That's a lovely thing to say, thank you. I just enjoy making videos that hopefully anyone can enjoy.

And no talking head! 👍🏻

Anton Petrov on What the Math is awesome as well. Agreed this is good!

@@LearningCurveScience penus

Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu7uuuuu7uuu7uû

That's so nice of you to say, thank you very much.

Amen!

you would love toi check out kurtzgezart channel as well, amazing animation and explanation

same!

​@@LearningCurveScience Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE, AS what is E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Indeed, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE; AND the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. Indeed, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Indeed, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma; AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution; AS c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. Consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. Consider what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE. Great. By Frank DiMeglio

unless you are a cockroach

@@julesv8664 Or a Tardigrade

I was thinking the same thing...I think you'd go a little crazy if you even saw one of these stars spinning a thousand times a second...like some haunting scream in space if you could hear it.

​@@julesv8664 Cockroaches can still be crushed under our jackboots tho.

Every atom of the universe wants to kill you fella

Yes my understanding is something similar, the black holes would dissipate the energy away.

Same here, it takes you away from everyday problems; to think how large scale universe really is. And as the saying goes: "Astronomy is much more fun when you're not an astronomer"

@@Moniveijo Maths

Once you cross the event horizon theres nothing going back, the blackhole will eat it away but some energy could also spill depending on how violent the blackhole is.

That’s because it’s literally half way between the 2

Thank you so much

@@LearningCurveScience I fail to see how such a relatively small stellar object purportedly made mostly of neutrons can have such an extremely powerful magnetic field.🤔

@@lestergillis8171 Because of its insane rotational speed.

@@mayro4803 OK... But neutrons are... well neutral. They carry NO charge of their own. Spin technically, should have nothing to do with it.

@@lestergillis8171 The surface still has protons and electrons that generate the magnetic field from the neutron star's rotational energy.

can't believe they can actually thanos snap you

Anything with larger gravitational force then your bodies tensile strength will tear you apart Or in simpler terms, a gravity high enough will exceed your bodies ability to not fall apart

Black holes are these clean mathematical anomaly whereas magnetars are zany and violent complex forces of chaos

Thank you very much, I find weird space stuff fascinating

this video makes black holes sound like magnetars on steroids

Indeed So much pressure

To be fair, we are even worse at estimating what is happening inside black holes, complex or otherwise. Even far enough in neutron stars, that's the case.

I don't know if you know them and you likely do, but " but why " is a fantastic channel of similar fashion

​@@judepeppers1206is that the channel with that annoying fish. I tried to watch a video from that channel but I couldn't get around the dumb talking fish.

@@kevynhansyn2902 I don't think so. I don't remember ever seeing a fish on their channel. I don't know any other channel with a talking fish either

I think the channel was called "Why Files". It popped up when I was watching this video. Crazy how things pop up when you least expect them huh? However I'll keep the channel you mentioned in my list as well.

Thank you so much, that's very kind of you. I always try to make videos that everyone can understand, and I know I don't get it perfect every time but I want to help people become as excited about science as I am.

yap yap yap, facebook scientists😒

You're subscribed to channels like Vox and SciShow, so being seen as "smart" most definitely isn't a concern for you.

​@@cursedcancersurvivor🤡

Why the micro agression?

Thank you very much

Thank you very much. I just really enjoy making these videos and if other people enjoy them as well, that makes me happy. To be honest, I just turn whatever ads KZfaq suggests on. I think you will see ads based on your watches not necessarily on my video. I'm really glad you liked the video though.

@@LearningCurveScience Well keep doing that stuff, I think your doing great

Right? Out with the hits

Subbed

35.4k now, not bad for 3 days :)

Wow that's even more extreme and cool

@@LearningCurveScience Would the surface really be that smooth? Or would it be effected by the extreme magnetic field like a ferrous liquid does when you put a magnet under it? Just curious.

@@lotoreo would be cool to see a spiky star

it is fun to imagine

Maybe it’s extreme gravitational attraction doesn’t allow for anything to move in the direction opposite to the gravitational force

Thank you very much, I'm glad you enjoyed it.

Danger IS fascinating.

Glad you liked it

Like this!!

Well, have you seen the new Jurassic park? Ya it's like how they took the T rex and added all the scary parts of other dinosaurs, and you end up with the Andominous Rex

100000000000¹¹² times scarier

teach it how to pick locks!

Thank you so much. My aim was always to try and make a channel where you didn't have to be a scientist to understand what I was saying. I want others to get as excited about science as I am. I'm not saying I get it right every time, but comments like yours mean so much to me because they mean I'm hopefully on the right track, so thank you again.

​@@LearningCurveScience This is the way to reach as many as possible. Unfortunately many people aren't interested in science because they simply don't understand the jargon.

Thank you so much. I may have said that already to you today, if so I apologise for not being more spontaneous

@@LearningCurveScience No worries, I appreciate the feedback on my feedback :)

​@@stephanieparker1250 Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE, AS what is E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Indeed, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE; AND the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. Indeed, gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Indeed, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma; AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution; AS c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. Consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. Consider what is the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE. Great. By Frank DiMeglio

Read the book "dragons egg"

You've calculated and compared these two quantities? What amount of energy are we talking about?

Thank you so much, that's very kind of you.

Thank you, that's such a nice thing to say and I'm glad you enjoy my videos.

Thank you very much

Thank you so much, welcome aboard

Given the power of the field, I'd say potentially. Maybe small magnetic vortices created by imperfections like temperature differences. Sort of like a magnetar's version of sunspots and solar promontories. Instead of being swirling "cold" spots and immense plasma arcs... They're just little dips and bumps because of how much more extreme the forces are.

Glad you enjoyed it!

A gravitational anomaly vs a magnetic anomaly? Interesting indeed

Gravity wins, always.

Thank you so much, I'm glad you enjoyed it.

Thank you very much, much appreciated

There's no singularity at the core of a neutron star, that only happens in a blackhole. What is a singularity flux? What is a runaway singularity? A certain mass collapses to a black hole once it is compressed inside its scwarzshild radius, that is all.

It probably has somewhere between a supercritcal hydrogen/plasma soup or maybe some forced Bose-Einstein condensates (even though those are meant to be low activity due to cold, maybe this is low activity due to density)

Glad you enjoyed it!

Thank you, I'm glad you enjoy it

..and brainwashing them even further into thinking the Heliocentric model is accurate.

Thank you very much. I'm glad you enjoyed

To be honest, you probably wouldn't get anywhere close. I just wanted to do the animation.

Far enough it would begin to steal your money and keys

I know, sometimes my scripts get a bit out of hand.

Everybody’s a critic. You try to research, write a script and do all the video graphic stuff. I loved the video regardless.

One of the biggest disappoints of that incident, is that they didn’t die only became sterile.

Thank you so much

Don't forget your complimentary nuclear neutron sticks!* *while supplies last

I totally haven't got a Tardis, The Time Lords are not missing one at all

Thank you very much. Shhh I don't want the Time Lords to know I've got one.

Thank you and welcome aboard