<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="0">00:00</a>:00 LIVE: Closing Arguments with Vinnie Politan <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="0">00:00</a>:25 Killer or Cover-Up Murder Trial <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="9">00:09</a>:18 Matt Johnson Debrief <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="53">00:53</a>:23 Alec Baldwin Trial Update <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="60">01:00</a>:28 Killer or Cover-Up Murder Trial <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="115">01:55</a>:42 Missing Child: Kambria Higgins #CourtTV What do YOU think? ⚖👇 Watch Closing Arguments with VinniePolitan, Weeknights 8p/7c ONLY on Court TV. MORE HERE: www.courttv.com/trials/closing-arguments-with-vinnie-politan/?

RIP Officer O'Keefe 💔 🙏

<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="82">1:22</a>:15 Kevin, another golden statement. If Karen hit John, there would be NO Reason for the bitt dials, the disposing of the phones and no lies between these people. EXACTLY!!!

Not guilty stay strong jury.

JUSTICE ⚖️ FOR JOHN OKEEFE AND HIS FAMILY 😢😢😢😢

🇺🇸👮‍♂️RIP Officer..🕊

Why can't people just look at the evidence and the lies. It is not difficult.

What makes me sick is how SOME (not all) people treat this as if it's a damn sporting event. 🙄

No, not a HUNG! There is way too much evidence that supports reasonable doubt. Dear God, may justice prevail in the state of Massachusetts...

So many angry, vicious groupies with no life.

That woman in the green shirt that spoke is the bomb!!

People are tired of the crap going on in corrupt communities, the injustice. They are fighting back….

The Defense attorneys are costing hundreds of thousands of dollars. Why are people donating to very Wealthy people?

This has been such a long day.. viewing from Hawaii I thought it was Saturday lol😂

I had a friend who worked for the justice center as a maintenance personnel that was spreading salt on walkways. He slipped and hit his head on the asphalt and wasn't immediately noticed. He suffered similar injuries as John O'Keefe minus the injuries to the arm and passed away as a result. The difference is this other law enforcement agency didn't attempt to charge someone for his injuries and later his death.

No one is above the law!!! Our justice system needs to be better than this and hope the jury finds her not guilty!!!

Those aren't anti KR people. They're anti TB.

NOT GUILTY! I hope this jury doesn't get strong armed by this judge to make a wrongful determination .

I would guess most of the jury wants 'not guilty' but 1 or 2 want guilty verdict.

It was *not* Karen Read that killed John; regardless if you like her or not.

This is the most ridiculous trial!!! Not guilty verdict couldn’t be more clear !!!!!

How does anyone think she hit him I will never understand..how..if she hit him at the force they say she did, he would be laying there, right there, he would be walking nowhere when all the people were pulling up picking up people and coming out of the house, he would be the first thing they would see..how would she hit him in the head, and no other bruises, no broken bones,multiple fractures in his skull..he is 6-1 216 lbs..he wouldnt even touch that taillight, the bumper would hit him first anyway..at this speed hitting him there would be damage to the car itself.

A lot of people over opinionated I thought it was innocent until proven guilty??¡

JUSTICE FOR JOHN O'KEEFE

You have to be careful how hard you push the jury to avoid tainting their deliberation with malice.

At <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="109">1:49</a> in this broadcast.. I don’t know why any juror wouldn’t be scared of backlash if they voted guilty. This is outlandish these people can stand in front of the courthouse where they walk in and behave this way.

Dear lord. That Rita lady seems unhinged and dramatic. Ffs.

It's crazy how the Karen Read supporters are outside talking about the evidence of the case, meanwhile, the anti-Karen Read people Are yelling about online harassment 😂 That has nothing to do with Karen.I'm so sorry to break it to you... I heard them yelling turtle boy and online harassment 😂 That's because they have nothing else to argue!! 🥴

Not guilty stay strong jury

How could it have been her? What he stood there and let her run him over? He is a Police officer he would know his surroundings and a car reversing towards him. Iam pretty sure most people would move out of the way of the incoming car. He was beaten and put outside. Its all about jealousy and men cant handle their alcohol. In my opinion. 😅

The thing that makes me sick is all the people who have made MONEY off this Officer's death. It's not support KR but how much MONEY can I make off this death.

Injuries depend on the posits of the victim and the car the speed the weight of the car and the impact which can cause the victim to be forced to move and land anywhere depending on the territory. I know this being a medical examiner in another part of the world. Therefore when so called examiners giving evidence makes me laugh. The CW examiner was actually right according to principles of medicine

Excuse you mr grundy, Dr Russell didn't "just walk in off the street" she was referred to defence by ADA Lewin <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="2240">37:20</a>

How can they find Karen Read guilty of hitting someone with an SUV when there is nothing on the deceased ‘s body consistent with being hit by a vehicle? I don’t think the doctor watched the trial.

How in the hell can a judge force a jury to come a verdict that they are not sure of. I guess that the judge wants a guilty verdict.

I still cant figure out why the defence didn't get the dog bite doctor show the jury the shirt and hoody to the jury to show the punctures in the clothing. it would clearly show that this wasn't caused by hitting the tail lende.

She said she did it, police unprofessionalism should not allow a person to have a pass on murder. Karen said she did not see him go inside the house. First interview at her dad’s house.

Supposedly the jury Foreman is a retired cop, and he was also appointed by the judge if you remember....

Exactly, we are probably all mothers so we could see through all the drama.

Guilty.

CORRUPTION CAN'T WIN. SHE INNOCENT

OMG COURT TV!!! When will you stop letting Kevin spout blatant lies?!! That woman never threatened the jurors and Vinnie shows a real lack of professionalism in letting him get away with that!

Even if you don't know if she killed him or not, if there's reasonable doubt, they need to find her not guilty.

I’m not sure if Vinny’s father(was a judge)is still alive but I would love to see him on here as a guest. Better yet a co-host/anchor.

The arm! Just look at the arm, for crying out loud!!

Why wasn’t the evidence that yellow cottage tales uncovered not introduced during the trial?

Justice for Johnny

Reasonable doubt - without a doubt. This needs to end. Karen was right when she said this is a waste of tax payers dollars. We need a verdict and we need justice for Officer John O'Keefe. Free Karen Read.

This woman is innocent.... everyone who disagrees clearly has NOT watched this case.

Good grief! When listening to Carole Lieberman, I thought this 'expert' is really reaching when talking about what the jury might be thinking. Court TV would have been no worse off asking Paul the Octopus to provide jury insight.

I think it’s great to see some people supporting the O Keefe family, long overdue! I think these protesters have more issues with the Canton police department than they do in Karen Reads innocence.

It's a small town, son. And we all support the team. --James McMurtry, Talkin at the Texaco

Long deliberations are usually good for the defense.

Well apparently the jury should have every piece of evidence of what they just sat through

@vinnie I am one of your biggest fan ❤🎉🎉🎉

I think the defense thought it would be an OJ Simpson verdict, 4 hours.

The Green Screaming Lady is unbelievable how many days she can go on!!

This case in particular to others that I’ve watched has the most reasonable doubt throughout the whole trial. The prosecution lacked a lot, not sure how someone is stuck on guilty. I’d understand but man the holes and the fact defense had better experts to back up Karen didn’t hit him.

Not Guilty!

@Vinnie Politan My understanding is that in Massachusetts, the Judge can only send the jury back to deliberate once more. If the jury comes back deadlocked again she can only ASK them to go back again and they have a right to refuse this request.

Free Karen Read and now Free the jury!!!!

This whole thing upsets me. It’s so unafair. They would kill a man and then frame his ex. Sad sad sad how humanity treats each other. May God have mercy upon Karen and punish those against her

I wonder if the equal amount of support would be there if it was a man who was cheating and was abusive and just unhinged as a personality that was up on charges of killing his girlfriend? I’m guessing not. Strange how it works. I’m guessing there wouldn’t be support outside court for the male. It would be the total opposite I think.

This was a hit and run. That's why no one ever went in the house.

👿 don’t drink and drive!!

I completely disagree with one of the panelists. I think the defense witnesses were way more credible. The prosecution witnesses and experts were a joke. I think one or two did okay. I would NEVER want that LE or Prosecution team representing one of my loved ones. The defense may be fine with a hung jury. They could use what evidence is found in the investigation being done currently on LE. I hope they all go down. It's upsetting for the good officers out there.

So basically the state wants the jurors to fight it out.

What was she doing all the time while her man was busy dying ? If she was not guilty she would have raised an alarm.

The science spoke. JOK was not killed with a car.

Shame on you all for calling a 90-10 split a divided community! What BS.

I've been watching this trial off and on since opening statements. In my opinion, most of the evidence points to her guilt until you see the photos of his arm. Coming from a family of canine trainers, I know without a doubt that those are canine wounds. And that alone would cause me to vote not guilty. She may have had an argument and even hit him with her car before driving away. But in no way does any of that explain those bite and claw marks. Those injuries came from a large breed canine.

The defense did their best to create doubt, but it came off as desperate, spinning out of context, and badgering witnesses to get frazzled answers. The main body of evidence is indisputable. There is no reasonable doubt in it. I'd vote guilty on the second charge of vehicular homicide while intoxicated, and for leaving the scene.

IF she can lie on that poor mother, about “how long to die in the cold” what else is she lying about. She called those poor mothers out of their homes only to turn around and lie on them.

No one would be surprise in Corrupt Canton if their is ONE hold out.

Take a deal?? People, now you know how the judicial system is screwing you up, even the TV host, think you should bow down, nomather if you're innocent......😢😮

It always troubles me when I see mobs of people blindly supporting a cause. Some may not be blind, but some are simply following. Very often, they have no idea of the truth, nor do they care. And it's the worst kind of group-think in a court case. Remember Amber Heard? People can and will see things differently and that's a good thing. I know a lot of people think that the snow plow driver was a good witness. I know some snow plow drivers and I myself drive when it's snowing. It's very difficult to see past your own windshield and you intensely focus on the road and the tracks in front of you. NEVER does one look very far off of the road when they're driving in a blizzard. NEVER. I believe the snow plow driver was afraid to say that he didn't see the area where the body may have been because he was focused on doing his job--staying on the road and plowing snow. Besides that, it would have been covered with snow by then...it's nearly impossible to see a hump in the snow even if you're looking. Fortunately the Jury has been mostly kept from the push of various groups, and hopefully they will make a just decision.

Find it rather odd the defendant does not fully look at jurors; especially when they are the ones deciding faith in this case, something seems " weird ". Guilty as charged get Justice for John O'Keefe, not officer John O'Keefe the person John O'Keefe.

Thank you @Court TV

I don't get it. I watched and believe the injury to his arm were caused by tail light. This is crazy I'm from Massachusetts makes my people look bad! I rely on DNA

Sericuty volunteers omg give me a break

Look at the arm again. That's not caused by a car. The wounds were caused by a dog. Reasonable doubt so not guilty.

I honestly believe there is pressure on one Juror, the foreperson. I watch body language and was really taken aback. The Alberts and also Paul looked in the very same direction as the Judge chose the foreperson. Paul needs a better poker face. The foreperson can be very persuasive. Please be careful.

None of the people who are saying that she said she hit him said that to the investigator in the beginning or in the grand jury testimony.They are just now saying that. So that makes me not want to believe it

This translates into give our guy time to wear down the decent and intelligent human beings who would let Read off. The judge did NOT follow protocol. I have worked with dogs my whole life, worked with a breeder, and have assisted in bite training GSD breed. THOSE were DEFINITELY VERY DISTINCTIVE dog bites and the dog was either given the command (more likely judging by location - the dog was working) or the animal saw an altercation involving family pack/inner circle and got excited/involved. The dog has disappeared and the house was sold - give me a break!

That court is ridiculous!!! The jury clearly wants to b hung and now they refuse to Let them go!!! Lally refuses to accept they r hung. The judge asked both sides and that fool is now holding the jury hostage!!! wtf? I cannot anymore with the foolishness. And btw she is NOT GUILTY!!!! There is just a hold out that feels sorry for the OKeath family

Oh, now she has body guards, but her Attorneys say she's indigent. So ridiculous.

Hope the jury uses common sense, CW was a FLOP

Trying to force a juror to vote one way or another should be illegal.

Can’t believe she said that about the jury. It’s not about right or wrong it’s what you can live with?😢😢😂😂😂

Jury will hang by Monday. Judge is partial, trying to influence jury.

What makes me angry Lally didn't present evidences properly,did not ask questions clearly and he was so boring but still some of the jury stands on him!!!unbelievable,unbelievable! I have no idea what was this trial the background!!nothing!!after watching so many witnesses,on and on!!even I got angry at witnesses why couldn't they just answer the questions!!!hostile attitude!!!so frustrating!!

If I was a juror, I would ask one simple question. Aren’t We Suppose To Be Innocent Until Proving Guilty. How Was Karen Read Proven Guilt. She Was Not Once The Until Trial

At what point does a jury say whatever to just get the heck out of that room and go home? How reliable is an outcome that’s “forced”?

I can’t believe that she’s never been charged with DUI…at the very least. She was very intoxicated, is that not enough to warrant a charge of some sort? If she was a drunk off the projects she’d have been locked up from the get go for being pissed up! It should be a charge in itself!

Thanks Yellow Cottage Tales for your excellent objective reporting on this important historic truly Massachusetts case. Many people can't handle the truth or believe that 2 things can be true at once. Rotten cops and that a drunken accident happened or worse.

Wondering how many of the general public actually know the name of the victim?

It's not Mat, Vinnie..It's HOMELANDER in disguise🤫

Can anyone tell me how the defense overcame KRs car going in reverse that night? What was their theory to that evidence? 🤔

No one forced her to Scream “I HIT HIM!”💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙

Nick Rocco is relying on his imaginations, not facts and evidence.