With spare falcon 9’s because falcon will have been replaced with starship

​​@@ThePixelated_kris starship heavy, a starship boosted by 4 falcon heavys.

@@fast-toast wat

yeahh ..... HE COULD DO BETTER

+HALL9000ish The N1 was put to shame when it kept blowing up.

Oh my god people who know history of rocketry!!! I love both of y'all.

+HALL9000ish The good thing for Space X is that they produce HUGE amounts of their engines -> they can test them really good.

+Robert Willis No, it wasn't a sound design. It was fundamentally flawed. For various reasons, they couldn't develop a really large chambered engine, and so had to cluster an obscene number of smaller ones together. These engines also relied on what was at the time the new tech of staged combustion. So, we had a situation where there were 30 new tech engines in the first stage alone, ( 6 times more than the Saturn V, for example, and thus at least 6 times the points of failure incorporated into the design)...plus they had a spectacularly complex system of fuel and oxidizer manifolds between these engines and the tanks (which were spherical and thus an inefficient design) and two additional stages to the overall vehicle, thus adding all those additional layers of complexity. Plus, they had to control this thing during its ascent by dynamically throttling these engines...which is crazy complex...and the Soviets lacked the advanced computer and electronics tech the Americans had access to in order to pull it off. Basically, Korelev, though a genius, was getting waaay ahead of himself when he first penned this thing. Could have been ego, I guess, believing himself capable of solving the problems with such an outrageously over-complicated design. We'll never know if they finally ever actually got it figured out, because there was never a successful launch. I'm work in design, and I can tell you, half a century later, that even by todays standards, such an insanely complex system was always going to be doomed to simple statistics.

Good boi

music from The Doctor

Same

@@Jvdbreemen ikr

@@Jvdbreemen is sus

Lmao it's true

@@Hygix_ lol your pfp is my wallpaper

@@chonk3358 lol

@@chonk3358 CHONK

@@Hygix_ chonk indeed

givingtnt the nasa’s space launch system rocket being boosted by falcon heavy’s

@@spamlord7570 Sick!😂

You better say sorry

YOU BETTER SAY SORRY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 😡

@@tamicadawkins5488 sorry

+Get Clarked All of them :)

+Tomasz Dzieduszynski SpaceX actually landed the first stage.

I know - I'm challenging the OP to land all 4 of those Falcons simultanously within the game. :P

+Tomasz Dzieduszynski then carry out the mission.... hehehe. Pushing KSP To its limits (and perhaps slightly beyond)

+Clark been there, done that.

Mike DeMarco This was actually the doctor who soundtrack for seasons 5-7(ish). Only reason I know that is because his companion was Karen Gillan who was the super hot redhead from the new Jumanji movie. So it kinda got me addicted to Dr. Who.

Wibbily Wobbly Timey Wimey. Stuff

@@thirdeyestudios5935 i have no idea where he gets that stuff from is actually a quote from DW. its in day of the doctor

It's not an animation. It's a game, and that's even better.

+Kenneth Cummings It's a game, and pretty realistic one actually. If you like space then it's a great thing to try out. ;)

+Kenneth Cummings However dat graphics doe... It looks like a serious animation tbh.

+GamerGab007 That just means that many simulations look bad ^^ While the game looks good a simulation could look 20 times better.

And that's why I love KSP

would it even form at such low pressures?? either way it was cool :P

How would that hhappen in RO KSP? Is that edited?

It was a Camera Tools mod feature

atsay714 yikes

Gotta go fast?

tinfoil hat on

Antifoul Awl you do realise that you can see the ISS in the sky at night?

sigh, I wish my original post could have been made in sarcasm font.... Notice I said KERBALIAN govt??? I *was* actually poking fun at those who think 'the right stuff' was fake.. It was a joke peeps, chill down. I got given a tinfoil hat and told to look at ISS...sheesh, some people have no comprehension skills.

All CGI! :D

+Antifoul Awl I'm pretty sure the tinfoil hat one was sarcastic

No, I really wanted to see how the (whole) ISS held together during launch and how many Falcon 9s you had strapped to it to get it into orbit. Like I said, watched it right after waking up :P

+Janne Aalto Woke up from a nap, read this comment and saw "Falcon 9 boosted ISIS to the moon".

The ISS was sent up seperatly

That would be glorious

@@jessealternate6050 it kind of did but it was a very small company launching mini falcon 1s

Juan Pretorius yikes

+UKRider agree!!

Someone should really mod that stuff in.

That was the sound barrier being broken from how fast it was going

Obviously when that pod was falling towards Earth at approx. 10.6 mach

+Ethan Bird Yeah, it's called a sonic boom...

hello Stonehenge!

Who doesn't?

kelly Whitehead Me?

Geronimo!!!

Doctor who

@@fluffieboi3139 Exactly what we are asking!

HELL yeah

Gallifrey！

Back when the show was good...

Music look like a remix of suicid mission of Mass effect 2

@@jackheier174 still is.

same i remember watching this years ago sooo many times, videos like this is what made me love engineering and science and is the reason why im even in uni doing engineering and not doing some trade for the rest of my life

I thought I was the only one with this, but no lol

macollo would be amazing at making promotional videos

To Titan.

lambaline *BFR

@@maxpower19711 BRF is overused

@@maxpower19711 Super Heavy Starhip SHS*

@@paulambert9207 so if it was called Natonial Super Heavy for some dumb reason would it been medical NHS

6:06*

@@felreymiguel5734 rest in pieces mate

@@sjavelin more like rust in peice

we all do.

I don’t

Remixed 11th doctor music am i right?

mike WIZZ ye

10 is best, no one can argue.

Well people wouldn’t make mods for the game, if the game wasn’t already awesome!

+Shizzak The game crashed like 5 times while I was trying to record this video. Now I'm just like: Fuck it, the spaceX/SLS launched Mars mission with Nbody gravity is going to have to wait until 1.1!

even astronomers visual pack won't work and i am getting everything from ckan. Can't use bobcatind mod for the soyuz. lots of really good mods that need some extra tweaking. not to mention but the SLS exploration engine drops my VAB fps to like 0.5fps. have you every had a interstage or a fairing just blow up your entire rocket 8 minutes into an LEO burn. Too many times for me. I fixed it by adjusting the decouple force to something of 30%

+maccollo how did you get RVE working. I get the clouds the city lights and the ground textures but i don't have any atmosphere textures. When the creator said to put the shared asset into the plugin folder and overwrite it, it just crashes on startup

Shizzak I just installed it as per the instructions. If you have problems getting it to work you could try to start with a fresh install of KSP and start by just installing RSS and RVE.

+maccollo i did as you said from CKAN and github for RVE. It works but its a bit wonky. maybe it works better is ksp 1.0.4 but the only thing squad offers is either 1.0.5 or 0.90 beta

I once strapped 6 Falcon 9 boosters around a center tank. Called it the Falcon 42. Didn't even panic!

toskana98 I have been playing for a month and "landed" on minmus.

Hey, that's a whole different league than the mun. Be proud of yourself!

What is RO?

@@schizophil1 realistic overhaul I think

No way. Clustering lots of boosters can be dangerous you know. The excess acceleration can seriously injure or even kill humans or kerbals. I refuse to build RSS rockets with s***loads of boosters unless I consider redesigning core(sustainer) stage.

The acceleration from using four 5 segment boosters isn't actually that bad. The boosters are already to small for the SLS core with a big upper stage, and their thrust actually drops over the two minutes that they are active, so the acceleration peaks at around 3 Gs.

***** That's only possible if Kerbal SRBs have thrust curve, but as of now, I have to split just one SRB pair into several SRB stages, each stage giving different TWRs by changing the amount of fuel and thrust. I use SMURFF mod instead of RealFuel or Realism Overhaul mod BTW.

Kerbal SRBs have thrust curve at least in RO.

Isukaman to

+Jonah Beale (RCFlyer) It might be the ullage simulation that's using all your CPU capacity. Just open the real fuel config file (realSettings.cfg), and set the "simulateUllage =" line to false.

+maccollo It's getting much better, however a couple of times a second the game stutters with a good framerate in between. Any ideas? Thanks for the help; I just managed to put a 3 person command pod & service module into LEO.

+Jonah Beale (RCFlyer) From what I've read that's caused by the KSP garbage collector. Actually I had the same problem, especially with this rocket. I was able to reduce it significantly by setting up a profile for KSP in the Nvidia control panel with the max number of prerendered frames set to 1. i.imgur.com/3EobR4A.jpg

+maccollo I'm almost there, I've uninstalled most of the non-essential mods for RO, and my framerate has increased drastically. Currently I'm attempting an Apollo 8 style mission, (3 kerbals to lunar orbit) of course launching it atop a very spicy launch vehicle ;)

Hey would you mind sharing your specs? I'm still saving for a PC, and my main focus is basically being able to run Realism Overhaul.

really? iTS DOCTOR WHO. "i am the doctor"

It's from doctor who

lol how to trigger a whovian

liam ward I am a whovian, I can confirm I am triggered

It is from Doctor Who

Cringe

The cringe makes me wanna throw up

i perfer the 13ths guitar solo xD

1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000/10

It's actually gameplay. Not an animation. You could do this yourself in a game called "Kerbal Space Program" available on Steam, assuming you can muster the skills required to pull off an Apollo 11 style mission.

+The Dockpacka Keeper The key to rendezvous is combining patience and careful orbit adjustments. You also have to use the nav ball a lot, keep the prograde and pro target vectors aligned and keep the velocity under control and you'll get there. Scott Manley made a good tutorial video on this, it helped me understand the concept. For my first rendezvous I built two crafts specifically designed to be easy to maneuver during docking. I kept the relatively light with 4 way RCS thrusters equidistant from the center of mass of the craft. I put one in a perfectly circular orbit to make things easier, then I launched the second one and flew it closer nice and slowly. It gets much easier after the first successful time, it's like something clicks into place in your brain, you get that "OOH, that's how you do it, of course!" moment. :D

The key to it is knowing you nav ball and practice. Like the other commenter, I recommend Scott Manley's video, as it was my rendezvous teacher

not when you are limited by ignitions mate

+Chris R High ignitions and rcs, you'll be fine

IS FROM THAT. I FINALLY REMEMBER WHERE DID I HEARD IT FIRST, THX

Peter Smythe lmaoo

+sesnd Haha

Maybe, eyes are just enough sucseptible to see stars, whils camera isn't . On the Moon small density of ionized dust wouldn't be enough to scatter light from ground thus making stars visible.

Even with the daylight? I thought it would be impossible to see stars in the daylight of the moon... Mainly because of the reflection of the light on moon's surface, offuscating the stars.

sesnd yes you can see planets and the earth.

KV_IRA the reason you couldn’t see stars from the pictures on the moon was because the moon reflects a lot of light. In order to be able to see detail on of the surface of the moon and of the astronauts. They brought the exposure of the camera way down. Therefore, you aren’t able to see the stars on the Apollo pictures.

yep but SLS will never fly with SpaceX Falcon 9 as booster

BUT WE HAVE CORONA

+DowzerWTP72 Yes it does :)

Right. There's others: TJI TCI *TMI Mars* Trans Jovian injection Trans Cryethian injection And Trans Mars Injection

Most of the "terminology" is pretty intuitive. The only things are probably the abbreviations. TWR: Thrust to weight ratio (TWR is the ratio of how much thrust you are producing and the weight of your rocket) LEO: Low Earth Orbit TLI: Trans Lunar Injection (a burn to raise your apoapsis (the highest point in your orbit) to intersect the Moon's orbit, ahead of the Moon's current location (as the moon is gonna move while you're going to it)) Some more stuff: Propellant: Fuel Orion: The name of the spacecraft (Orion is a real spacecraft currently being developed) Capture burn: The burn to decelerate enough to which the gravity of said object (in this case the Moon) is suffiecent to prevent you from exiting it's SOI (sphere of influence, or the sphere in which it's gravity is the main influence to an object) Escape burn: The burn to accelerate enough to which your trajectory will take you out of it's SOI.

+AJIuK1 How many subscriptions do you have?? XD

I have over 600

Then yes, you're right. XD (I have like 30, and think they might be too many. ^^U )

I don't have cable so this is my equivalent. 8)

+No Name Who even watches TV nowadays?