I hope so, we need more content with ships interacting in this way.

I left a sub waiting for more!

It just randomly popped on my main page, and i dont even know what is a star citizen haha thank you YT

@@Dar1usz YT algorithm has indeed blessed me with this video.

it didnt ever occur to me to watch this, but it somehow ended up deleting all my bookmarks and just leaving this at the top of the screen

I'm not worried about the game being good. I'm worried about them running out of money before it's done. The game is obviously going to be epic once it's finished it it getting finished that worries me.

People burbling about the 'game being finished' aren't paying attention. The goals of the Star Citizen are 'full persistence' and 'Server side container streaming'. Once those are in place, then the game platform is finished. But the business model for CIG is continuous content creation funded by new gamers and continuous purchases of insurance, flair and UEC. Then there is Squadron 42, which will be releases with 'Chapter One'. SQ42 will be continuously funding by new gamers and the purchase of new Chapters.

It disappears that's where it goes...

@@Bland-79 Them running out of money is the last thing you need to worry about. CIGs current development model is fit to how much finds they have. A company with 500 people developing a game isn't going to get halfway and suddenly realise they ran out of money. They have budgets for that shit. And that's not even mentioning that people are still pumping money in by the buttload for ships. In November SC sold more ship and made more money than any month yet. The game has set records for how much it's funded, so no... There not gonna run out of money that's ridiculous.

JessePoops 2Much damn, you must be clairvoyant...probably a side effect of those extra chromosomes!

Can't wait for My Polaris

Polaris bro's can't wait to get mine !

do what things ?

With the Polaris, think this is going to be a lot harder with it’s overhanging doors, especially, if people are going to cram multiple ships onto its flight deck

velocitymg you are the Captain! Make them park their shit right!

I believe they are going for the cinematic experience! That way people might shoot actual original short movies with all the upcoming activities!

Please I hope this doesn't happen. I don't want 8 year olds in the game.

@@WalrusWinking First off, I guarantee there's already 8-year-olds playing. Second, why would filming a series in-game bring children?

I don't think we need more of that red vs blue stuff

Go look up Hardspace, a mini series made in star citizen. But go look up more specifically Ep.6, it uses the new model of the game and really showcases the cinematic capability of the game

yeah when server side ocs come in 3.8 we should see improvements in all of those aspects.

Server side allows for better Net Code. It will not show that many improvements the next update. Evocati specifixally stated this.

@@ValhallaTwice Actually they said they aren't sure exactly how big the effect will be till they have areas where a lot of players are at once. But, we have already seen some of the SSOCS in the Citizencon gameplay, so it definitely is smoothing matters considerably. The thing is the tick rate of the servers right now are extremely low, but SSOCS allows that tick rate to get up to the 30 per second they have been aiming for. That will help frames some where network speed has been a limiter, but the biggest gains will be in people not hitching and jumping around all over the place as the server will be able to keep up with actual client side movement.

SmartassEyebrows exactly. 3.8 will be a test phase essentially for the entire game. So far they have placed a lot of confidence in it, but only the true serverside results will give them true feedback since it’s a difficult thing to test.

Server Meshing

Bryan Jonsson it’s amazing! Just as mind bogglin, I saw a vid of a dude jumping from one ship to another in space and him changing orientation based on the different simulated gravity

starting to get the vibe no one here has seen space engineers. Matching two ships speeds isn't some godly programming advancement. It's an idea. There's nothing modern about it. :/ In SE the graphics may not be triple A, and the Docking procedures may not be that of a flight model game- but the core physics remains the same. Entity A collides with Entity B, Match both entities to singular velocity dependent on which ship is docking and being docked upon. Vis Versa with taking off. In space engineers its called Relative Inertia Dampening.

@@piranhapants7290 I get what you're saying. I probably wasn't clear enough in my original comment, but I'm not impressed that someone was able to create code to make that happen. What I was impressed with is that the code was written to already account for this scenario. I'm not sure if you've had experience with writing code, but generally a programmer will have an idea in mind for expected behaviors of certain objects, and then he creates code to handle those. If a situation arises that the programmer didn't envision, unexpected effects may occur. I was merely stating that it was impressive to me that the code was robust enough to deal with this edge case, as an object on one physics grid (the 890) leaves it and transitions to a new physics grid. It impressed me because the velocity of the 300i when in the 890's physics grid is zero relative to the grid, but nonzero relative to the universe. I could easily see a programming error in which the velocity of the 300i could only be changed by engines, and thus on transition from the 890's grid to the universe's grid its velocity stays at a very low number, and not jumping up to the value of the 890.

@@piranhapants7290 If its not complex then why do most games fail todo this? Ontop of that SE is not even in the same realm as SC lol

​@@JBlNN the code is not super complicated Make a Targetting UI to "select" an entity being the other ship wait for key input of "relative inertial dampening" and literally use the already coded in velocity parameters for the ship to decelerate to the same speed, making the relative speed 0. Many games CAN do this, but it's not really a relevant mechanic, or even thought of concept. I.E. completely separate game, NMS. NMS is a coop game, but you can't do this. You could have relative inertial dampening to make cool formation flight etc.... but the reality is, this serves no purpose in the game mechanics. A weird example of a game that does this... GTA V: Online Motorcycle formations. Never said SC and SE are in the same realm. But SE does this mechanic just aswell in a more complex dynamic. Having to make code that runs a formula for weight, drag and G. SC uses prefab ships that do not change without upgrades, where they are hard coded. If you add a thruster mid flight in SE, it will handle the change in dV perfectly.

Dude this comments need more likes...

COME ON TARS

Friend (in 980 Jump): "Landing on the 980 Jump while in motion is not possible." Me: "No. It's necessary."

I was also expecting it to spazz out but im impressed.. its obviously not perfect, but if thats the Alpha, i cant wait for the 1.0

That's easy, just disable the movement of the smaller ship and attach it to the other ship (it's parent) and there you go.

@@psychepeteschannel5500 Yes exactly! 😅

Had to do something like this recently, friend accidentally fell out of his 890J in flight, me and a bunch of friends spent the next 45 minutes trying to get onto the landing pad with it slowly spinning out of control, a few of us had a few "almost" landings with a avenger titan with a few of them in it (that exploded on the last attempt) and I finally got a lucky landing in my Mustang Beta, ran to the bridge and started the engines to stop the thing, seriously love the weird adventures that can crop up in this game

@@UNSCPILOT Case: It is impossible Cooper: No, it's necessary

@@AdityaWaghmare I understood that reference

More like he started going to fast and just said fuck it and slammed into the pad hoping for the best. xD

Wait wait what? How did I not notice this

Doesnt work atm from my experience

They removed it since they introduced the new flight model.

Currently not working and back in the time when it was working it was not 100% accurate.

Target velocity maybe. If they both just hit V they would reduce input lag if they flew uncoupled. I'd happily demonstrate with SC: Korben_D

@Marco Salvatori did you have a stroke.

@@Realstealfan nobody named that is here..

@@plutoidrepublic2765 They deleted their comment

@@Realstealfan illegal, prosecute them for warcrimes

@@Realstealfan and what did they even say

radar screen needs to show close up.

Aye, having one of the MFDs showing a tail-forward undercarriage view would be fantastic for landings

1ChilledDude Exactly. The Airbus A380 already has it, so why can’t a virtual spaceship hundreds of years into the future?

@@coenogo true but how long did that take to become a reality non the A-380?

Landing screens are coming back but need some refinements to the object containers system and combined work from ssocs ocs and the rooms system before moving targets are possible. They have been doing internal testing to bring back the older landing hud from 2.3 which only worked on static pads.

Because that wasn't smooth?

If the netcode was smooth the flying was not then. Did you not notice the ships being out of sync?

Power5 Always room for improvement I say, it’s amazing watching this game progress in development like this.

I wouldn't expect fluttering to disappear. Probably will just improve somewhat.

@@TheUberKevlar other games can do it to

It's easier to do than you might think.

Ah yes, SWG. Good times.

I'll have to try this out with my friends when this reaches the live build!

Hundred seats

Thousands!

they did, and it's called an Argo.

@@MonteKristof that's not the name. That's the brand. Argo Astronautics, the Argo mpuv. But it should be an origin ship therefore a 300 series variant. You don't want to transport VIP guests with a tractor...

@@Greyson_Kousari You're right, I didn't remember off the top of my head MPUV, however, it would make no sens for Origin to have a passenger shuttle, as Origin clients most probably expect to be shuttled privately in all the luxury possible. Therefore, the 300 serie is perfectly fine, as the passenger can lay in a comfy bed, have a kitchnette and a TV in bed.

As a star citizen fan with absolutely not a single complaint about the state if sc so far, I hop they got sick ass graphic cards in the 2040's

Yes you did mate, the game is far more playable than it has ever been, one year back, and you wouldn't be able to even run the game well, now, smooth FPSs are possible and the servers are getting a system that will make it even better for us, there are still a good bunch of bugs, but it is getting there. Enjoy your time in the verse.

I can't wait to explore an entire SC universe, eventually.. I love space exploration and absolutely love the Aurora so far lol.

@@lunamaria1048 you might love the Avenger Titan even more if you're up for it!

@@lunamaria1048 Earning ships with ingame money should be even easier from the next patch (Alpha 3.8 onwards) because there will be less wipes ingame. So go and do some missions, get them monets and rent yourself s ship ingame!

@@voynich7825 yes, and very soon we will be able to keep our in game bought ships on our account, if they manage to make that not exploitable. That means wipes won't even affect ships anymore. You jumped in at the right time dude

probably wasnt available back then

I should have tested during the free fly. I think it might be a bit too wide but you might be able to get it in there awkwardly.

If it can, I may have to pick up an Arrow...

It's a lot of fun. Its a good mobile base so far in 3.15 on the PTU

@@Tez-YT I'm just worried about it getting sold out before I can get one T_T

@@dillinperry I don't think the 890j can go out of stock, they are just classified as "Limited Hull" which means you can't CCU to it. At least that is how it has been the last few times it has gone on sale.

Yes, the only loading screen is when you start the game. Nothing here was scripted... You can register for the game here (and get a bonus for using my referral): robertsspaceindustries.com/enlist?referral=STAR-L2SS-FGW3

I have been thinking about this for a while. The cool thing about this video is that it was completely unscripted. I hailed this guy via MFD (my audio is not recorded for some reason) and just asked if I could try landing in the hangar while he was flying. I play pretty often and have noticed how smooth and accurate the ship positioning is now. I'm just trying to think of way to record it and find the best way to show people.

@@Tez-YT I think if you just got someone with an 890 Jump to hold a steady speed over the surface of Hurston it should have similar results. Obviously it would be scripted but the landing maneuver itself should be much smoother.

Exactly

If the aerodynamics model was done right, then yes.

Argh, Pvp peasantS. None shall enter my Retaliator but me. MEEEEEEE!

I just imagine heists like this

"Just enjoy the game we have" spoken like a true tool and piece of shit half-game-being-finished lover. Dude is 12 and happy because all games are shitty products when launched. Grow up.