ayyy someone noticed tyty

@@sophiacristina I left tiktok months ago. It's not a terrible app. But you really can't stop scrolling unless you make an attempt.

@@bookle5829 It was a sort of a joke, even if i dislike tiktok, but understandable... Yes, it is about dopamine, the constant feed and the FOMO releases it and dopamine is know to be addictive... By what i know, this is intentional... KZfaq, instagram, reddit, tiktok, all have constant feed and FOMO...

That loop thing is actually silly

we have an error in comment it was because it was tiktok

I'm just going to bring my phone to the interview and show them this video. When it's over I'll ask, "when do I start?"

Oh, since you showed me the video, I have now learned Assembly so I don't need to hire you anymore. I'm going switch careers from HR professional to Assembly programmer and hire myself for the position.

“Assembly, 2 years of experience”

A minute ​@@FreerunnerCamilo

What a savage

I think it's ok, but it's a lot of work! I think the code of this game instructs the CPU to write data into its memory-mapped address space, and the GPU could copy this data into its memory, and the rest of the code in RAM or other devices could be processed by the CPU to make the game run. And so, the data processing occurs, of course!

Pokemon red and blue were also written in assembly

Super Mario world was written in assembly

Just try to write something more useful in Assembler as a HelloWorld based on a simple system API call. Then you will know if you already master Assembler. :D

@@davidjulitz7446 i suggest writing Pong game in assembly, wich supports multiplayer : ))

Nah... you're much smarter than you think. It's just a command sequence to set up a system call to tell the kernel to dump a string to standard out

what lol no

Assembly is actually very simple its just more tedious to write and understand when analyzing code. The same advice I have for learning to code (study lots of other people's code) applies to assembly too, get ollydbg and analyze programs youve written or are familiar with and look at how it's layed out and try to figure out what it's doing. If you don't want to mess with NASM and want to do super simple stuff when you load a program in ollydbg you can deliberately overwrite code with nops and then insert your own asm you write into that area and set the top of your code as your origin and watch your hand made code run right there stepping through it to see it working and watch the registers :)

@@TheGoodChap if youre on windows, visual studio has a built in disassembler. (you can even select specific parts of code to convert them into asm and even debug in asm)

@@plasmahvh gcc -S for the win.

You mean like the program generates a random number? Damn then we'll have to implement mersenne twister algorithm in assembly. Bet that'd be tricky as heck.

@@mayank8387 i programmed a very simple random number generator from scratch in python a few months ago lol. probably could recode that in assembly

Solve 3D wave equation and write the output to a data file 😂

@@mayank8387 I think you can just read from /dev/random or some shit, provided you're running Linux.

Im genuinely curious. How would you do that?

The missing ingredient in your channel.

most youtubers would spend like 16 minutes describing this and you just did it in 60 seconds. kudos to you. Will be here if you make more

*KZfaq keeps shoving its shorts in my face*

Already sub to you wanting more tutorials or complete course

Yeah, we do. :-)

thank you, your explanation is LITERALLY better than his and helps me understand

thx man, do you have any recommendations for channels for assembly other than this guy

@@Theproductivesidestacksmashing is a good channel about reversing. i don't know about any assemble channels

​​@@TheproductivesideBen Eater has some good projects that go in depth Also, do a search for "Fasm", that should bring up tons.

This is what happens when you learn assembly for 60 seconds.

😂😂😂😂😂

Would learning C# help at all or is it only really useful for unity projects? (What I would use it for)

​@@TheStickCollector it is helpful in web development too

​@@TheStickCollector You can do almost anything in C# and you'll have the knowledge to learn other programming languages much quicker aswell.

@@TheStickCollector learn c++, its much more useful than c#, theres not much c# can do that c++ cant

Nice, here is my summary as well. The rax register is used to say which system call you'd like to access (they're numbered by the kernel), then you can pass additional parameters in the other registers. Then, you run the syscall command. If there's any (integer) return value, it will replace the contents of rax with that.

All of this is documented in various man pages for x86!

Ah, memories... Back in high school I wrote a macro assembler (i.e., ASM plus "macros" which could be complex function calls etc) -- on paper, while vacationing! :)

@@kennethbeal I did use MASM (Microsoft Macro Assembler) a lot back in the DOS era, I used to Write Libraries on MASM and linked the .OBJ with Borland's Turbo Pascal code, it was at the dawn of 32 Bit when it was a new thing.

Old goodies processors,we usually build things from scratch i miss those days😊

Merely being able to see exactly step by step all the crap that a computer needs to go through in order to visually render you moving your cursor half a pixels to the right, all within the fraction of a millisecond, is insane in and of itself.

From all I've seen on it, writing assembly is just much more tedious than genuinely difficult to comprehend.

Isn't it clearer when you make constants capitalized? That way, you know they aren't variables that could be changed.

What means "secure"?

@@albertosoto4280 Something that is not easily exploitable and doesn’t let the user do some stuff outside of its original use case.

I always hated written in assembly because you have to manage your own function calls (put stuff on the stack, set return destination, go to the function, read variables off the stack, unroll the stack... so tedious). It's so much easier in C where all that boilerplate is taken care of for you!

Are there any people nowadays writing production assembly code? I'd assume the performance gain wouldn't really be worth it with modern compiler optimizations. Maybe embedded / specific hardware it's worth but idk.

⁠@@Dom-zy1qyThe performance of Assembly is basically no different from modern-day programming languages, it was only popular back then for its performance, which was previously unseen

What syntax is he using

@@glungusgongus gas also known as gnu assembly, windows is not set up make assembly and gcc outputs at&t syntax which is the worst assembly language to exist.

@@zmike9831 whys it called AT&T

? It's assembly

Learning C and assembly hand in hand makes both languages much easier to grasp. C is really powerful (and dangerous) because of how "low-level" it is. Think of it this way: Would you like 2 pieces of bread with jelly in between or would you like some jelly that is encapsulated in bread boundaries. I just really said nothing different there, but the POV and terminology were different. Using C is easier because it comes with a plate, a knife and a jar for the jelly.

Assembly is low, but not that low. Lower than assembly would be just ones and zeros. Assembly is essentially programming or manipulating registers/flags instead of variables and using instructions instead of functions. The key difference is registers and instructions are physical things on the microprocessor while functions/variables are abstractions to make life easier But there's this thing called interrupts and it makes your life SO MUCH easier and feels sometimes like you're writing in high level languages. Assembly is fun, once you're good at it. You can write assembly code like you're writing high level code BUT you also have the knowledge and imagination to think and understand where EVERY bit of data is stored on the memory, or like where and how does these bits move in the MP/memory. Sorry for this scuffed explanation lol I have recently finished my assembly course and I suggest also learning assembly in the context of microcontrollers to get an understanding of how the I/O work (like stdin and such)

@@abdullahalmasri612 Thanks for the in depth response, makes more sense :)

@@abdullahalmasri612 bro thanks for that explanation really learn something new

You rock!

Timex-Sinclair 1000. BASIC and assembly. Wild times.

Yup. It isn't hard to understand assembly, it's just hard to build something complex out of it.

Bro, you good?

This is just what I was thinking, didn’t specify the assembler being used or the particular syntax and you go about teaching. It these things that make the language confusing. Terrible approach to teaching

@@richmondkoomson3403 Hey guys - I thought it would be obvious by my over-the-top, crazed comment earlier that I was attempting humor. While I do prefer intel syntax, I was just joking. Didn't expect people to agree with me.

Explain

@@glungusgongus intel syntax and and syntax have the reverse 9rdering for operands

@@jjones3705 what is dest src

It is better tbf...

@@spaghettiking653its really not

@@tocraft573 At least the intel syntax doesn't spam %s and $s everywhere :/ that is just a sore on the eyes

@@spaghettiking653 that doesn’t even feel like a good argument, especially when using a good theme

@@tocraft573 How do you use a theme? What software? Any text editor I've used has no highlighting and it's a pain to look at. Moreover, the intel syntax doesn't use those symbols, which proves they're redundant and so there's just no point in writing them.