M2 Bradley Destroys T-80BV With TOW Missile! Perfect Ambush

Рет қаралды 119,227

Ай бұрын

A M2 Bradley destroys a Russian T-80BV with its TOW missile in a perfect ambush.
Support the Channel
www.patreon.com/user?u=80032585
buymeacoffee.com/suchomimus99

Пікірлер: 507

@johnvanzo9543 Ай бұрын

You put a smile on the face of this old TOW gunner.

@Paludion Ай бұрын

Sorry, I read "missile" instead of "smile." XD

@javir1669 Ай бұрын

@@Paludionx2

@ropeburnsrussell Ай бұрын

Thanks for your service, I hope it's ok to say that because I mean it.

@henrikbergman4055 Ай бұрын

I read that in Heath Ledger's Joker voice.

@davidjones6389 Ай бұрын

AIRBORNE!

@chukkie0001 Ай бұрын

t-72 from saddams army: "first time?"

@sirsmeal3192 Ай бұрын

No, the last...

@markusmeldre 27 күн бұрын

more like the t-55

@WandererJester 27 күн бұрын

@@markusmeldre They had more than T-55s sunshine.

@BENKYism 27 күн бұрын

@@WandererJester They mostly had Chinese Type-69-II's (T-54A variant, pretty much a T-55), only the Republican Guard and the Saladin division used "Lion of Babylon" tanks (T-72M1).

@WandererJester 25 күн бұрын

@@BENKYism Funny how you forgot about the T-62 as well, and the Battle of 73 Easting where the M2 Bradley killed more than just a few T-72s that were there. Take your revisionism somewhere else.

@Lan_Zadura Ай бұрын

Sucho: Apologies for the noisy background. Also Sucho: Records a flawless video with no background noise whatsoever.

@suchomimus9921 Ай бұрын

I'm at the campsite bar lol. Was expecting noise of the loud kids to show

@JoeVideoed 29 күн бұрын

@@suchomimus9921 Also the text was readable. It especially helps if you go full screen.

@user-vu3pe7ui6g 24 күн бұрын

@@suchomimus9921 don't try 2 slither away now. U promised background noise... U lied... U lied in my face!

@juanpablochaconvargas6919 Ай бұрын

Bradley doing Bradley things

@hksp Ай бұрын

idiot, he forgot to report the ending for tat m2. it continue driving down south turn east and then BOOM ! kaput. and theres vid of it

@thfrussia6717 27 күн бұрын

It was destroyed few hundreds meters away the same day. Was also Bradley things I guess...

@Pickle1762 27 күн бұрын

@@thfrussia6717 Source: trust me bro

@thfrussia6717 27 күн бұрын

I gave the link but crappy utube deleted it. what do you want from me else

@juanpablochaconvargas6919 27 күн бұрын

@@thfrussia6717 then post it on any other website 😒

@paulyoung4422 Ай бұрын

Nice of Bradley to give the T80 a TOW.

@hksp Ай бұрын

and then it got destroyed few hundred m down the road , HAHAHAHAHAHA idiot, he forgot to report the ending for tat m2. it continue driving down south turn east and then BOOM ! kaput. and theres vid of it

@freedomfirst5557 24 күн бұрын

That should be a bumper sticker

@davidjones6389 Ай бұрын

It's nice to see the Bradley in its natural habitat.

@ilaser4064 29 күн бұрын

David Attenborough voice engaged.

@janwitts2688 Ай бұрын

Artillery makes the armour button up, restricting their perception. Nice to see Bradley doing what it was made for.

@kameronjones7139 27 күн бұрын

Given how far the distance was I don't think the would have seen it over a mile away hiding

@juliuscheng5788 26 күн бұрын

@@kameronjones7139 Might have spotted the TOW missile launch cloud or the launch flash though. Maybe not enough time to react, but still a good tactic

@cartoonfan959 Ай бұрын

effective pest control

@h.a.9880 Ай бұрын

Another eviction notice served.

@hksp Ай бұрын

idiot, u forgot to report the ending for tat m2. it continue driving down south turn east and then BOOM ! kaput. and theres vid of it

@hanovergreen4091 29 күн бұрын

Orc-B-Gone correctly applied

@sirsmeal3192 Ай бұрын

Evidence that the 47th Separate Mechanized Brigade is back in action.

@1djbecker Ай бұрын

A reminder that Russia's 1st Guards Tank Army, especially its 4th Guards Tank Division, hasn't been seen in action. The 1GTA was the most famous and best equipped soviet/Russian tank unit, 'protector of Moscow'. Trolls vigorously asserted that the 1GTA hadn't been largely destroyed in the first three weeks of the invasion, and was finished off in the failed rescue of Izium/Lyman. We were told, paraphrased, that it was merely shagged out after a long squawk.

@Khronogi Ай бұрын

@@1djbecker"was the most" is that was from ww2? Are they a folk hero unit? The reason I ask is because it would be humorous to me if someone were to say they that they are the best equipped unit and also that they havnt been in combat yet because that implies russia wouldn't be sending it's supplies to those actually needing them but to what essentially would be a reserve guard force.

@john_in_phoenix Ай бұрын

@@1djbecker 1st guards tank army was severely attrited when they were surprised by the Kharkiv offensive and donated 100s of armored vehicles to Ukraine. Before that, they lost a lot of personnel (the reason they were in the "quiet" Kharkiv area).

@d3nza482 Ай бұрын

@@Khronogi It's a bullshit designation - like having 3 dogs, each long after the previous one has died, and calling them all... say... Cricket. Then, completely ignoring the fact one was a street mutt, one a poodle and one a chihuahua saying you had a same guard dog since 1942. Also, that chihuahua basically got wiped out by Ukrainians back in '22. The "trolls" he talks of is Ukrainian MoD’s Main Intelligence Directorate. Besides bringing receipts on the dead Russian officers, with name, rank and position to prove that, Ukrainians also took tanks - "destroyed and seized 308 units of military equipment from the said army". But have no fear - the ranks of the chihuahua tanks have been replenished by fresh fruits of green recruits. The parade army marches again.

@mortalz9940 Ай бұрын

47th brigade trying not to lose 8 abrams 😂

@CyberBeep_kenshi Ай бұрын

As a reminder, 'reporting from Ukraine ' is under bot attack again

@wdaswwqads 28 күн бұрын

As it should since it's fake news.

@jody-ne7xs 26 күн бұрын

Canadian disinformation BOTS

@KellyJK07 Ай бұрын

I practiced with the TOW system...40 years ago. Pretty great that we still use it...

@thePronto Ай бұрын

"Any unauthorized vehicle on Ukrainian property is subject to being TOWed, at the owner's expense."

@Bob94390 Ай бұрын

Good one! Tank you!

@donaldatherton319 29 күн бұрын

Print up that sign!

@CAPSLOCKPUNDIT 28 күн бұрын

It's what they get for parking in the fire lane.

@The_ZeroLine 27 күн бұрын

One of the best puns of the war and the wordplay in this conflict is heavy.

@bigfutus 27 күн бұрын

That is a T-shirt material

@jamesoldham9995 29 күн бұрын

I remember when the Bradleys were first sent, all the Russophiles we're saying how it was "Only fit to fight goatherders" and whatnot. Funny how they say nothing now.

@cal-native Ай бұрын

I was an engineer with an aerospace company that manufactured TOWs in the eighties. It is a BEAST! Even though it was wire-guided, it was very effective and accurate. The maraged steel body had so much internal stress that dropping one could cause it to explode with shrapnel going everywhere. Handled with care!😉

@_mysilentblue2227 Ай бұрын

In the 80's, 40 year old designs tearing up the russians current tech. Love it.

@Bob94390 Ай бұрын

Jamming a wire guided missile is not so easy :-)

@SgtBeltfed Ай бұрын

@@Bob94390 The best thing about wire guided is there's no warning. No signals to intercept, no laser to detect. First time anyone has any idea it's on the way, is when it impacts.

@teeanahera8949 Ай бұрын

@@Bob94390there are also hopeless in forested country and you have to remain on target for the duration of the shot. They have switched to fire & forget now.

@2639theboss 29 күн бұрын

@@teeanahera8949 Literally any ATGM is bad in a forest. An aircraft carrier might be pretty shit at fighting a land war in the Gobi desert but it turns out thats not what theyre intended for.

@donwyoming1936 Ай бұрын

1st time I've seen Ukraine use a TOW. The weapon is a beast on a Bradley.

@MrCantStopTheRobot 27 күн бұрын

It would never get posted on YTube but there's footage from last November, around Avdiivka itself. TOW2B top-attacks a BMP-2 in from the right flank. Vehicle immobilized, dismounts stumble out the back, then 25mm rips apart the dismounts.

@FirstDagger Ай бұрын

1:24 One suggestion: use yellow instead of red for unknown contacts.

@suchomimus9921 Ай бұрын

Good idea

@antoniograncino3506 Ай бұрын

TOW is an archaic guidance method, but it has re-emerged valuable because its guidance can't be jammed.

@badchefi 29 күн бұрын

Guided by wire is common with Ukrainian and Russian made ATMs. We used the old British Dragon in Switzerland back in the day. Very effective.

@WackyJackyTracky 26 күн бұрын

It can be jammed by Shtora on T-90 since 30 years

@TheRealSteve42 26 күн бұрын

It can be jammed by IR dazzlers, but not ECM. IR dazzlers aren’t really used anymore, so it’s not an issue.

@TheRealSteve42 26 күн бұрын

⁠@@WackyJackyTracky Russia does not use Shtora. It was ineffective and decommissioned for the same reason the dazzlers on the Abrams were. They cover a very narrow arc, while most ATGMs are fired from an ambush position outside of this arc regardless. It also only works in perfect weather and environmental conditions, as any sort of dust will prevent it from working properly, and even then it usually won’t stop the missile from hitting its target anyway.

@WackyJackyTracky 26 күн бұрын

@@TheRealSteve42 yea, but in the right conditions the TOW missile would go way off course. Maybe Russia will recomission a better version or soldiers will build own brew versions with 3 old T-90 dazzlers on top. Who knew we would see a come-back of turtle-tanks 😆 Anyway its wrong to say TOW couldn‘t be jammed

@jacknemo8021 Ай бұрын

Pop goes the weasel.

@cideltacommand7169 Ай бұрын

Pop goes the leopard

@kevinspaceyVEVO Ай бұрын

@@cideltacommand7169 due to the blowout panel in the leopards, they do not in fact go 'pop.' that feature is a Russian speciality.

@aconnagan3680 27 күн бұрын

@cideltacommand7169 yea western equipment doesn't "pop" unlike the turrets of your precious ruzzie tanks. We design our stuff to keep service men alive. YOU design stuff to be cheap without any regard for the crew. Same with our societies. WE have an effective society and government that is inclusive, YOU have a single man screw up your country for 20+ years.

@wunderlol Ай бұрын

Bradley are probably one of the best thing UA received after himars..

@john_in_phoenix Ай бұрын

They've certainly been one of the most visibly effective.

@SeanP7195 29 күн бұрын

CIA: Ahem

@john_in_phoenix 29 күн бұрын

@@SeanP7195 Yes, I agree. Intel and satellites help a LOT. In particular the link-16 capable radars donated by a lot of European countries are less visible, but really effective when Ukraine has ammunition for counter battery and air defense.

@jonathanpfeffer3716 29 күн бұрын

@@john_in_phoenixvery very true. the IRIS-T radar systems, the ones with missiles systems and without, have been quietly covering damn near the entire area of Ukraine without much press coverage. Absolutely vital for their air defense.

@john_in_phoenix 29 күн бұрын

@@jonathanpfeffer3716 I was thinking about the link-16 counter-battery radars, and how valuable they are against low-level drones and cruise missiles. I know Ukraine gets early warning when bombers take off with cruise missiles, and near the front line these radars can hand off tracks to NASAMS, Patriot, IRIS-T, etc. They significantly improve the radar horizon of air defense farther back. Air defense can get firing data before their own radars can even see the target. I know multiple European countries (and the USA) donated dozens of counter-battery radars, and they really help with the intercept rate.

@The_ZeroLine 27 күн бұрын

This is the biggest advantage of vastly superior optics.

@joeordinary209 Ай бұрын

Now feel better !

@buddhablue21 Ай бұрын

Hell on a wire

@BagoPorkRinds 29 күн бұрын

Its funny that the M2 Bradley continues to destroy more tanks than the M1 Abrams. 😂

@ThomasEPeters 27 күн бұрын

Easy when there are three or four times as many Bradleys than Abrams in the Ukranian Army. And when was the last time you saw a Challenger- England gave them twice as many as we gave M1s.

@D64nz 26 күн бұрын

@@ThomasEPeters clearly you can't count as England doesn't have twice as many in total. They only had 40 Challenger 2's in total and they can't even maintain that fleet. 😊

@ThomasEPeters 26 күн бұрын

@@D64nz Your nuts because the production run was over 300.

@tracboy80 24 күн бұрын

@@D64nz"only had 40". You dropped a zero on that. Not a huge number by any means, but yeah not 40.

@tracboy80 24 күн бұрын

@@ThomasEPetersAmerica gave some 30 odd M1s (an inexplicably low number considering the thousands in storage), UK gave under half that C2s. Ideally UK govt should have bought back C1 spare parts from Oman to give to Ukraine as they would have to cannibalise parts from working tanks otherwise.

@williamjones9662 Ай бұрын

Ruzzian tank traps go BOOM!

@hksp Ай бұрын

idiot, he forgot to report the ending for tat m2. it continue driving down south turn east and then BOOM ! kaput. and theres vid of it

@alexdemoya2119 Ай бұрын

Chadley

@MROJPC Ай бұрын

Welcome back TOW. Oh! How we have missed you! 👍

@stevo091 Ай бұрын

Bradley's is awesome 👍

@hksp Ай бұрын

sure, it goes boom few hundred meters down the road. and this idiot, he "forgot" to report the ending for tat m2. it continue driving down south turn east and then BOOM ! kaput. and theres vid of it

@rogeri2468 Ай бұрын

Only one TOW missile can be fired at a time. That's because it's a SACLOS system - the operator has to keep the crosshairs on the target - and the wires are what carry the steering signals. It also takes over a second from firing to the missile starting moving ("first synthetic motion"). That's the time required for things like the battery squibs to fire and the gyroscopes to run up. The time between the two explosions is simply too short. I used to maintain the system on Lynx helicopters.

@Travis_22 Ай бұрын

REME?

@12time12 Ай бұрын

Aren’t the new TOW missiles laser guided? Thanks for the in depth explanation.

@deloughi1887 Ай бұрын

@@12time12 It's in the name, if it was laser guided, then it wouldn't be a TOW, TOW is an acronym for Tube-launched, Optically-tracked, Wire-guided.

@rogeri2468 Ай бұрын

@@Travis_22 Yep.

@rogeri2468 Ай бұрын

@12time12 There were a number of improvements over the years, but an advantage of wire guidance is that it can't be jammed. That isn't something that you would want to give up, given Russia's electronic warfare capabilities.

@mytube001 Ай бұрын

I knew the TOW flies slowly for a missile, but it still looks odd. Good hit though, and that's all that matters in the end! :)

@markshutt1476 Ай бұрын

They are slow, by missile standards, unless it's aimed at you.

@SuperRede4u Ай бұрын

@@markshutt1476So true. 👍

@uffa00001 Ай бұрын

@@AmericanDiscord Ivan, you can clearly see the TOW fired at 0:09, and for a second or so you can clearly see its trajectory which is straight along the road. Review the clip. It's the other Russian vehicle which might have hit a mine. In any case, there are two Russian vehicles hit, one by a mine and the other by a TOW, and I don't see what do you rejoice about which is hit by what.

@AmericanDiscord Ай бұрын

@@uffa00001 the background explosion is clearly the TOW. If you knew anything about TOW you would know that the wire often snaps leading to stray missiles. Also you can see the crater from the mine blast in the provided photo behind the tank.

@d3nza482 Ай бұрын

@@uffa00001 It's called coping. Famous Russian national sport.

@marcusott2973 Ай бұрын

Much awaited, much appreciated excellent insights as always from you.

@taxesdeathandtrouble.1886 Ай бұрын

"the goal of equipping every drone with a mechanical equivalent of the eye of Sauron for less than the cost of a Happy Meal" -Perun Here’s to a free, independent and sovereign Ukraine, all of it.

@cideltacommand7169 Ай бұрын

No, I'd rather keep my organs.

@PutinsFailures 29 күн бұрын

Cheers to an obscure Perun reference 🍻

@markmierzejewski9534 Ай бұрын

It more cost effective to send aid to Ukraine vs not. Jobs are being created because of aid to Ukraine. The cost of placating to a weak nation just because … is zero reason. Russia is failing against the poorest nation in Europe. Let’s not forget this is year 3 of the 3 day special needs operation. And struggling to secure oblasts let alone control Ukraine.

@thefoodcan Ай бұрын

Wasting taxpayers money to aid a war that we should not be involved in, millions of homeless people in America and homeless veterans should be getting the aid. Ukraine could not win with other countries sending billions in supplys.

@nikosatsaves3141 Ай бұрын

Actually Russia is fighting against 2/3 of Ukraine the rest being the prorussian Donbas. If you put Crimea in the equation that drops even more.

@nehalemxtv5331 Ай бұрын

Moldova is poorest, Ukraine just next to it

@ekahab Ай бұрын

It also saves US taxpayer dollars by sending the older munitions to Ukraine rather than paying workers to dismantle them, which has to happen every decade or so. Chemicals degrade over time.

@2639theboss Ай бұрын

Yup. Exactly what i said when i called my congressional rep. My state alone is estimated to get around 70billion in economic growth each year from military spending. Yup. A single US state pays for the aid to Ukraine with just the jobs and economic boost from military expenditures. Every year. Anyone saying this is a bad economic play hasnt looked at the numbers and doesnt genuinely care about the economics.

@neiltitmus9744 Ай бұрын

Straight down the road that looked good

@bulldog71ss33 Ай бұрын

This is amazing footage.

@joetuktyyuktuk8635 Ай бұрын

You would think a well thought out ambush like this, the second explosion is likely another anti-tank weapon... maybe Stugna-P

@suchomimus9921 Ай бұрын

Could be, but I think stugna is more accurate.

@AstroGremlinAmerican Ай бұрын

Using a TOW to give a hot foot to the Orcs.

@soyyo85 Ай бұрын

Слава Україні та її воінам...

@henryo7778 29 күн бұрын

Great job! The advantage of the M2 lies in scouting, night vision capabilities, and the long-range attack power of the tow missile. Russian tanks have relatively poor night vision equipment, so the M2 should mainly operate at night, covering infantry attacks, rather than directly attacking enemy positions full of landmines during the day.

@captainhadd0ck Ай бұрын

What a beast! Slava Ukraini! 💙💛

@user-yo9pv1ni6t Ай бұрын

The Bradley, everyone loves to see this beast in action, So as i saw it, the Bradley was waiting behind some cover,,,which the ruzzian tank crew could not see. Once the T80 was near the trun in the road, the Bradley came out , stood its ground, HOPING the tank crew did not see the Brad,,, being at night, favor was w the Bradley,,,,,the Brad crew made the decision to wait til the 80 makes its turn, so aim for the turn BEFORE the T80 makes the turn,, Big chance here bc if the T80 does see the Bradley,, before making the turn, its RIP for the Bradley,,, the gamble paid off, what was great about this strike,,, the raod being staright as a arror, making aiming the TOW super duper easy. THe T80 crew just did not see the Bradley,,, The Bradley is fast, so staying behind cover waiting wasa a very smart move,,, and came out to geta clear staright shot JUST AS the T80 was ABOUT to make its turn. Bradley came to a sudden stop, waited for the perfect second,,, praying not noticed,,, ,,The Bradley is fast and this gave the slight upper hand to the Ukraineian crew. The ruzzians fear the Bradley's. Its a beast and causes panic in the ruzzian army.... ...The Bradley's stay in hiding mostly,, waiting like a Leopard stalking its prey. Incredible video here.

@ernestpaul2484 Ай бұрын

I do believe the Bradley's night vision and/or thermal imaging is of a longer range than the T-80's. The quality/clarity of the night sights on the Bradley are also better.

@uffa00001 Ай бұрын

Yes, I suppose either the Bradley had information from drones, relayed to it, or the two vehicles in the background are Ukrainian tanks, which saw the Russian tank and informed the Bradley of its direction. The Bradley then made the ambush counting on the Russian tank not realizing where it was. The Bradley certainly would have immediately escaped from its position, exploiting its great agility, if the shot had missed.

@ironman8257 Ай бұрын

You need to test for autism

@john_in_phoenix Ай бұрын

Superior optics enables the "see first, shoot first" advantage.

@hksp Ай бұрын

idiot, he forgot to report the ending for tat m2. it continue driving down south turn east and then BOOM ! kaput. and theres vid of it

@ParallelOrb 27 күн бұрын

Chad Bradley Vs Virgin T-80

@jimeditorial 29 күн бұрын

I was one of the naysayers who said that the Bradley was overengineered, too complex and too expensive. looks like I was wrong... I am surprised at how effective it is as a combat vehicle. Crews must be confident in it, as they appear to be taking on MBT's who's armor the Bradley crews know they can't penetrate. Between the ATGM's and the Bushmaster, which appears to be capable of destroying a tanks optics and sensor suite, it may be the most effective vehicle on the battlefield today. Who knew?

@alfredchurchill2328 29 күн бұрын

A TOW will kill a tank bro. Not just ruin optics etc.

@jonny2954 29 күн бұрын

Bradley overenginnered, complex and expensive? Have you seen any of the modern current gen IFVs?

@qinarizonaful 29 күн бұрын

Thank for being honest, and posting! 🎉

@jimeditorial 28 күн бұрын

@@jonny2954 compared to the M113? Yes

@jimeditorial 28 күн бұрын

@@alfredchurchill2328 I mean the Bushmaster.

@bigearl3867 Ай бұрын

Bad Brad is at it again!

@hksp Ай бұрын

its kaput alrite idiot, he forgot to report the ending for tat m2. it continue driving down south turn east and then BOOM ! kaput. and theres vid of it

@lifevest1 Ай бұрын

“Yes but but, just wait until Putin unleashes the waves of T-14s! He’s just clearing out old inventory!”

@wwlb4970 Ай бұрын

Exactly, who needs this inventory of low-quality outdated tankmen. They are long past "best before" date.

@JazzJaRa Ай бұрын

I assume it will just be one wave only because they don't have more than 20 of them and they will break down anyway.

@d3nza482 Ай бұрын

@@JazzJaRa They'd have to drop them from the airplane, they can't move down a Moscow street or try to mount a transport truck without breaking down. Greatest tank in the world. Galaxy, even.

@cideltacommand7169 Ай бұрын

@@d3nza482Greatest tank in the whole observable universe, they have such good stealth coating their armada of 2000 of them are invisible, only 20 that are broken can be seen.

@CrazyDutchguys Ай бұрын

@@d3nza482 i believe it was revealed that the tank didnt break down, but that they put on the handbrake in the tank and didnt realize it. So it wasnt mechanical issue, it was gross incompetence. Hope that helps.

@Canoby Ай бұрын

Damn, first we had Bradleys knocking out T-90 optics with their autocannons; now we're seeing them slamming T-80s with their TOW missiles. LOL maybe Russia should just get out of the tank game- obsolete IFVs are wrecking their best MBTs

@cideltacommand7169 Ай бұрын

No ?

@Canoby Ай бұрын

@@cideltacommand7169They should. Them canceling the T-14 alongside old US IFVs knocking out their mainline tanks demonstrates that Russians don’t know how to design, develop, maintain, and use modern tanks. There isn’t a “maybe” there; I was being polite

@Canoby Ай бұрын

@@cideltacommand7169 Russians canceled the one modern tank they spent over a decade trying to develop (T-14) and their deployed tanks are all getting slapped around by obsolete US IFVs in Ukraine. LOL OK I guess Russians just showing off their incompetence

@Canoby 29 күн бұрын

@@cideltacommand7169 Russia's tanks are pathetic lol

@PutinsFailures 29 күн бұрын

Russia’s tanks are all just modified T-72s, unless they’re even older models

@WhyWhatWhoWhenWhyAgain Ай бұрын

Absolutely like this!! Great video!!

@Nick-bp7jf 26 күн бұрын

Good to see that TOW is still relevant. I was not sure if it could penetrate modern armour like the T80.

@adrianlang6550 29 күн бұрын

Excellent succinct narrative. Uou rxplained detail i had missed Thank you as usual.

@patrickpeake3935 29 күн бұрын

Great, informative video as you do so regularly. Many thanks

@flixri726 Ай бұрын

The smoke on the right looks like it could also be defensive smoke after the vehicle saw the TOW launch

@sequoiasemperviren3163 29 күн бұрын

Fun fact: The Bradley destroyed far more Iraqi tanks than the Abrams.

@Mwwwwwwwwe Ай бұрын

More like CHAD-ley😎🦾

@13699111 Ай бұрын

Thank you for the update

@jameskennedy6207 29 күн бұрын

Love western tech.

@Kenneth_James 25 күн бұрын

100 Bradleys arrived today

@user-vu3pe7ui6g 24 күн бұрын

Arrived where? Florida?

@markmonaghan2309 Ай бұрын

Fantastic thanks again

@tonyyarbray Ай бұрын

don't have to shred russian rabble crap with your auto cannon all the time when you have TOWs sitting there waiting for their turn

@gherkamum Ай бұрын

🇺🇦❤🇺🇦❤🇺🇦❤👍💪👍🇬🇧

@kuidaorekitchen5850 Ай бұрын

Literally zero background noise! haha. Sounds good!

@suchomimus9921 Ай бұрын

I was recording it at a bar in Cleethorpes. Expected the background buzz to be picked up

@David_Crayford Ай бұрын

@@suchomimus9921 Interesting. A handful of people I know have gone out to Turkey for a couple of weeks, rather than fly in. One thing I first noticed was the birds tweeting in the background where you usually record. I don't know if you keep them, live next to a park, or just a large tree. It is nice to hear a bit of local colour in your videos.

@user-pi6hz5dk5b Ай бұрын

Not bad

@hksp Ай бұрын

HAHAHA, too bad and this idiot, he "forgot" to report the ending for tat m2. it continue driving down south turn east and then BOOM ! kaput. and theres vid of it

@wyrmhand Ай бұрын

For the almighty algorithm and 🇺🇦

@shinn-tyanwu4155 29 күн бұрын

Great thanks 😊

@PitFriend1 26 күн бұрын

Amazed the thing’s turret stayed on.

@tutts999 29 күн бұрын

Brilliant post.

@AvangerCellar 29 күн бұрын

When playing the video back and forth it turns out, that one of the two points in the north eastern rear looks like an error, because it moves with the turningrate of the camera. Maybe an artefact.

@thorwaldjohanson2526 25 күн бұрын

thank you for doing the zoomouts :)

@maddantt7757 Ай бұрын

Beautiful!

@arabbear Ай бұрын

Thank you

@gerrycooper56 Ай бұрын

Good investment - TOW for tank

@sneakerset Ай бұрын

Hey man - nice shot (Filter).

@DarkestAlice 27 күн бұрын

Thank you, Suchomimus, for your very interesting video! 🇺🇦 Перемоги і миру всім українцям! 🇺🇦

@philipmetcalfe4736 29 күн бұрын

certainly not towing thatT-80awa

@jimmiller5600 Ай бұрын

I'll bet the explosion on the left is a drone hit.

@user-ke4kn5cp5k Ай бұрын

The Bradley was designed as an effective weapon against the T-72/T-80. It has a powerful Tou-2 ATGM guidance system, this system is many times more powerful than the mobile portable version of the Tou-2 ATGM.

@my-yt-inputs2580 Ай бұрын

TOW not TOU.

@rudolfthecat1176 29 күн бұрын

It has the exact same missile as the portable TOW launchers...

@gardnert1 29 күн бұрын

Definitely not another TOW as they can't be fired together. They're wire guided so only one can go at a time.

@ArmUkraine Ай бұрын

Ahhh more Chadley action

@PeanutsDadForever 29 күн бұрын

Another Amazing Video! Thank you. 🇦🇺👴🏻

@eligebrown8998 26 күн бұрын

Nice job Bradley

@FhhffvFgcefhi 29 күн бұрын

The block armor is preforming nicely on the Bradley

@chrissmith2114 29 күн бұрын

TOW missiles never miss......

@Sugarmountaincondo 28 күн бұрын

This reminds me of original invasion back in 2022 and a fellow came across a BMP that had run out of fuel and he asked the crew if they needed a ride home and they laughed. I can only imagine the same conversation of if "Do you need a TOW" 😆

@RealityCheck6969 Ай бұрын

Russia keeps loosing tanks by the hundreds and still is pushing... with tanks. This is incredible.

@akotarakz Ай бұрын

They have the industrial and numerical advantage over Ukraine. This tactic wouldn't work against equal in industrial power and manpower nations/factions, hence the nuclear arsenal.

@CyberBeep_kenshi Ай бұрын

for now. its teally scraping the bottom of the barrel now

@donwyoming1936 Ай бұрын

Russia is down to using T54/T55s. Running out of their modern tanks.

@cideltacommand7169 Ай бұрын

@@donwyoming1936 How are they spearheading every front then ?

@akotarakz 29 күн бұрын

@@donwyoming1936 Unfortunately not yet. They use the old tank models for defence, mainly in the Kherson and Kharkiv directions. They use T-72s, T-80s and T-90s in the central direction and for assaults.

@andersjjensen 29 күн бұрын

Bradleys killed more Iraqi tanks, during desert storm, than Abrams did.

@jonny2954 29 күн бұрын

*Vehicles. Abrams still destroyed more tanks.

@kenthanna Ай бұрын

It was reported that more are on the way, and a more advanced version.

@john_in_phoenix Ай бұрын

Latest aid package included Bradleys already in Europe and more TOWs. I think they have arrived.

@hksp Ай бұрын

noice more to be turn into scrap metal

@john_in_phoenix Ай бұрын

@@hksp Like all the BMPs, T-72s, and T-80s? I'd rather ride a Bradley than ANYTHING Russia has.

@hksp 29 күн бұрын

@@john_in_phoenix whatever u wish n that area is the m1 cemetery

@sababugs1125 29 күн бұрын

@@hksp per 1 bradley there are 50 t-72s dead

@michaelanderson3096 Ай бұрын

Good vehicle - should have a wheel version.

@UkraineJames2000 27 күн бұрын

I don't know who Bradley is, but he's quite the badass.

@rodneyjackson7147 29 күн бұрын

shit ya! this is what i have been waiting to see

@GrandmasterFU666 24 күн бұрын

USA just delivered approximately 100 Bradley's to Ukraine

@av5301 Ай бұрын

🎯

@kskeel1124 Ай бұрын

About time...

@horuslupercal9936 8 күн бұрын

The Tow was really successful in Syria. Im surprised we havent seen more used in Ukraine.

@gozzog 29 күн бұрын

B-b-b-based.

@The_ZeroLine 29 күн бұрын

_When Brad Met Vlad._

@Brandon34098 Ай бұрын

if your the one that added the text if you can border the text with a black line it would make it easier to see

@_general_error Ай бұрын

@Suchomimus, add Black bolt text underneath your red/blue/white annotations - this will make them clearly readable on any background image.

@Vlaid65 28 күн бұрын

I suspect that it was a coordinated attack with ground troops and the other vehicle was taken out by a MANPAD - both firing on command at the same moment.