Firstly Legendary and Mythicals can (and has) lost to normal Pokémon in both the show and the game. In addition, its 1,072,961.37 lion per Pokémon. If you are going on the games 1. They would run out of PP 2. We have never seen Splash moves hit more than 5 Pokémon and helping hand be able to be used more than 2 times on a single Pokémon 3. Unlike Lions which hunt in packs, we never see Pokémon use moves without trainers or work together in the wild. The sheer number would overwhelm the Pokémon. If you are going off the comics/TV shows there are huge scaling issues with the show's power inconsistencies, such as an at least almost max level Pikachu (who had recently gone toe to toe with Zekrom) getting OK'OD by a level 5 snivy with leaf tornado. The show is far too inconsistent to use when analyzing this fight. Also, in the show Pokémon get tired, often faster than they would have run out of pp. In addition, some lion Pokémon have intimidate, and Lions manes are natural intimidation employed in nature along with their group tactics. With each Pokémon having (2/3)^1,000,000,000 power from intimidate only special Pokémon could do any real damage. In conclusion, there is no way for the Pokémon to beat all the Lions before the lions overwhelmed the Pokémon, especially with half of the damage dealing Pokémon (physical attackers) not being able to do anything.
@thomaskingsbury35953 жыл бұрын
But lion strong
@itspeytn72963 жыл бұрын
@@thomaskingsbury3595 there are Pokémon that can fly though
@jasperkra-caskey20483 жыл бұрын
@@itspeytn7296 The pokemon tire out - we have seen this in the Show through getting tired and in the games through PP.
@griffindyal77763 жыл бұрын
Just link him your wideo :)
@donovanwiebe24953 жыл бұрын
If you stack cakes on top of each other... you get a wedding cake. So naturally if you stack lasagnas on top of each other... you get a wedding lasagna
@paulinejoycelestino99763 жыл бұрын
you're onto something...
@nicholasmarini25443 жыл бұрын
As an Italian I can confirm the existence of wedding lasagne
@Fizz-Q3 жыл бұрын
i would eat that
@HUNT3R_103 жыл бұрын
Oh yes, I want it
@fwegs3 жыл бұрын
If i don’t have this at my wedding i’m not getting married. end of story.
@Pamanos0012 жыл бұрын
I would love to see how Ludwig justifies lions beating ghosts.
@refthegeneric2 жыл бұрын
don't forget *literal god*
@ddm24162 жыл бұрын
Ghosts aren’t real lmao
@Banan_Man_2 жыл бұрын
ok but a billion is a big number
@seanmalikdansaldo73752 жыл бұрын
@@ddm2416 it's real in pokemon
@lukeborks7312 жыл бұрын
and the devil, and space+time, and also bird pokemon, lions can't fly
@michaelsf39102 жыл бұрын
Love how he doesn't even consider the god pokemon that literally created all life, who could quite possibly erase all life just as easy if they wished. And lets just be honest one roar of time would wipe out half of the lions population.
@lucy-er4vt2 жыл бұрын
this. also, lions wouldn't hurt ghost pokemon, so it's a win either way. even if this wasn't the case, pokemon have literal gods that have control over time and space on their side. I'm sure they could take care of some lions lmao.
@awesomeknight123242 жыл бұрын
There are 1 billion of them though
@michaelsf39102 жыл бұрын
Don't matter how many there are, there are over 800 pokemon and most of them have some godly powers that could easily kill millions alone
@emilchristoffersen19232 жыл бұрын
I would also like to see a lion fight a flying Pokémon 🤔
@VixeyTeh2 жыл бұрын
I am as surprised as you. The pokemon card collector doesn't think they could win.
@hahaxaxa73433 жыл бұрын
I imagine 1 billion lions all at one place together would make the world laggy
@Bp-rg3oj3 жыл бұрын
This is the take
@emmalee49873 жыл бұрын
@Ian Norris wow
@joriskbos11153 жыл бұрын
We should combine all computing power in the world just to simulate this
@Kiehuva3 жыл бұрын
It would crash all the computers that are used to animate the pokemon
@MineBloxAllNite3 жыл бұрын
Life would crash and your save would corrupt forcing you to become a baby and start a new one
@livianpotato39323 жыл бұрын
My favourite techno quote: “ is the only reason why you keep a cat because you want something lazier than you around!?”
@cla_ssen_t80293 жыл бұрын
Damn I pretty sure I'm lazier than my cat😅😌
@azidal37553 жыл бұрын
@@cla_ssen_t8029 He said when he asked most cat lovers why they like cats more he was usually told it was because they were more self sufficient and didn't need much attention.
@rexysmile3 жыл бұрын
@@azidal3755 "a cats life goal is to find your most comfortable chair and sit on it."
@uyaachan_12623 жыл бұрын
nahh its because we all want attention but without giving too much commitment
@candiedcrusader78413 жыл бұрын
@@uyaachan_1262 your cats still need exercise, get them a way to do it without you if you're lazy
@ahmedamir6975 Жыл бұрын
I would love to see how ludwig thinks lion's are gonna kill a pokemon which is in the air
@SnorrioK Жыл бұрын
stacking?
@debe__ Жыл бұрын
@@SnorrioK then they just slightly go to a different place in the air lol Also there's a literal fucking god amongst the pokemon, and many other otherworldly ones. I'm sure they could genocide the planet if they all had a common goal
@SnorrioK Жыл бұрын
@@debe__ - Sure. But what happens when they run out of attacks as they tend to do? They can't fly forever can they? And when they land, there will be a few hundred million lions waiting below.
@generalgrievuuz Жыл бұрын
@@debe__ Yeah this is the correct take. There are multiple mons that would take out a billion lions single-handedly with multiple viable strategies.
@henrazz1150 Жыл бұрын
But like... a billion is a lot
@willcampbell24852 жыл бұрын
I love that Lud literally has an English degree and he was asking if there were any English nerds that could help😂
@karen18933 жыл бұрын
if anyone wants to see what one particular person 's answers here you go Jacksepticeye - 14:17 Yetiapocalypse - 16:07 Sykkuno - 17:16 Connoreatspants - 19:26 Aidencalvin - 22:08 Envy/Falco - 23:19 Ash - 23:58 Mizkif - 25:11 Friend - 26:06 JSchlatt - 26:21 Moistcr1tikal - 27:47 QT Cinderella - 28:32 Alpharad - 30:01 Mcthaboss - 31:49 Atrioc - 33:11 Stanz - 34:55 Technoblade - 35:30
@rG1vZ3 жыл бұрын
No pewds :(
@Shan-gx8rh3 жыл бұрын
No corspe :(
@magienjoyer3 жыл бұрын
No tubbo :(
@nanogirlniyah56253 жыл бұрын
No Valkyrae :(
@celiachavez36163 жыл бұрын
Thx 🙏
@Leon-jx8wc3 жыл бұрын
Funny little fact. Jack was actually a dog person, but since he got a cat, he turned.
@17SharkBro3 жыл бұрын
Adding onto that, he's actually allergic to cats, but he said his doesn't give him allergic reaction.
@chriscisco98803 жыл бұрын
How do you know that?
@Leon-jx8wc3 жыл бұрын
@@chriscisco9880 Because he had a dog at his parents house and he always said that he was a dog person back then. But his gf has a cat and they moved in together. So now he likes cats more
@grimreaper26803 жыл бұрын
Yeah I remember that, he used to talk about that a lot when his girlfriend moved in with him, he said how he didn't liked cat before and was a dog person, but now after having a cat as his own pet he likes cat more than dogs now.
@crowsoto96123 жыл бұрын
@@Leon-jx8wc oh yeah! he had a border collie I think? black and white
@kinfongyeung54002 жыл бұрын
RIP Technoblade, Legends never die
@KillerWolf1324 Жыл бұрын
This is the only reason why I came to this video bc I knew I would find cringe people like you I'm not a hater of techno heck he was my fav at a time but this aint the place for this
@sahave5042 Жыл бұрын
@@KillerWolf1324 You scanning youtube videos comments that are 2 months old to find Rip Technoblade, did I get this right
@KillerWolf1324 Жыл бұрын
@@sahave5042 No,did it ones and why do you care what i do!?
@MrGhostTheBigRoast Жыл бұрын
@@KillerWolf1324 crringe
@xcake88 Жыл бұрын
@@KillerWolf1324 he’s allowed to comment what he wants to bud
@VixeyTeh2 жыл бұрын
So a single molecule of water is not wet, but 2 or more molecules of water is wet. As a general question I think that we should say yes, because a single molecule is such a specific thing that it should have to be expressly specified, so all other instances should be safe to assume is more than 1 molecule amount of water.
@mr_checkit11715 ай бұрын
Bro this is always my exact argument why water is wet
@Bluestar45359 күн бұрын
I know this comment is over 2 years old. But I was literally debating with my friend earlier and this was my exact argument.
@BlockMasterT9 күн бұрын
My argument is just “well it’s definitely not dry”
@sondresjtveit86533 жыл бұрын
if two lasagnas stacked on top of each other isnt one lasagna, then how is a cake with multiple layers one cake?
@DODUCKA3 жыл бұрын
It's not like they smeared icing all over the lasagnes to give the illusion of one lasagne the way they do for cakes. Also layered cakes are baked with the intention of combining into one cake. Think of the noodles in a lasagne. You wouldn't say that a lasagne is two lasagnes because there's two layers of noodles. Similarly, you wouldn't say it's two cakes just because there's two layers of cake batter involved in the making of the cake. The question would be "if you stacked two layered cakes on top of eachother, would you have one or two cakes?" And I think that if you looked at that structure, especially if the icing was different colours or something, it would be very clear that you just stacked two perfectly good cakes on top of eachother like some sort of diabetic tower of Pisa
@theqwertycoder_alt3 жыл бұрын
Layers need filling between them. Layers, when directly stacked, do not connect.
@alexandervanaken80663 жыл бұрын
It depends because if you put 2 different lasagnes on top of each other its 2, but if you put the of the same lasagnes then its 1
@JackoLfc083 жыл бұрын
cake is to lasagna(meal) as cake layers is to lasagna(pasta).
@novabova073 жыл бұрын
@@DODUCKA but a lot of people also cook two different lasagnas at once with the intention to stack them later so they don’t fall over while baking... and on the note of two different layers of noodle, no. I wouldn’t say that two sets of noodles stacked on top of each other are two lasagnas. Just like I wouldn’t say that two GROUPS of noodles stacked on top of each other are TWO LASAGNAS.
@dirkratham3 жыл бұрын
"Techno is the definition of inaction" also techno: Goes on full blown potato war against a child
@ZachWasabi3 жыл бұрын
in minecraft*
@Lazy_Depression3 жыл бұрын
I think Im_a_squid_kid is in college
@alicerivers23633 жыл бұрын
@@Lazy_Depression *child.*
@katiecashmoney74273 жыл бұрын
When I saw that he said no to pineapple on pizza I knew right then and there that I subscribed for a reason. Blood for the blood god, pineapples on pizza is a sin.
@BallsD33p693 жыл бұрын
Don’t let these things distract you from the fact that Techno said the 1 billion lions would defeat every pokemon in existence.
@gactx55132 жыл бұрын
Rest In Peace techno
@scott--16292 жыл бұрын
shush
@KillerWolf1324 Жыл бұрын
Stfu not the place this is a ludwig video from a year ago,you just going to:"RIP TECHNO" at every video he was in for the likes!?
@bunitwix Жыл бұрын
@@scott--1629 dude he died shut the fuck up kid
@infinitecookies92762 жыл бұрын
I know this is the classic argument whenever people talk about every pokemon but I still stand by Magcargo canonically being "approximately 18,000 degrees F" (approximately 9982.2 degrees C) meaning that all the lions and pokemon would die immediately except for pokemon that somehow survive off of random abilities and moves they have and magcargo
@liamekstromcamman1821Ай бұрын
Victiny literatly incapable of losing🤣
@dragonwings12733 жыл бұрын
“Techno is the definition of inaction” That’s not what I remember from the potato wars.
@matsroscam3 жыл бұрын
It's what I remember from his upload schedule
@Jezzibolt3 жыл бұрын
The two sides of Techno’s ADHD right there. He either does nothing or does something a lot.
@MrcreeperDXD7773 жыл бұрын
@@Jezzibolt theres no inbetween lol
@ZSpieg3 жыл бұрын
And him taking over smp earth
@ryanfawcett47273 жыл бұрын
A Pokémon can literally summon a blackhole, summon tornados, and slam a continent into the ground, One billion lions wouldn't even stand against the black hole...
@ditto-w3 жыл бұрын
Argument for Pokemon side: Gen 4 Blissey The lions would all starve to death before Blissey went down.
@ryanfawcett47273 жыл бұрын
@@ditto-w Faxxxx
@candiedcrusader78413 жыл бұрын
@@ditto-w blissey gets sucked into another black hole, since its based on earth not pokeearth, and the laws of science apply, there is a singularity formed and then the explosion after kills any remaining Pokémon, forming new elements.
@owl29443 жыл бұрын
also ghost types are completely immune to lions since a lion would be normal type. plus flying pokemon shooting pure energy. the lions really stand no chance.
@josephtan64453 жыл бұрын
If only black holes existed
@Henry-hn3vt2 жыл бұрын
Can we talk about how there are flying Pokémon and Pokémon that travel through space and time and a literal god Pokémon and Ludwig’s argument is “1 billion is a big number”.
@mrclean57442 жыл бұрын
not to mention god is a pokemon
@oliverstone6320 Жыл бұрын
He calls us dumb lol. Theres trillions of microbes and bacteria on us yet they have as much chance to beat all Pokemon as the lions
@VixeyTeh Жыл бұрын
@oliver stone well CoVid would have a better chance at killing the pokemon than lions. Litterally, one Charizard could fly-by attack set fire to the savannah, and none of the lions could even touch him.
@Color4206 ай бұрын
Also, the flying pokemon can just fly til the lions die of hunger, the ghost pokemon can just exist until lions die of hunger, kyogre can flood the land and drown the lions, Jesus of pokemon can just say no to the lions and bam they die, dialga can fast forward through time to kill all the lions, one fucking Pokémon is all you need to wipe them all, just pick the right ones, and then one of each, the lions are fucked
@json172 жыл бұрын
For the trolley problem, an important question is if there is a legal system, you would be legally responsible for the one person's death, but not for the four.
@madisonsheard65652 жыл бұрын
I was thinking the same thing.
@urnoob55286 ай бұрын
i think there are laws about doing harm to prevent bigger harm
@tm21223 жыл бұрын
about the pokemon vs 1 billion lions: isn’t arceus like... literally a god
@Chase112113 жыл бұрын
Or any bird/ flying type and just stay in the air !!
@deformedmustard3 жыл бұрын
@@isaacwheeler3086 when the flying types are in the air the lions cant reach them Gonna edit this bc people keep replying to me, sure you can make a ladder, but you are forgetting about the other types of pokemon. Poisonous pokemon, fire pokemon, all the fucking GOD pokemon. It does not matter how many there are, pokemon win everytime. If you wanna go argue further into the hell known as the KZfaq comment system, please, be my guest.
@deepfriedjoefish94313 жыл бұрын
Eventually flying types are gonna get tired and need to land, think how much effort it would take to constantly flap
@nutzach_3 жыл бұрын
@@Chase11211 they wouldn’t be able to stay in the air long enough, the lions would get them when the land. 1,000,000,000 lions vs around 1,000 Pokémon, lions win easy. There is about 1,000,000 lions for every Pokémon and some Pokémon as super easy to beat like weedle. So while some will be hard like arceus, they would run out of PP before they could deal with millions of lions. Edit: I rescind my statement, I have been proven wrong, but there do be a lot of lions
@Blitzuru3 жыл бұрын
@@deformedmustard this statement is literally checkmate, unless in said universe where the battle takes place the pokemon have the pp systems
@NoName-rl5xn3 жыл бұрын
"Any English nerds in the chat?" me : b-but you're ...
@Trikip_3 жыл бұрын
We are communally revoking degrees
@thedevilsguardfox16513 жыл бұрын
Technoblade could tell him
@Ranger2923 жыл бұрын
yro’ue*
@ghrphbc3 жыл бұрын
*Yor’ue
@eddie-zu7kg3 жыл бұрын
yur'oe
@c0smiclobic9682 жыл бұрын
Even with his diagnosis, he was still doing a 7/10
@potato.pancake2 жыл бұрын
wasn’t he diagnosed june 2021… so this was before then?
@lennio49122 жыл бұрын
Okay let’s end the Pokémon debate: Ghost type Pokémon are immune to physical attacks so no matter how many lions there are, they can’t hurt them. Even if they wiped out all the other Pokémon, they can’t do shit about ghosts.
@decidous2 жыл бұрын
they can bite the ghosts
@lennio49122 жыл бұрын
@@decidous please elaborate further
@decidous2 жыл бұрын
I will not
@lennio49122 жыл бұрын
@@decidous >barges into comments >disagrees >refuses to elaborate further >leaves
@twlightnightfall1315 Жыл бұрын
@@lennio4912 I think they might be referring ta the dark type move Bite. And ta their "argument," I say that the lions can't learn pokemon moves so...
@jasperrrrrrrr3 жыл бұрын
lions would lose, based on the phrasing of “every pokemon” rather than “one of each pokemon”
@BluebeerryBPS3 жыл бұрын
And even so, there's literally multiple pokemon who can end the world. Like, It wouldn't be hard for certain pokemon to kill everything on Earth, considering there's a literal god
@vg62563 жыл бұрын
@@BluebeerryBPS you dont even need pokemon that can end the world, flying pokemon can easily end the lions
@BananaWasTaken3 жыл бұрын
There are Pokémon who are ghosts, who are gods, who can fly and rain projectiles on the lions below, and Pokémon who can create black holes.
@cooltm28013 жыл бұрын
For me it's the issue of what "fight" means. Because the pokemon could just turn it into a battle of endurance. They all run and hide or fly, while the lions starve and eat eachother.
@vg62563 жыл бұрын
@@cooltm2801 i would assume combat
@nintendweeb3 жыл бұрын
Connor really said “water is always wet, therefore it isn’t wet”
@L-Puffin3 жыл бұрын
But he's right though? For something to be "wet", or have a wet state, it must also be able to be "dry", or have a dry state. If something can never be dry, then can it ever be wet either? Nay. Water is always wet, therefore it cannot be wet.
@BerniPro3 жыл бұрын
@@L-Puffin so according to this dumb argument Connor made, Ice is not cold, fire not hot, air is not transparent and a 1kg weight isn't lighter than a 2 kg one. cmon man...
@RobReith3 жыл бұрын
You absolutely do not have to be in a dry state to be defined as wet. Anything that touches the water will become wet because the water is wet. If you look up wet in the dictionary one of the definitions is "a liquid that can make things damp."water falls in that category. So all you contrarians can give it a rest now. You have to be silly to not think water is wet that is absolutely ridiculous. If you jump in the ocean will you not emerge wet? It must be because all of that water is already wet. Now the water on you is also wet, causing you to be wet. Otherwise you'd just be dry without the water causing the condition of wet. I really don't know how else to word this so you'll understand that water has to be wet for there to even be such a thing as wet.
@nintendweeb3 жыл бұрын
That logic does not make sense to me. You are admitting that water is constantly wet and using that as a reason for it to not be wet. That is like saying I am constantly a person but I can’t not be a person, therefore I’m not a person.
@DanS0443 жыл бұрын
He said water is always wet therefore you cannot apply a status of moisture to it
@JohnGenericName2 жыл бұрын
What's a lion going to do about a Ho-oh? It's flying 100ft in the air and can breathe fire. Even an army of lions can do literally nothing because they can't reach things flying around.
@notohkae2 жыл бұрын
20:42 An ice cube can be wet if it has water on it and it can be dry if it doesn't have water on it (completely frozen)
@bedrock30_3 жыл бұрын
AS AN ENGLISH NERD I CAN CONFIRM IT IS “WHERE THEY LIE”
@wastedpotential99453 жыл бұрын
I thought it was 'Where they lay'
@clemencina3 жыл бұрын
@@wastedpotential9945 yeah i think he was going for the past tense of "lie" so that would be "we will see where they lay"
@micahrogers75363 жыл бұрын
@@clemencina First of all, this is a pointless argument for us to have, but it would indeed be "where they lie" because the word lie in this context isn't effect by tense, as it isn't referring to something's physical position.
@griffindyal77763 жыл бұрын
Who remembers when he did this with us when we were still his friends?
@seraphim-kpopdreamcorpsear52553 жыл бұрын
Power corrupts.
@quoteclone3 жыл бұрын
Now he only talks to people with over 20k twitch subs :(
@jaydubbzit35513 жыл бұрын
You were never friends.
@redwolf06993 жыл бұрын
I get the whole thing about the meme and all that but I was kinda sad when the not your friend thing turned into a meme because it’s a good point
@themachooo28703 жыл бұрын
@@jaydubbzit3551 😐
@racsoboom85702 жыл бұрын
Ludwig: "I am not your friend" Also Ludwig: "Did you go two for two? Welcome, friend.
@FrankieTravale2 жыл бұрын
The thing about the Lions vs Pokemon thing. There are certain pokemon that the lions just can't fight back against. Such as Rayquaza, it can for one, fly. It can stay in the air using a ranged attack, and it could pretty much wipe out the entire earth if it wanted. Infact, many pokemon could theoretically wipe out the earth. How is a Lion supposed to counteract that.
@A_Krix5 ай бұрын
Even with a billion of them. I don't think they can beat literal gods.
@matthewgross30263 жыл бұрын
35:53 Techno used one monitor for all of his youtube career up until now when he had a second monitor just sitting in it's box for like a year.
@ThoomLord3 жыл бұрын
Uses techno for click bait, proceeds to look at his poll for like 10 seconds.
@theroosterbrcbloop97893 жыл бұрын
Time stamp ? I’m desperate for techno content
@sooshi45603 жыл бұрын
@@theroosterbrcbloop9789 find it
@JadeAleman3 жыл бұрын
35:30
@thatoneguy16473 жыл бұрын
@@JadeAleman thank uuu
@joemongiardo15563 жыл бұрын
It’s like he knew our plight as techno fans
@DanielWilliams-fy5kc6 күн бұрын
Science describes water as "Aqueous" a term meaning OF or CONTAINING water. The Oxford English Dictionary describes wet as being COVERED or SATURATED with water or other liquid. Something containing water cannot simultaneously be covered is the solution that it is containing unless it were to spill and no longer be containing the liquid, therefore water is not wet.
@GorillaMon5412 жыл бұрын
Seeing this video on July 3rd, 2022. The last answer sheet being Technoblades is kinda crazy.... Rest in Paradise, Techno 😔
@Lynix3 жыл бұрын
ludwig pokemon can do alot of damage
@ChiefYoshi3 жыл бұрын
Depends on how hard you throw them at someone
@louie79863 жыл бұрын
Yup
@Eli-lu5he3 жыл бұрын
True and I think Ludwig is forgetting about mythical and legendary Pokemon Arceus one Pokemon could wipe out a billion lions
@Yance_0003 жыл бұрын
The issue is that they will eventually run out of pp and struggle themselves to death
@tko50193 жыл бұрын
@@Yance_000 exactly I wrote an English essay on it bc I didn’t know what to write about plus people don’t realize how much a billion actually is
@ElJay13103 жыл бұрын
The question that has stumped centuries of people being how many lasagnas are there all together
@gabeegg51593 жыл бұрын
New guys wouldn’t get that joke
@dylankim32733 жыл бұрын
the answer is one
@meganchalmers83513 жыл бұрын
The hardest questions I've ever heard is... if you drop a bar of soap on the floor, is the floor clean or the soap dirty?
@koshizzh3 жыл бұрын
@@meganchalmers8351 the soap is probably dirty right?
@BigFatNuts693 жыл бұрын
Well my thoughts on this are: if you bake two cakes and stack one on top of the other, it's still a cake. So the same logic applies to this question.
@tangentkatz Жыл бұрын
I have come back to this video 2 years later. It was the first Ludwig content I ever saw. Before it, I'd literally never heard of anyone pouring milk before cereal. This morning, for some reason, this video popped into my mind. I decided to try milk first......and it's actually better??! I know exactly how much milk I get. Perfect milk-to-cereal ratio. Thanks for changing my life, Ludwig!
@GotAnyChance2 жыл бұрын
Rest in power, Technoking
@BirdGod3 жыл бұрын
It’s hard to tell if ludwig even went to college like my mans think that a billion lions can kill a literal blackhole
@maryam-xo3 жыл бұрын
Wait what?!! Lol, what’s your college? I’m curious 👀
@GiggityxGamer3 жыл бұрын
@@maryam-xo Not sure what this comment is supposed to mean but OP is referring to the fact that some pokemon are actual gods who created the universe and can erase the lions from existence, stop time, send them to another dimension, or create a blackhole to suck them up and close it.
@gabrielloeb88523 жыл бұрын
@@GiggityxGamer and yet they can be beat by an electric mouse
@Nugcon3 жыл бұрын
I seem to have missed the lesson where they taught us about Pokémon. feelsbadman
@GiggityxGamer3 жыл бұрын
@@gabrielloeb8852 when was arceus beaten by pikachu? first of all arceus is immortal. second, pikachu never beat the creator of the universe.
@zanxaa3 жыл бұрын
I would like to see the billion lions take on a weird looking dinosaur that cuts the fabric of space as its signature move
@an_egg_cultist3 жыл бұрын
And you are telling me it is under human submission? Most Pokedex logs are from children, so lots is probably exaggerated anyway. I doubt it would last against a billion lions.
@zanxaa3 жыл бұрын
@@an_egg_cultist just because it's logged by kids doesn't mean it not true
@an_egg_cultist3 жыл бұрын
@@zanxaa never said that. Said exaggerated
@zanxaa3 жыл бұрын
@@an_egg_cultist somewhat of the same but still, there's also the anime that proves their abilities
@magicfuture94303 жыл бұрын
@@an_egg_cultistI'm pretty sure it's logged by the professors in each region
@hoshi65392 жыл бұрын
My points on some of these: - as an italian, theres not a limit on how tall a lasagna has to be, stacking them makes a tall one -this one isnt close, there are some pokemon who can literally solo the lions, just think of Arceus who literally created the universe and can destroy planets easily, put in palkia (god of space) and dialga (god of time) and the lions dont stand a chance -water is what makes something wet, if a person has a dress on then they are dressed up, but the dress itself isnt dressed up
@gerechjorney55472 жыл бұрын
the pokemon one seems easy but is tricky, since even tho Arceus created the universe there is no proof he can destroy it neither in anime or games. Also it seems that every pokemon is able to beat each other in a battle so i would go for the billions lions.
@hoshi65392 жыл бұрын
@@gerechjorney5547 kyogre is able to flood the whole world 💀 he literally solos
@gerechjorney55472 жыл бұрын
@@hoshi6539 still gets beaten in game by a small group
@hoshi65392 жыл бұрын
@@gerechjorney5547 thats just wrong 💀 a single water attack from kyogre one shots them all, there are tons of legendary flying pokemon who could just nuke the city + tons of dragons and ghost type pokemons who cant even be hit by lions
@gerechjorney55472 жыл бұрын
@@hoshi6539 there are less than 1000 pokemons and all pokemons can be hit by all other pokemons, so physical attack works on all of them. Also they run out of PP. There have not been a pokemon whos attack catastrophically damage the surroundings areas or the trainers in the games.
@toppmz83152 жыл бұрын
Dawg.... while I respect that you had the courage to admit your flaws, you should never publicly admit that you pour your milk before your cereal. That admission immediately put you on a list of suspected serial killers.
@SkeleBlade972 жыл бұрын
Don't you mean Cereal Killers?
@phoenixgoose88442 жыл бұрын
@@SkeleBlade97 boo
@dingleburrs27142 жыл бұрын
Sorry im with lud on this one
@saikrishnatunuguntla28762 жыл бұрын
I go milk first. coz i like lil bit crunchy flakes.
@saikrishnatunuguntla28762 жыл бұрын
I go milk first. coz i like lil bit crunchy flakes.
@Bruhcissus2 жыл бұрын
This video just taught me that ludwig is inherently wrong about most things
@0987654a52 жыл бұрын
Honestly… just his logic for 1 billion lions vs. Pokemons is flawed. I’d just like him to explain how the lions would beat flying and ghost pokemons
@syfor22372 жыл бұрын
And no joke Arceus otherwise known as GOD
@kylecheng37102 жыл бұрын
Ikr THERE ARE POKEMON THAT CAN BEND TIME AND SPACE ITSELF GIRATINA CAN FOLD THE UNIVERSE INTO A BLACK HOLE AND FUCKING EAT IT ARCEUS IS LITERALLY *GOD HIMSELF* This is Kyle, and thank you for coming to my TED Talk.
@terrarohr2 жыл бұрын
@@kylecheng3710 1 billion is a big number
@AEX1LE2 жыл бұрын
@@terrarohr ok and there’s a fire dog that whenever it’s barks a volcano erupts a Pokémon that can quite literally cause a draught to drain all oceans a Pokémon that can cos enough flooding to remove all land and you think 1 billion lions could survive that?
@webber80352 ай бұрын
I love how Technoblade still never dies after 3 years... HE GOT THE MOST REPLAYED LETS GOOOOOOOO
@naygoats955 Жыл бұрын
In regards to the trolly problem I believe the the correct choice is almost always to pull the lever because if you think about it 5 people most of the time are able to out pay one person
@cameronsmiljan93747 ай бұрын
The problem I have with the trolley dilemma is that you're literally a bystander until you actually do something. Until the moment where you make the choice to pull the lever, you're not doing anything wrong. Once you pull the lever, you're a murderer because you actively made the choice to switch the tracks. Prior to that, the 5 people being tied down were already there and the trolley was headed for them before you got to the "crime scene". It's not your fault that they're there and they're going to die anyway, so the blood isn't on your hands. If you pull the lever, the blood is on your hands. If you think about it, the problem is about what you think will weigh on your conscience more: 5 people dying by someone else's hands, or 1 person dying by your own. If you can live with the guilt of killing one person, pull the lever. If not, then don't.
@marlonlernmark4 ай бұрын
@@cameronsmiljan9374well this thing is, what’s the difference between doing and letting happen? If there was no one on the other track, would letting the train kill 5 people still be right? No. Letting people die when you can save them is close to or the same as killing them, imo
@Freezyloen3 жыл бұрын
Quote of the century: "as I've gotten a little bit older, i've realised that taking away agency from other people is a little bit freeing, so.. to.. y'know, just to tell people no to certain things is.. kinda relaxing"
@trynt_xasan3 жыл бұрын
Connor is an old soul
@neonsabr3 жыл бұрын
*Pokemon literally controlling space, time, and creation* Ludwig- NO LIONS
@carton98923 жыл бұрын
If you use bite on those Pokémon in game they take damage
@MrSatan-zs1rt3 жыл бұрын
@@carton9892 If you put a lion in a black hole it dies
@jasperkra-caskey20483 жыл бұрын
Firstly Legendary and Mythicals can (and has) lost to normal Pokémon in both the show and the game. In addition, its 1,072,961.37 lion per Pokémon. If you are going on the games 1. They would run out of PP 2. We have never seen Splash moves hit more than 5 Pokémon and helping hand be able to be used more than 2 times on a single Pokémon 3. Unlike Lions which hunt in packs, we never see Pokémon use moves without trainers or work together in the wild. The sheer number would overwhelm the Pokémon. If you are going off the comics/TV shows there are huge scaling issues with the show's power inconsistencies, such as an at least almost max level Pikachu (who had recently gone toe to toe with Zekrom) getting OK'OD by a level 5 snivy with leaf tornado. The show is far too inconsistent to use when analyzing this fight. Also, in the show Pokémon get tired, often faster than they would have run out of pp. In addition, some lion Pokémon have intimidate, and Lions manes are natural intimidation employed in nature along with their group tactics. With each Pokémon having (2/3)^1,000,000,000 power from intimidate only special Pokémon could do any real damage. In conclusion, there is no way for the Pokémon to beat all the Lions before the lions overwhelmed the Pokémon, especially with half of the damage dealing Pokémon (physical attackers) not being able to do anything.
@yojirex63743 жыл бұрын
The problem is that he views the lions like normal type pokemon, so the question to him is the same as "could 1 billion rattattas beat all pokemon?" which imo does not make sense at all, because Lions arent pokemon at all in that sense.
@abhinav.283 жыл бұрын
If there are legendary Pokemons.. don't forget dragons existed.. Whom do you guys think will win a T-Rex or Charizad 🤔 😂
@gameswithcathal80032 жыл бұрын
For the trolley I wouldn’t pull the lever because that would make me a murderer. Instead I’d walk away
@kennethhenderson11072 жыл бұрын
Well that's part of the moral dellimma. You do have the option to let 4 people die vs 1, but then you have to live with the fact that you could have saved 3 extra lives at the cost of that one other, but if you pull the lever you get to know that you did save 3 extra lives, but by your direct action 1 life was taken that wouldn't have been before. Either way you've got it on your conscious. I would personally pull the lever.
@codetwip86782 жыл бұрын
35:31 🙏🐷👑
@ChawkG3 жыл бұрын
*Actual pokemon gods who made the entire universe*: "Idk bro that's a lotta lions."
@Praise_FSM3 жыл бұрын
also, 30million copies of pokemon have been sold, if there were like 30 pokemon average on each copy, the lions are outnumbered
@RevenantMain13 жыл бұрын
Ditto: **becomes lion**
@OGEdy3 жыл бұрын
There could be 3 arcues since there was already on and ditto and mew can transform into an arceus
@moresnqp3 жыл бұрын
@@OGEdy theres so many lions tho like they have no chance
@n3onblueblasters8783 жыл бұрын
Even if it wasn't legendaries Gardevoir can make BLACK HOLES.
@meckogecko21103 жыл бұрын
Ludwig: puts the milk first Me: puts the bowl first
@blur_13683 жыл бұрын
That's what I'm thinking
@A_Dimension_Hopper3 жыл бұрын
truly genius
@crinklekevin8483 жыл бұрын
Bruh genius
@hasunx0123 жыл бұрын
Yes I pour the bowl first too
@Nespire3 жыл бұрын
me: puts the table first
@murkwithasmirk68772 жыл бұрын
6:06. Arceus alone would clap 1,000,000,000 lions. He’s a universe level threat (considering he created it. Also everyone knows. It’s always easier to destroy than it is to create). Not to mention all the other pokemon who are continental level and country level threats. Hell even steelix would be invincible against all those lions. Best they can do is scrape all the dirt off his skin
@genshinisgreat4772 жыл бұрын
Macargo tho, he don't have to do anything and he beats all the lions, he just has to exist
@cameronsmiljan93747 ай бұрын
@@genshinisgreat477 True. They touch Magcargo at all and the lions die by melting.
@lyven98722 жыл бұрын
The main issue with the whole 1 billion lions vs every pokemon seems to be perspective. I believe there are two kinds of perspective to take here, which is game and lore / anime. On a game perspective, yea. Heck, there’s moves and other team set ups where lvl1 pokemons or a team or normally weak pokemons can easily take down even the highest leveled pokemon. It’s not a question that a billion lions can easily sweep every pokemon in existence through brute force in numbers. On a lore perspective, it’s a very different story. Legendaries will obviously be the MVP of this fight, and they will treat those billion lions like ragdolls. You got a pokemon who reigns over the very land, and the very seas. A single earthquake or a massive tsunami can easily wipe out those lions goodbye. And those are just two legendaries. And, without game perspective, how the heck are lions going to kill pokemon who can fly and teleport. They’d be attacking and retreating like it’s some damn video game. At this perspective, id call you an idiot for choosing lions when you got beings who can control time and space itself, dimensions, and most types of existing elements at a whim.
@bloodwolf26093 жыл бұрын
he keeps bringing up the argument "What if you stack this lasagna on the other lasagna" but doesn't address dividing the original lasagna into 2 halves and then restacking them, at which point the question becomes "How many lasagnas exist in 1 lasagna" which is funny. To elaborate, a single lasagna with the layers of "pastry, sauce, cheese, pastry, sauce, cheese" and he's arguing that stacking another "pastry, sauce, cheese, pastry, sauce, cheese" would be 2 seperate lasagnas but what is stopping these 2 seperate lasagnas from being 4 separate lasagnas? idk kind of sounds like a line is being drawn Ludwig... Or even further, what about no cheese and just having a "pastry, sauce, pastry, sauce, pastry, sauce" and calling that 1 lasagna and not 3? Feels like the "Gordon Ramsay" or "Stale" arguments are more like straw-man arguments that avoid the real question.
@CurtTalksSports3 жыл бұрын
bro i’m not gonna lie, i don’t understand a word of that
@lan25983 жыл бұрын
@@CurtTalksSports same
@lan25983 жыл бұрын
Ayoo CHILL
@axelinerys38413 жыл бұрын
Yes yes I totally agree, and like, even if one could consider a set of those layers 1 section of a single part of lasagna I still think stacking 2 lasagnas would make one. Let’s look at cake for example. When making, let’s say, a 3 tiered cake you bake each part individually then stack them on top of one another. Does this make this 3 separate cakes? Well, no, people still address it as 1 cake because you put multiple parts together to make a single item. That’s my take anyways.
@dwan70633 жыл бұрын
Yeah to put it more simply if 2 lasagnas each with 4 layers combine to make a lasagna with 8 layers, then could a 4 layer lasagna be considered 2, 2 layer lasagnas stacked together, equating the 8 layer lasagna to become 4 lasagnas stacked together?
@collegesavings72563 жыл бұрын
The “is water wet?” Question is a trick question because it can be answered both ways. Answer 1: Water is wet, because the term wet would indicate that there is an excessive amount of moisture in or on something. Answer 2: Water is not wet, because in order for something to be wet, there has to be a surface that can retain water, or lots of moisture. I could go more into it but you get the point. In my opinion, water is not wet.
@jermainechambers69773 жыл бұрын
As a biochem major, I’ve argued this so many times I’m too tired to keep going. But I like your answer. You obviously aren’t uneducated.
@demented-gamer3 жыл бұрын
you have other molecules of water making itself wet. so even if you don't count water as wet you need to be talking about 1 single molecule of water.
@ko-Daegu3 жыл бұрын
Water is actually not wet scientifically speaking
@ko-Daegu3 жыл бұрын
@@demented-gamer scienceline.ucsb.edu/getkey.php?key=6097 So it depends on your definition of wet really Ans the context
@marinovanderzalm82053 жыл бұрын
@@jermainechambers6977 so, as you are educated on this, and i'm not, can you explain me your point of view/just the fact?
@flurriethefox2 жыл бұрын
For the trolley problem, think of it this way: Five people are on one track, one person on the other. You get to choose whether or not to save the one person or save the five people by pulling a lever. This is the main plot of the trolley problem. BUT, if you pull that lever, you would be responsible for killing that one person, whereas if you were to just leave that lever how it was, you wouldn't be responsible for anything since you didn't intervene. Some of you are probably gonna ask, "Well what if it's my friend on that track? Or a government official?" or some sh!t. It's still the same. Even if one of the five people was a person in power, you would STILL have the blood on your hands, however if you just left it the way it was, you wouldn't have to worry about anything since you didn't have a role in the grand scheme of things. Think about that :)
@coolgamer-pq5hb2 жыл бұрын
Yeah but you’re basically killing the 5 people by not intervening when you easily could have. Let’s just say for example: there is a guy who can choose to save 5 people, or one person. If he saves either group, the other dies, so ofc you would go with the 5. I understand what you’re saying, but, this makes more sense to me.
@coolgamer-pq5hb2 жыл бұрын
Also you intervened by not intervening when you could have, it was still your decision who would live or die. You had the control and power to do so. So whether or not you think it, you killed those 5 people by not intervening.
@lukethompson77402 жыл бұрын
By not intervening you would be jailed
@ilikerice41752 жыл бұрын
RIP Technoblade
@KillerWolf1324 Жыл бұрын
👍but👎
@kamino95023 жыл бұрын
1 minute of techno content found guys, since he never uploads those are our only sources
@umi81123 жыл бұрын
Ikr
@ipizza99413 жыл бұрын
On god, techno content is more scarce than diamond
@MissPoplarLeaf3 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I'm only here for the Techno content
@hanum43693 жыл бұрын
@@MissPoplarLeaf same 😂
@TechnobladeClips3 жыл бұрын
ty ludwig for techno content
@josephmcgowan62123 жыл бұрын
How would lions beat every type of Pokémon ever? The lions can’t do shit.
@sentientbeing87383 жыл бұрын
There is a pokemon canonically hotter then the suns surface, that alone will be enough to stop the lions.
@lettucegangmember26213 жыл бұрын
@@sentientbeing8738 I think mega ray should be enough honestly
@sargentzero3 жыл бұрын
Dragon pokemon can literly drop a draco meteor on them and insta kill them all
@Louminos_3 жыл бұрын
its a lot of lions though
@sargentzero3 жыл бұрын
@@Louminos_ meteors or a billion lions think about it
@Y0uneedt0kn0w7 ай бұрын
8:32 I never understood this question its either 1 person dies or 5 people die so obviously pull it because you save 4 extra people
@SponkyCraft5 ай бұрын
Right but if you pull it, then you directly killed the person who was not about to be killed. If you don’t do anything, you have less guilt because you aren’t forced to make a decision. You didn’t tie up the people on the track, you just witnessed it.
@Y0uneedt0kn0w5 ай бұрын
So you would rather have no guilt and let 5 people die than have a bit of guilt but have saved 5 people and killed one?
@CoolRubiksCube4 ай бұрын
@@Y0uneedt0kn0wI think I'd pull the lever, but still I don't feel that your logic works, as it suggests that a doctor should kill a healthy person to get life-saving organs for 5 patients, which I think feels very wrong. It's not just about the guilt that you would feel, but the action of killing being morally worse than the inaction of allowing death.
@BandannaBread2 жыл бұрын
27:11 I don't think Schlatt would do nothing. Doing nothing is just the closet thing to standing there while eating a bowl of soup.
@chriscisco98803 жыл бұрын
How could 1 billion lions beat one of every Pokémon, even though that’s a lot of lions, some Pokémon are basically gods
@osmantahmazli39433 жыл бұрын
Macargo is hotrer than the sun
@hpermutation44393 жыл бұрын
Yes, but they would run out of PP and then they have to use struggle and die of recoil.
@osmantahmazli39433 жыл бұрын
@@hpermutation4439 dude some moves have a hell lotta pp plus you do understand that Macargo is literally hotter than the sun and Yveltal just has to go into his cacoon to kill everything around him, AND THOSE THINGS DON'T EVEN NEED PP
@jamef13 жыл бұрын
they'd each have to kill 1000000 lions tho
@osmantahmazli39433 жыл бұрын
@@jamef1 no, they wouldn’t, Yveltal is the literal interpretation of death and in cannon if he “dies”/goes into his cacoon, he ends all life with him, all yveltal has to do is just go into his cacoon and boom done
@MrcreeperDXD7773 жыл бұрын
"sir they outnumber us 1 billion to 893" "then it is a fair fight"
@pegl1n7313 жыл бұрын
Just wait till the next generation
@Version_Object3 жыл бұрын
Does this count evolutions
@willbusters36973 жыл бұрын
Due there’s a Pokémon that is literally a GOD.
@chupacabra1843 жыл бұрын
Arceus can just instakill all the lions why is this so hard for people to understand
@konradl57365 ай бұрын
RIP techno blade
@JustK4fun Жыл бұрын
Just some random pokemon like Magcargo, would beat all 1 billion lions on his own. That dude is twice as hot as the Earth's core.
@arvito12243 жыл бұрын
There are literal gods in the Pokémon universe. Pokémon who invented time and space. Obviously the Pokémon would win.
@christianflora23163 жыл бұрын
Yeah there are easily double digit numbers of pokemon that could solo 1 billion lions lol.
@pomelo98403 жыл бұрын
Yeah I agree. Like heracross is a big beetle and darumaka has warm turds, don't forget garbodor since he's basically just your opinion
@unaihmg93523 жыл бұрын
@@pomelo9840 if you take the manga its not even fair same as anime and pokedex. so the lions only chance is game, but its canon in the game that an legendary pokemon once distoyed the hole planet and negrozma can absorb all light/ heat from the sun
@pomelo98403 жыл бұрын
@@unaihmg9352 and yet it dies to a big fucking beetle
@ppvectored2963 жыл бұрын
That's a lot of lions though...
@Hyperion_HK3 жыл бұрын
Fun fact, cereal got its name for the roman name of Demeter, Ceres. She's the god of the harvest, and since cereals are made of crops like corn and wheat, they were named cereal crops.
@fidget_10613 жыл бұрын
Not a fun fact
@Hyperion_HK3 жыл бұрын
@@fidget_1061 nobody asked you
@fidget_10613 жыл бұрын
Don't want to argue with you so just take this cookie 🍪 :D
@Hyperion_HK3 жыл бұрын
@@fidget_1061 fair enough, I accept the cookie and respect your opinion
@tommaso57763 жыл бұрын
@@Hyperion_HK you shouldn't just take the cookie, because if you didn't like mrbeast's video he'll take your cookie and you'll have nothing
@changedacclol Жыл бұрын
1 billion lions gets deleted by a few shadow balls
@jaysondavis96936 ай бұрын
Rip technoblade, gone but not forgotten
@lucky_luke55543 жыл бұрын
For the pokemon vs lions one it doesn’t really matter how many lions there are. There are flying pokemons that can just chill in the air and kill all of lions while the lions can’t do shit. For example a charizard can just chill in the air and fry up all of the lions under him
@lycosgames82373 жыл бұрын
But did you consider 1 billion is a really big nymbert
@Ottoni1743 жыл бұрын
@@lycosgames8237 how would a lion kill a Steelix? or basically any pokemon made of metal, rock and fire?
@MultiGerel3 жыл бұрын
@@Ottoni174 let alone ghost types. what the fuck is a lion going to do against a ghost
@lycosgames82373 жыл бұрын
@@Ottoni174 a lion couldn't kill a steelix but 1 billion could because of big number.
@Ottoni1743 жыл бұрын
@@MultiGerel i actually think that a very angrey geodude could fuck up thousands of lions before breaking its fists on their skulls
@1stdragon1233 жыл бұрын
Pokemon obviously, wtf are lions gonna do to a ghost type or any of the many that fly. Not to mention the rock and steel types or the actual gods.
@crafty6083 жыл бұрын
lmao a goddam giratina vs a lion..
@davidandcindyburris49543 жыл бұрын
literally, if they are fighting every pokemon some of those pokemon in the real world could cause huge natural disasters and easily demolish the lions, what lions gonna do against a 7 ft tall Dragonite that can shoot a hyper beam from its mouth and fly
@davidandcindyburris49543 жыл бұрын
and that's only if its the original 151if its more then we got Arceus a literal Pokemon God what the lions gonna do against a god
@chum55183 жыл бұрын
🤓
@gnarlydude62123 жыл бұрын
But a billion lions..
@LinkinML10 ай бұрын
Ludwig:flexes that he’s an English scholar Also Ludwig:”Any English nerds in the chat?”
@beesburg46962 жыл бұрын
It’s one lasagna because it’s like baking a two layer cake, just because you have two layers doesn’t mean it’s two cakes
@technetium.3 жыл бұрын
counterpoint to the 1 billion lions: literally any steel type, they're made of fucking metal
@GiggityxGamer3 жыл бұрын
additionally: (getting progressively scarier) ghost: unaffected by normal moves which is all a lion has fire: pokemon made of lava, what is a lion gonna do jump into the pool of lava? Mewtwo: can mind control half the lions to attack the other half kyogre: tsunamai engulfing the earth to drown them solgaleo: can absorb the energy of the sun and blind every lion Dialga/Palkia: Can pause time for them and transport the lions to another dimension Arceus: the god that created the above, can just delete anything it wants. What have we learned? Ludwig doesn't know much about pokemon lore
@DrewconicSorceress3 жыл бұрын
Additionally, Gardevoir can create black holes
@vigor96753 жыл бұрын
Lions can bite, bite is dark
@randomshotz133 жыл бұрын
Pokemon can't kill other animals... Only make them faint whereas lions can kill so over time (yes it would take forever) lions will win as they chip away at the superpowered beasts
@Ottoni1743 жыл бұрын
@@GiggityxGamer Macargo is twice as hot as the sun, even him alone could beat 1b lions without even attacking them, the lions simply need to touch it
@pitchfourks3 жыл бұрын
my favorite thing about the trolly question is that by diverting the trolly you are willingly murdering the single person, but saving 5 others. if you don't do anything, you're just an innocent bystander that witnessed a gruesome accident.
@kaciehardt7862 жыл бұрын
Ex-fucking-actly.
@ghoulishgam3r5082 жыл бұрын
Nope, because you are choosing not to save 5 people when you could.
@jakeblaylock34902 жыл бұрын
@@ghoulishgam3r508 and thus we have arrived at the Trolley Problem
@SquirrellBoy4242 жыл бұрын
This was 1000% what Schlatt was thinking.
@SlumberousSnorlax2 жыл бұрын
@@ghoulishgam3r508 you could go to jail for pulling the lever
@cron18072 жыл бұрын
A level one pidgey can create a hurricane outta nowhere. There are 898 pokemon, and most of them can end the world, or cause massive natural disasters. Yveltal is able to kill literally everything, pokemon have LITERAL GOD, and Giratina can just send all of the lions to the shadow realm. To say lions win is to ignore how stupidly powerful pokemon actually are.
@VixeyTeh2 жыл бұрын
Soup according to both the dictionary and Wikipedia "A liquid dish, typically savoury and made by boiling meat, fish, or vegetables etc. in stock or water." Cereal is typically sweet not savoury and is usually made of grain or carbohydrates not the meat and veggies specified above. It is served cold/raw, not cooked or boiled in broth or water. Therefore, cereal does not qualify as soup in all 3 categories.
@Odlian3 жыл бұрын
Dude, Ho-oh can literally just revive any Pokémon who die. The Pokémon will always win.
@johnniegraham54143 жыл бұрын
those pokemon faint what about when a lion rips ones head off
@jacksaunders3863 жыл бұрын
@@johnniegraham5414 Ho-oh revives the dead. That’s what the comment says, not fainting. Ho-oh, in lore, can revive Pokémon, he did so to create Suicune, Entei, and Raikou
@daflipofpowa23883 жыл бұрын
also, gardevior can just make black holes
@johnniegraham54143 жыл бұрын
@@jacksaunders386 ok mr lore
@jacksaunders3863 жыл бұрын
@@johnniegraham5414 well it’s either lore based or game mechanics, and if it’s game mechanics, lions still lose
@MopishfoolVids3 жыл бұрын
Schlatt definitely chose all of the wrong answers on purpose. I have no doubt.
@someoned1663 жыл бұрын
schlatt is the type of guy whod do that
@hay3943 жыл бұрын
Most definitely
@lancesfoodreviews4233 жыл бұрын
but Pokémon would win
@doomstar45653 жыл бұрын
Especially on the trolley.
@pinkdolphin65473 жыл бұрын
me out here agreeing with schlatt on literally all of them: :|
@eldunari667615 күн бұрын
Okay here's what I think would be best: Q1: One Lasagna or two? Well, if the lasagna doesn't have both the top and bottom as pasta, you COULD say it's one. It's like stacking burgers. If you stack two burgers that both have two buns, you just have two burgers. But if one of them is missing a bun, its a Big Mac, which is one burger. Same with lasagna. As long as there isn't a double layer of pasta, you could call it one lasagna. HOWEVER, most lasagna have pasta on top and bottom, and as ludwig said, one part could be different from the other. Therefore, it is TWO. Q2: 1 Billion Lions V. Every pokemon? I'm not a pokemon nerd, so I don't know most pokemon, but lions take that dub. I've seen ludwig play pokemon before, and it only takes 2-3 pokemon to kill pretty much any strong pokemon, so 1 billion lions. Q3: Is cereal soup? I think ludwig nailed this one, if you asked someone if they want soup, they aren't looking for cereal. Soup needs broth, and vegetables/meats in it. I could see some kind of descriptive writer describing any solid in any liquid a "soup", but for conventional means, cereal is not a soup. Q4: Is water wet? No, water combines with things to make them wet. You need a mixture of water and something to call it "wet". Saying water is wet is like saying blue is purple. You mix blue with red to make purple. Blue by itself is not purple. Water is not wet. Water makes things wet. Q5: Pull the lever and actively kill one person, or leave it and kill 5? Leaving 5 to die when you can save them is murder just the same as if you killed 5 people with a knife. Inactivity does not mean you are innocent. Just kill one person instead. No one is bringing you to court because you saved 5 people. Pull the lever. Q6: How many holes are in a straw? I say none. A straw is a hollow cylinder with an open top and bottom. If the straw was wider than it was tall, I would consider it a hole, but since the straw is so thin and tall, I'd say its just hollow. But between 1 and 2, then obviously 1. Q7: Can pineapple go on pizza? Yes, it physically can. SHOULD pineapple go on pizza? No. If I ordered a regular pizza, and it was brought out to me as plain cheese, I wouldn't get all upset and say "Hey, there should be pineapple on here!" By default, the only things pizza SHOULD have are dough, sauce, and cheese. So "yes" for it can, "no" for it should. Q8: Cats or dogs? This isn't a very specific question, so I don't know how to answer. Is it which do I prefer? Which is best in general? Which is easier to deal with? Who knows. I'd say dogs, though, because we literally evolved them from wolves to be our friends and helpers, while cats are just wild animals we decided to keep as pets. As the phrase goes, the dog is man's best friend. Q9: Do you pour milk or cereal first? I pour cereal first. I think everyone should. If you pour milk first, then you're eating off a top of dry cereal, and then getting to the bottom, where there's just milk and at that point just eat and drink them separately. You need to pour the milk into the cereal to get them mixed up, because the milk has more mass and will drive into the cereal. Also yes I took like 20 minutes to write all this, because I always see people ask these questions, so I need to put my answers down somewhere, or it'll drive me crazy. These answers feel so obvious.
@eldunari667615 күн бұрын
Fyi the last sentence of each paragraph is the TL;DR
@l21gaming2 жыл бұрын
Ludwig: that's a lot of lions Pokemon films: pokemons bigger than mountains, pokemons that can move things with their mind, pokemons that can teleport........ Yeah no for sure a lot of lions
@thisismychannelname54762 жыл бұрын
but 1 billion is a big number
@oricalu4483 жыл бұрын
Before techno came up at the end, I was convinced that "pewdiepie" was techno. It just seems like the kinda thing techno would do.
@xoxo.e10r43 жыл бұрын
Yep
@theeffectoflogic33 жыл бұрын
Little do you know, pewdiepie is just pulling Lud's pewds; he was informed of this poll, contacted Technoblade & had 'im switch places.
@mattbill55653 жыл бұрын
lions would be normal type, and as we know they wouldn’t be able to do anything against ghosts. gengar would be able to survive the lions. flying types would be able to fly for a very long time, and rayquazza would be able to just fly back into the atmosphere, regain his health, and fly back down to kill the lions. lions don’t have any reach besides right in front of them, it’d be impossible for them to do any damage to rayquazza. with no projectile moves, lions would be at a heavy disadvantage. also kyogre? he’d have such a better advantage being able to submerge deep underwater. the battle would take forever, and the lions would kill most of the pokémon, but in the end the pokémon would win. Also the question is EVERY pokémon, not one of each type of pokémon. that means it is well more than 900 pokémon.
@caseyc36863 жыл бұрын
a billion is a LOT of lions
@certified_freak3 жыл бұрын
A billion is a lot of lions though
@smile--3 жыл бұрын
Galaxy brain
@wildabeast08373 жыл бұрын
Not to mention so many other points, think about this way, ice Pokémon would trip too, lions are used to heat and would get crapped on by blizzard
@caseyc36863 жыл бұрын
@@abyske8215 some of the lions will die and become ghosts themselves
@mrpuddingpop12 жыл бұрын
That anyone in the world things a ducking big cat could fight the batshit mythical amalgamations of Pokémon is fucking laughable
@edwardkingsley4929 Жыл бұрын
If you poke two holes into a basketball there are TWO HOLES. If you then stretch it into a shape of straw there still is TWO HOLES AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHH
@georgianagiannakopoulos67532 жыл бұрын
Technically, it is 1. And let me tell you why because I researched. a lasagna is defined to be an edible dish that is layers of meat cheese wide strips of pasta and vegetables. So if you add another lasagna on top of the original one, you are essentially adding more layers to said lasagna. So now you have one massive one.
@lukakaps95482 жыл бұрын
But, a lasagna is baked whole. Also there is a top layer of cheese, wich gets crispy when baked wich does not happen to cheese inside of a lasagna
@_Cujo_2 жыл бұрын
@@lukakaps9548 Doesn't matter. The key aspects of a lasagna are that it is layered and edible meat and cheese with pasta and veggies. It never makes any claims to the quality of the lasagna. If you cook a really shitty lasagna and somehow manage to crisp the middle cheese, you haven't divided your lasagna into multiple, have you? As long as there are alternating layers of meat and cheese and pasta and veggies, it's one lasagna. Maybe one really awful tasting, week old lasagna, but still one lasagna.
@Megan-uu2fj2 жыл бұрын
I think if you bake them both together on top of each other then its one but if you bake one, then bake the other, and the cheese on top doesn’t melt them together then its two
@MichelleWilliamsPewDiePie2 жыл бұрын
Exactly it's one
@codrangelf2 жыл бұрын
What if the lasagna is never removed from its baking form? I’ve personally never made a lasagne without a baking form, meaning to stack one lasagne on top of another there is a layer of glass/metal between the two lasagnas.
@Windowmeiker3 жыл бұрын
How would the lions ever win? There's literally Pokemon that control space and time, not to mention the other godlike pokemon
@obiz05613 жыл бұрын
Any legendary wipes the lions, and, you know black holes, time control, a literal god, and they’re ALL FIGHTING ON THE SAME SIDE
@jasperkra-caskey20483 жыл бұрын
Firstly Legendary and Mythicals can (and has) lost to normal Pokémon in both the show and the game. In addition, its 1,072,961.37 lion per Pokémon. If you are going on the games 1. They would run out of PP 2. We have never seen Splash moves hit more than 5 Pokémon and helping hand be able to be used more than 2 times on a single Pokémon 3. Unlike Lions which hunt in packs, we never see Pokémon use moves without trainers or work together in the wild. The sheer number would overwhelm the Pokémon. If you are going off the comics/TV shows there are huge scaling issues with the show's power inconsistencies, such as an at least almost max level Pikachu (who had recently gone toe to toe with Zekrom) getting OK'OD by a level 5 snivy with leaf tornado. The show is far too inconsistent to use when analyzing this fight. Also, in the show Pokémon get tired, often faster than they would have run out of pp. In addition, some lion Pokémon have intimidate, and Lions manes are natural intimidation employed in nature along with their group tactics. With each Pokémon having (2/3)^1,000,000,000 power from intimidate only special Pokémon could do any real damage. In conclusion, there is no way for the Pokémon to beat all the Lions before the lions overwhelmed the Pokémon, especially with half of the damage dealing Pokémon (physical attackers) not being able to do anything.
@mustafaguldas90113 жыл бұрын
you dont even need to think about space and time if they just fly lions are useless
@jasperkra-caskey20483 жыл бұрын
@@mustafaguldas9011 lmao Pokemon get tired
@roguepawww32143 жыл бұрын
@@jasperkra-caskey2048 some Pokemon float lmao
@NotWhatItLooksLike2 жыл бұрын
Rip techno
@FireSkulls1232 жыл бұрын
Pokémon would win against 1 billion lions. This is because lions cannot attack the flying type Pokémon. Even if the lions were smart enough to stack on top of each other, some Pokémon can survive in space. Lions cannot survive in space. I rest my case.
@keymonn12513 жыл бұрын
There is no rule surrounding how many layers constitutes a lasagna. Therefore, a single lasagna can be made of a varying number of layers- however (correct me if i'm wrong here), the cheese at the top of a lasagna tends to be crispier, fuller and more well done in comparison to the cheese present in lower layers. These contrasting characteristics could help us in distinguishing where the 1st lasagna ended and the 2nd one started (assuming we have now stacked the two lasagnas on top of one another). In doing so, we have a physical, chemical and visual way of viewing each lasagna- which as a result supports the contention that stacking a lasagna on top of another lasagna still leaves you with two lasagnas.
@MrBlazeSniping3 жыл бұрын
Very true, easily two lasagnas
@rwinkler43213 жыл бұрын
nah its one
@Gabriel-pj2fc3 жыл бұрын
Doesn't it also kinda depend on when you bake the lasagnas? If you bake them at the same time in the oven, and then stack them as soon as you take them out, it might be considered one, but if you bake them separately it's definitely 2. Like if I bake two pizza halves at separate times and then put them together later on, that doesn't make it one pizza.
@tiffanylastinger39253 жыл бұрын
That's what I thought is since the lasagna has a topping that is vastly different.. it is 2 lasagnas
@tonfidler63733 жыл бұрын
its an easy answer, if i make pasta, then after an hour i make the same pasta, have i made 1 or 2 pastas??
@frenchygary73763 жыл бұрын
Arceus could literally just fckn delete the lions
@ronaldperera77093 жыл бұрын
Exactly
@cl46553 жыл бұрын
Can literally just reshape the universe to one where lions never existed.
@tigertian12512 жыл бұрын
Yeah but it’s a lot of lions tho
@connor.cleave71642 жыл бұрын
Did you know? Read more
@miguxle4202 жыл бұрын
@@connor.cleave7164 damn
@VGN2275 ай бұрын
Anyone who thinks 1 billion lions is beating every pokemon is delusional. Imagine Mewtwo, he has human intelligence. He would have the brain to comprehend the situation. He can talk to every pokemon to get them on a team, while the lions are scattered. Also, rayquaza or mewtwo or some other powerful pokemon can fly to space and blow up the planet they’re fighting on. Killing all the lions and other pokemon, but rayquaza or mewtwo or whatever is still alive. Also, if the explosion of the earth kills mewtwo or whatever, the will only die after the lions are dead.
I don’t know how but in my head I can hear sykkuno say “well a billion is a large number.... I could pay my water bill with that!”
@GabrielVXIX2 жыл бұрын
I heard something really interesting from an italian about the lasagna thing The term for lasagna in Italian, lasagne, is plural. They aren’t referring to the dish as a singular object, it’s just the stacked noodles as a collective. If i understand correctly, this is generally true for (most) pasta dishes in Italian. like if you have a baked mac and cheese (just to address the “dry top” argument) and put two scoops on top of each other, it isn’t 2 mac and cheeses. It’s still 1 mac and cheese because macaroni is referring to the noodles as a collective. So, you can have multiple separate lasagne, but when they’re stacked, the collection just gets larger. it’s still 1 lasagne.
@laurencamila90242 жыл бұрын
yeah this was my thought process exactly. Lasagna is like a layered cake. Stacking another one on top essentially means more layers. If you typically do 5 layers and one day you do 6 does that mean you have more than one lasagna? no. Therefore stacking another one on top is still one lasagna
@rowry-chan2 жыл бұрын
@@laurencamila9024 but is it technically a layer if there's one "later" that doesn't have filling and just has 2 things of pasta🤨
@schlawyn3r4182 жыл бұрын
You should be a professor
@nagol37 Жыл бұрын
Just means more lasagna either way so I happy
@VixeyTeh Жыл бұрын
Exactly, Lasagne has no upper limit of stacked noodles.
@shromnomnom23822 жыл бұрын
Adjective. wet, damp, dank, moist, humid mean covered or more or less soaked with liquid. wet usually implies saturation but may suggest a covering of a surface with water or something (such as paint) not yet dry. This is why water isn’t wet. Water makes things wet, it itself, is not wet
@worldwideforall2 жыл бұрын
Techno.....
@Meichrob73 жыл бұрын
The problem with ludwig’s answer to the lions question is that he changes the question around to suit him. If someone mentions birds who can fly he goes “yah in real life sure but tackle in the games can hit flying types.” But if someone mentions the earthquake move not having a target limit he goes “yah but there’s earthquakes in real life and that didn’t kill all the lions.” You need to pick either the “what’s the lore say” option for Pokémon and try to apply that to the real world, or “what would the mechanics be?” and try to imagine how 1bill lions would be represented in the Pokémon game. If you need to flip flop between them to defend your point it’s because your point isn’t valid.
@whatever48473 жыл бұрын
If he watched WolfeyVGC's video he will learn that the lions dont stand a chance. He ignored the Pokedex, he managed to give HP to the lions, and used stats to kill them all in just one shot
@whatever48473 жыл бұрын
@@weirdchamp4601 you cannot use video gsme logic AND real life logic, it would be unfair. I could use pokedex logic and destroy the lions with a snap, but its unfair. PPs are video game mechanics, so using video game logic the pokemon win. Using real life logic, many factors apply. Ghosts are invulnerable. Space pokemon can chill in space away from lions and just blast the earth. Moves like black hole can kill every lion in one. Lions don't stand a chance
@Utuber693 жыл бұрын
Either way lions lose
@Meichrob73 жыл бұрын
@@weirdchamp4601 Issue is then you gotta deal with a lot of them being able to wipe out like continents.
@nickodagoat73953 жыл бұрын
Arceus is god, MewTWo is a psychic, and groudon is a Earth Bender. Add Charizard and Pikachu, no amount of lions win