Exactly, I hear the brake, fast, and slow settings as well.

***** Something is wrong if you can't tell that Lennard has had training that most musicians haven't. Cory is good no question about it but Lennard is a legend in the making. I don't even think Cory would want that battle.

***** Put it Like this I dont think Cory can do all that Lennard can but I'm sure Lennard can throw back anything Cory does with more added on.

So you saying Cory isn't any of those things? If you say no you don't know anything of music. Not to mention if you are a musician you must of been trained to think like that everybody doesn't get the chance to get trained because last i check it takes money and everybody doesn't have that and that what makes Cory unique a child prodigy unlike the others you mentioned also you now knows all that theory and training them other guys have because once he had enough money out his own pocket he went to Berklee

This comment didnt age well

@@Eric-pu7lp at all Cory is hands down the best ever at this point in time no debate to be made anymore

Ethan Thornton .....well said! Why should anyone compare? It’s an honor to appreciate & vibe with!

I ageee

Agree with you

I’m from the East Coast... I know Corey, Travis, Glenn.. Quennel, John Peters etc.... I love Razor though...

Not saying I don’t love my NY brothers, I do.... Razor is just a different style!!!! Like Wendell Lowe.......

I think that's a ridiculous statement. The ability to learn is as much God given as creativity...DId not God give Daniel, anf the 3 Hebrew boys special ability to learn...Daniel 1:17...IJS

Creativity can be taught. Improvisation is taught as a foundational subject in many of the Arts.So when did creativity stop being taught?

Your responses are pretty ridiculous but they are revealing....It's called education. When a person goes to college, the goal is not to teach them the profession, but to educate them about a profession and they use that education to be creative within the profession or any profession. This is why many professions require a college degree, whether of not in is in the area desired. For example, Jonas Salk was not shown how to develop the polio vaccine, he was taught the principles of medicine and and he used those principles to be creative and he came up with the cure. The idea is not to tell someone to "be creative" as you stated, but to provide them with the fundamental skills then tell them to apply those skills creatively. When this is done, the collective output looks nothing like the input because it is new, or a creation...Many of the world's problems and life defining discoveries are solved in this manner. So educating one with the processes and procedures and inviting them to apply these things in areas where they have not been applied yield new results. A new result is the output of creativity....

You see Ezzy, I've been around church musicians all my life and most of them learned by copying patterns, runs, and chord progressions. And that's how they practice. Very few take the time to acquire a music education that would allow them to create something new, and because of that they don't comprehend true creativity. I see the comments on so many of the videos that I check out regularly here and on other sites when people are commenting about skilled musician. And the fallback is always "but they are not anointed'. To someone who looks for patterns to learn how to do things this would sound like junk because there are no evident patterns, but you can hear trills and chord progressions from some of the great composers being incorporated into a gospel piece. This is true creativity, but everybody will not understand, just like calculus, everybody that can add two plus two just won't get it....

Truth

+foxybrown2 Now that question really makes no sense...You ask who on this planet does not play what he has heard from other skilled musicians....Those who are gifted, skilled, and talented enough to create what the other musicians will hear and try to emulate, that's who!...That's an easy question to answer....

ObserverMusic No not good answer you still have to learn from someone like i said nothing is totally new you can add on to what you have heard, But you have to listen to someone to learn the language.

+foxybrown2 But learning from someone has nothing to do with creating. And I disagree, there is quite a bit new and more is being created. Also, as with anything in life, If your teacher uses songs to teach you how to play you may be correct, but if your teacher uses songs to teach you techniques, then you use those techniques to create. That's how the world's most complicated issues are addressed. take math for example, a student goes to school and the math teachers teaches techniques, afterward that student uses these techniques to solve problems that the teach couldn't solve. So the student is not simply doing the math that the teacher taught, but using the techniques to do new math and solve new problems. I work in a field where this is expected.

That is not what i was saying you still have to start from some where you have to listen to what someone has played to even have anything to work with. If you talk to any of the old or new jazz musicians they will tell you that they listened to someone else to get ideas from. Joe pass listen to Charlie Parker Joey D the Organ Player studied Jimmy Smith

Yes...I just watched 2 Eddie Howard videos and not once did I get distracted by the Leslie switch. Some musicians no how to fitness it....some don't. Even that awful clicking is extremely distracting, you'll get that when you record that close if the musician is that rough with it. I really enjoyed his chord structures....so don't get it twisted.

COGIC Athem "This Is the Church Of God In Christ"