Read Agatha Christie's " Witness for the Prosecution". A lesson on how to manipulate the truth and the jury. As soon as she started her crying testimony I thought of that story.

@@cynn3367 Agatha Christie was a GENIUS!! Thank you for writing that! Seeing your comment has made me determined to set up a beach chair in my livung room, don a silk caftan, sunglasses, big hat, and sip a champagne cocktail whilst watching, "Evil Under The Sun"!!! 🥂😎🥂

Did they ever manage to prove that she (or someone else) was guilty of murdering that little boy?

@@marycanary no this scene was at the end of the episode, the husband was found not guilty

I hope they bring them back in the revival, kill them off and their killer(s) get off.

You had me at the first half, I thought you were talking about the lawyer that was sticking up for the husband.

Yeah, I thought unequally attracts each other but in this fall it‘s the other way around. There just evil.....and fantastic actors

They belong together. A power-hungry woman and a cheating lowlife narcissist

They deserve each other

I don't know if it's full-on narcissism. That word gets thrown around a lot. She married for money and status, NOT for love and she probably knew he was a chronic cheater from the onset. As long as it created the perfect illusion and allusion of stability, mobility and wealth, she would tolerate everything else. If anything, it was next-level survival. The horrible tragedy is that two people had to pay the price for his proclivities. He should have been sent to jail.

Society is made of people. Problems in society are the symptoms of what’s wrong with the people

_"WMDs and "mobile launchers in Iraq."_ And Urban Moving Systems had nothing to do with that day in September of 2001?!

Doesn't help when people started to change THE truth into "MY" truth.

@@brokenman58 😂🤣😂 SOOO TRUE👏👏👏

The truth is what actually physically happened in this case anyway

She pretended to be mixed up in order to create reasonable doubt with the jury.

@@edwardokeavy5241 Me too, she cleverly victimized herself as a woman whose husband had affairs, while simultaneously trying to mar him, to confuse the jury; but she was doing it because she's fiercely loyal to her husband in a very sick and twisted way lol

Husband and wife were in it TOGETHER

Basically she confused the dumbJurors. Since it's rarely to assume people can infect other people intentionally or unintentionally he is not held responsible. But I think this case was messed up all in all...

@@samlsd9711 I admire your nom de plume.

Could she have gotten away with it if she didn't spill the beans? (for the audience's sake, after all)

👋🏿 I do

She literally told Sutherland what she was going to do, stand by her spouse accused of murder.

Rfftwbc in hñj j m movies and then the first

Those are completely different things than having your spouse cheat on you. I've never been married so odds are I'm going to get something wrong, but it always seemed to me that when your spouse cheats on you the trust is broken because they are giving away something that is supposed to be shared only with the one you married. If your spouse is accused of embezzlement or murder then that's a situation where the wife or husband is of the mindset that their spouse is innocent of the crime until it is proven otherwise.

@@lucindamobley5492 depends on how you view fidelity. open marriages exist. it's only cheating if he doesn't have her consent, which he clearly does. i see her point about women willing to divorce over infidelity but not murder, but i don't see how that telegraphs her intent to stay married through infidelity AND murder.

@@dietotaku For me the idea of an open marriage feels like an invitation for more problems to enter the relationship than people think can be solved. God always intended for us to remain pure until we marry (men and women alike) because we would get hurt otherwise. And even then God can use what we do wrong for good.

@@emmyfall2143 how was your response posted before the comment your responding too, wtf

No, she played it perfectly. She told the truth. Then she lied. But then she admitted that she was lying. Where is the perjury? Which 1 is the lie? You sure you know? Prove it.

@@alcoholandfun243 one of them must be. She at least catches an a misdemeanor

@@biruss Yep, one of then is. But which 1? The one she admitted to lying about? The one she corrected herself on? Or the one to told after? 🤷‍♂️

@@alcoholandfun243 if 2 of them were under oath, it proves perjury happened

Oh, they still could've gotten her on perjury (even recanting doesn't get you out of that) and the husband on bringing a dangerous virus into the US and transporting it irresponsibly.

@@sonrouge but they didn’t…. So there’s that lol

That's evil. And they deserve each other. I feel bad for the son that died and his Mom, Eve though she shouldn't have been sleeping with a married man. She didn't deserve to lose her child. Sad. And that he got away with it, with the help of his wife?? Sickening. Wow....

It was dumb to admit it to the though

unfortunately for her she has no attorney-client privilege or privilege to privacy in this case and the prosecutors could very well re-try her for perjury and her husband on a mistrial.

@@ericthomas917 Admit what? That she lied the 1st time? The 2nd time? Or the 3rd time? She said she lied then corrected herself. Which is the lie?

@@MrSpikethefirst not if they can't prove which was a lie

@@r.rodriguez4991 good point. perjury beats mirder though.

So that’s how the pandemic started! 😂 glad to know we finally have answers.

Calling it covid isnt totally wrong here bc it is a coronavirus but covid stands for coronavirus discovered. So here youd want to say covid-03. The reason it's called covid not covid-19 or sars-cov-2 nowadays is bc its still an ongoing pandemic

@@annakepes8050 COVID doesn't stand for coronavirus discovered... It's coronavirus disease lmao

Yes. COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) is a disease caused by a virus named SARS-CoV-2

Why would the wife purposely throw the case so he could walk after humiliated her? I guess it was an open relationship?

The no. 1 cause of death for pregnant women in America is murder at the hands of the father.

@@ellejagerman6105 Wrong. In fact, really really wrong. I did some digging around but even just a simple google search is enough to prove you wrong. You know the claim is sketchy when it goes against scientific consensus without a paper or study.

He was trying to kill the mistress . I’m not sure the son was the target

bruh there are cases of parents abusing and killing their own children everywhere....plus, @Elle Jagerman, you are most certainly, and utterly wrong.

Even when i watched the movie called the good son I still don't know if I would kill my own son even when he was the devil himself....

Also the mother of the dead son could sue for wrongful death

Why wasn’t he charged with the murder of the son and injecting the virus into both of them?

Bringing SARS into the US🙄 bet you still call it the Spanish flu

I dont think any of the DAs on this show would have went for the case(Even McCoy when he made it), though clearly they could have. Any actual time the wife would have gotten would have been negligible at best and in every other way but physically a spit in the face to the mother who lost her son at worse. Not to mention how much support the DA would lose amongst certain significant voter groups for either going after a wife for "supporting" her husband on the stand regardless of the reality of the case OR for "knowingly coercing" a false testimony from a "vulnerable witness" and then vindictively punishing her for her inability to hold "the lie" together and again all she would get is whatever she would get for pejury charge if anything at all. Just a lose/lose situation on top of a loss.

Yes!

Which was based on the short story by Agatha Christie.

I agree Marlene Dietrich and Charles Laughton were phenomenal

New York has a big pool of experience stage actors to pick from.

@@toastnjam7384 ay that's true didn't even think about that

There’s many talented actors/musicians/artists who didn’t have the recognition or opportunity they needed. I wonder why someone ends up famous over the others? Ideas anyone?

I would consider subscribing to peacock if they didn’t still make you watch adds

A woman as smart and evil as her probably has her own ways to make sure neither of the options you gave could effect her.

@@user-qn9bx3jm5d nope. Inheritance law outmaneuvers her

Khrystyne Haje

OMMFG!

Marlene Dietrich. (Hard name to spell.)

Um.... Agatha Christie actually...

@@meeraglides3485 WITH Marlene Dietrich. BY Agatha Christie. Or, more accurately, adapted from a play by Christie.

Fun fact: Dietrich means lockpick in german.

Me,too.😏

If you just want the money you could

I mean, like she said, it’s antiquated to get hung up on such things at a certain point with some people. She probably has flings too; but together they financially are far better off than any of the partners they keep. So why throw it away? Like she said, there are worse things than cheating.

She doesn’t believe in monogamy and they seem fine with polygamy. Some people are okay with having an open relationship.

@@Clorgisclorg Yep nine certain she was cheating as well she just did it better

It was about way more than money. Standing, for example. And now she gets to watch him go rot, while she is seen as the tragic, wronged victim. It’s brilliant.

Money power im sure is a socialite she wasn't trying to give up the lifestyle.

The woman is a sociopath obviously

@horacehalt4216 Like Dune's Bene Gesserit Sisterhood. You let men think they are the ones with power while you carefully control them in the shadows. The wife probably wants him to think she will stick with him no matter what until the time comes when she sticks a knife into his back when he outlived his usefulness.

The theme from S1-S6 is the Criminal Intent theme song, specifically made for that show. The music used for S7-S10 was from Law and Order: Trial By Jury.

Its the director of music in a closet with tap shoes. He dropped it, and raised the pitch for the heel hitting the floor.

He got off

@@thewrongshoes Apparently, with multiple women.

@@mikedupont3585 Hi Oh!

Bastardization of language. Semantic change. It’s nauseating to hear people say “nauseous” all of the time.

He gets off Scott free

Oh, but the husband who murdered his own son (in attempting to kill his mistress) is a-OK?

@@lenawagenfuehr53 Nice way to derail the topic of the issue at hand here. She's a pathological liar and is exactly no better than him. Both of them should be in prison equally. If you're defending her actions, then you're pretty much the same as she is which wouldn't surprise me a bit. Birds of the same feathers flock together.

She pretended to be mixed up on the stand in order to create reasonable doubt with the jury.

You have to buy those in sets of whole seasons on video.

Try peacock sub. Trail then cancel before 14th day

Use putlocker

@@billmurray7473 Pirate.

bruh thats illegal lmao

Me 2.....Me 2

Elisabeth Rohm. She was on Angel and Buffy before this

@@CommonSense8421 thank you 😘

They (the husband and wife) got away with it.

Husband is a wealthy doctor poisoned his mistress with SARS, which lead to her infecting a dozen people including their child, who died. He gives the SARS box to his assistant to get rid of, but in a stroke of bad luck she gets murdered in a carjacking gone wrong. The SARS outbreak happens shortly afterwards and the police are able to connect the husband to the crime, but his wife says that he was with her the whole night he supposedly came over and poisoned his mistresses. Wife is a stone-cold narcissist who doesn't care about the affairs or all the people he killed, only the comfortable lifestyle he provides for her, so she tells conflicting stories on the stand in order to confuse the jury and make her think she is mad at her husband for cheating on her and is trying to frame him in revenge, which means they find him not guilty. Realistically McCoy could have just called for a mistrial and have her charged alongside her husband for perjury, obstruction and accessory after the fact. The defence lawyer would also be obligated to inform the judge that when the prosecution claims the wife just lied to protect her husband, they are telling the truth as she was present for her client gloating about it.

Watch the Rowan Atkinson comedy skit 'A warm welcome'. Rowan Atkinson (portraying the Devil) placed lawyers in the same group as looters, pillages and thieves. Lol.

Oh wait she’s an amazing actress

Seen

Nah not really. She has nothing in Angie Harmon (although a brunette) or Alana delagarza

She gets more money staying with him, the lifestyle she gets by staying with him versus leaving is different. I'm also guessing she has dirt on her husband in case he leaves her.

Bad couple won the case

They got away with murdering a kid. That's a hard pill to swallow.

Yeah, that was pretty much the end. Jury came back not guilty, and she walks out of the courtroom with her head held high, and a smile towards the DA table. It sucks, but a good episode none the less

That's sad

What country are YOU living in? 🇷🇺 or 🇨🇳?

Sadly, no. The husband got off in the end but I don’t remember how in the world he was able to but from watching this scene. I believe it’s because of his wife’s testimony she created reasonable doubt when she changed her answer to the question: Where her husband was on that night.

@@cybertron3438 ya but didn't the wife also kinda confess in the presence of officers of the court (defense and prosecutor)

silencia08 I’m assuming you’re talking about the part at 9:38 . I agree with you that McCoy should have done something but since I’m not a lawyer or anything, I don’t know why he didn’t do anything about it. It’s a really a twister of an episode so I’m not surprised a lot of people are confused as to what the eff just happened there

@@cybertron3438 Yeah I was thinking the same thing. She literally just admitted to multiple officers that her whole testimony was a farce. I would've thought that McCoy (and possibly even the defense, as although defense attorneys do represent their clients zealously, it is illegal for them to still use a testimony/evidence that they KNOW is false) would've done something about that, but I guess he didn't for some reason lmao.

This was a classic example of how the guilty manage to walk away free.....just like Casey Anthony was able to do