It's over my head too. Halp!

Oh. Bort liked the raise.

This is an awesome comment by bart.

Lol he was probably just nervous, understandable tbh

I don't think the caller got it.

I'd have burn marks on my wrist from the felt jamming my chips in the middle😆

I totally disagree. If the two players are good players, you should be good here never. These players are obviously very bad.

I expected one Villain to show up with either AA or 66. But given the pot odds against these bad players it’s worth a call even if you think you’re beat.

@@111tedward I was expecting 66+ from SB. After the reveal it's obvious these guys are pretty feeble. I think hero's river decision is totally player dependent for this exact reason. Because against certain players, I'm actually folding here.

Nobody is ever folding top pair to a small flop raise at any stakes.

SB never ever ever has 66 and not getting the money in on the turn. Ever.

What do you mean?

Camera is closer to you and background is different

Just me but I like it more

@@richardmiller1329 ah I see. Noted! Thank you for the feedback

Welcome. Great content! Keep up the great work Bart!!

Is there any kind of an entry fee? $5 rake seems awful low.

@@patrick_kyker Nope it’s truly a max rake of $5. There’s another charitable games organization in the area with a $6 rake and the casinos are all $6+1

Theoretically you could actually argue the opposite: you might want to be tighter in a full ring LJ position compared to a shorthanded LJ position. This is because 3 players have already folded, and those 3 players will be slightly weighted towards having lower cards given the fact that they folded. Which gives slightly more weight to the players behind you having higher cards. It’s probably an insignificant distinction though. You certainly shouldn’t be playing tighter from a shorthanded LJ compared to a full ring LJ. BUT it’s live poker, not theoretical poker. I think a full ring LJ might play looser simply because he doesn’t get to play as many pots in full ring and he’s bored of folding.

Is the LJ the LJ when it's UTG?

He probably just forgot to mention live poker river snap shoves on draw heavy boards that miss are many, many times missed draws turned into bluffs. Live low stakes punt off stacks constantly like this. He also said 66 was the only hand he’d expect to lose to, not that it’s the only hand he can have. That’s a huge difference. If he can only have 66, it’s a fold. He’s not gonna go over all 8176 hands that live low stakes guys punt with so that people on the internet won’t “gotcha” him.

It doesn't make sense for SB to shove and hero beats most of LJ's value (mostly AK.) It's pointless to try to make logic out of the illogical. Sometimes people just want to punt.

Bart not even including 2 pair in SB range is contradictory to what you’re claiming

@@Godvernment You're obviously right and the professional poker player and instructor who specializes in life exploits is obviously wrong. The internet wins again......

@@fenikstechnologies1173 he’s a low stakes poker instructor and he’s not infallible stop blowing him so hard you look pitiful

This is an absolute snap call all day. SB COULD have 6s, I guess, but I’m skeptical we don’t see them start blasting on an earlier street. Same with jacks. If they played Ks or AA that tricky, cest la vie. LJ has the Jack sets and probably the six sets more often plus the aces and kings. You also cover LJ, which is nice, so you can recoup a bit even if you lose there. Bottom line, when we hit the set on a board this disconnected, we are just piling with no regrets unless a painfully obvious draw comes in. I’m internally doing a dance that both guys called here because I’m felting two guys with like AJ and KJ a whole hell of a lot. You lose a decent amount here… but you mostly win.

QT should be folding the flop it has nothing. This is a snap call.

@@TheTree1 exactly. I figured no way QT gets to the turn. What are they looking to pair a queen against a King high board?

​@@aheroictaxidriver3180 That would be JKo

QJ with a club, lololol

True but they rake $10 on bomb pots and a lot of the games are half and half. The bomb pot rake is part of the reason RCG is dead imo. No one’s making money when they’re raking $10 and people have $300 in front of them.

@@dan22482 I didn't notice the change during the bomb pots, oops! The last few I was there for I just skipped altogether

5 doller rake at 1/2

Max

The point is that QT SB is very unlikely based upon the flop distribution and configuration of the opponents. We also went over the other hands that the preflop raiser can have that 44 beats when he calls all-in for less on the river.

I can see folding to a club on the river especially against 2 people calling a huge turn bet. Very likely at least one is on a strong flush draw. It's very dumb to be doing that with a broadway draw which is what came in because if you make your broadway with a club, you are still very likely to be beat. Unless you were beat on the flop, you pretty much like this runout. I would have called the river as well.

Value. You’re missing value. This is a snap call.

@@CrushlivePoker you narrowed the SB range down to QTcc and 66 which both beat 44. You never gave a worse value range or a bluffing range and you completely dismissed the possibility of an over play range (KJ/A6cc). So what part of SB’s range does 44 beat?

Kk would of got it in pre. QT would of never called the flop. Leaves 66 which is only 1 hand with only 3 possible combos. There's lots of Kx as well and even ATs and even suited Kx that we are crushing.

yea right like that could ever happen in real life

For $20 vs the $1700 he won? I'm guessing you play 1-2 NL or limit.

@@rsandoval9203 So you want to use the outcome to justify the play? By that logic you should call here with ATC pre because you know it's only $20 and hell you might flop trips or a fh. Fwiw solvers agree with me this is a fold pre generally speaking, but hey what do I know you keep spouting shlt

@@Charlie_Ses I'm saying that if you ask anyone who is a professional gambler or someone who actually makes money playing poker whether or not they would put up 2% of their stack to see a flop with a pocket pair REGARDLESS of what it is, 99% of them would. Since you clearly play 1-2 and probably buy in for $100, that would be like calling a $2 raise for you. It's called gambling for a reason son. If you are scared, go play checkers.

@@rsandoval9203 You're talking utter shlte, but ignorance is bliss I guess. The problem with calling in the CO with 44 to a LJ open is you have no idea whether the SB and BB are going to 3 bet, and if they are half decent they are going to widen their 3 bet range in that spot to pick up the dead money. It's bad poker to call in that spot, but especially when it's your very first hand at the table and you have no idea who you are playing against. The SB or BB could be very aggro players 3 betting heavily, the LJ could be very tight meaning you're dominated against his opening range. And I tend to play online mostly so your predictions are wrong, but I understand what a 4bb open is. But you carry on belittling people online with your moronic bs and everyone is happy. Have a nice day fool.

@@rsandoval9203 Nobody folds pre in 1-2

Q10 of clubs should be the only straight for sb (and would the average rec float this hand after hero calls?). Offsuit Q10 are not getting implied odds to call turn. If they are calling Q10 off, then you have to pay them off. If they are constantly making -ev calls then you will make up for their luck in other hands. Nothing else makes sense. When a play doesn't make sense, you should always call being at the top of your range. I would give LJ 5 combos of sets because most sets will go allin on the turn (maybe less because he had the clock called on him on the river so I would discount set of A) vs. 9 combos of AK and maybe a few combos of KJ. Don't forget the math. LJ calls for less and hero is getting nearly 5 to 1 on a call. I would say this is an easier call with recs because a pro will never donk jam this river.

More attention needs to be on the turn. I would love for the hero to tell us what kind of hands he could have that was a bluff on the turn.

Huh

@@JS-nz2qc you couldn’t comprehend my statement? Wow embarrassing

@@gordong.5154 I’m all in

@@JS-nz2qc lock in

@@gordong.5154 your statement doesn't make sense. "Don't take your robbi videos... so embarrassed for you brother". What do you mean?