Hahaha 😊just using simple strategies!

Can you explain the reasoning a bit more on your side? I would understand it if the rules said something along the lines of "IF R is infected by X then S is also infected by X", but it seems the rule says "R and S are infected by the same computer". Am I reading that incorrectly? Not trying to be pretentious, just trying to stop crying over this problem haha

@@sydneygraus7554 at 4:45, he’s still going over how the computers are connected in the network. The computer that is connected to R is also connected to S. Your question is how the computers are infected by virus. Very different things.

@@HalfLifeRachel I’m not sure what you mean, i think you might be over analyzing it a bit. Would you mind elaborating on how the connection between computers is very different from the order in which they were infected?

Thanks for the comment, but you are misunderstanding something - the rules stipulate that each computer gets the virus EXACTLY ONCE, which means that exactly one computer goes to both S and R. Your two statements that you say are false reversals are actually exactly equivalent. Hope this clarifies!