No video

IHO NY 2023-Ian Tattersall

  Рет қаралды 17,761

ASU Institute of Human Origins

ASU Institute of Human Origins

8 ай бұрын

The ASU Institute of Human Origins presents Ian Tattersall, Curator Emeritus of Human Origins, American Museum of Natural History, speaking about "The Origins of Modern Human Cognition."
Modern human beings process information symbolically, rearranging mental symbols according to rules to envision multiple potential realities. They also express the ideas thus formed using structured articulate language. No other living creature does either of these things, reflecting a qualitative cognitive gulf between modern Homo sapiens and every other species in the Great Tree of Life on the planet. Yet it is evident that we are descended from an ancestor that was both nonsymbolic and nonlinguistic. How did the astonishing transformation to modern cognition occur? Was it simply a passive result of the increase in brain size that typified multiple lineages of the genus Homo over the Pleistocene? Dr. Tattersall presents what the scrutiny of the fossil and archaeological records reveals to answer these fascinating questions in our evolutionary history.
The ASU Institute of Human Origins is one of the preeminent research organizations in the world for the study of human origins across the broadest range of transdisciplinary research to create novel approaches to the solution of pressing and newly emerging scientific questions relevant to our society-from the emergence of modern humans in Africa, and human behavioral and genetic adaptations to a changing planet, to what understanding the behavioral ecology of nonhuman primates informs us about how we developed culture and cooperation.

Пікірлер: 39
@ruaraidhmac8171
@ruaraidhmac8171 10 сағат бұрын
A magnificent discussion delivered beautifully. We have come a long way. As DJ says may our descendants also have the ability to look back the same way we have been able to. Love, peace and understanding to the world forever.
@robertlevy2420
@robertlevy2420 12 күн бұрын
Possibly the critical change in Homo Sapiens was the ability to verbally share ideas rather than having to visually try to demonstrate the idea!! The incredible sudden ability to store and spread ideas became like a match to paper!!!!!
@amourdesoipittie2621
@amourdesoipittie2621 5 күн бұрын
Except chimpanzees have exactly the same verbal capacities as us. Whatever makes us unique is not our capacities to communicate. Humans use lanaguage first to come up the thought themselves (not all thoughts) externalization of these thought may be done verbally, orthographically or by sign.
@robertlevy2420
@robertlevy2420 5 күн бұрын
​@amourdesoipittie2621 the use of sound to impart long encoded meanings was the key! The difference between what a parrot can do and you!
@amourdesoipittie2621
@amourdesoipittie2621 5 күн бұрын
@@robertlevy2420 I beg to differ, the key lies in the encoding part. What is used for the encoding sound, letters or signs seems irrelevant.
@robertlevy2420
@robertlevy2420 5 күн бұрын
​@@amourdesoipittie2621everything has a starting point. I'm arguing that the verbal language game came first and other complex communication followed.
@chuckley99
@chuckley99 4 күн бұрын
Good lecture.
@LaboriousCretin
@LaboriousCretin Күн бұрын
9:37 communication leading to social constructs that helped in things like hunting in a pack and other pack activities. Social constructs leading to abstraction and other more complex thoughts. Religions forming as a type of coping structure and part of the hierarchical structures formed. From tribes and clans to big cities with a range of cultural mix. Humans influenced by their surroundings and even names. Thank you for sharing the video.
@kennj321
@kennj321 2 күн бұрын
just my 2cents but I think human cognition started because humans started eating a highly varied, novel, diet and that took lots of eye, finger, brain coordination for food preparation. very quickly when your doing complex tasks like that the sequence of operations your doing, technique come into play that require further skill sharpening. the ultimate is when your solving time oriented problems like saving surplus for later as part of the process. My guess is storing surplus food of novel food (not just squirrels using instinct to store nuts) was as big of change in human evolution as farming was later.
@JasperTees-y8z
@JasperTees-y8z 2 күн бұрын
Wrong. We developed language so vegans could tell us to stop eating meat. You can’t argue with the science!
@josegarciavelazquez4399
@josegarciavelazquez4399 4 ай бұрын
felicidades al mr. Ian Tattersall por su trabajo, exposición y trayectoria profesional.
@marinagomes7054
@marinagomes7054 7 күн бұрын
I am Portuguese teacher of physics and chemistry very interested on this theme. I loved every single word I heard
@elfootman
@elfootman Күн бұрын
Skip the resume reading 4:20
@cherylharris3928
@cherylharris3928 3 күн бұрын
Mr. Ian Tattersall, in reference to the statement “ take red ball outside”, what would be the variation that humans would make on that that other primates could not?
@cherylharris3928
@cherylharris3928 3 күн бұрын
Mr. Ian Tattersall, in reference to the statement “ take red ball outside”, what would be the variation that humans would make on that that other primates could not? Just looking for a specific to illustrate the concept. Thank you.
@howardleekilby7390
@howardleekilby7390 4 ай бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ Thank you Professor. You have given me a new and improved name for our species. Homo Sapiens seems a bit egotistical. Using your term CLEVER HANDS translated into Latin seems much more satisfying: Homo Manus callidae. ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
@JasperTees-y8z
@JasperTees-y8z 2 күн бұрын
The term Homo sapiens was actually a propaganda tool used by the leftist homosexuals to claim we’re all gay.
@paulquirk3783
@paulquirk3783 12 күн бұрын
He should have defined symbolic cognition and illustrated what counts as evidence for it.
@lenlester5963
@lenlester5963 Күн бұрын
I’m not a scientist, just old. I remember a video where a woman said her (chimps?) were yelling a certain way because they were excited about getting grapes with lunch and heard other, distant chimps who already were fed yelling that way and she posited that they were communicating. And then there’s the apes who are trained to point to words to “say” things. I don’t think this argues against your explanation, just begs some refinement. I think it supports the concept that the hardware for cognition was present but not used. In the book “how emotions are made” by Lisa Feldman Barrett we learn that emotions depend on words. I think this is more support for your theory. Of course, as a scientist you should be spending your time trying to disprove the theory (and hopefully failing), not looking for support.
@robertlevy2420
@robertlevy2420 12 күн бұрын
Donald Johanson' s tech comment is profoundly evoked/captured by that bone toss/space ship cut in 2001 A Space Odyssey!!
@maxplanck9055
@maxplanck9055 3 күн бұрын
Has anyone considered the homo genus is a composite of all previous hominids not an exclusive separate species ✌️❤️🇬🇧
@BradleyLayton
@BradleyLayton Күн бұрын
How so?
@RileyRampant
@RileyRampant 6 күн бұрын
Hard to buy the concept that anatomically modern humans only figured out how to speak in the last 125K years. I suspect the watershed event was more subtle than that. The fact that language processing is embedded in the neural structure implies that this process didn't just spring out of our species' head like Athena out of Zeus'. I always view non-adaptive and non-gradualist explanations with suspicion. All that hardware got pushed right up to the threshold for whatever transformative mutation / cultural innovation that changed the course of human interaction/behavior thereafter.
@junanougues
@junanougues 4 күн бұрын
I'd have to agree. Besides the evidence that points our modern brain has a much longer history than 125000 years. And even earlier, it's not out of the realm of possibility that Homo Erectus did language, too. It tracked big game. Which requires gist and inductive narrative thinking.
@oldernu1250
@oldernu1250 Ай бұрын
Distinctively different? How? Most people today are as incapable of constructing a hand ax as a motherboard. Symbolic bollocks, I fear.
@TheJgibbons
@TheJgibbons 4 күн бұрын
In the beginning was the Word, and it sought the highest thought.
@DianaStevens42
@DianaStevens42 Күн бұрын
I don’t think
@davidviner5783
@davidviner5783 17 күн бұрын
Jebel Irfoud, 300000 years ago has been reported as the earliest evidence of H. sapiens.
@Marcin-Zagorski
@Marcin-Zagorski 7 күн бұрын
Very archaic though, hardly distinguished from Apidima remains from Greece. Oldest homo sapiens considered as modern would be Omo (discovered up to the date of course).
@GeeThevenin
@GeeThevenin 2 ай бұрын
How did they process the audio? Impressive.
@DivyenduKashyap
@DivyenduKashyap 8 ай бұрын
Absence of consistent display of symbolic behaviour by neanderthals? There are quite a few pre-sapien rock art sites in Europe
@togodamnus
@togodamnus 8 ай бұрын
Yes, the evidence is both inconsistent and sparse. Its foolish to attribute alleged art works to H neanderthalensis via approximate dating; it's not at all resolved in regards to first or earliest presence of H sapiens in Eurasia or Asia.
@gingi453
@gingi453 7 күн бұрын
The African hominiod was more reproductive and destroyed the Homo Heidelbergicus as well as Denisova, who were the first intelligent humans. We still use their brains in the northern and far eastern population showing up in IQ 100-110+ , Africa is still producing lots of "homo sapiens" with IQ 60 average..but more reproductive, just like before..We need to save our intelligent population, limit migration or it is a dead end road for humanity..
@mozhgansavabieasfahani7560
@mozhgansavabieasfahani7560 7 күн бұрын
They are thinking that neanderthals could very well have spoken too.
@chuckley99
@chuckley99 4 күн бұрын
That intro was ridiculously long
@grahamgillard3722
@grahamgillard3722 19 сағат бұрын
When did free will kick in? Just answer that.
@taharqaheru145
@taharqaheru145 Ай бұрын
Am sorry Jesus and Allah but the game is over😂
@gooddaysahead1
@gooddaysahead1 Ай бұрын
For the sake of argument, let's just say that their stories are mythological. They are 100% stories created to tell and convey wisdom about the business of living. Some of the mythology is helpful and some of it is crazy. That's where we come in and decide which part is crazy and try to avoid it.
@ruskinyruskiny1611
@ruskinyruskiny1611 4 күн бұрын
A watch indicates the existence of a watchmaker.
Nastya and SeanDoesMagic
00:16
Nastya
Рет қаралды 46 МЛН
Why Is He Unhappy…?
00:26
Alan Chikin Chow
Рет қаралды 79 МЛН
Finger Heart - Fancy Refill (Inside Out Animation)
00:30
FASH
Рет қаралды 30 МЛН
Irving Finkel | The Ark Before Noah: A Great Adventure
58:19
The Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures
Рет қаралды 4,5 МЛН
Neanderthal Genome Project: Insights into Human Evolution
1:22:46
Linda Hall Library
Рет қаралды 155 М.
Explorer Lecture: Dr. Donald Johanson, "Cleveland, Lucy, and the Human Story"
1:43:17
Cleveland Museum of Natural History
Рет қаралды 83 М.
Cracking Ancient Codes: Cuneiform Writing - with Irving Finkel
38:55
The Royal Institution
Рет қаралды 2,4 МЛН
Daniel Everett, "Homo Erectus and the Invention of Human Language"
1:10:43
Harvard Science Book Talks and Research Lectures
Рет қаралды 432 М.
Fungi’s Resilience and Intelligence
52:00
Show Me the World
Рет қаралды 394 М.
Nastya and SeanDoesMagic
00:16
Nastya
Рет қаралды 46 МЛН