evil!

Yeah, and if he had an extra minute or more, that's easy. As it was, finding and executing the quick and obvious mate makes sense in time trouble. It's not like a simple mate X vs. a simple mate Y is meaninfully different when both mates are trivially obvious.

Bishop works too!

It's funny how things change. My parents would check to be sure it wasn't serious (lots of blood, broken bone, etc). As SURE as they were sure it wasn't serious, then it was often punishment for being careless or stupid or bad or whatever. This was in the 60's to 70's when I grew up. I think to depression era parents, they figured tough parenting and lots of discipline and high expectations made kids tougher and better prepared for life. I think it depends on the emotional make-up of the child, which is hard for a non-expert to accurately figure out (especially back then since confessing weakness or unhappiness or fear or nonconformity was often a way to get into trouble, where today it would more likely be met by attempts at nurturing for a well behaved kid. Not saying one or the other is "better" -- just that things are rather different from what I observe through friends and family and child raising.

Swipe right on the comment section once the video isn't in full screen, this new KZfaq is confusing but they do give you a little on screen pop up to let you know.

Time stamp it and share it! (To time stamp, type in minutes:seconds, like 37:00.)

I thought that and couldn't tell why he didn't play c4 to stop any counterplay what so ever

Respectfully, when asking such questions after a video with multiple games, it's much better to give a timestamp, or at least describe which knight is attacked by which pawn to save someone time finding the spot. I quickly found the spot at time 1:20 where white's king knight is attacked by b4, so I assume that's what you're talking about. To me, ... B-b4 pinning the knight there is an OK move, but not great. It takes a move to move the bishop to a meh square, and the knight isn't in meaningful danger, or is the pawn structure if black takes it with the bishop. So you could do that but I think there are several better moves like B-e7, B-b7, b4, etc. I was a decent player in the OTB tourney days, like the mid-90's, a 1900ish player for years. Best by far in the endgame, so not claiming to be an expert or anything -- just trying to answer your question with reasonable judgement, re thinking level in a 10 minute game.

Didn't Magnus lose a game in a Rice Cooker Declined by resigning on move 1? It must be strong!

And if they break while under warranty, you have to go through a lot to get a refund/replacement.

He analyzed that later and it's not AT ALL obvious to me. Respectfully, if you're going to suggest that, far better to mention the specific sequence which you believe would trap the queen, so it can be analyzed or thought about, re answering such a question. It WOULD be positionally WORSE, which he mentioned post game when he briefly analyzed that.