Homeless bans are cruelty. Kicking someone that is down, is cruelty. Destroying/confiscating someone's property is cruelty. These are 8th Amendment violations, medical and financial discrimination. As a person on Disability, govt mandated poverty, I cannot afford housing or a campground, and therefore have no choice but to park on the side of the road. The Safe Parking areas are so restrictive that I don't qualify, since I'm disabled and not going back to work. And they kick people out at 7am, not able to return til 7pm, with no place to go during the day. And forced to this regardless of the medical ability to drive safely at that moment. And they threaten to tow my RV, taking everything I own, because I have medical issues. Again, medical and financial discrimination, and 8th Amendment violations. I've been fighting this locally, after seeing that several cities and counties throughout the country ruled them unconstitutional, and now the supreme Court rules against my life. They think it's ok to criminalize us for being on govt mandated poverty.... I want to sue the SC over this! I've been threatening to sue my county, they've been sued before over these bans. Of course, we don't want people trashing an area, but that's what litter fines are for. They can't treat someone as guilty of a crime they are not committing. I, in an RV, raised to be respectful by my parents, make no mess outside my vehicle, I shouldn't be treated as guilty because other people are guilty. That's injustice. Being Disabled doesn't mean I should lose my Rights to Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness. Yet cops threaten to take everything I own, and random people threaten to vandalize my shelter. And somehow these people don't think that vandalism is a crime......... 🤷🏻‍♂️ The SC needs to be sued.

The REAL problem with Justice Thomas that NOBODY is talking about is this: The reason HE gives for his "mistakes" of not reporting all these gifts & so on is that he misunderstood the statue and the legal form he was filing out. How is that nobody else find this deeply disturbing? I mean, if the man can't understand a simple statue on ethics, or how to fill out a government form... WHAT is the basis for his ability & authority to decide the most difficult, complicated and important interpretations of laws in the nation?!? HIS OWN explanation for his misbehavior completely undermines his credibility without even examining the ethical issues...

Project2025 unfolding before our eyes

Landmark rulings are an understatement! No more life appointments, term limits for Supreme Court.

George! They're doing exactly what Aileen Cannon is doing! It doesn't take 6 months to say NO

Roe should have been codified! Thomas's wife is MAGA up to her nose. She was at Jan 6. He should have recused!

Lack of regulations means disaster.

Liz did an awesome job here NBC. Thank you for airing this important discussion on this rogue court.

That’s where the money disappears. A whole lot of kickbacks for the favors! Only the public is dumbfounded.

I don't see anything wrong with -having- _demanding_ a *follow-up interview:* Any of the justices who sat there in front of Congress and *lied out of one of their two faces* when they said _"I respect _*_settled precedent, and Roe is settled precedent",_* should be brought before Congress again and asked *_"So, what's up with that?!"_*

The situation is so bad that the whole Roberts court will need to be reviewed and many rulings overturned. Congress will need to begin writing laws to check the courts for corporate and political bias. All protections of corporations over people or liability will need to be stripped. Any action against professional doctors to be stripped because judges are not licensed doctors with credentials to judge health or outcomes.

President, Senate and House election all crucial for America. Vote blue 💙

Sorry George but they mean to completely dismantle those agencies one by one

The Court has been paid off to do whatever these bribers want them to do. Expensive vacations. The judges need to live within their means like the rest of us.

Didn’t the court just rule on receiving tips. I wonder who will get tips for this ruling

I'm not American, but I'm very sorry that the USA is increasingly similar to a third world country...

Remove and replace Alito and Thomas. They have shown nothing but extreme corruption at the very least.

Tenure at the university I taught at was not a guarantee of a job for life. We were assessed yearly, and if our performance didn’t meet a particular level two years in a row, dismissal proceedings could begin. Maybe more assessment and job performance demands would work?

Could've listened to this panel for an hour longer. Disappointed there was no mention of Martin v. City of Boise, as inflation and housing shortages are pushing millions of Americans to the brink.

Something needs to be done and all the talking needs to stop too much talk not any action

All of your speakers are focused on the larger picture, the major issue is if the decisions are moved to the judicial, they do not have the numerical capacity to decide in a reasonable time.

Legislation needs to be drafted and brought to the American people for a re-structure of the Supreme Court appointments, and have them accountable as any other federal employee.

If Trump wins and get congress, wave goodbye to this country as you know it...not hyperbole. Its coming, and its coming fast ya'll. Get your stuff in order

The court has really changed! Thats an understatement..The future looks bleak.

What George doesn’t understand is that the judiciary is ignorant about science. They are really stupid about what nitrous oxide is. Gorsuch proved that. We need experts to decide complicated solutions.

They don't care what we think, they already proved it

Why doesn't the Supreme Court operate like an appeals court? There should be a large bench from which you draw a certain number of justices. Plenty of room for recusal, plenty of justices to decide, much more impartiality of decisions and they could handle their larger docket in a timely fashion.

If we want change we need to vote blue at the state level more than ever.

IF THE COURT IS MOVING TOO FAR TO THE RIGHT, then the so called justices are in violation of their sworn-oathes to uphold our Constitution! And... Lawyers - NOT KNOWING - whether or not something is Constitutional - or not - is SICK! We The People NEED our 2nd Amendment to be fully operational!

Sorry Conway, this time you really don't know what you're talking about. This ruling is a parallel to the RvV - In that case the judges step in and overrule the doctors, in this case the local (bribable) judges will rule about things they don't understand, instead of leaving it to the federal experts in the area.

With this debacle decision we can lose the government of people, today I'm not sure if equitable corporate entities care about people's lives

Reading this AFTER the immunity decision came out. Shtrumph was NOT disappointed as George suggested he would be...😒

Third trimester has to be an emergency and it has to be a delivery, not an abortion. Huge difference

Isnt NOW is Biden's opportunity to appoint his people to scotus...

Now we know, Neil 😢🇺🇲💔

🙏🙏🙏prayers for America 🇺🇸… please let’s fight together get out & vote blue against authoritarianism & convicted felons!!!

George, Ted Bundy was well liked and very personable. Untillll.......

LANDMARK RULINGS ARE AN UNDERSTATEMENT! NO MORE LIFE APPOINTMENTS, TERM LIMITS FOR SUPREME COURT. 🙂😄😀

What I seriously miss here is a valid discussion on how the SCOTUS is corrupted, and by whom. And, what impact this may have had. In particular, on justice Thomas. Also, whether and how a criminal investigation into such payments and gifts to justices could happen. In Germany, where I live, a an official, public servant or judge can not accept or welcome any gifts by third parties, it is a crime.

You criticize President Biden. Just listen to yourselves stuttering on this program. And and and just trying to start a sentence. All of you. Just listen to yourselves.

I have always believed that court decisions should generally be the same given similar sets of facts as is the case with science. Unfortunately, law seems to be opinions and mostly logic. One gets the impression that anyone who is logical can become a judge without legal education

Ordinary people will not understand any of this. That is why we have the various agencies in place - so that experts in their fields can implement. No regulation = chaos.

When the Court has final say about the Constitutionality, ie the legality, of a law, it is no longer a coequal branch. It is the highest authority.

Spoken like a true Federalist Society member, George!

RBG said Roe should have been decided on equal protection grounds NOT1st amendment grounds.

The Supreme Court should administer according to the law, but now the six judges administer according to party. The us Supreme Court Really makes the American people sad.

Why is that Justice Thomas born 1948, Justice Alito born 1950 isn’t being harassed like Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor born 1954 to retire when both these men are senior in age to her?

Vote blue 💙 America our only safe choice. America needs to reelect Joe Biden n move forward. 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙

Only leave 4 minutes for the audience to ask questions. How selfish. You use up 99% of the time and 100% of the Oxygen in the room.

Thomas' failures to disclose were not "ethical lapses, " they were criminal acts, and they should be prosecuted as such.

It is refreshing to hear a panel of experienced and skillful legal experts engage in civil debate in a respectful and coherent manner. It is certainly an uncommon occurrence in today's contentious political and social climate. I wish there had been more time to expand the discussion and answer more questions from an audience that I am sure have been made anxious and unsure about the future of this current extremist Supreme Court. I agree with George Conway that Justice Thomas needs to be investigated, at minimum by the Senate Judiciary Committee for his flagrant impropriety in accepting over $4M in gifts from wealthy donor(s). As a property manager, I once returned a $50.00 restaurant gift certificate to a representative of a local union who wanted to thank me for kicking out a non-union moving company from the commercial office building I helped to manage. I immediately returned the gift certificate with a letter explaining that I was simply doing my job, and I could not accept the gift. Justice Thomas acts like a double showcase winner on The Price is Right (and then some). I would love to hear his justification for accepting lavish gifts and what he was required to do in return.

Roberts does not care if they are trusted or not. The smirk on his face is obnoxious.

This was over adding a government employee every time you go out and fish you had to pay $500 because they wanted to know the location if you want to know the location and track it put it on a GPS now the reason the agency passed this watch to put on a business fisherman because they have some crazy environmental nut that doesn’t want fishing. The only thing you’re going to do is if we don’t finish all the companies from other countries are going to come in and scoop it up. They don’t have the regulations so they were punishing Americans for no reason just to get them to stop and fish and that’s what they do over and over and over and over like the regulation that you gotta have electric cars that’s insane I can buy whatever car I want as long as I want if not everybody’s going to buy used cars and used engines and keep them cars forever you accomplish nothing because you can’t stop a car company from building a car engine.

Thomas cant figure out a disclosure form.

Postponed abortion decisions until after denutering administrative agencies.

How do you challenge a supreme Court decision?

I want to hear his response to this now, today.

Thanks for educating us.

13 Districts, 13 Justices

Us should set up a judicial commission to appoint judges🤣the arguments I know that,ll be there will be that it,ll also be partisan which is true but the commission will most likely have pple from both sides,,,like it can have the CJ,a representative of the supreme court,the appeals courts,the normal federal courts,,the AG to represent gvt,two representatives of the bar and maybe a representative from each party which can publicly interview judges who apply and have a set and unchangeable qualifications like a certain number of yrs on the bench or in practice,consider them and appoint the best,this whole president appoints is very rare in most countries and naturally they,ll appoint the most liberal or conservative judge they can find

Chevron is great when they created the agencies no way Congress planned on the agencies having as much or more power than they do. They’re unchecked on elected and they’re adding to laws not making rules making laws that’s causing taxation and affecting peoples lives. The only difference is the agencies can add rules, but if they affect business or tax citizenry, they need to go back to Congress and explain to them why they wanna expand this law and negotiate them. What date is get rid of ideology so if you have all leftist are all people on the right working in the agencies it’s not what they want. They have to go to the courts were they have to negotiate or they have to go to the Congress where they want to change the law and negotiate with them and you’re gonna get a fair and balanced interpretation you can still do everything they want. They just have a check which they should have a check on them.

They should not be life turns period.

the In the UK there are no agencies rather in the Government and its Ministries/Gepatments of State the Executive, and Legislation functioning very well

Excellent conference. Brilliant, astute minds with endless integrity.

And now days later we see that they were all wrong about how the supreme Court was going to rule on presidential immunity.

Wonderful & informative . Would you consider to make a debate or discussion about the term limit for the supreme judges with scholars ? Thank you for these panal was eye opening.

Seems like abolishing Chevron is more pervasive than eliminating Roe v Wade, in terms of creating confusion about what and who has authority to regulate whom and how. I suspect plaintiffs will have to litigate regulations and govt agencies will have to waste even more money on court costs to defend their regulations and citations for violations. What a mess.

These people not now real law.

The media doesn’t let him move on all they do is keep talking about his debate going on

Wait! Don't we want the people who decide safe levels of toxic chemicals to be politicians and judges?

SCOTUS did a hawk tuah on Roe v. Wade

POWERFUL PANEL!!! Great insights, super smart, forward thinking. Well done and, Thank You!!

I never thought I could agree with anything George Conway said, but I agree with his stance on the way the Supreme Court did by getting too involved during the time of the Warren Court and Bergen Court. Even Justice Ginsberg didn't agree with Roe.

I hope Lauren Boebett was in the audience.

The article that called out Justice Thomas neglected to call out the amount of money the Liberal Justices took. They all have taken money. Either call them all out or don't call any of them out.

Hi George : a lot of people really love and appreciate you. Love❤

43000 views when I came here, 622 upvotes. While most of the comments are against the court decisions, most of the viewership seems to disagree.

Roe v Wade v "if it's not in the Constitution it's not a right" v The 9th Amendment? "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights, shall NOT be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." It's pretty obvious that they don't have to be.

Yes absolutely.

So also the the supreme court juges are also above the law!

The founder didn't give the supreme court a lot of thought and how politicized the court could be. To fix this mess, the constitution needs to be modernized.

A pleasure to hear the opinions of three intelligent people helping the voters to better understand the issues that are at stake for our country. Thank you.🇺🇲👍

all I know is it changes everything

Was Chevron influenced by the Daisy Chain?

No more can these power brokers not be removed.

I thought criticizing the judicial branch was a threat to democracy.

It's a woman's decision to have an abortion or not. She is the best person to know whether to have a child is affordable, beneficial or reasonable to provide total care for another person, possibly for life. Momma Baby Daddy's Maybe ?

We need Judge Judy Judge Mzthis Judge Msbelibe .

This Court decides their conclusions then attempt to justify.

Katyal should add a coda to this video, commenting on his feelings about the decision on immunity that in fact does what he thought it wouldn't because it couldn't. It's a sad time in America. We've had sad times before this, but this feels quite different. Insanity seems to be ruling.

the scotus has gone rogue...feral. Call in the FBI..

George, I love you but, you always give the Maga Court too much credit where none is due.

Listen to them whine. Congress do your job

Mrs Thomas has constitutional rights too, optics not withstanding. Optics not withstanding

What a high quality panel. Wow

Posited is the administrative agency if they want to add a rule that’s a law it’s not a helmet you’re talking about taxation in this case $500 every time a boat goes out to fish because you have to hire a government agent and have to only fish 9 AM to 5 PM which is insane If you want to do something like that you go to Congress say we need this added to the law and if it makes sense Congress to do it and if it doesn’t make sense, you’re doing something that’s no good. Because you don’t need all the Republicans are all the Democrats you need the majority have to Republicans and half the Democrats to agree if it’s good because they can’t reject it like a normal bill by a minority party they have to take it up.

Death by 1000 cuts, bled us out

Can anyrhing be done now that we know the Court's decision on presidential immunity? Could another challenge be made in the future if some of the justices leave?

Instead of cutting everyone short. Why not 15 20 minutes? Also you took 2 women questions and no men questions.

Congress's job isn't to delegate!! It's to legislate