Arthur Herbst to be fair so can shooting it with something

@@dutchman55 Oh no, rly?

@@GuilhermeBianeck FIGHT FIGHT! lol

@@dutchman55 what? Nooo shooting things never causes damage 😂

@@dutchman55 what would we do without you?

lol

+Fat Al subtle reference.

se escrevam no meu canal gringos

+Mr. Swissington Gaming Don't hate for noobery

Haha you almost made me *fallout* of my chair.

Yeah, they're all effectively in the same reference frame

Same, I was expecting the magnets to fly apart and kinda turn into buckshot

+RJinthematrix personally i think TAOFLEDERMAUS should've had two shells for each target. one hollow; and then a solid round to see which rounds perform better against the targets they're fired at.

I just like watching things get smashed

***** ???

😂😂😂😂😂

No control group. Did not follow scientific method properly.

+Patriot 03 Jokes aside, I hope the message at about half way through wasn't directed toward me and my comment I made the other day about "wanting" to see higher resolution slomo. _(Which it may not)_ I *never* said I "can't stand" the current setup, or anything hostile like that. I just said I'd like to see higher resolution slowmo in the future _(Like when someone would say they'd like to win the lottery, or something silly)_. Not even as a demand, or a serious comment in the present reality however when you said *_"I've given up saving for a better camera."_* (As in, ever or also that there was originally an intention to) that sorta killed my hopes to see (one day) a cheaper, higher speed/resolution camera that could eventually be used in the years to come. That's no disrespect to you or your content, there is no denying that a higher resolution, and or higher speed footage would allow us to learn even more from the already amazing slomo on the channel. I'll also be the first to say that I haven't spent a dime on any filming equipment and its not my money so of course I'm in no position to make demands of you or criticize your process and the work it takes to run it. (Or the cost of it as is) For instance, it does not mean I "can't stand" the already amazing and enlightening footage. Nor does it mean I don't appreciate what work already goes into the current production both on your end and the technology used in the cameras. I would never prefer a video with no slowmo, over one with even the lowest quality slowmo (Which this is clearly above that point anyway but for the sake of argument..) - Before the halfway point I was already asking "Where's the slowmo?" - Further, having an opinion about something I'd like to see, or news I've heard does NOT mean I have a sense of entitlement _(Not that you claimed that)_. to be clear I fully acknowledge that I am NOT entitled to ANYTHING you produce. I'm grateful for what you already produce (for me, for free) and don't ever think otherwise. TL;DR I meant no disrespect. I won't be ashamed of the fact that I prefer higher resolution imagery over lesser if given the option to choose between either. That does *NOT* mean anything else other than what I explicitly wrote.

Wait, you know magnets don't kill hard drives, right?

Commenter I heard it was a myth that they did, but still I don't like putting them near my components. Also, when they're flying at several hundred feet per second than certainly will :)

They don't hurt electronics what so ever. They did with floppy drives, but anything else 100% safe. They put magnets in iPads now....so...

Commenter As I've said, I've already heard what you've said.

hollow

Hollow

+Dan Troop I agree, I think he added that part to take shots at some people who said they would like to see higher resolution slowmo, mistakenly taking offense. (I'm basing that off some comments I saw, and one that I made, so maybe I'm wrong and someone literally said they "couldn't stand the low resolution slowmo" - But I didn't see that being said)

+Patriot 03 unfortunately cameras with high frames per second for recording are very expensive. we're looking at a $50k-$100k investment here :// (but it is worth it!) i'm interested with the new camera technologies. i'm hoping decent slow motion footage will be readily accessible in the near future.

+Patriot 03 I'd be willing to bet it was a shot at someone who probably said exactly what Jeff put in the video. I think most of us who appreciate the slo-mo footage have no misconceptions about how prohibitively expensive high-speed + high-resolution cameras cost. It's just a limitation of the video hardware, but when manufacturers allow it, you're trading off high amount of pixels per frame or high amounts of frame with lower pixel resolution. As Pieman6711 already pointed out, to get the gear with capability to do both is a big investment. Essentially why I try to click like on as many of TFM's videos as I can, to add to their revenue, they make great vids and I'm sure they'll keep investing in better gear as they can. tl;dr - Don't take it personal, It's just TFM's way of passive aggressively dissing the loudmouth complainers

+Christopher Hurley i work in a lab modeling water droplets hitting a 500°c metal plate, we use a hi-speed camera. University paid for it but very expensive. On such cameras you either have high speed but lower res or not as high speed but good res. plus you can only buffer to the internal camera memory as even 1gbit network connection saturates. BTW this is a over 200k camera.

It would seem that you could combine the two types of shots. Use the high ress to paint the high speed photos into sharper detail. A bit of hard core post prossening.

I saw it to

+Lazy Orc lol

+Averagetroll Same here

+Lazy Orc sv_gravity 1

+Lee Riley +1 CS:GOness

lol

lol

Even as a Clinton supporter, I laughed at that.

lol!

lol

+Sebastian MacCormick They are exactly the same.

+TAOFLEDERMAUS firing a hollow shell against a melon and then a solid shot against clay is evidently not the same

You should recreate the video the way you'd like it done then.

***** I'm not capable of attaining the required weaponry. I'm simply suggesting a way to shoot you're videos so you accomplish what you are claim to do.

I would recreate it but i don't think the people next door want me to fire my shotgun so close to em lol. Sup TAO! I have been watching your videos for a long time an i enjoy em a lot, keep em a going! One of my fav vids you did was the parabolic mirror out of mercury, that was impressive.

+T1HSTAE thanks~!

I don't think he really cares about that considering he's shooting at it

HARD ANAL omg a fellow potato

one. qustion did u still have you're rifled choke tube when u were. shooting the machoned allumiman slugs. big rig

Malachai Davidson funny joke.. But did you know their are strong magnets inside a hard drive

Righteous Question mark о

Anonymous who told you that

Unless the laptop has an SSD rather than a hard drive. Then you need to put more than one bullet in it. In any case, your browser history now also lives in the cloud, so it'll never be truly unrecoverable.

Sure. Cancer.

The test wasn't about the terminal ballistics (hitting stuff) just the external ballistics. A lot of people just focus on the damage, not the journey.

true, but if you can fit more science into less time without muddling your control, why not?

Just a thought. Do appreciate the work you put into your videos. It is great stuff, very well filmed and easy to hear.

Steve Bridge God, shut up Steve, nobody gives a sh*t about your opinions.

jsj297 LOL! No one except you. Thanks for caring. :-)

I'm pretty sure using a round like this on a human-being would constitute a warcrime. but I get where you're coming from. I kinda wanna see how badly it'd wreck the target dummy.

@@BlitzkriegOmega it's not a war crime if nobody finds out

You know, anything flying supersonic into a harddrive might gum up the works a bit...

Yeah, but, magnets?! Ya know - 'cause they're magnets.

Thanks!

I almost closed this video the when you said it was the end. Joke went over my head.

+7.62 shawn: *slo-mo. I first read your comment as saying "Your slow mom has always been awesome!" 😅

+ImprovisedSurvival haha thanks!

+MattV2099: Guns & Food I think these things might have potential, they work alright it looks like

thats scientifical! !

+MattV2099: Guns & Food WHAT HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

+MattV2099: Guns & Food turbine grooves in magnets :P

+MattV2099: Guns & Food you forgot the part where he puts the rounds in jello

+Chuffered FUoogle I wholly agree with this. But as I started to think about it, I wondered how much it would cost to rent a really high speed camera for a 2-3 day shoot, and invest some real cash in it? The "slow mo guys" get about a minimum of 1.4 million views per video, and sometimes *way* more. It could have the potential to grow this channel, and then bring in more money to be able to afford more shooting. I just looked it up quickly, and it seems like a minimum of $2500 a day, because you usually have to hire a technician with it. And then you have to rent the additional equipment, and then also have enough hard drives to store the footage... But if that increased the ad revenue on KZfaq, it could potentially pay for it. It does seem like a lot, but if you planned out your shoot for 8-10 hours and prepared everything in advance you could really get a lot of amazing footage to last for months, or even a whole year. +Taofledermause could even re-shoot the more interesting things he has done already, but "in HD!!!1" Anyway, like you said, it is a great channel already. No complaints as-is.

+inthefade yeah, he's already said he doesn't really have the money to do much fancy stuff, that's why the more exotic and expensive rounds are either sent to him, or he only makes a couple. I doubt he could spend thousands of dollars on a single day renting all that and firing hundreds of random rounds to make months worth of videos.

+Asterio if you get a a magnet that is powerful enough to affect the trajectory of the projectile than it would rip the shotgun out of their hands. And it might take a few fingers

none That's why you don't stand next to the monster magnet with a shotgun. You should shot from some distance away, thought it's common sense. :/

Asterio it would still rip it out of their hand if was powerful enough to affect the trajectory of the projectile in a noticeable way. the projectiles are going very fast. the only reason the magnets were able to do anything to each other is because they going the same speed relative to each other

But if it was secured proparly and done with high presision you could shoot a target round a corner with a fair amount of accuracy

Fucking magnets, how do they work?

Nope, there be Many of us that have the CRAZY GENE, IN US. Like firing off. Half a COW Magnet from ones 20 gage single shot , shotgun. IT WORKED ONCE! & KICKED LIKE A JACKA__ RESULTING in a split tree trunk and a very bruised shoulder.

Theres no camera yet that would survive the acceleration. Also, the video would be unusable due to shutter rolling and the high speed

drkastenbrot You're right. One day though. I was thinking maybe the GoPro 4 which has been dubbed "The Ice Cube" due to its size.

+Dark Orbit King We couldn't afford anything like that anyway. The g-shock is a lot like a golfer driving a golf ball. It's very intense.

thanks!!

+Anders Flem haha.. just commented the same thing.. then just seen your comment.

^^

+Anders Flem You do know there are magnets inside of harddrives right?

yes and?

+twinbladeshugo the magnets interacts with the other magnets in bad ways also those magnets have a job

thanks Ian!

Source abc7ny.com/health/houston-child-nearly-dies-after-swallowing-magnets/1146838/

V4 Garage usually have them removed the same day you get shot with them..

keep in mind that it happened to a toddler, I dont think commercial magnets are strong enough to tear through adult organs by attraction alone

The guy would be probably dead or had them removed during surgery. Also, those things do not attract each other very well at some distance. Are either already clustered or it won't have any effect. Different to them being in your colon.

Oh that's _fucked_ *Up!*

+Pelonius thanks!!

+TAOFLEDERMAUS Get the slowmoguys to record some of your tests

+Average Joe Well if YOU say so.

+201 bub ... good attempt i guess.....

ooooooo~ 😱😨..... 😧

+Jager Overson Hasnt reached that yet.. just.. random statements so far

How could anyone reply to these comments ? Haa

No, they tested it on mythbusters on a pig I believe

eric whitlow actually I got curious and there seems to be a few videos here on KZfaq doing just that. Seems deadly

Yet inaccurate at distance

yep if it fits you can shoot it from a shotgun

Joe Shmoe a Vietnam veteran told me they used to put like a buck 80 or 2,10 in dimes in their shells and that they shredded really good, however he used to tell lots of bullshit stories, I didn't think dimes would carry much velocity and would basically fly all different directions and until each other and hit everything but your target

There's several accepted ways of pronouncing it.

I'm not saying your pronunciation is wrong, but "say-bow" is also correct.

***** I wasn't criticizing you're pronunciation in the video. You just seemed unsure because you stumbled over the word.

HenriFaust I learned this from Star Trek.

Its a french word drop the "t"

+shunkajun thanks!

+Sarin Highwind They'd complain if I had a naked blond dancing around... and be pissed she wasn't a brunette!

***** I bet they would complain if you had Jerry Mich...hd.. shooting or Kirsten Joy Weiss.

A lot of people would rather see a shooter acting human and missing shots now again. Saves the old ego, ya know? lol

I'll be out there in a few weeks.I can pretend to miss a few. (we'll just load jello)

thank you!

aids sadly we don't 😥😵😭😭😭😭

If the magnetic force was _incredibly_ strong, you'd need something like a titanium shotgun to stop the pellets from magnetically sticking to the barrel. It'd be reducing muzzle velocity anyway. You might be able to use some kind of strong aluminum if that's a thing.

Jam or you could fashion the barrel out of a non magnetic material like ceramics, carbon nanotubes, or an alloy that doesn't include iron in its makeup (obviously some are more practical than others)

just put aluminum sleeves in hard wood. I bet that would work.

+Louise Logar I didn't name the magnets.

+Louise Logar You are thinking of Buckminsterfullerene I believe, C60. Named after Buckminster Fuller who was the architect behind the modern geodesic dome, which if extrapolated to a full sphere would resemble this carbon arrangement. I imaging buckyballs (the magnets) are named similarly since you can create similar arrangements to the molecular structures that you can create with carbon.

+Jesse Purkis that is what these were

I didnt think bucky balls were made from rare earth magnets but i do know they are not very strong of magnets because ive had neo dimium magnets that are the same size that will pull themselves thru your hand

Flat neodymium magnets stick together with much strength because they have more surface area than a sphere.

+Jesse Purkis en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neodymium_magnet_toys

+TAOFLEDERMAUS this is true love the vidoes tho

wah

Caleb Porter yea wah u don't make no FUCKIN DAMN sense

I think he wants mythbusters style.

RAIL GUNS FTW

+spinosauruskin gauss rifle! WTF

TRAIN TRACK PEW PEW

+/AH\Panda Man I see the panda!

PunkInDrublic98 Yea because wiping out your hard drive is illegal

because that's what you get when you expose hard drives to a strong magnetic field.

choking victim...

Hell yeah brotha. rock the 4ooz

Comet pizza hard drive round?

Jojo

Jojo

How much does your chunk of neodymium weigh?

@@jengleheimerschmitt7941 very little though. And that I presume is also an issue. You need weight which we're not getting unlike lead here.

That's too bad. It's one of the best elements.

Pay better attention next time.

yeah i agree was there a control and i just missed it?

TAOFLEDERMAUS nice aggro response that didn't address anything. I agree this test was a bit inconclusive

+TAOFLEDERMAUS. After a second view there is still no control. Everything was shot with different shells except the door. The door was in a different field at (about) 70 yards with 50 holes in it already. I'm just saying maybe use some science not abouts and kindas if you're posting test results, that's all.

Same number of balls, same velocity, so why not use different targets? Or couldn't you find something else to complain about?

thanks for the nice words!

+TAOFLEDERMAUS can u prove this in a ballistic gel please

+thebirdmanjoe2 I don't think it would make a difference. It would fly as a slug with normal pellets anyway and the magnetic force is actually quite weak, so it won't hold them or anything after impact.

lol

+JD Wenrich The term is "rare-earth" magnets, and that's what neodymium magnets are.

thanks!

+TAOFLEDERMAUS awsome video but dangerous should have rigged shotgun to fire on string

Why? It's the same as any other small buck shot only magnetic.

Classic

I have a new one now

O. Rothe Keep in mind they cost an absolute fuck ton.

must not be a 15k one but a few hundred dollars for something like this VC GC-PX100BEU would serve well with 500 fps

We are using one of the new Chronos 1.4 hs cameras. It goes up to 21K fps

this is a realy awesome change!

jeaahhhh!!!!

I think he mentioned that he did do a callab with them at some point and loathed the whole experience.

+Amarís Blackscale Not with slomoguy. Gavin wouldn't reply to an email from me muchless do a collaboration with me. Nothing in it for him. Ya know?

+TAOFLEDERMAUS Sure there is: You have the means to offer some fantastic and really interesting content! You know destin, right? Don't you think he'd be willing to get you guys together or maybe even do something with you directly? I realize this is all just wishful thinking, but hey, naïveté isn't always a bad thing :)

I know Destin a little bit. talked with him on the phone a few years ago, etc. It's difficult coordinating stuff like that when we are so far away.

The targets were not the focus of the test.

please STFU!! this was a great idea with pretty fair results. if ur gonna bitch, try coming up with something as original on ur own!!

+TAOFLEDERMAUS forget this loser!! Great idea and good results in my opinion. U know the GOV will probably make something killer out of this, if not already. Great idea, very imaginative!!

The fuck is wrong with you Defiant Brood? He was calling out a flaw in the test, by using different targets the pattern was different even if they were the same round. There was no hate in the comment, other than maybe the last sentence.

There wasn't a flaw. He just fixated on the wrong thing.

+atari67 thanks!