LiteVNA64 VNA, Hardware Differences between 64-0.3 and 3.1
Рет қаралды 1,750
2 ай бұрынA visual inspection of the latest hardware revision of the LiteVNA 64 and the previous release.
@johnwest7993 2 ай бұрын
Thanks Joe. Your work is close to being the gold standard of KZfaq applied RF videos.
@Mr.Laidukas 2 ай бұрын
Thanks for the time and effort making this video. Laidukas is my nickname, in Lithuanian language it means "wire". My true name is Aivaras. Again, thanks for the video.
@joesmith-je3tq 2 ай бұрын
Hello Aivaras, glad to help.
@steve_seguin 2 ай бұрын
I bought a 3.1 the other week and it should be here any day! I'm very excited. Thank you for the video.
@joesmith-je3tq 2 ай бұрын
It's great for working above 300MHz, but for narrow band, low frequency work, the original NanoVNA will out perform it. They are cheap, so it's no big deal to get both.
@steve_seguin 2 ай бұрын
@@joesmith-je3tq 900mhz is the frequency I need specifically, for LoRa networking, but I also want to do some 2.4ghz long range stuff down the road. Figured this was the best device in my budget, although the original NanoVNA was very tempting given the price.
@joesmith-je3tq 2 ай бұрын
@@steve_seguin The original NanoVNA has poor performance above 300MHz where it uses harmonics. I was surprised when the software was changed to support >900MHz. The LiteVNA is a much better choice. There is also the open sourced LibreVNA. I understand it is a full 2-port VNA but I have never looked into it.
@steve_seguin 2 ай бұрын
@@joesmith-je3tq I value your insights; thank you
The Retro Shack
Рет қаралды 9 М.
MaviGadget
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН