Great video as always. I got caught up on why we use llevar and not tomar? My immediate thot when I started the video was to use tomarlo…..???

Do you have a problem with putting (lo) first? hoy no lo puedo llevar al trabajo vs hoy no puedo llevarlo al trabajo.

I'm a little confused on why it's not 'Tenemos que llevarlo a un hospital'

@@adamc2320 yes he just confused a lot of people. The airport, to work, to the hospital is all the same. So why does it now change to (le). Once he explains this it will clear up a lot. l

@@kcorpora1 you're right, both work well!! That's why I gave the examples with "La necesito llevar..." to mix it up from the first set of examples.

Thanks Crystal!! I like the term “sentences frame”! Yes, they can be really helpful for developing fluency without getting caught up in too much analysis. 😊

I'm glad you enjoyed it! 😊

Thanks Zach, I don’t see why we can’t replace the word park with something. E.g. where are you taking your brother tonight? I have to take him to something, I don’t know, some event.

@@realfastspanish I suppose you could. I think a better and more concrete example would be "lo quiero" because you can't say "I love him something", whereas something like "i want to give him a hug" you would use le because the hug can be replaced with something.

I'm not trying to be pedantic but those statements open up a whole can of worms. "To bring him - to the park/the medicine" would mean to me that at the time of speaking, I am at the location where he or it needs to be delivered at some time in the future. In that case, you'd use "traer" wouldn't you? Tengo que traerlo al parque mañana. However, if I am distant from the location I need to get "him"/ "it" to, I would "take" it/him. In that case, you'd use "llevar" wouldn't you? Tengo que llevarlo al parque mañana. Or, am I missing something? I know it makes no difference to the pronoun.

@@TheRealJoseramirez traer and llevar are interchangeable in this case

Thanks for the feedback! 😊

I'm glad you enjoyed it! 😊

Thanks Claire, I appreciate it!! 😊

Thanks, I'm glad it was helpful! 😊

Thanks for the feedback!! 😍

Thanks Shilpa! 😊

Thanks for sharing Simon!! 😊

🙏

Thanks Nadine, it’s a good suggestion, I’ll add it to the list!

Thanks for sharing!

Thanks for the suggestion! I will add it to the list 😊

Muy bien 👍 Gracias Alan! 😊

@@realfastspanish "Espero que mi español SEA bueno" I´m native speaker, I´m sorry my terrible English.

Yes, that’s correct Ruth!! 😊

You need to use 'se' in any situation where you might end up with 'le lo' next to each other. When that happens you replace the 'le' with 'se' so that it's clearer and sounds better. For example if you want to say "I'm going to take it to him" that would technically be "Le lo voy a llevar" or " Voy a llevarlelo" But Spanish doesn't like this so you replace the Le with Se Se lo voy a llevar Voy a llevarselo

Thanks for the feedback Denyse!! 😊

Almost always it will only be one option and context will tell us which one it should be. I provided the example with the tea and coffee and Guzmán so that it was clear. But, yes, sometimes it could be both if context does not make it clear.

Yes, “Le” could be translated as ‘him’ or ‘her.’ Keep in mind that the central and northern part of Spain, they use “Le” instead of “Lo,” e.g “Le llamo a la casa a diario” (I call him to his house daily) instead of “Lo llamo a la casa a diario” and, sometimes, they would use “La” instead of “Le” for women. E.g. “La dije que no quería” (I told her I didn't want to) instead of “Le dije que no quería,” so it could be a little tricky for learners, but you'll get used to it.

Thanks for sharing Mark! 😊

A Canon, I hope it's okay 🤷‍♂️

@@realfastspanish the quality looks really good. Which model specifically are you using? I would like to get one.

I wouldn't take my advice on camera gear, I'm sure it's not the best or cheapest. I also think lighting and the camera lens are even more important than the camera itself. Check out some KZfaq channels that give advice on camera gear, you will get a lot better information from them.

Thanks Konrad!! 😃

The last two TV clips used loismo and leismo Leismo/laismo/loismo just means that in some places the locals will use le instead of lo or La instead of Le etc. They will talk in a way that is not strictly correct but is normal there.

"Different situations", so you implicitely already came up with tbe answer yourself. E.g. "ser mal" or "estar malo/mala/mal" mean different situations. Btw., English has a rudiment of such, since "estar" and "to stand" have the same (Latín) root. So, e.g. you can say "I am/was corrected" as well as "I stand/stood corrected'. And you mentioned quite rightly, such can "be used in different situations". And... the more English you know (and Swedish or whathaveyou), you will find a lot of terms meaning basically "the same but have to be used (differently) in different situations". Another btw.: I know a lot of people claiming to be fluent in a foreign language, they hardly get the gist of the headlines of a newspaper. Six month, yeah..., fluent, yeah, in a way. Coffee, please, pay, please, huh?, how much?, not understand, write price, ah yes!, thank you, bye.

Thanks Chris, I hadn’t considered the opposite of logic language processing as emotional language processing but simple pulling words and phrases from memory based on lots of good quality practice!

@@realfastspanish I understand. Languages are more phrase oriented than word oriented. One's brain needs to be wired to a new language. It's just endless repetition, with here and there things which can be learned according to a formula.

Les is referring to you guys. God blesses you guys. God bless you to one person would be Dios te bendiga

@@ron61584 NO. Never say "god blesses.."

Thanks for sharing Gabriel!! 😊

Pues sí.

Sí, España tiene el leísmo!

@@IlCaroSassone españa y la comunidad hispanohablante en general. Es lo peor del español supongo, su leismo tan extendido desde hace siglos

Hola Rey, yes, this is all okay, but I'm trying to encourage students to avoid logic when they are trying to produce Spanish. So rather than asking "does this sentence have a receiver?", simply practice "decirle" over and over so you don't have to think about the logic.

@@realfastspanish I see, so it can feel more natural to them, right?

Hay que means 'one has to' or 'one must'. It's a sort of impersonal phrase, not referring to anyone in particular, just general for everyone e.g Hay que comer para vivir - One must eat to live

This might a good topic for another video! 👍

Gracias Bail. There are definitely a lot of exceptions to this simplification (I see him - lo veo, I know him - lo conozco, I add something to it - le añado algo), so you’ll need to be careful with this.

… is the easiest… Functional English is indeed very approachable and serves its purpose, but to master English is a different thing altogether.

I would say all languages are difficult to learn, and then there are varying levels of "difficulty"

Lol. A real expert's opinion who apparently thinks that "most easiest" is English and not gibberish.

Mi-ar placea să vă văd încercând să învățați românește. 😅😅😅

"Proper grammar" might be subjective here. I would say all languages have grammar and if we want to speak the language well, we have to get used to the grammar.

My suggestion: Back to square one, learn proper English and then you will be yearning for Spanish grammar, spelling, and pronunciation rules. Guess why there is no such thing as "spelling bee" in the Spanish speaking countries?

@@konradberingmeier5190 because it's a phonetic language ;) and I love Spanish grammar. It's all logical or at least most of the time.

@@rsmrymcgwn Wrong tree 😘