Absolutely agree

@@bbbb-db9gr do you not understand it’s a joke ?

Right now, she is Schrodinger's queen.

Lol

The possibility of Queen Elizabeth II being immortal are possible somewhere about 0,000000000001% to 0,000000000000000000000000000000000000001% LOL

Same here

Same ;(

QE2 forever!!

fr

Yeah what a stand up gal killing all those kids. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pbV6h5Nl0rmvZI0.html

So you are suggesting we dissolve the monarchy for good? I'm sure we can do without more ribbon-cutting ceremonies.

@@jimmyjames1411 dissolving the flag will be the death of the UK . it literally stands for United Kingdom . Without a King/Queen there's no Kingdom.

@@jimmyjames1411 I definitely suggest that. And I love tradition and I identify as conservative. But the dissolution of the monarchy is long past due. Here in the USA, we have a saying that goes “We fought a war 240 years ago, so we no longer have to care about those people.”

@@LyleFrancisDelp yeah but Commonwealth country’s have everything figured out better than America, I love being under commonwealth having fair wages and Medicare, don’t fix what isn’t broken

@@itsem2k15 I expected a “yeah butt”. You can have all that without these overly privileged people. Monarchy should be dissolved.

But wait! As of today, she has eleven more days to reach Rama IX of Thailand's length of reign.

It feels like cheating that he was 20 years younger than The Queen was when she became Queen, when he became King of France.

@@DigitalVanquish it's logical at the time people lived less long

Lies again? Football jersey

@Homeward Bound Not really. There's documentation of Romans living to be 100 years old. As with any statistics, it's easy to misinterpret them. The average life expectancy was certainly lower in the 17th century, but that's only because infant mortality was so high. Once you made it through childhood, you'd likely live into your 60s/70s. Currently, medicine doesn't really make us live longer, but rather keeps us healthy for longer.

I agree i have always looked up to her. Imo she was a great queen! She will be missed. RIP

That amazes me still after more than 7 months after her passing that she had enough strength to welcome the then-new Prime Minister

lol yeah and imagine she’s just like *laughs immortally*

Every time someone makes a video like this she gains a extra 10 years from the universe

It’s not like she doesn’t know the drill! She became Queen when her father, the King, died. She knows exactly what’s going to happen. They actually have massive practice drills she can see from Buckingham Palace windows and Windsor Castle.

@@dhanushr04 🤣😂🙏🏾

@@dhanushr04 hopefully.😁

The Commonwealth is growing. There are now member countries that were never part of the British Empire (Rwanda and Mozambique).

@@allanlank yes, of course for now the commonwealth may still be growing but Jennifer is saying AFTER the Queen dies, some places might slowly leave. We don’t know how Charles will maintain the level of respect his mother has.

@@allanlank I think Jennifer possibly meant that some of these countries will no longer wish to have the monarch as head of state.

@Jennifer Kiesel Have you given any thought to another disintegration? I'm referring to the possible demise of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and N. Ireland. I've often noticed how the ongoing state of the Commonwealth post-QEII seems to preoccupy everyone, but no one seems to be too concerned with the possible dissolution of the U.K.🫠. Is that not a possible future reality?

@@wyzemann I've been thinking of making Northern Ireland into a Canadian Province, just like Newfoundland in 1949. Northern Ireland would get more autonomy, Canada would get better access to the EU, and the Irish Republic would get access to NAFTA. WIN, WIN, WIN.

They also chose their mistresses from the same family.

Same with George IV who waited a long time, became Prince Regent and then only reigned for ten years before he died and then was succeeded by his younger brother William. Both had outlived the Duke of Kent the fourth son of George III and also Queen Victoria's father.

I would love to see Anne crowned

Anne also has the high and noble distinction of having being an adulteress.

@@a.t.c.3862 so does Charles? cheating runs in the family.

@@hmno6244 We already knew about him, it's mentioned often enough, but we never seem to hear it about Anne - and yet it's true. Geese and ganders.

If a council were to pick the next head of state, it would be a president, not a king.

Charles the 2nd, comes to mind. v

I read he was called Charles because it was HMTQ favorite name for a boy

I though he was going to be George instead of Charles when he takes the throne.

@@ohwell94 well one would assume that Right? Lol

Really? Doesn't George have a mentally ill King?

be hilarious if he fell off his perch a day before his mum did

Personally, I would think it DEPLORABLE, TO CROWN CAMILLA ANYTHING!!! She, & Chuckie are not worthy of the time of day.... Charles used Diana, she was nothing more than a place for him to "Dump His Load"... HE BROKE DIANA'S HEART, DIANA LOVED CHARLES, REALLY LOVED HIM!! Not only LOVE, DIANA ADORED HIM ALSO... "Charles has waited all his life to become King"🤴 TO BAD CHARLES, . DIANA SAVED HERSELF ALL HER LIFE, A VIRGIN, YOU WEREN'T WORTHY OF HER, OR HER VIRGINITY... ...... DON'T EVER FORGET ...... REMEMBER HOW YOU CRIED IN THE STREETS BACK IN 1997 ??? YOUR HEARTS WERE BROKEN, THE "PEOPLES PRINCESS" WAS DEAD!! MANY OF YOU SWORE THEN, THAT CHARLES WOULD NEVER BE CROWNED KING, YOU CAN MAKE IT HAPPEN PEOPLE... USE YOUR VOICE, TAKE A STAND, DUMP HIS SORRY ASS!! LOOK AT CAMILLA GORILLA, IS SHE THE FACE YOU WANT REPRESENTING YOU OR YOUR COUNTY?? I DIDN'T THINK SO... SPEAK UP, TAKE A VOTE, WHATEVER YOU NEED TO DO, JUST TELL THEM THIS... " IF THERE'S A WILL(IAM) THERE'S A WAY"... *WILLIAM AND KATE*

If his health prevents him from doing it that would be the only way he would decline willingly.

@@kellyhoover7750 *country

@@kellyhoover7750 Diana was nothing more than an arranged marriage. The man has always loved Camilla. I want him to call her Queen and shove it everyone's face who thinks it's any of their business :D

It is all protocol and well known from history what will happen. I dread the day.

The Queen has been monarch for so long that there are very few people who remember a time before her reign and none at all in Parliament. So, at this point, the death of a monarch and the accession of a new one is effectively unprecedented.

@@kate_cooper True it will be very uncommon and her death will be felt throughout the world.

@Gary Allen No.

@@kate_cooper I have relatives and friends in their mid-70s and 80s, I'm sure it won't be unprecedented.

There are still post boxes with Queen Victoria's cypher on them.

@Kyle Paige The town of Nairn has a Victorian post box.

There are Post Boxes in Harrow with Queen Victoria's cypher.

There is a VR postbox in Warwick

There are plenty of Queen Victoria postboxes around the oldest is still used in Dorset

It isn't a popularity contest. You cannot change the constitution because some people don't like Charles.

I know what the law is. But somehow I do not see Charles as king. He does not have IT.

I agree. William would be better. The only consolation is that Charles won't be on the thrown for very long. We will get William In my lifetime and maybe even George

@@chelseahulmston9056 wow! You must be really young! 😮

@@Vesper1205 32. Only a few years younger than William.

Except Charles is already 73 so William /might/ not have that long to wait.

Charles' parents will have lived into their late nineties. He can probably live as long. He may wish to step down in his late eighties for William just like other European monarchs of late, particularly if his health declines. Louis would be at university. Charles clearly wants his son's family life to be stable & happy for them all. It's a family partnership to perform service. Very admirable.

Except if Charles becomes King I hope my country will want to become a republic since the thought of that woman sitting up there with him turns my stomach!

You do understand the monarchy is symbolic and they don't really do anything right?

@@Devilishlybenevolent they don't do anything /political/.. diplomatic on the other hand..

Her reign even outlived my own grandmother and grandfather. Grandmother was 1943-2019. Grandfather was 1945-2004. It’s insane.

My grandmother is dead, but my mother turns 84 in just about two months.

Elizabeth II is almost old enough to be my great grandmother.

@@EpicB She is as old as my mother! I was born in 1950.

@@Volcano-Man I was born in 1998 so that makes you about old enough to be my grandparent.

LOL yea I really felt that; as much as I'm a fan of tradition, I can't help but agree that Charles isn't a desirable king

@@kassiopeia5565 wait til he gets in office and implements the WEF draconian Green agenda

A monarchy survives on the will of the people. People do not want Charles as king, and most territories have already started attempts to split from the commonwealth

Life changes all the time. Imagine if Andrew was in line for the throne any closer than he is now? That would have brought down the monachy.

Tampons and Randy will bring the monarchy down unless HRH Prince William is king #clarencehouse

Don't take that for granted. Times have changed.

Of course times change. But the one time the monarchy got thrown out, it came back again.

GOD SAVE THE QUEEN 👸🙏

My heart broke when I saw her sitting alone at his funeral 💔

It’s 2022. LGBTI+ became a strong community. You can’t remotely say or think of the N word. But there are still monarchs??

Right, you do know today we would call him a groomer. Someone who starts a relationship with a 13 yr old girl to get her to marry him.

Good riddance to psychopathic trash. Flush it all into the ocean and freedom will spread across the globe. With an estimated 18 trillion pounds or 30 trillion American dollars she has way to much power and money; she owns most of Canada.

Things that belong to the State would remain so, but all.of them also own things privately...they'd keep those.

Well start by looking at all the crown land not only in the UK but also in commonwealth countries

As far as I know only Balmoral castle is privately owned by the family.

@@marroosh9771 Sandringham

Own? When you learn history you find out they pretty much became filthy rich exploiding the colonnies. Go back to junior high.

Look up Edward VII, he had to wait a long as time as well as his mother, Queen Victoria was long lived.

i think charlie boy will beat it ,just needs to live to 140 plus

Charles has partied too hard His attitude of entitlement apparently included his good health; he hasn't taken care of himself. Anyway, I have noticed the same thing that you have. He looks horrible!

@@jaynecampbell4396 Charles I lost his head, Charles II lost his attempts in 1652, and I think Charles III will lose his throne. He will most likely abdicate in favor of his more popular son, whom I fully support to become King William V.

@@jaynecampbell4396 absolute rot. Charles was never a partier nad he has taken care of his health...

The last time it actually happened was 70 years ago, and all the drills in the world can't guarantee that the real thing will go smoothly.

That's human nature for you

if you want a look search for the announcement of Philip's death in british media. they took some minutes to let the news narrators who were present at the minute to change into something somber, then broke the news. they are prepared for such events but if it happens it is still chilling to see it happen and the news anchors are not immune to the occasion.

@@lilymarinovic1644 idk they handled Prince Philip's death pretty well. The BBC newsreader was changed to black pretty quick.

Unthinkable? You mean death. We all have to go sometime.

What may well "bring down the monarchy" however is Islam. I won't live to see it, but I suspect my grandchildren will.

Yea the title and wording of this is a bit outlandish. As for Charles and Camilla, theyve been married longer than he and Di, his children have forgiven him--what right does a stranger online truly have to judge them? Can they? Absolutely. But its still wrong and frankly childish.

With a bit of luck it will

@@carlosluque2346 luck?

luckily, Charles is already in his70s.

The thing is, CowMilla was Not in love with Charles The Man Child, she had been in a seven year campaign to get Andrew Parker Bowls to the altar but he had better things to do, like Charles’s sister Ann, Andrew dated her while still with CowMilla so CowMilla had her girlfriend that knew Charles introduced her, hoping it would make Andrew jealous, it didn’t work until Charles went off to do his duty to the crown and this the kicker, CowMilla had her father place the engagement of his daughter to Parker Bowels, so there it is…look it up, I love researching lie’s people tell for whatever!

@@janismarierawlins8805 you are embarassing

Charles true love was Kanga, Lady Tryon. She died a mysterious death.

@@ClaireEmilia But she is correct.

Charles is too old and too weak to be King Parker Bowles and Charles are not popular

Guess we'll see

She has Died. RIP Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth II ! God Save the King Charles III !! The Monarchy can and will be survive!

@@margaretblyth8534 well he is now King and appears very popular and Camilla is Queen Consort I’m sure he will do well he is very caring

The King is only in his early 70s so with current lifespans I think he'll live until his 80s or 90s. Maybe he'll be short of his 100 birthday like his father so it could over 20 years of him.

I believe Queen Victoria, Edward Vii, George v and Edward viii were all alive at the same time. There’s photos of her at his christening

@@choralfanatic96 you are right

@@choralfanatic96 I didn't think of them, just looked it up, Edward was born in 1894, so he was alive when she passed. Thanks for the info.

George the 3rd (Queen Victoria's grandfather) I think

@@Lulu-ut9pv no he had no living legitimate great grandchildren when he was alive in fact he had very few grandchildren so they were only 2 generations of heir after him unlike now when we have 3

We even named a swimming pool after Harold Holt even though it is highly likely that he drowned.

Omg... lol is that really true? That's funny!

@@danusdragonfly6640 - Yep, if you look up the the swim centre’s Wikipedia page it says ‘The Harold Holt Memorial Swimming Centre is a public swimming pool complex located on the corner of High Street and Edgar Street, Glen Iris, Melbourne, Australia.’

Yea, because it's never controversial naming things after politicians.

It is a joint US Australian naval VLF communication base initially run by the US. Some months after Holt disappeared as a mark of respect, the name of the base was changed. Holt had arranged for the US to pay a peppercorn rent for the land. The US also named a frigate after Harold Holt. Changing the name of the swimming pool seems odd. Although Holt was the area's local representative and the country's Prime Minister in Federal Parliament when he disappeared.

The Prince of Wales has stated he will be known as George VII which is a tribute to his Grandfather the late George VI ( Albert ). Original names and Reigning Monarch names are often changed. King Edward VIII name was David for instance….. King George VI name was Albert…. King Edward VII name was also Albert….. Queen Victoria’s name was Alexandrina …. But I understand where you’re coming from. Have a good day.

@@ilovesmysangsomsangsom3500 afaik Albert is a given name to most princes because of Prince Consort Albert but they never use it as regal name out of respect at same time.

@@rivenoak you don’t say……

@@ilovesmysangsomsangsom3500 Prince William was not named Albert among his 4 given names, but his brother was maybe the family will drop the tradition by now; the consort to Queen Victoria is after all gone for a very long time already.

He could change his name. But let's face it. We're all just gonna keep calling him Charles. 😆

Atleast he cares about climate change and he can't be worst then Putin...😂

@@truefairytale164 , Today, a comparison to Putin, is a pretty low bar. v

@@truefairytale164 But he doesn't care enough about climate change to give up his multiple residences and private jets. 😅

I don’t mind Prince Charles and think he could do a good job and I believe Camilla has earned her title she will get when the Queen passes but saying that I do believe the crown should pass straight to William and Catherine to bring a younger modern royal family in to the world

I do

And what a legacy of "Charles" he has chosen to follow

500,000 out of 7 Billion people on the planet really isn't a lot🤷🏼‍♀️. It just seems like a lot. Do the math.

@@Pearlruby718 Is it not clear that I did the math? Nobody thinks that 500,000 is a large number amongst the world population, but it is the highest that it has ever been. In fact it’s only 0.007% of the earths population. But that is irrelevant. More specifically there are 25 countries that have the greatest longevity. Developing countries do not enjoy the same benefits. If you’re going to live to 110, you probably need to be from one of those countries. Japan has the most, but the UK is amongst the countries with extreme longevity. You really need to be female, which already cuts the worlds population in half. And you need to have made it through the genetic bombs (cardiac, neurological, cancer, aneurysm) and have reached the age of 80 before the chances of becoming 110 get better. Therefore, to be one of the 500,000 to make it to 110 : using nation of origin, sex and health record of the person, the wealth of a person, the amount of caring attention a person gets, and the access to medical care. I won’t bother you with all the medical and sociological stats. But, The Queen has about a 0.34% chance of reaching 110. Interestingly, and I did not figure this one out myself, the Queen is believed to have a 90.91% chance of reaching 100. Assuming she does, her chances of making it to 110 will go up to 30.7% and up every year from that point on. If you truly want to “do the math“ you really need to learn how to do statistics. You can’t just take an amount and divide it into the entire planets population. I see where you were coming from, but you were terribly condescending for someone who doesn’t understand these things

@@Kris-ib8sn Princess Alice died at 84.

@@MFLimited How about genetics playing a role as well. I am in my 70's. My maternal great grandmother lived to be 98, her daughter my grandmother 96, my mother 93, my father, 90, his father 96. So technically I might just have longevity on my side because of genes. They too lived through pandemics and diseases before there were cures. My point being maybe all of the people who live long may just have a good line of genes and nothing more. Maybe it's just inherent and nothing mystical or food based or climate based ect. Just good genes 😌 Just another opinion not trying to offend just another veiw point.

@@Pearlruby718 I mentioned genetics. Yes, just as genetics can bring good, genetics can bring bad. That’s why I mentioned “genetic bombs“. They exist in every family but they old are you get without them showing up the more likely it is that you have avoided them. If you have a family with a good longevity, you are female, you live in a country with excellent healthcare and you have access to it and you have people around you who love you and look after you then your chances of living longer are, of course, much better than most. I come from a country where people live pretty long, England But: I am a man, my father died at 49 and my mother died in her 60s and pretty much everyone in my family had cancer, by the time they were in their 60s, on both sides. So, even though the life expectancy for men in my country is in their 80s, mine should be in my 60s. However, if I live to my 70s the chances of me getting even older go up

The castles and palaces won't be going anywhere :)

It won’t end with Charles, the monarchy isn’t going anywhere anytime soon.

@@Natashaa_1 Thankfully

@@Natashaa_1 honestly Charles isn't even THAT bad of a monarch anyways... Britain had even worse monarch and yet it managed to survive just fine.

@@moviefan005 We don't know what kind of monarch he'll make.

When I was watching the video I was thinking the same thing. What would happen if Britain removed the king, but Canada refused to. He could move to Canada and be king there perhaps?

rip bozo

I agree.

I wouldn't say it is a burden, king and queens do literally nothing nowdays

@@0912sooli well they would be under constant public scrutiny, which can be very taxing on such a young family

Thanks for your earth-shaking parsonal anecdote.

@@0912sooli - how ignorant can you be.

😂😂

😂😂😂

Aye no royal spog is ready to drop so he needs something else

What a gross visual…..

@@vickilee57 ikr

SHAR MIN AUNG.

Which is my point Cassidy .....Betty Windsor should have done exactly that .Monachist argue say it's up to,these people in these particular countries to do so .But we all know it's NOT the commonwealth countries to anoint a king or queen it's Britain .So the queen can withdraw her commission if it pleases her from those nations .It cuts both ways of the fence .she could or should have done this in the 60s .To prove to the world she (Betty) she's a modern queen .And still be a face of the commonwealth but not a colonial master to particular countries .

Yes. He'll be more of a transitional monarch.

He will be more Transitional I agree. People forget that he’s still an old man, and will likely only last 20-30 Years, which compared to the Queen isn’t exactly long.

@@Uqwefsdjxsa just like how his great-grandfather Edward VII didn't last that long before his son George V took over.

@@moviefan005 Edward VII and Charles are actually very comparable. Both the sons of extremely popular, long reigning queens. Both had scandals related to affairs, and both were generally seen as highly unpopular and ascended the throne at an old age. Thing with Edward VII is, when he actually became king, he went from being deeply unpopular to actually becoming very beloved by the people. I expect it will be similar with Charles. A lot of the antipathy to Charles becoming king is simply the fact he isn’t The Queen, hangover animosity from the Diana affair (which becomes more and more remote with each year), and unsubstantiated statements he will meddle in politics, which he won’t

Same, I don’t like the royal family but it will hit different when the Queen does die. It’s feels like she’s been there forever 😢

Need her. What for.

@@michaelpower4372 turism mostly

Nope. We dont

@@rrl9399 people come to see Buckingham Palace or the Tower of London, they don't see the Queen. Its not like people don't go to Paris and see the former palaces because there is no Monarchy there.

@@101Mant such a closed mind, are you aware of the many places that are a direct resultant of the monarchy, perhaps the Buckingham Palace, or the Tower of London, to strip the link to Royalty here is to strip also the very predicate to them

Preach brother

Me

No its more like to see how this people are getting towards destruction after ruining colonies....their most precious daughter-in-law died...their one heir left...their other heir is facing court....

The Netflix series "The Crown" mixes fiction with fact, it is entertainment not an historical record. I stopped watching it after a few episodes for that reason.

No!! We don't all care for them. Time for this corrupt load of scoundrels to go.

@@Joescoatrose Precisely how do you intend to change the British system of government, with what do you intend to replace it? Do you actually have a vote? Please tell me which system of government is free of prejudice and corruption, just as an example of what we may chose to follow.

@@robbiewilliams2123 Exactly. As an American, I agree that things most definitely aren't so simple. Most systems can be exploited, even in sly ways that keep the citizen looking the other way.