those things. I saw the boat that was in the water where the body was dumped. The same boat with her blood on it. but, you go ahead and wait for evidence lol

@@HappyGrouch I don’t think there’s any reason to be rude my friend. I didn’t know you were at the crime scene and witness so much I apologize I thought you just had the same public interest as the rest of us who followed this case for over 20 years all I was simply saying is if they found evidence to refute what was put up at trial by the prosecution what is the harm in letting that evidence be presented or should we as a society disregard any evidence that could possibly exonerate someone if their innocent understand me I’m not saying he is innocent, and I definitely was not there at the crime scene to witness anything like you were I have no up close and personal knowledge of the case other than what was put on at trial which I watched on TV and followed the recaps from Nancy Grace at night. so once again, I do apologize.

@@dro2real836i didn't mean for it to come off rude. I apologize! I was being more sarcastic than anything. I didn't mean to offend you at all!! I was at the city facility when they brought the body in. Everything else I watched like the rest of the world. I have no direct connection to the case. Looking back on my comment to you, I see my errors lol sorry. I have to remember that context is hidden in text. Sorry friend!

@@HappyGrouch it’s all good. I appreciate that very much.

I'm just thankful that there are a lot more people who know he's guilty than are scrambling for anything to exonerate that monster. It's ridiculous. And please don't confuse the moral IP with the LA IP, who have taken on this farce for money and publicity. Big difference. Why do so many people not know this?

It is, this is a chapter in the Innocence Project Network, there are many chapters.

​@Harley57 it is not, this is the statement from the website of the national Innocence Project and official branches : On January 18, 2024, the Los Angeles Innocence Project filed motions seeking DNA testing and post-conviction discovery on behalf of its client, Scott Peterson. Any and all inquiries about Mr. Peterson’s case should be directed to the Los Angeles Innocence Project, a non-profit organization wholly independent of the Innocence Project.

They are totally separate organizations.

This is the Los Angeles chapter of the Innocence Project Network, there are about 70 chapters.

@@jocelynastheart2732 I think you havent watched enough !

😁@@Razormiller no because i have a life!

​@@jocelynastheart2732 Lol Oh yeah youre far too busy making youtube comments about the x files to find time to watch the x files !!

@@Razormiller omg give it up bud! move on from any of my comments!!!

@@jocelynastheart2732 You know youre the one replying to me right! Im just replying back to you ... Hahahaha you cant make this up. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Ok that’s helpfully informative

If I’m not mistaken, it is a chapter like there are in different areas of the US. All of these chapters are within THE Innocence Project. It wouldn’t be a new entity having no association with the nationwide group. Hope that makes sense. 😊

It’s a step in the right direction. Law Enforcement from the very beginning failed to properly investigate

@@RLFinTX yes it does

Yes, law enforcement failed to properly investigate from the very beginning

@@Solitude47152Not only Brocchini is known for hiding evidence, and lying, he lied many times throughout this case.

But there isn’t. Just a few butthurt skank California lawyers trying to get some publicity for themselves.

He took them to their bodies so there is too much proof that Chris Watts did it!

Well, we'll see, won't we? You may be in for a huge disappointment, however.

And remember he told her that he was a widow long before Laci died!!!

He was convicted on one hell of a lot more evidence than being a cheater. Come on, you can't actually believe that.