I studied the NASB95 versus the LSB. In my opinion, the LSB is far superior. I never like the practice of the NASB95 of placing many of the more literal readings in the margins. The LSB has reversed this practice in many places. If you want to see LSB translation notes, you should check out the free version of Accordance. Concerning my favorite bibles, the LSB is tied with my NKJV.

I’ve definitely fallen in love with the Esv and then LSB already since reading it. I love reading both and comparing! I really like the CSB too but I gotta stick with my number one favorite the Esv 😇

I felt the Holy Spirit move when you started speaking. How good is that. You are a blessing. Keep going brother.

Thanks for the great review. I read the LSB the year it came out (on Kindle) and really enjoyed it. I don't know if it could ever unseat the NKJV and ESV as my favorite translations, but I do have a high opinion of it.

The English speaking world is very much blessed with the NKJV. I wish we had a bible as readable, beautiful and exact as this one in our language. Greetings from Germany

This was super helpful!

Thanks for your post. I purchased the Legacy Standard Bible right after it was released. It's a great supplement to the NASB 95.

Thanks for the review. Maybe one day we will get that Majority Text version! I really hope so.

The print edition has the units of measurement and monetary equivalents in the back.

Thank you,Rev. Always good.🌹⭐🌹⭐🌹

Do you know of ECM? This version of the critical text reverted a lot of changes back to the majority text as they consider these renderings as being the initial ones. The point is that the LSB used ECM as their primary textual basis. Unfortunately, ECM is only out for the Pastorals, Acts and Mark yet - but you can check the manuscripts yourself since ECM is online available and getting updated

A few comments. 1) Interesting that you like the transliteration of YHWH but not measurements or other names. If they want to be accurate.they can't put metric measurements, nor would the American audience have any more clue as to what those mean. 2). I'm glad to hear your preference for the underlying text. Such an important issue. 3) My biggst problem with the LSB is one you did not mention: the name. This NEW Bible is not "Legacy" nor any kind of "Standard." Why would they use words so loosely on a Book that is built on words having objective meaning? This seems to undermine the translation even before one opens the cover.

The lack of translation notes in most print editions is a major weakness of the LSB. Digital versions do include them but I like it at the bottom of the page. Thankfully this is fixable as they print more.

I have a hard copy. Pros: translation philosophy, paper, format. Cons: no footnotes/marginal notes, no cross references, no concordance. Conclusion: I would wait for them to put notes, concordance, etc, before buying a hard copy. Definitely better than the NASB2020, slightly different than NASB95, not sure that it is any better than NASB77. Having said this, I totally agree with Shawn that if they would have used the Majority/Byzantine text for the NT, this would probably be my new everyday use Bible.

Litra is the most Litral translation! 🤣 I haven't really had the inclination to purchase this one, and I'm still left with the question: "In an age of a proliferation of English Bible translations, why the LSB?"

Why the ESV is not in your Top 5 ? Maybe you have already made a video about this and if so, can you please give me the link (or one of the commenters can do it).

Have u ever did a review on the kjver

How about "vain glory" in Philippians 2:3? It drives me nuts that a modern English Bible has that antiquated phrase.

Not an ESV fan?

Have you ever read the Modern English Version or the World English Bible?

I understand their attempt to be literal but such translations are great for teachers, for the most part. I am a Majority Text guy, if I were to buy one, I would teach from it in the Old Testament and perhaps on a few passages in the New Testament where there are no textual variants.

I am kind of skeptical..another translation?..seems to me English is problematic.not the Greek.

2 Sammuel 21:19 LSB There was war with the Philistines again at Gob, and Elhanan the son of Jaare-oregim the Bethlehemite struck down Goliath the Gittite, the shaft of whose spear was like a weaver’s beam. The most accurate bible is still the KJV which accurately describes Elhanan killing the brother of Goliath and not Goliath who was killed by David . The Most accurate translation is the LSB ? Did these so called scholars miss Sunday School? Every word of God is pure . God warns about adding or subtracting from his word. How embarassing judgment seat will be for you!

The modern Bible versions like the LSB say the opposite of the KJV in certain verses. For example, the KJV calls those who worshipped idols “superstitious,” whereas the LSB calls idol worshippers “religious.” “Then Paul stood in the midst of Mars' hill, and said, Ye men of Athens, I perceive that in all things ye are too superstitious.” (Acts 17:22 KJV) “So Paul stood in the midst of the Areopagus and said, “Men of Athens, I observe that you are very religious in all respects.” (Acts 17:22 LSB) The Zionist disciples of Satan were able to change their Bibles to make Israel a "spreading vine" in the NIV and even a "luxuriant vine" in the NASB, ESV, and the LSB in Hosea 10:1. God, however, states that "Israel is an empty vine" in his KJV Holy Bible at Hosea 10:1. “Israel is an empty vine, he bringeth forth fruit unto himself: according to the multitude of his fruit he hath increased the altars; according to the goodness of his land they have made goodly images.” (Hosea 10:1 KJV) “Israel is a luxuriant vine; He produces fruit for himself. The more abundant his fruit, The more altars he abounded; The better his land, The better he made the sacred pillars.” Hosea 10:1 LSB) So we know from that issue that the KJV is God’s word or the modern Bible versions are God’s word. They cannot say the opposite of one another and both be God’s word. This is a foundational issue. This is a major issue. There is no middle ground here. "Choose ye this day whom ye will serve." Joshua 24:15. Edward Hendrie Author of "HOAX of Biblical Proportions"

Great video. If I may correct you and so many others who says Yahweh translates to God from Hebrew... it doesn't. It translates to Hashem or HaShem. Yes, every Tanakh and Chumash states it as such.

No way, I'll always have my KJV until someone can pry it outta my cold, dead hands. Randy White once said "we ought to put our big boy pants on and learn to read it". Money grubbing publishers are in league with our enemy in changing what was once an English standard (with its oddities, but also accurate plural pronouns) so that None of us are on the same page anymore and no-one excels at scripture memorization. Thy Word have I hid in my heart is now impossible - exactly what Satan wants. Now sit back and think a while, how would you stack that up against promoting narcissistic personal reading preferences? Grace and peace brother! (tempered with a little hot-button sauce😁 )🌹

re. the Hebrew of Genesis 37:33. When you have infinitive absolute followed by a perfect the verbal idea is intensified - Yosef has surely been torn to pieces. An Introduction to Biblical Hebrew Syntax Bruce K. Waltke and M. O'Connor 35.3.1 Absolute Complement: Usually the intensifying infinitive with the perfective conjugation forcefully presents the certainty of a completed event, as in ‎טָרֹ֥ף טֹרַ֖ף, 'Without a shadow of a doubt he has been torn to pieces'