the only question is why malaysian government pay some payment to sultanate of sulu if they believe that sabah belongs to them, why you pay if you own it.

If they wanted to come to SABAH peacefully, why bring fire arms ????

1. Why attack Lahad Datu in the first place? 2. Who is going to be responsible for the life sacrifices due to the Lahad Datu assault? 3. Who is going to pay for the loss?

*Whenever there is two fish fighting in the same pond, the englishmen must have passed by.*

I knew the brits left a big mess in south asia (the india partition) but i didnt know they did the same thing in southeast asia. Who gave them the right to give the territory they leased to the 3rd party?

Ain't gonna lie... I ain't gonna sty in sabah if the sulu claim it.. Who in the right mind wanna do daily live feeling unsafe..

We, the sabahan doesnt even speak their language. We dont even share the same culture. Where were the sulu when the japanese invaded borneo? Sabah belongs to borneo. Kingdom of dayak.

Surprised the documentary did not make any mention of Cobbold Commission (which is a significant historical event that led to the formation of Malaysia) and interviews with everyday Sabahans (not stateless) on their thoughts about the Sulu’s claims. People forget that Sabahans are legally Malaysians.

Rest in peace to all those.

Sulu/PH need to resolve 2 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu need to show undisputable proof that earlier, Brunei Sultanate give North Borneo to Sulu as a gift for assisting in the Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of 29/12/1877 agreement (consist of 4 agreements) signed by Brunei Sultanate that grant the whole of North Borneo to BNBC. These agreements exist and keep in the National Archives in London. The word “grant” been used, and it has never been challenged or protest by Brunei, even when the British turned Sabah into British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946) and finally incorporate into Malaysia in 1963. Secondly, let assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish its territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and Carpenter Agreement 1915 with the US. Later Spain and US relinquish North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. At the end, Sulu has nothing. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay.

Sulu claim is based on the earlier judgement by the Madrid Court in 2019 (1) that acknowledged Dr Stampa as an appointed arbitrator, and he later granted final arbitral awards favouring Sulu with the sum of USD 14.92 billion dollars against Malaysia. This became the basis by Sulu to enforce the ruling for all their claims in other courts such as in France, Luxembourg, and Netherlands. But this do not hold water as on 29th June 2021 (2), Madrid Court retroactively invalidated his appointment, and nullified all his actions as a purported arbitrator. Later the Spanish Constitutional Court on 2nd February 2023 (3) rejected the Sulu appeal to that annulment of Dr Stampa as an arbitrator. Thus, all court cases (including in France, Luxembourg, and Netherlands) that relate to Dr Stampa is null and void. Just like court case in Spain (thrice), the latest Sulu claim (2nd) at Luxembourg court will face the same fate. In making an arbitration claim, you need to abide with the arbitration law of the country. To be recognize internationally, it needs to follow the New York Convention 1958. One of the prerequisites is that there must be an arbitration agreement or clause between the parties. Read Article 2 and 5 of the convention. Also read Section 4 of the PH Arbitration Law (RA 876) which has similar requirement. Do Sulu have an arbitration agreement or clause with Malaysia? Furthermore, Petronas shares in the joint venture projects (company based in Luxembourg) in Azerbaijan already been sold to Lukoil (Russian oil company) in February 2022. What to seize?

can you imagine, malaysia pay because they pitty on them, if follow british order malaysia no need to pay even 1 cent because british already take from brunei,,but malaysia didnt,they also same muslim as majority malaysian, but then they use malaysia kindnest to stab back from behind, what a sad case for malaysian

Sabah is now Malaysian territory, regardless of claims. Those who invade will be met with fire and fury.

If the sulu had attempted to negotiate amicably instead of attacking the lahad datu first, all this chaos would have been prevented.

Sulu claim for Sabah was invalid. Sabah belongs to Sabahan, as Borneo belongs to Bornean. The injustices faced by Sulu do not constitute anything to us. The injustices are brought by themselves, their own government, their own leader, their history in action with British, Spanish, and American. Want to have a lot of money from Petronas in billion? Do you think all money comes from Sabah income alone?My goodness grace.

If Malaysia pay the said rental and augmenting thier rent it never going happened to this trouble we are all peace minded till the next generation

They can't ignore it forever

"In the midst of chaos, there is also opportunity" Sun-Tzu,

This one is interesting. Thanks 👍

sulu talk alot and where are they during the japanese war ? ? ? after the post war, sabahan vote to join Malaysia under Cobbold Commission

I would be embarrassed to lose in international court of territorial claim..

If sabah was malaysia, issues like this would never exist in the first place 2nd, why would you pay to the sultunate of sulu if malaysia owns it?

The sulu can't even claims South China Sea from China military 😂😂

Siti spoke perfect Malay, how can she be foreigner? Borders shouldn’t be lines on map drawn by rulers Edit: I only feel compassion for the people living their lives the only way they know how and this can be seen in this video. I don’t care about the politics.

Dream on..Sabah belongs to the Federation of Malaysia.

41:50 Tak osah masuk TV lah makcik untuk jadi jurucakap pengganas Sulu..haiya apa dah CNA...🤣🤣

Good to see Sir Assafal .. well respected Leader

We have this autonomous region of Muslim people in Philippines. They have their own law and forces. For a very long time, Malaysian government has been paying lease to the private owner of Sabah who are situated in Sulu which is a part of autonomous region of Philippines. And these private owners of Sabah are paying big taxes to the Philippine government because Sabah lease received from Malaysian government. I wonder why Malaysian people don't know about this. But Philippine heirs have kept records and evidences about the lease.

Sabah is not an uninhabited land where you can claim. It one of the state of MY and have its own political parties. Sulu or PH protest or filing to UN to claim Sabah is pointless. People of Sabah have feeling, human right and voting power. Sulu very insist for claim based on history, Than could Johor claim Singapore?, England claim the United States? Japan claim Sabah because of ww2? It just act of stupidity.

Any pro Sulu or PH claims on North Borneo, their primal source of reference will be the Sulu and British North Borneo Company (BNBC) agreement dated 22 January 1878. In this agreement, Sulu “lease” North Borneo to BNBC (Tausug version - missing during his majesty trip to Singapore) while the English version is “grant and cede”. This information will easily be cherry picked in any of their discussion or debate. But what they will not be revealed are those that can refute their claim. The followings are few of the information that had been kept secret: 1. The agreement between Brunei Sultanate that grant and cede North Borneo to BNBC on 29 December 1877 which is 3 weeks earlier than the agreement between Sultan Sulu and BNBC (22 January 1878). This will deny that North Borneo was a gift to Sulu from Brunei. If disagree, show undisputable proof that Brunei Sultanate (original owner) give North Borneo to Sulu as a gift. 2. On 22nd July 1878, Sultanate of Sulu relinquished his sovereignty on Sulu Archipelago and its dependencies thereof to Spain (Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement). 3. On the same day, 22 July 1878, Sultanate of Sulu wrote to Governor General of Philippines and Governor of Sulu terminating the 22/1/1878 agreement between Sulu Sultanate and BNBC. Thus, the agreement is null and void. 4. On 24th July 1878, Governor of Sulu wrote to BNBC concerning the Spanish sovereignty on Sulu and its dependencies including North Borneo and the termination of the 1878 agreement. 5. Governor General of Philippines wrote a letter on the same matter dated 20th August 1878 to the Spanish Government in Madrid. 6. Finally, the issues on the agreement between Sultanate of Sulu and BNBC and the status of North Borneo was settled through the Madrid Protocol (7th March 1885). North Borneo belongs to the British under this Protocol. 7. In addition, during the US colonization of PH, Carpenter Agreement (22/3/1915) was signed by the Sultanate of Sulu which relinquished its temporal sovereignty of Sulu and its dependencies. 8. Later, the 1930 Anglo-US border agreement acknowledge the boundary delimitation between PH and North Borneo that belongs to the British. Most of the above documents are kept either in Public Record Office (National Archives) in London or General Archives in Madrid. It can also be accessible from the Philippines Official Website with Spanish to English translation. Rebut my comment with facts and references. Not hearsay.

Again with this tired charade. I thought being the batu api was Indonesia’s thing, but seems as though Singapore is now in on in too, give it a rest. South East Asia needs stability and peace, what’s bad for Malaysia will be bad for Singapore too

The Philippines government couldn't even pacified it's own Southern Territories and still has the audacity to claim Sabah from a better developed country.

At the end of the day…it’s all about the money, what more when people have lived in poverty.

Resource kept saying 5300 dollars lease. It's msleading because the currency is in Ringgit which has far lesser value.

Mana boleh datang negara orang ikut jalan haram... Pasport takde... Bawa pulak senjata api.. Mungkin kat sulu tu bawak senjata api tu perkara biasa... Tapi kat malaysia ada undang2

Bringing guns for negotiation, well said Sulu.

If it is surrendered the land to british why the articles of 1878 have content that "THE LEASED CAN NOT BE TRANSFER TO OTHER COMPANY OR NATIONALITY WITHOUT THE CONCERN OF SULU MAJESTY...? this article will clearly the land was only leased not ceded...the transfer of leased to other was a violation of agreement.

finally!! i waited this for so long to be tackled by CNA

Greediness is not good motivation for war. Let the Sabah people choose where they want to side on. Its up to them.

funny how they try to use jungle warfare against Malaysian forces🙃

Put it to a plebiscite and let the people of Sabah and Northern Borneo choose where they want to belong. I'm Filipino and I'm tired of all these issues that keep dividing us as people with our Malaysian brothers and sisters. Philippines or Malaysia, it doesn't matter, let the people choose.

Interesting didn’t know about this til now

great docu

Justice was rendered. Abide and adhere to the rule of law.

So let me get this straight. So the Sulu cannot develop their own land and want to impose on other territories ( that was built on Sabahan own sweat and tears? ) If they are underdeveloped, ask the Philippine government to assist more to improve rather than impose your problems on somebody else. Furthermore, when Sabah was fighting for independence, I dont see the Sultan Sulu army or followers coming to contribute anything? The point of the matter is, no matter what all of us said. Sabahan (all of Sabahan) chose Malaysia for centuries. I know a lot of Filipinos back up the Sulu, but we have never tried to claim any of your territory? Why the disrespect? if we want to talk about history. Most of ancient old Sultans have been everywhere, claim everything. But does this hold out now??? This is not a contest, we have always respected both countries with our own borders and sovereignty. For you to claim something for the sake of being greedy under the pretense of a 1000 old agreement doesn't make sense. Again the Sulu even claim that they are Filipinos. They don't even have a country to govern? so who are they trying to get Sabah for???

Sulu people should have peace and prosperity first in their own land before even thinking of taking over Sabah because of their resources.

It's like Russia claiming Ukraine is theirs even after annexing Crimea since they are linked historically. If you ask Sabahans, they'd prefer Malaysia and not Philippines. It just that the Philippine side cant accept it.

Even the Professors from Universities in Malaysia in the interview stated that the area. 1. Was given to Sulu, 2. Sulu decided to lease it to British. So, Malaysia decided to muddle the claims by twisting the word padjakan.

Semua sudah jadi sejarah move on lah, macam Singapura jugak yg diambil oleh British dr kerajaan Johor pada masa dulu, hormati perjanjian yg datuk nenek kita dah buat apa nak buat kita generasi sekarang yg menanggung kesan dan akibat dr perjanjian2 dulu, Sabah kekal selamanya bersama Malaysia..Amin

One thing in dont understand from this pirates is...Sulu influence were not only in sabah alone...but Going until parts of kalimantan , Indonesia...so why Sulu not claiming Kalimantan aswell? Why only claiming sabah? If they really want their so-called " owners of the land" than is logic for them to claim Parts of Kalimantan aswell

Sulu pilipin ingat ATM kita ni kicai² bah😅 ksian yg datang hantar nyawa jak

I'm on Malaysia's side. Sabah belong s to Malaysia and if war should happen, then let it happen. Malaysia will easily win.

Government state of sabah said sultanate of sulu don't have strength or power to being threat to your sovereignty. But why your some of your leader in parliament of sabah & Malaysian goverment messing around because of Arbitration Tribunal victory of sultanate of sulu in Spain & France 😂 Yes sultanate of sulu they don't have power & strength because they don't have any kingdom, but sultanate of sulu they have a princess born to be a genius, with good heart to helping his people & families 🙏 Princes Jacel Kiram is the poorest princess in the world but she is one of the kind princess in the world why? Because she didn't use of power or strength to beat Malaysian goverment Arbitration Tribunal she use his heart & brain to recognize that sabah is belong to Sultanate Of Sulu Because is not all about the money, is all about the history claim of his family or ancestors #ThatsTheMeaningOfPrincessTrueLeaderWithGoodHeart ☝🏻💛🙏💛

24:20 How can the Suluks claim that the Malaysian Armed Forces when they came to Sabah with heavy arms? It is illegal to carry firearms in Malaysia - ALL Malaysia. Did they expect a red carpet welcome?

better sulu become part of federation of malaysia since majority is muslim. better peace and more prosperity than manila government.

There’s no sultanate in Php, only republic now, sultanate is defunct, so where got legit land now? Just like the maharajahs in India, no more stately lands for them, they are now just ordinary citizens. All lands belong to india republic. Sabah is now E Malaysia.

What undisputable proof do you have that Brunei give Sabah to Sulu? Bear in mind that Brunei (original owner) grant and cede North Borneo to British North Borneo Company on 29/12/1877.

So, if Malaysia don't want to pay 5,300, Malaysia should paid 15billion usd, and after that they should not be able to claim the region? Let say Malaysia agree to it, you will see another story in Sulu.

Don't challenge the Malaysian sovereignty !! Sabah and Sarawak had voted to be a part of Malaysia long time ago. Sulu or Mindanao itself should secede and gain independence from the Philippines

The Philippines claims Sabah on the basis that Sabah was said to be once under Sulu Sultanate. Descendants of former Sultan of Sulu claim that Sabah belonged to Sulu Sultanate because Sabah was given by Brunei the original owner to Sulu as a gift for purportedly helping Brunei to fight rebels. But Brunei refuted this claim and denied ever having given Sabah to Sulu. There was NO DOCUMENT regarding the transfer of ownership of Sabah from Brunei to Sulu signed by both Sultans. In fact on 29 December 1877, the Sultan of Brunei ceded the whole of Sabah to BNBC/British and concurrently appointed Baron Von Overback, the co-owner of BNBC as Maharajah of Sabah and Rajah of Sandakan and Gaya. This cession agreement was documented. When BNBC went to Sabah to begin their business, Sulu claimed that Sabah belonged to Sulu. BNBC agreed to enter a "pajak" agreement with Sulu after they were advised by their fellow businessmen in Hong Kong who advised that Sulu would attack them if they didn't have a deal with Sulu. This "pajak'' agreement was signed on 22 January 1878. BNBC understood that this "pajak" was a "cession", so did early generation of Sulu Sultan accepted it as "cession". Only later generation of descendants of former Sultan of Sulu claimed that the "pajak" agreement was meant to be "rent" or "lease''. Still there was NO DOCUMENT regarding the transfer of ownership of Sabah from Brunei to Sulu signed by both Sultans. The two above events led to an overlapping issue on Sabah. What ever it was, the above agreement and overlapping issue were superceded by later event. On 22 July 1878, the then Sultan of Sulu had relinquished all his possession and sovereignty of Sulu and it's territories including Sabah to Spain. The Sultanate of Sulu only remained as hereditary cultural and traditional entity without any sovereign territory. In 1885, to resolve overlapping issue on Sabah and other issues involving other islands, Britain, Spain and Germany arrived to an agreement known as Madrid Protocol in which Spain surrendered Sabah to Britain. As new owner of Sabah Britain had full control and sovereignty over Sabah and they could do what ever they wanted. Sulu could not claim anything because they had already relinquished the sovereignty of Sabah to Spain and Spain surrendered Sabah to Britain. What ever happened to Sabah after that was under British jurisdiction. Even though British had full control and sovereignty of Sabah, they still honoured the annual "cession money" payment stipulated in the "pajak'' agreement as consolation for the Sulu Sultan. So did Malaysia when formed in 1963, still honoured the annual "cession money" payment as consolation for the Sulu Sultan. The term "cession money" was used because to use the term "consolation" was felt to be too degrading. Thus the term "cession money" was continually used as used before by the British. Even the argument about the word "pajak" and it's meaning in the "pajak" agreement still favoured the British. The "pajak" agreement was written in classical Malay, in jawi script (Arabic alphabet). Malay is the national language of Malaysia and Brunei, and mother tongue of majority Malaysians and Brunei. In those days, Malay was also used by people of Sulu because Malay was the "lingua franca" of this region including the present Philippines. That was why the agreement was written in Malay. But over the years Sulu people had lost their Malay language (standard Malay) because of several reasons like colonisation by different European. This made Sulu relied on translation of the agreement. Things got worse when they translated it to Sulu's local language, be it Tagalog or Tausug, which was rather translation of another translation, that they translated it to their favour. The word "pajak" carried several meanings depending on the contact used in the sentence or passage. It could mean "tax, rent, pawn, lease, or cession". In the agreement between BNBC/ British and Sulu, the word "pajak" was used together with the phrase "selama-lamanya" which meant "forever". When "pajak" was used together with the phrase"selama-lamanya", in this contact the word "pajak" meant "cession". Cession means "the formal giving up of rights, property or territory by a state". When Sulu "pajak" Sabah to BNBC it meant Sulu ceded Sabah and it meant Sabah no longer belonged to Sulu. This was further clarified. There was a second agreement which was a supplementary to the first agreement known as "Confirmation of Cession of Certain Islands Agreement". It was regarding certain islands between Sabah and Sulu which they were not sure whether they were included in the first agreement or not. In this second agreement, the word "pajak" was no longer used because they thought it might lead to misunderstanding by later generation. Instead the word "menyerahkan" which meant "surrender" was used, and the annual payment was increased from 5,000 dollars to 5,300 dollars due to certain islands included. Another example where the Philippines generally or Sulu in particular misunderstood due to wrong translation or translation to their favour, was about the clause that the territory could not be transfered to another party. Yes, there was a clause that Sabah could not be transfered to another party "... without the consent of 'Duli Queen'...". The British translated "Duli Queen" as "Her Britannic Majesty", even though it was not correct literally but it was correct in the meaning. The "... Queen" was referring to Queen Victoria, the ruler of England / Britain at that time. But Sulu translated "Duli Queen" (or rather translated from a translation) as "Their Majesties' Government". This led to an understanding that "Duli Queen" was the ruler of Sulu. The question was since when Sulu as a Muslim state had a female as their ruler (Sultanah or Queen)? The above showed that North Borneo (Sabah) had indeed been ceded to Britain, that was why it could not be transfered to another party without the consent of 'Duli Queen' (Queen Victoria), the ruler of England/ Britain at that time. And further it was stated that any dispute about the agreement had to be referred to the "Consul General" being the Queen's representative in Borneo to be resolved. It meant that outside Arbitrator had no jurisdiction over the agreement. This fact became the main reason of judgement by Paris Court of Appeal in setting aside and annulling the Paris Court (lower court) ruling awarding the heirs of the defunct Sulu Sultanate. On 31 August 1963 Britain gave independence to Sabah and before that on 22 July 1963 Sarawak was given independence. The people of Sabah and Sarawak had exercised self determination to form Malaysia together with Malaya and Singapore. The sovereignty of Sabah and Sarawak as component states of Malaysia is intact and recognized internationally and recognized by the UN. This was confirmed and clearly stated in the United Nations Malaysia Mission Report "Final Conclusion of the Secretary-General", 14 September 1963. The last sentence of the report says: "I fervently hope that the people of these territories will achieve progress and prosperity, and find their fulfillment as component states of Malaysia". Full text of the report can even be accessed from the Philippines Government Gazette website. About the arbitration award by Paris Court to Sulu of US$14.92B, it had since been set aside and annulled by Paris Court of Appeal. Here is the latest situation. Latest as in June 2023: 1. June 6th - Paris Court of Appeal had set aside and annulled the previous Paris Court (lower court) ruling awarding the heirs of the defunct Sulu Sultanate. 2. June 27th - Dutch Court of Appeal in The Haque had dismissed a bid by eight descendants of former Sultan of Sulu to enforce the arbitration award by Paris Court (lower court) ruling, and dismissed an attempt to seize Malaysian assets following the Paris Court of Appeal decision. 3. Paris Court of Appeal also imposed on Sulu €100,000.00 (Euro currency) to be paid to Malaysia as legal cost. 4. Mean while in Luxembourg, a second attempt to seize Malaysian Petronas assets had been filed in Luxembourg Court due for hearing in September 2023 after the first attempt was dismissed. This will likely be dismissed too following the Paris Court of Appeal decision. Now is already December 2023, no news about Sulu's claim proceeding in Luxembourg Court. It looked like they withdrew their case when they acknowledged the Paris Court of Appeal decision. Malaysia had spent around RM32m, equivalent to about US$6.6m to deal with these Sulu claim cases in various European courts, in Madrid, Paris, Luxembourg and Netherlands. Apart from the €100,000.00 Sulu has to pay to Malaysia as legal cost, Malaysia is planning to sue Sulu for compensation for the loss of RM32m spent.

Brunei Darussalam has the rightful claims over Sabah and not Malaysia Or Sulu because Sabah came under the influence of the Bruneian Empire in the 14th and 15th centuries.

If this claim is allowed, then the claim of sultan hussin's heirs over singapore also needs to be allowed. At least Kampong Glam palace and 22 acres of sultan hussin's land should be returned to their heirs.

Its just all about the oil deposits around sabah. UK has an interest with the deposits. So Malaysia a British Client State will see to it they will get. Just talk and settle it.

the sulu migrants in Sabah are not happy when the sulu royal pundits come to sabah and threaten war. even so sulu did own half of sabah originally, the fact that they got ousted by their own phi government and lost all the sovereign in their land in phi. it is easy to blame Malaysia government for the suffering of the suluk community southern phi when they can't blame it to Philippines government who take awah their automomy malaysia government has be so accommodating the suluk people the alleged royalties by letting them staying on pulau gaya a part where historically no in the lease. Philippines people need to understand that the poverty in the southern Philippines are caused by the Philippines government not by the Malaysia government. The migrant sulu community knew pretty well that they live better as a illegal migrant than legal citizens in their own home in Philippines. They got to earn more money than their people at their hometown southern Philippines and even get better healthcare by the public hospital and ngos in sabah. The sulu royalties and especially Philippines government are to blame for the sulu community grievance for generations. Their refusal to have set up an office and help their own people in immigration matters make this harder for them because phi government in principal refused to acknowledge Sabah. The self claim sulu sultan should take sabah and Malaysia generousity and look at making economic plan than pressuring sabah into war for money If 200 people can go to war and die for you, why not use them to work on the plantation and factories made produce that they can sell. I felt that the real sulu community oppresor are the phi government and selfish sulu royalties pundits who living in a better life in their imaginary power while their people living in poverty. Philippines government and the sulun royal pundits should decide if they want to improve and empowering the sulu muslim community or just another greedy land grab of Sabah. Even if Malaysia return sabah to Philippines, do we really think the sulu royalties pundits will have the right to run the place? While the conflict between the rebels and phi government not settle, they will give it to more pro christian politician to run the country and the sulu community still be poor and neglected. Most of the sulu migrants rather risk of working illegally in Sabah and legally in southern phi because the peaceful surroundings created by Malaysia government These people run to sabah to avoid war and conflict. now seeing these sulu pundits and phi nationalist threaten Malaysia with confrontation are basically stupid and selfish. Malaysia governments give sulu community more opportunities than the phi federal government and sulu royalties pundits. if so the sulu royalties pundit going to create chaos in sabah i bet the sulu community in sabah will smashed them first because under sulu or phi government, nothing good come.

British came to 'divide and conqure'. And divide they did. South East Asian fighting each other. And the sad part most Malaysian and Sulu's are not only Muslim but probaly share the same root. I mean you can look at the Malay's and Sulu's and see how similar they are.

sabah must give a small piece of land first to the owner of sulu, because it already won.

It must be painful when you are stateless in your own land

Its all happened because of colonialization back then hundred years ago by European like The British, The Spain, and The Dutch that split and separated the people of Southeast Asia ASEAN must be united, because now we facing a "big dragon" In north natuna sea (south china sea)

I was in Malaysia during that time, studied at Sunway University near Kuala Lumpur, I did not use a smartphone, and the way the news covered it (especially The Star - Malaysia) was like a full war, not a standoff, so I was thinking to fleet to Singapore or Thailand, drop half of the semester left.

Mostly Filipinos knows that sabah belongs to the sultanate of sulu... But why until now mostly mindananoan people close their mouth about this issue.

Sabah more develop than PH.. thats why Sabah choose malaysia not PH

Wait so the guy said that the sulu is weak well nice because the french supports sulu so i guess Malaysia is on the weak spot

Why did they brought firearms in the first place?

That's international law must abide, next is chaos

it's coming .. And they already scared .. 15 BIL...

Biased reporting from the neighbouring country singapore. Of course

My husband have been deploy there during the operation left a scar on his leg until now ,he got injured during an operation.

Benigno Aquino Senior already sold Sabah to Malaysia !!!

Now Sabah, Philippines will return to the real owner....... Malaysia will pay 14.9 billion dollars with interest!! Congratulations to Sultunate of Sulu!!

100 Civilian Royal Army with pistol and machete VS 6500 Malaysian Army with full battle gear modern equipment, trucks, dogs, tanks, bombs and fighter jets. 🤣😂🤣😂🤣

indonesian here, Sabah ppl speak malay much easier to understand atleast for me, than those ppl in KL. Didnt know that :-)

I'm confused, so let's say Sabah is given to the Sulu sultanate, is it their (the Sultan) plan to have it incorporated into the Philippines or is their intentions is to have their own country?

no malaysia side of the story?

Another win for the Philippines... Sabbah truly belongs to the Philippines by paper a d by royalty. Facts

The only solution for this matter is the whole sulu territory ceded to Malaysia and reinstate Sulu Sultanate with their chosen Sultan having the privilege of Malaysian Rajahs.

this is why you don't google translate official documents

We SUPPORT our Muslim Brothers for their RIGHTFUL claim of Sabah, Sabah belongs to the Sultan of Sulu, which is a CITIZEN of the Republic of the Philippines, ALLAHU AKBAR!

Orang Sabah sedikit pdtang asing ramai!!

Actually, whole philippines is own by Indonesia, now they want it back.

Shame on Malaysian Government not recognizing these people as citizens. Shame on you 15 Billion times.

What is now east Sabah was originally a Brunei procession. Sultanate of Sulu claim that brunei give it to them for helping them with a certain war. Which the Brunei claim they never received and thus they never transferred it sovereignty to Sulu. When the Brits arrived & wanted Sabah. they just paid both Brunei & Sulu who claim sovereign over Sabah. And in the contract they specifically said it's NOT a lease. Jump forward a few decade the then US which administer the Philippines & UK which administer Sabah sign a border delimitation agreement which is now the border between MY & PH. Sabah join Malaysia after a UN observed vote where the majority of sabahan voted for to join in.

Ez win for Sulu Sultanate vs Malaysia 😅

Whos country the owner of the sulu citizen is the country have legal right on sovereignty over sabah...cepat2 lah bagi ic sama kaum suluk bajau

7 minutes into video just showing about the invasion in past. may as well fix the title accordingly

Southern Philippines especially Sulu had never experienced so much peace before. Too many kidnapping, terrorism, and illegal activities were happening before. But when PH President Duterte took his office we saw significant improvement now. More entertainment, more tourism and other business activities. I could describe it like Japanese-Halal type of environment. At 7-8pm all activities are stopped and rest time occurs. It is more of a Modern-Muslim Organic Society. During marawi seige, many corpses are recovered and none of the residents there confirm their identity. That's where they found out that it is more a Malaysian/Indonesian decent dead bodies. And those who are funding the insurgency in the Southern Part of the Philippines are Malaysian government and Americans and west oligarchs. Sad to say, Sulu ancestors and its rightful people can only achieve this peace thru a bloody battle. And too bad for Malaysia they are a victim of British and Western Imperialism but they had their share of prosperity in the land century already. It is now a turnaround events for Philippines.

i see sabah as one crimea in the future when the time comes that the philippine politics is no longer a joke.

What Happen To 15 Billion ; What Really Happen To The Money

If this is historically true so this is a classic example of a renter of a land who never return that land to the rightful owner. If we could not call it a land grabber so what it is? Additionally, I could not understand a country, which majority of its citizens are from Muslim Malay descent, could not accept "stateless group of people', who are Muslims and have Malay descent too and who were living in Sabah for decades already. If they can accept Chinese and Indian descent individuals to join their citizenry, how they could not do it to their own look alike- brothers. Correct me if I got wrong..

22:02 It is strange to say that they and their kin want to try experience live in Sabah. Is like someone from frustrated in Perlis want to try live in Johor. Lol. 25:48 Those land don't belong to Malaysia and Philippine, but when you lease to the country british, choose to be in another country who cannot fight for you or recognize you. Sulu became of no standing between both country. Unless they form a country themselves.

Any Filipino and Sulu supporters would point to the 1878 agreement and claim that Sabah was lease to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). But there are numerous evidence to point that Sulu did not previously own Sabah as the self-proclaimed Sulu heirs would suggest, the claim that the Sultanate of Brunei gifted North Borneo (Sabah) to the Sultanate of Sulu as a gift can be disputed and debunked by the following evidence: - 1877 Agreement Prior to the 1878 Agreement which was signed between the British North Borneo Company (BNBC) and the Sultanate of Sulu, there was an agreement that was signed in 1877 between the Sultanate of Brunei and the British North Borneo Company. Within this agreement, the word “grant” has been used numerous times. It’s also stated within the agreement that the entirety of North Borneo (Sabah) will be ceded to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC) for 15,000 Mexican gold coins . With these statements, it’s clear that the Sulu Sultanate did not own North Borneo (Sabah) and that the 1878 agreement is redundant. I would also like to point out that within the 1878 agreement, the word “pajak” was meant to be stated a “grant and cede”, and within the receipts of the so-called “rent payments” are listed as cession payment. Cession means to give something away. With that this proves that the 1878 Agreement wasn’t a lease agreement but rather a cession agreement. But let’s say for the sake of argument that the Sultanate of Brunei gifted North Borneo (Sabah) to the Sultanate of Sulu and that the Sultanate of Sulu did indeed own Sabah and that the 1878 agreement was a lease agreement. Yet the Sultanate of Sulu has signed many agreements which relinquishes their rights over Sabah. These are the following: - 1878 Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement This agreement highlights the Sultanate of Sulu’s surrender of sovereignty to Spain. This means that anything happens whether internal or external affairs is under Spanish jurisdiction. - Article III of the Madrid Protocol of 1885 The Madrid Protocol of 1885 was an agreement between the United Kingdom, Germany, and Spain to recognise Spain’s rule over the Sulu Archipelago. There is a particular statement within Article III which states that Spain will relinquish all of their claims on Borneo. This alongside with the 1878 Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement as stated previously shows that the Sultanate of Sulu now no longer have any jurisdiction over North Borneo (Sabah). This also means that North Borneo (Sabah) is now under complete British jurisdiction. - 1903 Confirmation of Cession This agreement was signed between the Sultanate of Sulu and the British North Borneo Company (BNBC) in which it states that the Sultanate of Sulu will grant and cede North Borneo (Sabah) as well as additional islands which is how the payment of 5,000 Mexican gold coins which at this point has switched entirely to the Malayan dollar increased to 5,300 Malayan dollars. - 1915 Carpenter Agreement This agreement was signed between the Sultanate of Sulu and the United States. Within this agreement it states that any power that the Sultan of Sulu has over his land has been given to the Philippines which is under American-rule. -1930 Anglo-US Border Convention This agreement was signed between the United States and the United Kingdom. This agrement also define the border of North Borneo (Sabah) and the Philippines with the agreement being that North Borneo (Sabah) will remain under British jurisdiction and the Philippines being under American jurisdiction. -1963 Malaysia Agreement Finally this agreement was signed between the United Kingdom, Malaya, Singapore, Sarawak, and North Borneo (Sabah) to form a new country now known as Malaysia. Now that North Borneo (Sabah) has gained it’s independence from the UK, they opted to join this agreement and with the previous agreements signed, it means that North Borneo (Sabah) now have self-determination. And with the UK approving this agreement under the Malaysia Act of 1963 which has been passed in the British Parliament. This agreement has also been recognised by the United Nations and agreed on by the UN General Assembly and the UN Secretary-General himself. This means that Sabah is now rightful Malaysian territory. With all of these facts in place, it’s clear that Sabah rightfully belongs to Malaysia and neither the Philippines nor Sulu have any legal claims over Sabah.