This is not true. Imam Bukhari and Imam Muslim, a muhaddith, the greatest muhadith followed the school of Imam Ibn Kullab as mentioned by Imam Asqalani. As did Imam Zahiri who followed the circles of Imam Ibn Kullab

This is not true. Imam Bukhari and Imam Muslim, a muhaddith, the greatest muhadith followed the school of Imam Ibn Kullab as mentioned by Imam Asqalani. As did Imam Zahiri who followed the circles of Imam Ibn Kullab

@Path of Sahaba lmao say that to the hanbalis who kept persecuting Imam Bukhari to such a point he kept asking Allah to Kill him and take him from this life 😭😭😂

This is not true. Imam Bukhari and Imam Muslim, a muhaddith, the greatest muhadith followed the school of Imam Ibn Kullab as mentioned by Imam Asqalani. As did Imam Zahiri who followed the circles of Imam Ibn Kullab

I'm right here 🤣

Theres loads of us saying that🤣🤣🤣🤣Alhamdulilah

I'm the real one 😀.And I'm extremely excited

A lot of us. Jazakallah Khaira :)

Kalam is bidah

What do you mean "over your head"? May I know

Mashallah

Volgens jullie is hij een Taymi Mujassim lol hij exposed heel jullie Aqeedah

@@Firelord2nd u havent heard of the lecture and went straight to comment?

Salam from Indonesia

@@afei4989I did listen. Maybe 4 times again

He has often spoken about this topic. Search through KZfaq. For example: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gJ2AaJp2sLLbqqM.html

@@simpleviewer7445 JazakAllah brother

The digital dawah is very poisonous you should choose very wisely, there are very little that have devotedly presenting the fact with knowledge like Yasir Qadhi may Allah accept his effort and reward him Jannah al firdos.

I have emailed about this too and really would love to join a private paid learning platform.

If you're going to make paid content, please don't make it too expensive. The exchange rate between US dollar and my local currency is just too high.

@@Tk-ik2pp what is his email?

Sure

You have a dirty mind. I didn’t even think of that until you mentioned it. And in any case, it wouldn’t be awra.

Who said anything about awra? It was a fashion tip dude. You’re the one making it dirty.

This is not true. Imam Bukhari and Imam Muslim, a muhaddith, the greatest muhadith followed the school of Imam Ibn Kullab as mentioned by Imam Asqalani. As did Imam Zahiri who followed the circles of Imam Ibn Kullab

ATHARI AQEEDAH VS THE PSEUDO ATHARI (PSEUDO SALAFI/WAHHABI) These rightly guided Hanbalis would 1. Negate the human meaning; meaning not attribute it to Allah عزوجل. 2. Thereafter submit its meaning to Allah عزوجل This is called Tafweed; which some 'Ash’ari and Maturidi schools did as well -The Salafi/ Wahhabi do not do this hence they are not to be taken seriously when they say they are 'Atharis That is because the blasphemously believe the human meaning is possible with Allah عزوجل -The Salafi/ Wahhabi do not do this hence they are not to be taken seriously when they say they are 'Athari That is because the blasphemously believe the human meaning is possible with Allah عزوجل -As for Tafweed. Yes, it’s referred to as Tafweed with Tanzeeh. Remaining silent BUT clearing Allah from the Kayf "the How" and clearing Allah from resembling the creation in any matter So it is remaining silent for the actual meaning. However, The Wahhabi they say that they remain silent of the how. So they say that there is a Kayf but they don't the Kayf so they remain silent. This is what they claim and that’s a lot different from remaining silent from the meaning and clearing the Kayf, which is the Aqeedah of the TRUE Salaf us-Saliheen The Athari/Hanbali creed are two types, one is a Sunni Aqeeedah the other has been Hijacked by the Pseudo Salafis/Wahhabi sect (i.e. the Anthropomorphists) ! 1st The true Athariyyah creed (Hanbali Aqeedah) is from Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal رضي الله عنه which belong to Ahlus Sunnah Wa'l Jama'ah which is similar to the al-Maturidiyya and Asha’irah Aqeedah, which does not apply direction, body parts etc. to Allah عزوجل. But a forgotten school because of the Anthropomorphists. 2nd is the Hijacked Athariyyah by the Taymun (Pseudo Salafi/Wahhabi i.e followers of ibn taymiyyah, Ibn Qiyyum, ibn Abd al-Wahhabi, Albani, Bin Baz etc. ) who has hijacked the term, which is not part of the Ahlus Sunnah Wa'l Jama'ah and our Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal رضي الله عنه are free from Anthropomorphism, they apply direction, body parts etc. to Allah عزوجل . The problem is today's Athari speak with authority about topics they have no understanding of nor are they qualified to comment on. Athari means only using what what said in Qur'an and Sunnah meaning they believe in the Words of Allah by whatever Allah meant when stating them and laysa kamithlihi shay. So a real (Sunni) Athari is the same in core belief as a al-Ash'ari and al-Maturidi only without deeper sharh or possible explanations. Some Sunni Athari scholars: Shaykh Abd al-Qadir Jilani al-Hanbali, Imam ibn Jawzi al-Hanbali, Imam adh-Dhahabi ash-Shafi’i, Imam al- Laalikaa’i, The Tamimi family, Al Khalwadhani, Ibn Hubairah, Al zaghouni, Ibn Qudamah, Ibn Hamdan, Ibn muflih, Al Tufi, Ibn Rajab, Ibn Najjar, Al Mardawi, Ibn Balban, Mari' Al Karami, Al Saffarini, Ibn Salum, Ibn qa'id al najdi, Al Shatti Family.

@@zccau2316 whats not true ? Are you trying to respond to someone else ? Imam bukhari followed Ibn Kullab !!!? Go read khalk afaal al ibad for imam Bukhari yourself ( not parts from here and there ) and you would understand what school of thought he belonged to ...

@@fifafreebies8941 you are lost because you have zero understanding of the athari school and from what you have written, zero understanding on what tajseem is and 3olow is. I dont have time to educate you on this , the dr. Is talking way beyond your grade here, lets learn from him ... on a side note , never judge something without researching it yourself, dont listen or read segments here and there from ppl then make up your mind . Salam 🙂

@@saadallahchebaro8282 Imam Bukhari died because extreme Hanbali kept persecuting him. What are you On lmao?

What distinguishes Islām from other religions? Its belief in the Creator (in Arabic, Allāh). Most religions believe the Creator is a man, some tangible entity, or some being that exists somewhere high up on a throne, or some kind of spirit. Muslims believe Allāh, the Creator, has no resemblance or need to the creations in anyway whatsoever. Among the creations is darkness, light, time, space, directions, such as above and below, places, the heavens, skies, and everything else. This means the Creator existed before all the aforementioned creations, before time, place, above and below, darkness, and light. Thus, it is known and is the belief of Muslims that God existed without a place, space, and direction, and after creating them, is clear of occupying them. This also means the Creator is clear of being a man or volume taking entity, as whatever takes up space needs that space to exist, and Allāh is clear of need, thus clear of occupying space. Allāh is not an ethereal entity, such as a spirit, or a tangible entity, like a human. Allāh is the Creator of both.

Yea this isn't true. No one claimed this ever, until ibn taymiyyah

Ibana is one of other books such as makalat al islamiyeen which were quoted by Ibn Asaker in tabyeen kathb al muftari , that been said , I know for a fact that Imam Al Ashari would not write something so fundemental in aqeeda to please a human being , given that even post these books , al barbahari didnt accept him not did Al Ashari recant.

@@saadallahchebaro8282 apologies, maybe "pleasing" is not the right word more of "seeking approval", "there are differences, but we are also ahlus sunnah".

@@hassanabdaladl i think both camps tried to make claims. Some Asharis, also say that Ibn Taymiyyah "made tawbah" in the end and became "ahlus-sunnah" (Ashari).

@@MuhammadZakyAbdurrahman he actually did lol but no one believes that he meant it. Even asharis don't believe that he meant it. He made tawbah and pronounced he was an Ash'ari, in an Ottoman Court, if I remember correctly. But he was basically forced to do it

@`Abdul-Hādi at-Turāni That is interesting; do you have some book or video in english explaining this about Imam Nawawi?

Yet the sheikh said and its well documented that Atharism in the past isn't same that of Ibn taymiyah time...

You can watch that in his Q&A Series

@@MuhammadZakyAbdurrahman yh need the link to that

This is true and having looked inti this matter for some time now , when you compile all of the athars of Imam Ahmad , you find that without a doubt he is not a mufawid at least the maturidi way and some of the same athars include no manaa except the manaa that Allah described himself aside from it being an ahad which some like al khalal didnt accept. I would really love to hear the Dr. Opinion on this .

@@saadallahchebaro8282 just adding on to what you've mentioned; it is clear by gathering the various Athar of Imam Ahmad RH, that he indeed committed to Ithbat of the sifaat and consigned the howness to Allah. In essence, he committed to the Tafweed Kaffiyah and not Tafweed ma'niyah and this is in line with the Athari doctrine, as supported by over 100 narrations from the Salaf committing to Tafweed Kaffiyah and not Tafweed entirely. The lone narration that mentions Imam Ahmad saying, without a meaning and with a how, can be relegated to a refutation against the Jahmiyyah who denied the attributes in its entirety. To assume that that one narration proved he followed Tafweed is odd since you would be disregarding the many prevalent narrations wherein he committed to the meaning yet didn't enquire into the how. Also there are two opinions regarding that narration the commentator mentioned, one being that it is a discontinued report and one that it is an accepted report but a refutation to the Jahmiyyah.

@@AliAbuH agreed though some neo-hanbalis claim that we have to use ta'weel to explain this specific athar of Imam Ahmad since taking it as by althahir would imply both kayfiya and meaning are unknown given that many hanbalis post 500 hijri where actual mufawida to some extent specifically on the manaa part . This is why I wanted the Dr. To elaborate on this point to clear it up since he touched base on it very briefly.

I’ve been looking into this, especially today. It looks like he skipped over this in this talk. Maybe he will cover in the future talk. However, he obviously doesn’t believe that this was the creed of the Salaf.