There will only ever be one wolverine for me. I think it would feel wrong for anybody else to play him

anthony cheesman 2, though one (Craig) who was the best

2 jokers 2 warmachines 2 gwen staceys 2 punishers 2 elektras

And one iron-man..

Mo54321ManU 3 Superman

Jamie Craig lol and scream at the same time

and then get arrested

wow

Good thinking. I also saw it as "the only one who could kill Wolverine is Wolverine". Am I the only one who when he saw him in the shadows thought that this was Victor Creed for a second?

Visual Aids X 24 wasn't the villain. He was the villains weapon. He was there to just KILL.

Visual Aids it's kinda of funny where he dies right in the woods right where he was born killed by his self because he didn't have the courage to shoot himself

Visual Aids Plus it makes sense since they obviously had his DNA available.

donald pierce xander rice and x-24 were the villians

It would have fit perfect in the prescene with deadpool.

I agree, but maby we could see the suit in deadpool 2, if they decide to have a new wolverine in their.

l23 O24 TRUE! they had a really different approach on the universe. Serious and real af.

Sadly I don't think we'll ever see the costume on screen :( It's a damn shame because every single Wolverine costume is iconic.

It's not about needs, its about what my body wants.

Lol

LOL, but there is still a chance we might se Hugh Jackmann as wolverine in his yellow costume in Deadpool 2

I'd love to see his yellow suit, I'd make him wear it "for one last ride" just like the comics X-23 used to read, and he'd do it for her it would be awesome, instead of calling him daddy she'd call him a hero, like Charles said he was supposed to be

VJ Raj Would've ruined the tone of the film.

hansel benito Which is saying a lot!

I still prefer Deadpool. Both are great tho.

ThreeStars AndASun Well, Logan was a great movie, but I prefer Deadpool because that movie puts me in a good mood. Logan is great, but it's...depressing as fuck.

They are very different movies

How gory is it? I haven't seen it yet but I'm just curious if it'll be too much for me

Lots of arms, legs and heads being chopped off

I love how everyone goes lyk "......is the best comic book movie since or better than The Dark Knight" That alone kinda makes the Dark Knight superior, coz it set the bar high enough that everything that follows will ALWAYS be compared to it

Michael Otis Not really. I compare it to the dark knight because it came out at a time when the MCU was only beginning, and the X men and Fantastic Four franchises were at their lowest ( Fantastic 4 rise of silver surfer and X men the last stand). Yes, it is a good movie, but Logan is better.

Matthew Jess The cinematic universe has overstayed its welcome, especially after phase 2. These films cannot be what and all it needs to be coz it's in service to something outside of the film - it has to make room for upcoming films usually at a cost of being a complete film itself. It is forced to fit in a certain tone and pallete and us such limits creativity and artistic integrity. This is why the films by Shaymalan (Unbreakable), Singer, Raimi and Nolan will automatically be superior as FILMS! Coz they focus on being GOOD FILMS with these characters in them, and aren't restricted by a shared universe to be a certain way. There are genuine arcs, surprises and a feeling of finality with their films - with a tiny hint of sequel setup way at the end (Joker card tease at the end of Batman Begins for example). So no I dont think the MCU is the savior people make it out to be.. With that said, the Logan film brings back that sense of completion where it feels like its own independent film - not desperately trying to setup more setups but by being self-contained. But The Dark Knight films are superior as FILMS - on a TECHNICAL AND STORYTELLING LEVEL they are near flawless. The sheer ambition alone in directing, acting, score, practicality, cinematography, themes, etc in that trilogy are on a higher level...Logan's just great for what it is. You can prefer it to Dark Knight subjectively, but objectively (yes film can be viewed objectively), not even close.

Matthew Jess That music also terrified me. Those out of place sounds made me uncomfortable and it felt like a horror movie.

Matthew Jess completely agree the forrest fight felt more like logan understood he had to do it to ensure Laura had safe passage! fucking amazing film, the action actually felt like it had to happen more than it just being in the movie for it to have cool action.

Flynn Rider logan in my opinion. They show the actual feelings and the darkness of each character

Flynn Rider there so different can't really compare them. I think people are going to so my thoughts are coz Logan is so new and fresh in our minds and people are on a high that right now we're excited but I'm due time your see the flaws in the film and more viewings will change.. IV seen it once and already hate certain things...plus sorry the villians in this are nothin compared to Heath ledgar joker, he took it too a whole new level and will probably never be touch. Logan is definitely best wolverine film, I don't count it as a X-Men film at all well this is just me

Flynn Rider Logan

Too soon and still to heartbroken to decide

Flynn Rider lol dark knight easy. Logan is awesome, tdk is legendary.

Carlos dead pool didn't look stupid in his suit

Deadpool is not a serious movie as Logan. That's why

Yes, MCU will probably put Wolverine in the yellow suit and make him just as childish as their other characters. Thank god, we'll always have Hugh Jackman to wash that sour taste away.

Childish as their other characters, you say? What did you expect? These are based on comic books for crying out loud...Not EVERYTHING needs to be gory and bloody, you know.

Daniel Brongers: If you believe not being childish means it has to be gory and bloody then you need to read up on the actual meaning of what a theme is. The key word is theme. You can cry out loud all you want, but after you're done crying I would seriously recommend you to read up on these areas where you clearly show lack of knowledge. Happy reading.

Dan Palmer i cant love this old man logan arch cause it just felt soo random

kenway leviathian I get that because I felt that they couldve maybe given us a little more back story into how the world got to the state it was in and what happended to all the xmen, but i think it was the best way for Hugh Jackman to bow out of the role.

Antonio Arce I think they went for the "leave them wanting more" take on it, which makes it even more sad that this is hugh's last one 😭

Antonio Arce An A- plus is perfect.

Antonio Arce Nothing is perfect.

Antonio Arce An A+ is the highest

If "A" was perfect, there never could be a movie with an A since there are no perfect movies and there never will be. So I disagree, it's fine to use the a for non-perfect movies, it's better than an awkward B-E rating (no "F" either seeing that no movie could be completely without any merit at all either).

Carlos Pena in Days I think beast has a small line comparing time to a river, and how it eventually reaches a similar result. instead of sentinels killing mutants, professor x accidently does, and therefore some of those events still occur, but slightly different, such as keeping his claws in the wolverine

Carlos Pena ok the simplest way to explain this is Bryan Singer didn’t like what happened in X-men 3 like a good majority of fans soo in days of future psst he erased X-men 3 basicly. So he essentially took X-3 out of canon and made some prequel stuff (First Class),(Apocalypse) soo everything happened in X-2 and the first is my understanding the reason Logan appears in the prequel stuff is for cash and u Mays ay in apocalypse he meets Jean and cyclops they won’t remember,beer Logan at that point till the day they die and Singer never gave a full story just flash backs so all that happened just in Apocalypse shows him escaping that’s the simplest way I can explain but basicly anything Singer did happened

Just because I don't review a movie, doesn't mean I didn't see it.... And with that said, I have yet to see either of those movies. Ill add them to the list.

Edin Ibranović autopsy of Jane doe was a solid movie. But I'd say most people didn't see them because they weren't promoted at all. I just ran across it on PlayStation one day.

King Milos No I think it was R

Marvelmania360 i think he does, but he's not one sided nor biased af. He actually loves both and doesn't fan war.

Marvelmania360 or maybe he likes both idk

Cool

Marvelmania360 I personally like marvel more tho tbh

Marvelmania360 Why does it always have to be one or the other??? Why can't it just be both? I fucking love DC and Marvel very much and equally, as they both have their pros and cons

It would have been so much more emotional. if he died with the suit on especially if it had The xmen logo on it, showing that he died an xman and became the hero x23 always saw him as in the comics she read about him.

Eric Bergstrom Look bud. Xmen Origins, Xmen, X2, X3 and The Wolverine don't exist anymore after the events of DOFP. Basically anything originally that happens initially from 1973 to 2023 never happened.

Besides the time change, I can assume that Magneto stretched the Adamantium still on his bones over his claws before DOFP to prepare?

Beorn Wulmoth Ummm yes sorta, because these timelines are happening side by side so certain events happened. For instance in the film, you can see what Wolverine collected through out the ages, like an Adamantium bullet, dog tags and the katana sword he was given at Nagasaki.

Eric Bergstrom that was in the old timeline. In the new timeline, he gets his adamantuim claws when he gets captured by striker in Days of future past, he all ready has them before the next movie in the timeline, xmen apocolypse

We know The Wolverine did happen because he had the katana on the wall.