Legal Professional Privilege: A Conversation with Lord Neuberger

  Рет қаралды 4,343

UCL Laws

UCL Laws

5 жыл бұрын

Lord Neuberger and Stephen Mayson, Honorary Professor of Law, UCL Laws
Legal professional privilege is claimed to be “a fundamental human right guaranteed by common law, and a principle which is central to the administration of justice”. It has been developed by the judges to promote the observance of the law, and is intended to encourage full, frank and confidential communication between clients and their legal advisers. Privilege exists for the client’s benefit, and is absolute: in broad terms, unless advice is sought to enable the commission of a crime, only the client can waive privilege and the legal adviser cannot otherwise disclose their communication. But the modern world poses increasing challenges for privilege. Who is ‘the client’ (particularly in a corporate context)? How does privilege interact with investigation, prosecution and deferred prosecution agreements? Who is a ‘legal adviser’ (legally qualified, qualified abroad, in-house)? In what circumstances is a legal purpose ‘dominant’ when a client seeks advice? What constitutes ‘privileged communication’ in a fast-moving, globalised and hyper-regulated world?
To explore these issues, Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury, recently retired President of the Supreme Court, will be in conversation with Professor Stephen Mayson (Honorary Professor and member of the Centre for Ethics and Law at UCL). Lord Neuberger presided in the Supreme Court decision in R (on the application of Prudential plc v. Special Commissioners of Income Tax [2013] 2 AC 185. The Court took a narrow view of ‘legal adviser’ and declined the invitation for further judicial development of legal professional privilege to include legal advisers who are not qualified lawyers. The starting point for the conversation with Lord Neuberger will explore whether this conclusion truly supports the fundamental human right and the administration of justice at the heart of privilege, as well as being at odds with the structure for authorisation to practice reserved legal activities under the Legal Services Act 2007.

Пікірлер
Lord Neuberger lecture - The Process of Judging
1:19:13
University of Surrey
Рет қаралды 21 М.
Legal Privilege: Implications and tips for in-house lawyers
42:29
Thomson Reuters Legal Europe
Рет қаралды 1,7 М.
Scary Teacher 3D Nick Troll Squid Game in Brush Teeth White or Black Challenge #shorts
00:47
ПРОВЕРИЛ АРБУЗЫ #shorts
00:34
Паша Осадчий
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
ОСКАР vs БАДАБУМЧИК БОЙ!  УВЕЗЛИ на СКОРОЙ!
13:45
Бадабумчик
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Slavoj Žižek in Conversation with Jonathan Derbyshire at Central Saint Martins
1:56:53
Sleepwalkers: How Europe Went to War in 1914 - Christopher Clark
52:53
Gresham College
Рет қаралды 418 М.
UCL Mishcon Lecture 2014 with Sir Keir Starmer
1:13:02
UCL Laws
Рет қаралды 31 М.
Rory Stewart In Conversation
1:09:49
The Conduit
Рет қаралды 4 М.
Think Fast, Talk Smart: Communication Techniques
58:20
Stanford Graduate School of Business
Рет қаралды 39 МЛН
Understanding Neoliberalism as a System of Power
1:33:02
UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose
Рет қаралды 126 М.
Scary Teacher 3D Nick Troll Squid Game in Brush Teeth White or Black Challenge #shorts
00:47