That cook at the beginning was really proud of his chief’s hat, just wear it under the helmet!
@phased-arraych.91504 жыл бұрын
My Grandpa was in the Air Force when they first debuted the M16. It was known as the 601 back then.
@jco52544 жыл бұрын
USA STRONG how is that funny?
@longredroad424914 күн бұрын
the 601 was my first rifle in the USAF
@IAF710 жыл бұрын
Good old times. I miss my m16a1!
@Panhead535 жыл бұрын
I got a Troy GAU 5A as my only rifle- feels like an old friend!
@rickyj55472 жыл бұрын
Go bulid a retro ar-15 with a parts kit.
@JosephAnthonyJosefius4 жыл бұрын
You can hear the tuning fork ring after each shot 😂
@lindycorgey27433 жыл бұрын
You can hear it if you shut the bolt on an empty chamber. Just not as loud.
@steveperry13442 жыл бұрын
i remember hearing the spring in the stock.
@coburna5 Жыл бұрын
Here I am with a smith vortex on an 11.5 hearing that same “ring a ling a dinga ding dong ding.
@leonardwilson18463 жыл бұрын
Went through Lackland July, 65. At that time we were being trained with the M1 carbine.
@joeelledge46073 жыл бұрын
My father was there at that time. He started BMT just after his HS graduation in 1965. M1 carbines and Pith helmets.
@MrTimFarnham2 жыл бұрын
Hey Leonard I went through Lackland July '65 also. I was in Flight 751 and our first TI was Sgt. Ventry. I got out 6 months early 20 Dec 1968.
@dattebayo109 жыл бұрын
it was the first debut M16 by the US air force unit
@HighlanderNorth17 жыл бұрын
I love the audio sound of the M16 being fired at the beginning of the video. Its like "pweeshooow pweeshooow pweeshooow".
@steveperry13442 жыл бұрын
at basic training in july 1968 when we were qualifying with the M-16 the kid next to me was shooting at my target as was i and when they brought the targets up to count the hits mine was loaded with way to many holes and his had none. he caught hell and so did i and it was get down and give me 20 for both and then the whole flight.
@wadebarnett2542 Жыл бұрын
I had a lot of trouble lining up on my target. I don't doubt I gave my neighbors a couple of holes in their targets.
@bettyboop653409 жыл бұрын
if you miss your m16, then get an ar15
@jballew223910 жыл бұрын
Interesting that in some shots you see them using the old waffle-pattern magazines.
@arianquentin69852 жыл бұрын
i dont mean to be off topic but does anyone know of a trick to log back into an instagram account..? I was dumb forgot my login password. I love any tips you can offer me.
@jettgunnar46762 жыл бұрын
@Arian Quentin instablaster ;)
@arianquentin69852 жыл бұрын
@Jett Gunnar Thanks so much for your reply. I found the site on google and Im waiting for the hacking stuff now. Looks like it's gonna take a while so I will reply here later with my results.
@arianquentin69852 жыл бұрын
@Jett Gunnar It did the trick and I now got access to my account again. I am so happy:D Thanks so much, you really help me out !
@jettgunnar46762 жыл бұрын
@Arian Quentin Happy to help :D
@abigailsaoirsefinnegan4 жыл бұрын
That chicken wing tho. 🤣
@steveperry13442 жыл бұрын
i remember the first M-16 i shot did not have the forward assist button like those in the film.
@coburna5 Жыл бұрын
Nice “waist weld” with that telescopic sight, there flattop frank.
@josemoreno33343 жыл бұрын
When I went thru BT back in Aug.1979. We only got to shoot the M-16 once. It had a .22 adapter . I did get a score of 100 and a small arms ribbon.
@brainysmurf7410 ай бұрын
Looks older than 67
@JosephAnthonyJosefius9 ай бұрын
Yeah, they are using the waffle mags they replaced by then.
@landmine9406 ай бұрын
It not an Assault Rifle or weapon and you are allowed in military training or service to refer to it as an assault rifle.
@danbanks79308 жыл бұрын
The first versions of the m16 issued to troops in the field in Vietnam. Don't have the crome lining in the barrel and the hi humidity and dirt quickly built up along with that dirty powder that ball ammo used were the perfect recipe for epic weapon failures we all know about that occurred over there I saw the story of the m16 on history channel
@bobsmith-ru7xp Жыл бұрын
That magazine catch though.
@gophop7 жыл бұрын
I want some KFC after watching this.
@brianfoley43285 жыл бұрын
It's the cooks shooting at the AP's........
@whathappy60524 ай бұрын
Had me at accuracy of a sniper rifle also where to get that bipod?
@tarantulapettingzoo29806 жыл бұрын
what model of scope is that?
@CWake19 жыл бұрын
Pretty sure that's Clooney at 2:26.
@bettyboop653409 жыл бұрын
notice, no forward assist.old school rifle
@videomaniac1087 жыл бұрын
The forward bolt assist on my M-16s in 1969/70 never worked to clear a jam. I invariably had to break the rifle down and field strip it to get it unjammed.
@alexmartin91776 жыл бұрын
until the Air Force standardized on the army version they didn't have forward assists
@JosephAnthonyJosefius4 жыл бұрын
Gene Stoner who designed the AR15 said it was not needed.
@nickmad8878 жыл бұрын
show more
@NoNameNoFace-rr7li7 күн бұрын
no forward assist on af models...
@wadebarnett2542 Жыл бұрын
I don't remember seeing that film.
@scottdunkirk81984 ай бұрын
There is no “assault” in the nomenclature of the M-16
@colinbyerly80517 жыл бұрын
M203 grenade launcher m 16 was issued as well as 45 cal pistol and 81 mm motor and as forward observer carried a radio , the 45 postal was to not hit motor while setting it to Aiming stakes or direct target like in Arctic conditions were maps are useless and just have to aim site to target ,, then the ammunition m16 203 grenades and more, 5.56 magazine 30 to 60 rounds if you tape them upside down flip the magazine , smoke assorted, 45 lb radio Pr 73 standard radio pack with spare batteries, food personal winter gear / jungle / Arctic jackets boots snow and ski and slay harness to pull large 10 man tents 5 gal gas arctic stove water and extra winter bags inner sleeping bags more 81 motor rounds and weeks food for 10 people and not break a sweat in the -13 hot day to - 93 with wind shear Force Arctic winds January to February for Arctic Raiders patch , but jungle school was much hotter more rust on everything almost in hours time , its more weight than people can carry so many just dropped gear as they started to die until they just fell into the snow to die , it was their time mentally and physically, in jungle you just drop into a large spike needle tree 4 inch covered ,, black palm tree, or have viper attack your face in a fraction of a second and never see it as the weight humidity and heat and days of dehydrated food 3 hours sleep if lucky per day 5 days on end some days no sleep and walk all day water may be used up quickly and just heat stroke and abuse of physical pain and existing conditions of bug bites wet clothing socks and bug bites constant , for Jungle Expert Badge and Expert infantry Badge , yes we need better ways to reduce weights To the troops as in time they like I will have Back problems and leg pains and neck and headaches allergies to exposure and frost bite pain in cold weather , and so forth not felt at the time of all the work at a younger age so much damage is done as infantry man that the grenade and fragments of deflected munitions burning holes in clothing if your lucky that that is all , or jumping out of helicopter that shoots up because he thinks he's getting hit by rounds and end up falling out at even higher altitudes than expected and so forth , printing with new metals on computers will bring back the power to protect troops who are defending country's , who do not wish to hear about anyone getting hurt unless its battle related ,, its all battle related and it takes one who has done that to know without question. I feel in ten years these old films will make the new weapons look like these old ones that , are used today , we need more grenade launching m16 or the m 203 as we called them light and functional with bigger hitting explosive rounds to help the enemy find his death faster if that is what he is looking for .
@AKSnowbat907 Жыл бұрын
The M-16 isn't an assault rifle. An assault rifle is any rifle used to commit the crime of assault.. The M-16 is literally just a small caliber hunting rifle setup to fire full auto (at that time).
@ForensourceАй бұрын
You is a goofball.
@SouthernGround7 жыл бұрын
lol, each gooker stops in the clearing to be shot at " hey GI! you see ok? we not moving target now, we each do it, stand here long time, you go boom boom" or was it "love me long time "? in that case use a rubber.
@TheMetalHeaD2569 жыл бұрын
I notice the shiny bolt carriers. No phosphate finish. Were the originals chrome-lined everywhere? Nickel plated? Anyone know?
@eatkosherbacon9 жыл бұрын
Many of the early M16 variants, including the USAF ones of the time, had chrome-plated bolt carriers. bpullignwolnet.dotster.com/retroblackrifle/ModGde/RflGde/604.html
@TheMetalHeaD2569 жыл бұрын
Thanks, haha. Actually I found that out about an hour after posting my comment. However I didn't know 3/4ths of the stuff on the site you linked... that's a very cool page. Also calls out my home state with those AF field exercise photos at the bottom.
@demonprinces172 жыл бұрын
80s some rifles had chrome bolts then replaced
@spd5796 жыл бұрын
Yup, REMF's got shot at too! RVN. Old lesson's, return. Same shit, another generation!
@tmpass9 жыл бұрын
who added "assault rifle" to the title? Rediculous.
@dzac019 жыл бұрын
Actually, in the selective fire M16 the term is correct... in the case of my semi XM 15, it is not.. Auto fire makes the difference..
@anthonylawrence9307 Жыл бұрын
Where as the m16 was designed to replace the m14 and for Vietnam, and Vietnam being a "POLICE ACTION" (US Government definition not mine) therefore it is a defensive weapon. Nuff said.
@johnandrobinmccoy8305 Жыл бұрын
the term assault rifle is not used in the US military. That is some cooked up civilian term. Try service rifle.
@cal30m1 Жыл бұрын
Sure, next try telling us that the 9mm Bullet doesn’t “Blow The Lung Out of The Body”!
@voodoo14494 жыл бұрын
It never was an "assault" rifle. Assault is a type of behavior.
@SonOfTheDawn515 Жыл бұрын
It had that classification for intermediate cartridge, shoulder fired rifle/carbine, with selector switch capable of full auto fire.
@meanjune9 жыл бұрын
Everyone hated the M16 in Vietnam. It was way too complicated, and the 5.56 NATO was too weak.
@SecurityGuy428 жыл бұрын
+MinJun “Botchey dog” Kim No, they hated the M-16 (original model) because of jamming primarily. McNamara and his Wiz Kids cut costs on the original model before production. They changed the recommended powder for the cartridges with a cheaper type, which increased fowling. They said a cleaning kit wasn't needed so none was issued, which would have been fine IF they had stayed with the recommended powder. They removed the chrome lined barrels because who needed fancy barrels in combat they said, the chrome lining prevented rusting in humid environments like Vietnam. The resulting rifle was a disaster and got people killed. The M-16A1 was a vastly superior rifle (it has a forward assist on the side to help push the bolt forward as the weapon got dirty during firing) because many of those "luxury" features were included and flaws corrected. The 5.56mm cartridge couldn't do the same things as the 7.62mm Nato could in the field but you could carry more of it and it is easier to control during Auto fire. As for being complicated, all weapons are complicated unless you are using a sharp stick.
@meanjune8 жыл бұрын
+SecurityGuy42 I agree, but in my experience most troops liked an M14 or maybe an AK. Look at the early Navy Seals, most used high powered WWII weapons. I'm not saying I fought in Vietnam, but in my "research" and asking that was the case. There is a picture of my father in Vietnam, and everyone was holding an M14, AK, or even an M1. Some were holding the M16.
@Direwoof8 жыл бұрын
+MinJun “Botchey dog” Kim Yeah the M14 and the BAR were much better and more reliable. But the ammo was more expensive which is why they made the m16 I guess.
@HighlanderNorth17 жыл бұрын
Hyaku Yeah but the BAR was an outdated and impractical light machine gun by the late 60s. The M14 was difficult for most soldiers to accurately fire in full auto. The first shot is on target, the second shot is a little high, but by the 5th shot ++, it's become anti-aircraft fire! They probably at least should have done a slight design revision to the M16 to add a gas piston. There are companies now that make adapter kits to change the upper receivers to short stroke piston designs, that do away with the direct impingement system that dumps dirty, hot gasses into the receiver, bolt assembly and etc. I'm not sure why that ever seemed like a good idea! If you are trying to save weight, you can still achieve it, while still adopting a reliable and clean cycling system.
@HighlanderNorth17 жыл бұрын
wavygr We are talking about the govt here. There are endless stories of pay to play, where a company will 'encourage' politicians to choose their product over all others, even in the face of proven scientific testing that illustrates the inferiority of the standard adopted models when compared with the newer competitors products. The same is true of the M16 family. Its always justified by its devotees, who say, "well you just have to keep it clean at all times". That's well and good in Iraq, where they do patrols for a few hours, then return to a clean, air conditioned building with tables laid out with all the top notch cleaning supplies. You can take your time dismantling it every day and relubing it etc. But in many wars you won't be able to do that reliably every day. I remember watching a real life description of the Blackhawk down fighting, where special forces landed fresh into the city in helicopters with guns that had not been used in fighting yet, but as these guys described the situation, supposedly multiple M16's were jamming and suffering stoppages within minutes of being in battle! I can't imagine how the M16 would've fared in WW1, where you didn't have the opportunity for the constant maintenance it requires.