mr timestamp guy would be proud

😂 thanks

Thanks man!

Forza *Horizon* 5 Minecraft* they can't* get worse?

So helpful thanks

That's exactly what I was thinking. Lol! He may need to get approved for overtime.

i'm waiting too. XD

He should put a PayPal link at the end of that one, I'd sent him a buck or two for it lol.

He should hire timestamp guy. Missing timestamps are kind of dealbreaker for me

Minecraft at 9889

We believe in you man! You can do it!

looking for starcitizen :)

You can do it!!

Fucking sexy man, we lova ya!

Star citizen isn’t in there

LTT should do all graphics card releases this way... LTT crew playing a bunch of different games on different GPUs for comparison. I rather sit through three hours of this than 3 minuets of benchmark graphs.

I agree. I love this setup!

I imagine these don't pay them as much and with so many things Linus & Yvonne are putting the money into, this is a once in a blue moon situation.

Sure, but handling those cameras are heavy :( Unless they use smaller ones but quality will be impacted.

Finally, a genuine time for the use of the word(s) "low-key".

Just needs drivers which just needs time.

Witcher 3 was a win for Arc though? Am I missing something?

@@TankSenior That's his point, Witcher 3 proves that Arc can be good but it's currently being held back by other issues (mostly drivers).

@@MistyKathrine Ah I thought they meant there was *something* holding it back on witcher 3 - was wondering what it was because I saw no issues (except with nvidia hairworks but that seemed very unecessary).

I think they mentioned in their video about it that it only runs directx 12, it just translates everything not directx 12 which uses a lot of its resources

I'm pretty sure Linus is blue team at that point

@@BIGAPEGANGLEADER A friendly in TF2 is a player who doesn't attack anybody. Including enemies.

Here’s the rest TIMESTAMPS AND RATING Elden ring (Good) 1:00-12:45 Crisis (Good) 21:45-27:45 City Skylines (Meh) 31:00 - 33:30 Forza Horizon 5 (Arc Fail) 35:15 - 35:45 Witcher 3 (arc win w/o hair) 40:30 - 45:45 TF 2 (Good enough) 54:30 - 58:30 Anno 1800 (Bad for both) 1:03:45 -1:07:45 Rocket League (Bad Arc) 1:12:00 -1:19:15 BeamNG (playable, Riley bad) 1:21:30 - 1:24:00 Satisfactory (Good enough) 1:29:45 - 1:33:30 GTA V (fucky at best) 1:41:00 - 1:50:00 Refusing to do star citizen 1:50:00 -1:53:30 Skyrim (hits fps cap) 1:53:30 - 1:55:00 HL2 (good) 1:57:44 - 1:59:15 Halo MCC (chugs) 2:05:00 - 2:08:30 Doom Eternal (Okay) 2:16:00 - 2:20:15 PubG (Both crash) 2:23:00 Valhiem (Better than 3060, then worse) 2:26:00 - 2:32:45 Destiny 2 (good) 2:38:00 - 2:45:00 Minecraft (Good) 2:50:00 - 3:00:00 Decenders (Unplayable) 3:02:00 - 3:05:30 Linus makes a statement 3:05:30 Fallout 4 (meh) 3:12:30 Control (better w/raytracing than 3060) 3:24:00 Battlefield V (struggle bus😅😅) 3:38:00

@@ntindle you barstard 😂

Y'all timestamp guys are killin it

@@Pax.KZfaq you’re all timestamp guys are killing it? you all timestamp guys are killing it The fuck? 🤨

Absolute legend

If CPU usage is only at 20%, something else is probably getting maxed out. Minecraft hosting requires that you dedicate RAM for just the server. So you could be running out of that ~

By hosting I mean running a single player world (single player is still a server, but no console) Opening to LAN just allows other people to join your server (that's why opening to LAN is just a click of a button, and doesn't require you to re-join your world, etc) My RAM usage is 4 out of 16 GB when I'm in single player tho

One thing that comes to mind is that your render distance could be higher in singleplayer. Servers default to 10 (previously 8, i think). What was happening on the stream is obviously the CPU maxing out, though.

I have an RTX2060 and get FPS in the 200's in minecraft...but I usually run non-fancy mode

@@researchandbuild1751 I have a GTX 860M (on Linux) and I also forgot to mention I'm using shaders, without them I get up to 900 fps

I wish benchmarking Minecraft was more commonplace. It can be very demanding on your CPU to run a server with a huge amount of entities/players/redstone contraptions and there are some shaders, like the SEUS ones, that can absolutely wreck your GPU if configured properly. Running Minecraft can mean a whole host of things and is not something to take for granted. It’s also massively popular, I really don’t understand the neglect.

Imagine a benchmark where they use one of the big world downloads from big creators, like a Hermitcraft Shopping District. Now that's something that would stress-test a computer!

@@Respectable_Username boatum s8

@@d313m5 They don’t know how to play it haha

@@michaelerekson9912 Or better yet, Mumbo's S6 base. Xisuma flew around it to performance test his new PC at the time because it was so laggy 😂

Exactly. Infact the 3060 dipped to almost 100 fps.

Was looking for this comment. Linus' "definitely worse" conclusion was a bit annoying, I'm surprised no one in the room or in one of the chats said something.

@@technicolourmyles The chat spammed it all the time they just ignored it

Q++a

@@jmorriss9519 lol wut

I bet Intel will just realize they're sinking money into something which will never give them any returns and they'll drop the discrete gpu's and pretend they never existed.

Let's be honest, I want Intel in GPU, but that's like rolling a dice, they are not proven GPU manufacturer like Nvidia and AMD, I expect Celestial will be competetive. Arc is a disappointment for me, I kind of wanted AMD cpu and Intel GPU.

@@Kocan7 don't expect intel to come up with their first GPU and be on par or better than Nvidia or AMD right out of the gate

@@aerosw1ft They could be way better, they were supposed to be on the market in q1 22, and instead of developing good drivers they tried to do every bit of tech and introduced RT and DLSS competitor. Intel is not a small plucky company, they are giants that dwars AMD. I expected that after almost 6 months delay they would introduce a product that fight Nvidia and AMD in low and mid-low tier, but what I can see is a bit of a mess. I'm sorry, but let's be honest would you recommend arc to a friend? I can introduce amd/nvidia gpus no problem, and I hope Battlemage will be stable enough for enthusiasts, but I just can't see anyone wanting to play on arc.

@@Kocan7 dwarf amd? Mate what? The 3000 and 5000 series absolutely slayed man you’re nuts rn the 5800 3D is the best cpu on the planet currently

AI stuff would be great, rendering might be poor due to (understandably) lack of support from rendering software, but yeah we need an array of testing on those

Check the reviews from Hardwark Canucks and EposVox, they did some of the non gaming benchmarks in their reviews.

@@AbyNeon You can't be sure of that, back in the 90's I had a few graphics cards for no other reason than to evaluate their architecture based efficiency within a specific set or type of 3D CAD calls. The different ways they approached the execution of the call within the simulated space and the relative efficiency of different methods was what I was curious about. Hundreds of hours spent analyzing different methods VS each other using different fixed parameter "tick speed" to simulate computational cost as it were between different approaches in the direction of a solution. This is a very long way of me saying "I don't agree - there is some problem that Arc is currently the best scalpel to dissect, I just don't know yet what it is :-)"

@@AbyNeon I do see advantages with how Arc does things in particular when it comes to analyzing the relative 'cost' of one approach compared with another, in terms of compute resources used. And yes it does matter, a lot actually, even to those who haven't the faintest clue what I'm talking about. To try to elucidate what I mean a bit more in a general sense, every kind of computational analysis science ends up needing it's own language or at the very least terminology and set of agreed upon concepts, problem types, and solution types. These over time evolve to be more and more exact and efficient in their function, be it to define a problem, define a solution, build the road from one to the other, or in some cases demonstrate or prove something new, like what was defined as a problem not actually being one at all but rather a convoluted solution in search of a fitting problem.

Its amazing. The harder it gets the better it gets in relation to other cards

Yeah it's not bad at all and with time it will probably get better as the drivers improve.

Seems very hit or miss, but in general for the price I think its a good thing.

I have a A770 16GB and it's really really good. When it comes to some classic games, there might be issues, but still, very solid first attempt and tons of VRAM for future games

Did you miss the part about having 120fps + but still getting stutters? Just go get a RX6600 :D

@@friendlyreptile9931 Depends what you need.

nobody cares about 4k

@@Jeremy-ho9cr tell that to basically everyone lmao

@@Jeremy-ho9cr Not on a phone maybe, but on a big 4K TV they do. 1080p youtube looks like garbage. The bitrate makes any fast motion look worse than high bitrate 720p.

I doubt that they'll do that. I haven't actual even thought about it, but if they actually raise the rates or make it a higher tier I will also end my subscription I've had for many years now.

I'm confused as to why they don't limit 4k to channels above a certain amount of subscribers. Also I'd be in favour of abolishing 4k for less compressed 1080p. 1080p video looks great, 1080p KZfaq video looks like steamed turds localized entirely within your kitchen

yea man

Almost happened about 10 years ago with Project Larribee.

It's the frametime consistency that matters. The 1% lows on Arc were brutal a lot of the time.

Not only that, but 99% of 18 fps, that actually sucks

@JacobTech tell me you’re a pc snob without telling me you’re a pc snob

Yeah, if you triple buffer vsync fps lock to a lower frame rate like that, it will basically make it like an older console experience, where it's technically low fps but you don't feel it. At least from my experience. But monitor also matters, 30 fps on 240hz 4k will feel extremely worse

No 90 is unplayable for many fast paced games for me. I need 144 for Doom Eternal. My brain couldn't parse everything going on at 100. (my old laptops screen was a binned 120hz panel, I could push it to 100 hz even though it was "60")

Been on Arc, myself, for a while. The performance improvements have been pretty damn big. I bought mine when, where I am, it was priced so far lower than the closest Nvidia had to offer and my 1080 had died. It's a great entry to gaming, in my opinion. Hoping the future drivers iron out more kinks and that Battlemage cards continue the trend of steady improvement.

its alright but i still chose the rtx with the amd kit update: it was a great choice!

Every other time I've used it that was the case but Control does DLSS soooooo well

Oh God stop.

Thanks Jeeves.

If they keep at it, older games are not even gonna be relevant anymore in the coming years. And in those years, the market is gonna change. More people are gonna be playing newer games than the old ones so people are still gonna have the option to buy nvidia if they want to play older games with more stability or people who have no interest in playing old games can stick with intel and save more money assuming the prices difference is still gonna be the same years after. 10-15 yrs for nvidia cannot be necessarily true for intel. Intel has been around for so long. And their experience in chip making will make a difference. Their arc project has only been around for a few years and it is already this good. In a few more years they ARE GONNA CATCH UP. If they keep at it. I am just so happy Intel is showing these kinds of results for a first major release.

It really just depends on who is buying the card and for what

If the cards were higher end they could just brute force most older titles.

Intel should release a tool that allows people to finetune and test all the different micro stuff. Basically crowdsourcing optimizations for older games.

@@bathrobeheroo smart idea

@@n0k0m3 maaaaaan try explaining this to them x100 and the only thing that will go through their head is “NoT FrEee”. Obviously i like the 4k feature but i have defaulting to 1440p which looks amazing still.

I would be okay with it if ads were reduced for non premium content.

On Floatplane they charge $5 extra per month just to watch LTT content in 4K instead of 1080p. Meanwhile on KZfaq, 4K is free. Shows where he's coming from.

@@motokid6008 Could be an experiment, I usually get 2 ads, 3 ads maximum. Some are on experiments without consent and apparently get 8-9 ads in videos.

@@sfgrgfsf212 The difference is that Floatplane has always been a paid platform. 4K has been a free KZfaq feature for years now, and they want to take that away and paywall it. People aren't going to accept that with open arms, especially right on the heels of them stripping dislikes and attempting to dump us with 10 unskippable ads.

Premium gang

I mean yes it doesn't work well with DX9 Titles but It will surely get more than 144FPS since it's an older Title. Sure if you're a top tier professional in certain games you need like 240FPS on a 240Hz Monitor but it really doesnt matter if you have 700FPS or 150FPS in like 98% of the time as long as the 1 and 0.1 percent lows are good

or it could be the halloween update the devs just released...

@@TheyCallMeContra *dev. Singular.

@Engineer Gaming Clueless

Amazed it that it seems to have decent OpenGL performance. That's something AMD has only begun to fix over the last couple of months on their GPUs. So the fact that intel isn't horrible there is actually pretty promising.

So glad they played Java. Really wanted to know how OpenGL would run. 500FPS, completely unmodded, is... great!

Yeah, it's such a strange reason to stop playing a game for him lol

if your system doesn't support rebar/AMD equivalent don't buy ARC, even their own developers have said the same thing. get something like the 6600XT if you're looking for something in that price range.

You can do this in Intel integrated drivers and AMD both integrated and dedicated drivers so Arc should support it

Thats just how Funcom do (or dont) things.

use dxvk

well there is dxvk and whatever protons one for dx12 is and there is alwasy vulkan as a better api than dx12

They would have to compare setups for Intel and what they did. They had several setup issues on the ARC side and ran several dx12 games in dx11.

Probably in a future video

I think they are working on that. Id be shocked if not😅

@@nathaniel5157 Yeah hopefully. Tech youtubers sometimes just focus on games benchmarks and seems like they sometimes forget there are more than just gaming for gpus

@@lisat9707 Yeah I hope so. That's what I am looking forward to.

@@MrMaddog2004subscribe it's true that they often focus on gaming, but I don't think that's the case in this situation. It's just that this live stream was directly targeted at gamers. Most people probably don't want to watch a live stream of Blender Renders and Unreal Engine xD

Too much driver issue to even consider it to buy If for gaming

@@andyastrand plus is better if you have 300 dollar budget to buy something used

After all, Intel's sheer size should allow them to update their drivers fairly quickly, potentially allowing the arc a770 to catch up to something like the 3070 two or three years down the road. Add in the increased longevity from the wider bit bus and decent vram capacity and I could see the a770 continuing to be a decent 1080p card for a good while.

LTT is actively avoiding comparing ARC to the 6600 xt and 6650 xt which is priced the same to the arc gpus around $320 and below

@@JC_BOYplease don't post this multiple times

@@crazybeatrice4555 just report for spam

@@JC_BOY Theay are goign to compare with the card that most people is going to buy, my circle of friends are pc gamers and none of my friends thought of buying a 6600X or A 6650, only one though to buy one for a moment becaus it was the only one but literally just like 2 hours later there was a 3060 restock on the online shop we mostly use in Mexico, most people are in thge marketfor a 3060 so they are gopign to compare withthe one most people have or want to buy.

Also curious about Planetside 2 performance, hope somebody does some testing with it