Thanks bro

Awesome dude! Walksnail is really killing it with micros and the Avatar Pro quality is 🤯

We could take the ducts off and full send it!

Definitely great value compared to this 👌👌This platform is for when you want a lightweight freestyle package

❤ my Pavo20

Same here. I fly my pavo20 (3s) for the same reasons lionellttl does. I bought a pico (2s) and have been disappointed from the performance. Now the flylens85 (2s) promises to deliver pavo20 (3s) fun. Maybe I will give flywoo a shot to take advantage of my 2s LiPos. Otherwise they will probably end up at storage charge for eternity.😅

@@LarsEchterhoff i find that the pavo pico v2 in 2s is really only a good whoop when walksnail is the VTX. O3 is too heavy for the pavo pico if you ask me. The 20 is dead on for the 03!

@@MountaineerFPV Jepp. I also think the slightly larger 2 bladed props do a better job on the pavo20 as well as the flylens85 compared to the pico with its 3 bladed props. I do still think about frankenstein something more capable out of my already retired pico... But not sure if it is actually worth the effort and money to spend.

Glad you enjoyed it

Man I haven’t! I really should but I’ve grown to accept the reflections 😅

Well yeah the cost can feel ridiculous for a tiny quad like this but to each its own. Someone out there might find value in this with an O3. Thank goodness I’ve that influencer money(zero dollars and zero cents) 😂😂🥲

@@lionelttl really what I'm saying is that if you (the consumer) were to be buying an 03 unit, that investment would be better placed into a better quad body, that has a little more power to weight to carry it; like for instance the flywoo explorer 4 inch dji and many of flywoos other DJI offerings

@@greedfox7842 no doubt! 5" for me any day! I'm just reviewing this quad as it is and I think it's very good for what it is

Thanks for the tip, but I don't really mind it at all as I don't use it for work

Radio master Pocket

Thanks. You should get The Dji O3 version BUT with the FRSKY option I think.

Happy holidays to you too! I’m using the goggles v2 and it’s perfect for me. I feel the goggles 2, looks better and brighter but the field of view is smaller to me

Only v1 goggs no work with 03 unit

One day soon

I appreciate that! But I really don’t publish often enough to warrant more subs. Thanks for watching!

Congrats! You've never flown a bad quad!

@@lionelttl There are no bad quads, only bad tunings.

I value you and your opinion. Firstly I try and test the quads as received with the manufacturer’s tune so that viewers would know what they would receive if they buy it. Secondly, I used to believe that any quad can fly well with a good tune however I stand corrected as badly designed quads + good tune can’t compete with a good quad + good tune. One example is that a noisy quad would require more filtering and thus adds more phase delay, making the pids slower to react when tracking your stick movement. So when I say that it goes where I point it to, I mean to say that the stick tracking feels very locked, more than I would expect on a micro that’s carrying an O3 like this and is still one of the best quads I’ve owned. But yes a good tune makes any quad fly well.

I would get the 85mm just because the larger prop size gives it more strength against the wind if its outdoors. 75mm would be better if you're only flying indoors but maybe watch the reviews from other reviewers like Nick Burns to get an idea

Might be heavier than it can handle but you can definitely try

No sir. Singapore

3 mins plus

I've not flown any of those, so you can't take my word for which is better. My theory is the larger 85mm prop size would be better because it would be more stable against the wind

@lionelttl thanks alot. I just prefer the indoor whoops and a little outdoor If I need so going to a light 75 I wouldn't mind. 85 is going to be too big for indoors, like most 75s are you know

Sure bro. Lemme just go check.. yeah it was completely flush with the lens

@@lionelttl kzfaq.info/get/bejne/f7J_eqliqrS3iJ8.htmlsi=e93SYZHqn-CnRPLh 13:34 he says your problem and >:D I have the same drone also. I promise just push it on firmer and you can use the nd filters without reflection lol

Thanks man. I’d suggest you search online for it

Thanks for stopping by. Well I was flying really slowly in the cinematic flight and I was using the 750mah battery. So the weight reduction could've impacted the flight time. Hope this helps

Didn’t have it. Felt 750 was the good medium between the batts available

@@lionelttl I currently fly a DJI AVATA like all new comers, but I am after something like this to film indoor skateboarding and in door events. Would you recommend this over the tiny newbee and dark star?

I’m trying to get what you mean but yes it’s the best tinywhoop that can carry an O3. It’s too light compared to a normal 5” O3 quads I normally fly but that’s a given at a quad this size. But I would take this over any of the other Pavo, meteors or cinewhoop style o3 quads out there as they don’t fly well with the added weight.

Thanks. I’ll try that tip!

@@lionelttl thanks for the video although I own it already this would have been a nice help to decide to buy or not .

It’s to protect my camera when I was doing that intro shot

I guess not but tell that to flywoo.