Hall of Famer Patrick Chapin is chasing not only his first Pro Tour victory, but also a chance at the World Championship. Jamie Park seeks his first Pro Tour Championship. Who will win when they face off in the quarterfinals?
Пікірлер: 67
@hamsterdancer424410 жыл бұрын
Chapin looks like my friends dad and Parke looks like my socials teacher
@BaconFrisbee3 жыл бұрын
Glad Patrick won. That BUG deck is mind-numbing to watch
@NitroTheRhino10 жыл бұрын
Glad to see Chapin playing something fun and not just perpetuating monoblack like everyone else.
@svenniepennie423710 жыл бұрын
This is block constructed. Mono black devotion doesnt work all that well without: Pack Rat, Lifebane Zombie, Nightveil Spectre, Underworld Connections, Desecration Demon and Mutavault.
@harryg890110 жыл бұрын
"Did you feel good about yourself when you said cat fight?" that made me laugh.
@kavisterling76048 жыл бұрын
Love this gameeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
@samjabloner243910 жыл бұрын
Not necessarily such a bad play. He was setting up two reaper scry triggers, and got a valuable creature off of Chapin's board. It was in no way an unreasonable expectation that he hit 1 land in the top 3 cards of his deck.
@thegreatmajora1310 жыл бұрын
it think i would have been looking for a three mana removal spell for the brimaz. If he finds one, then kiora goes ultimate, and it becomes VERY hard for Chapin to win. A hero's downfall in the top three cards effectively wins the game.
@samjabloner243910 жыл бұрын
thegreatmajora13 Definitely. At any rate it isn't like he punted by blocking with the Caryatid, he had plenty to do with one mana more or just a removal spell. Definitely interesting how Chapin's Thoughtseize on Caryatid was so effective (I think that was this game?).
@jakob18710 жыл бұрын
It was an incredibly bad play. Chapin is playing off top-decks in that round. Absolutely no reason to sack a necessary mana when you aren't drawing well, especially when you have a Kiora on the board that Chapin will HAVE to swing at. Kiora is a dime a dozen. Hitting a land was VASTLY more important. Caryatid should block Courser, Reaper on Fleecemane, and let the Courser wipe out Kiora. When it really comes down to it, though, Parke just got outpaced because he had no mana on board. Bad draws are bad. = /
@Gossemir1310 жыл бұрын
wtf did I just watch
@ekriakon9 жыл бұрын
bobby fisher!!!
@GoblinTinkerer10 жыл бұрын
Did they just namedrop LRR's Graham Stark? LRR has come a long way.
@mrphlip10 жыл бұрын
Not just Graham getting namedropped by the commentators, but also a tap-tap-concede in game 1...
@Thebeardieguy12310 жыл бұрын
I have Jamie's sphinx
@GToul1310 жыл бұрын
awesome match!
@TheLuminousCleric2 жыл бұрын
@18:45-ish....how come Chapin /and nobody else for that matter/ declare beginning of combat? It is a high level tournament. You would assume they follow through with all the steps.
@SneakyCentipede Жыл бұрын
Because it's a high level tournament
@greengrapejelly9 жыл бұрын
Abzan Midrange vs. Sultai Control
@griffithdota8 жыл бұрын
+Justin Rose for some reason i like bug and junk more
@greengrapejelly8 жыл бұрын
Who doesn't xD
@griffithdota8 жыл бұрын
some newcomers that have no idea of eternal formats
@TheTexasDice10 жыл бұрын
55:00 That was the stupidest block I've ever seen. What the fuck happend? Caryatid would have blocked the Courser without a problem and the Lion too. A really bad play by Parke here.
@ryansanderson822910 жыл бұрын
Does Patrick Chaplin have OCD
@Travis706031210 жыл бұрын
it looks like it.. I have OCD and arrange and rearrange my cards the same way he does
@Prinrin10 жыл бұрын
I don't believe he does. If you're referring to the constant shaking, he has a nerve condition.
@ryansanderson822910 жыл бұрын
I was more refuring to the arangement of lands and such
@svenniepennie423710 жыл бұрын
No, thats just making sure that all cards and their state are easily visible.
@svenniepennie42379 жыл бұрын
azzans I play *exactly* like that and I dont have OCD. There is a huge difference between wanting things to be ordered properly and having OCD. There's always a ton of people claiming they have OCD or that "[their] OCD is acting up" on the internet. The vast majority (if not all) of those people dont have OCD. They just have an appreciation for order and symmetry.
@jotunmarty10 жыл бұрын
some one help me out at 6:00 minutes he scrys after he plays the courser of kruphix what is that scry trigger from though ? ?
@IceMaverick1310 жыл бұрын
Sorry for being so late in this response, but here's a breakdown of Jamie's turn at about 5:49 if that's what you were referring too. He played Courser of Kruphix which makes you play with the top card of your deck face-up. The Courser also reads that if the top card is a land, you may play it. The first card he flipped over (and subsequently played because of the Courser) was a Temple of Deceit, a blue-black land that lets you scry 1 when it's played.
@ARQ9310 жыл бұрын
dat die roll at the begging >
@jakey001710 жыл бұрын
maybe an homage to mcDarby
@Mrkingrandoh10 жыл бұрын
Does anyone know where i can find patrick chapin's deck list?
@AnubisApprentice10 жыл бұрын
Mtg's Home page it should be under the daily archive.
@zorac9110 жыл бұрын
mtgtop8 . com
@Mrkingrandoh10 жыл бұрын
Thanks for resoonding. Sorry for looking at it so late
@AnubisApprentice10 жыл бұрын
It happens. Don't worry about it. Do you watch these for fun, or study to go pro, both? Just curious.
@AnubisApprentice10 жыл бұрын
Who? I hope you're not refering to me. Only time I net deck is to play test against with my own creation. If you plan grinding to go pro level better know the deck you're playing against and have memory muscle against that deck and/or any variants against it. That is how I see it. If you are neting it just to rebuild and play to claim the prize, in my opinion I see no point in doing it.
@AlleyCatGhost10 жыл бұрын
So, like. Yeah, I can't see the cards...
@jayceehampton96946 жыл бұрын
P05TPWN3D Who cares?
@danbrown743810 жыл бұрын
did jamie not know he could grab Elispeth with intusion?
@JJ-Toreddie Жыл бұрын
Jamie is still contemplating that to this day
@svenniepennie423710 жыл бұрын
1:54 How is Bile Blight one of the few cards that can kill Fleecemane? Sure, you can kill it before it goes monstrous (although, so can Hero's Downfall and Silence the Believers), as soon as it goes monstrous it's just as pointless as the rest of them though. Even if he were to have two out, one of them not being monstrous yet and you'd target that one, you still wouldnt kill the monstrous one, it being 4/4 and all.
@ryan151515x9 жыл бұрын
svennie pennie Bile Blight give -3/-3. When Fleecemane becomes monstrous, it gains indestructible. the only way to "kill" an indestructible creature is by -1/-1 counters. Because indestructible says that this creature cannot be destroyed by damage or effects saying "destroy", while -1/-1 counters are not "damage" and it's toughness is reduced to 0, thus, Fleecemane dies.
@svenniepennie42379 жыл бұрын
ryan151515x Ok, when Fleecemane Lion becomes monstrous it gets: Hexproof - So Bile Blight can't target it anymore A +1/+1 counter - So -3/-3 is not enough to kill it anymore Bile Blight is just as useful/useless when it comes to killing Fleecemane Lion as most other removal spells in the format.
@AIMLESS-NAMELESS3 жыл бұрын
@@svenniepennie4237 if you have 1 monstros and 1 normal fleece main on board and they swing with the monstrous one you can block and bile the one that’s not monstrous. Way better then the other 2 removal spells for fleece specifically
@AIMLESS-NAMELESS3 жыл бұрын
Your also wrong about how indestructible works and even if it’s just a normal fleecemain it’s better then all other removal by mana alone the rest is just gravy
@bisonsama3212 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately you can’t quite deal deal with an indestructible creature by dealing damage to it then giving it -X/-X. Unless your X is = or > to its toughness anyway. Despite what MTGO or MTGA show, damage actually doesn’t change toughness : a damaged creature simply has damage marked on it, and once it has been dealt lethal damage, it dies next time we check state-based actions. But indestructible makes a permanent ignore destruction and lethal damage altogether. So if I block a 4/4 indestructible with a 1/1, then -3/-3 said 4/4 (before or after combat damage, doesn’t matter), my opponent still end up with the same thing : a 1/1 indestructible with 1 damage marked on it, which won’t bother dying ‘cause lethal damage can’t kill it. But yeah : Bile Blight is still a decent answer to Fleecemane in this matchup due to its very low cost compared to the 5 mana needed to Monstruous the Lion, but it’s not that far from Hero’s Downfall. And none are a 100% clean and reliable answer : some Lions will become Monstruous despite your best efforts. I’d say 5-toughness creature (notably ones that can gain Hexproof like Prognostic Sphinx and Reaper of the Wilds) are the closest thing to an actual clean answer to a Monstruous Fleecemane in Parke’s BUG deck. Oh. And didn’t quite get it at first but commentators probably actually meant to mention Fleecemane as one of the few maindeck targets in Chapin’s deck that trade 1 for 1 with Bile Blight. They’re not necessarily praising Blight, they’re likely saying it has few good targets in this matchup.
@waflz81310 жыл бұрын
The Decklists anywhere?
@michaelschippel686910 жыл бұрын
On the website its on the daily post stuff just go back
@jayceehampton61217 жыл бұрын
I know I never got to say this, but would the fucking judge shut up about their line of play, and let these men think! There is no time limit.
@wasteofusername17 жыл бұрын
I'm pretty sure there is a time limit, why would u want someone to think about his turn for 10 minutes
@jayceehampton61216 жыл бұрын
The top 8 has no time limit.
@NitroTheRhino10 жыл бұрын
Boros Burn would have obliterated these decks.
@Aflay19 жыл бұрын
I don't understand why they play their cards like that. I mean, I know it's competitive, but they really take it a step further with the finesse of how they play their cards.Either a lot of time to spend, or a prerogative, maybe slight of hand?
@pkfreezing9 жыл бұрын
What do you mean exactly?
@jayceehampton61217 жыл бұрын
Aflay Shut it.
@jakob18710 жыл бұрын
The overall lack of Herald of Torment in these BUG decks is truly disturbing. Reaper + Herald = godlike. Add in Golgari Charm at a 1x or 2x, and you can keep Reaper of Torment alive through a Supreme Verdict unless it gets countered. It's literally nigh unstoppable, and with the amount of card draw available to a BUG deck, getting a Golgari Charm is almost a given. Then again, against Esper and Azorius control decks...even Patriot control, I have not had a problem sweeping the round with a BUG deck. It just outclasses it in a lot of big ways. I've been running that combo with my BUG deck, and it gets work done. Those two cards together stops Stormbreath and D-Demon, prevents an Arbor Colossus monstrosity, and gives you what I think is a slightly stronger flyer than Prog Sphinx. Nonetheless, I'm so happy to see people realizing the power of Prog Sphinx. I've been playing him for a while within multiple different decks, and that 3 damage stacks up after a while. Moreover, he's nearly impossible to remove from the board, especially in a deck where you'll almost always have at least three cards in your hand.
@ignis4910 жыл бұрын
do you not know what block constructed is? there's no supreme verdict and no golgari charm so why would they play herald of torment to combo with reaper?
@jakob18710 жыл бұрын
I know what block constructed is. My comments were directed towards overall standard play, and I did not specify that in my comment. That is my bad. However, even in current standard, those same decks are still seeing a lack of Reaper of Torment in them...as well as Master of the Feast...or just in general, BUG decks aren't seeing play at ALL. It's sad, as the deck is a lot of fun and plays with some great tempo. I've been consistently at a minimum 3-1 on FNMs, and as soon as I can get to a bigger tourney, I'll find out how the deck does in that situation.
@StravinskyCruz4 жыл бұрын
Why did jamie let elspeth resolve and make tokens? We could have used heros downfall before resolved. Am i correct?
@joebutcher74564 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately not, if a Planeswalker resolves, then the active player retains priority until they take another action. The only opportunity Parke had was to let Chapin select his Elspeth's ability and then respond to the activation. Even if he did this, the ability would resolve and the tokens would then still be made. Really, the only way to deal with a Planeswalker ability is to counter it with a Stifle effect such as Disallow or Squelch. Hope that clears it up for you my dude :)