Penetration values please? Can't be bothered to look it up myself lol

ISU's i think And yeah. 152 medium velocity

@@warbrain1053 The ISUs have bigger hulls, and the notable IS rear. Taller Crew compartments might i add.

@@davyjones5873 i rechecked the front, so SUs. My bad

How could that have been a kv-6 if it wasn’t even a Russian tank it was a German super fortress that never even got built

I've discovered it now. It's a big tank engine.

oh you mean the P.1500 Monster that uses the P.1000's hull and Schwere Gustav 880mm gun mounted which practically makes it a mobile Gustav with good armor? but a easy practice target fir allied bombers

@@shadowblade404 i thought this was a joke bu HOLY CRAP THAT IS TERRIFYING

@Ultra Kaiju of destruction mount AA guns on the Monster? Where exactly do you plan to mount those the P.1500 Monster was a open hull design for easier access to the gun to better load its 880mm shells that weighs 7 tons each which requires a crane to lift instead of a inclosed one so you can't exactly mount anything in this air

No you're just need some aircraft carrier that just a sitting duck

True. Counterpoint. THE LANCASTER WITH 12,000 POUND TALLBOY BOMB WOULD LIKE TO KNOW YOUR LOCATION.

Now planes on the other hand...

@@person0-016 ratte: stop stop stop tickling me

@@Givemeaccount5971 And planes didn't sink the much larger bismark?

Yeah.... The Ratte wouldnt even need both main guns. The sheer concussion of one of those shells landing nearby would effectively kill all of those SUs. And probably send their burning wrecks flipping around for a second if reports from the D-Day inland bombardment missions are anything to go by... Honestly, its a waste of ammo. The Maus turrets on the rear would be better suited to anti tank work. The main cannons would be better suited to leveling the city that dared get in its way...

It's an animation made for the sake of entertaining a few thousand internet surfurs, don't worry the slightest little bit.

of course it would have been able to move. As long as you are able to disperse the pressure its not that problematic. The only problem would be that the tactical value uf such a machine would be extremely low due to countless problems on the logistical and ....every other side

@@andrefasching1332 you don't just need to solve the pressure. You still need to apply enough force to the tracks to make them actually move

@@notlistening6499 well yeah, no shit. You need motors. While the vehicle would without a doubt be slow even on favorable terrain there are basically no limits on how big things you can motorize. The crawlers at the kennedy space center for example weight over 2700 Tons. Engines of the 40s were of course far less efficent, but the project would have been possible. Thinking about it....a 1000 Ton panzer would actually be able to move quite "fast" as the usage of ship Engines could provide more than enough Ps/Ton for adequate movement

@@andrefasching1332 pretty sure the crawler was unarmored. 1,000 tons was just an estimate, in order to have decent armor, I think it would need to be a lot heavier than that. Plus you can't move at all on an empty tank, and they would have never had enough fuel to run the thing.

Both tank will take forever to turn

MUDAMUDAMUDAMUDAMUDAMUDA

HORRY SHET IS THAT A JOJO REFERENCE!?!?!!1!1!1!1

@@user-it3xy2cw1t no need to turn your tank when yoy have guns able to bombard London from berlin

And get run over in the process

SCP peanut what are you doing

Lancaster with 12kg: finally I wont miss this drop

The Ratte's armor is "only" 150-360 mm, modern tanks have an effective armor of 700mm+, but due to its size, it's more unlikely that you hit important parts of the Ratte

Those rockets have 6kg of TNT, and I dont think it would do any damage at all.

так и этот немецкий танк тоже небыл создан

Но был и в чертежах

Wtf are you on about? The kv6 was made up by a dude who used a couple model kits, I think he used a kv2, 2 kv1 and a couple bt turrets to make it.

@@tylera9665 kv-6 was created by a schoolboy; it was not created on the drawing

@@judg7438 does it really matter either way it's fake

"tier 3 tank" imagine not living with videogamemechanics

@@andrefasching1332 bruh lol

@@andrefasching1332 i mean if you search up wotb tier 1 or 4 gun sounds, youll see

KV-6 to Ratte "how the hell does this thing even drive on anything thats not an highway?"

@@erwannthietart3602 fun fact, it cant

If you pitty me I lied about all this I know it’s bullshit

Please don’t like this comment I lied about all this the reason for the channel name is it’s a old account and the old videos on my account don’t show my current age

Он използывал Трюки И Трое Программ FlipaClip Ibis Paint X И Kinemaster Для Его Логотипа

Ratte i mean they use KV-2 Turret on kv-6 2 KV2 Turret is not enough they usually fire anti concrete can pne 90mm APCBC can pen around 140 rattes side is 250mm the rockets IDK

@@itsalmostfun8567 Rocket has HE warhead. Can't even pen a Tiger I.

The Ratte’s engine and transmission would’ve probably commit not live before the fight would’ve happened. (Probably would be the same for the KV-6 as well)

Buat hiburan

RIP my Fingers

ye

There is 3. 2 one each side near the mause turret and 1 on top of the main turret Or 4 in each side (idk there is so many model of this tank)

@@alvindms4660 there is nothing on the sides the accurate one was from Wikipedia where it has 4 flak 40 guns and those models you see on google are likely false

For the size of the ratte It has only 150-350mm of armor

@@user-it3xy2cw1t That is large

There is no KV-6 prototype, models, or even blueprints because it was created at 2010 on DeviantArt

@@Yeahimman32 KV-6 is behemoth?

@@randoply i am confused on what you're talking about "behemoth soviet proposed super ultra heavy tank" so i refer it to the KV6