Main Engine Dry Running Test. No Oil for the Main Engine 90 sec. Running Part 2 is coming soon!!
Пікірлер: 69
@krystiankrychu25073 жыл бұрын
still wainting for 2 part XD
@master7chief4 жыл бұрын
I call BS. First, the firing rhythm doesn't match the speed of the engine shown. Second, between 0:35 and 1:05 I hear what sounds like a ship engine, turn 52 times; coincidentally the exact speed of this 104rpm engine at full ahead. Third, the turbochargers pitch is consistent with an engine under significant load so how could you take a dry engine of this size from standstill to 45rpm and under load for a 90sec test and not have any transient engine or turbo spool up sounds? Unless it was already stabilized at 45rpm, then lube oil cut to begin the 90sec test in which case we should still see lingering oil flowing down surfaces towards the sump. Finally, I hear the audio skip at 0:45 and 0:53 like it was spliced/looped. I think its a sped up time lapse with audio of the same engine running at 104rpm. Not busting anyone's chops, nice video, but I shall not be fooled today. Haha
@rasheed45854 жыл бұрын
How come teflon coated bearings?
@brianatherton49165 жыл бұрын
Wow that thing is frigin huge
@TheLatchford4 жыл бұрын
Not one single low lub oil pressure alarm. It should go off the second the engine starts
@Genius_at_Work4 жыл бұрын
That's because they just filmed slow turning with the Turning Gear and then sped up the Film. Nice Try though.
@rigididiot3 жыл бұрын
@@Genius_at_Work Slow turning is on air. Won't work either if the oil pumps are not running. Turning gear... Well, I counted 27 revolutions, that is about 1,5 hour of turning. Nobody does that voluntarily either. But if you check very closely, you will find that the sound and the video remain in perfect sync during the time you see the crosshead moving. I am pretty sure this is real, and oil pressure alarms are pretty easily bridged.
@tidakadaide2 жыл бұрын
I like how they make out looking at the connecting rod bearing without dismantling can tell them there is no damage....must have x-ray vision. 100% China engineers
@clementgoetke23852 жыл бұрын
1min 38 sec did you not watch video
@tidakadaide2 жыл бұрын
@@clementgoetke2385 that is just a random bearing, no where did they show them disassemble anything.
@clementgoetke23852 жыл бұрын
@@tidakadaide its only a 2 1/2 min video
@tidakadaide2 жыл бұрын
@@clementgoetke2385 good point...
@brettb.74255 жыл бұрын
In all, if it was damaged, autozone carries these long blocks I think.
@dancaptain20556 ай бұрын
You are right 😂
@anubisraf8 жыл бұрын
What is the purpose of this test?
@goanrecipesmore...92525 жыл бұрын
For what reason is this test carried out? Are u trying to say that engine is safe to run with out oil in emergency for some seconds??
@Forepeak.9 жыл бұрын
How is the lubrication of the stuffing-box solved?
@davidboardman85906 жыл бұрын
Timo Lemke The stuffing box is just a double seal air and oil nothing more
@darklord11345 жыл бұрын
Thats a lot of oil at the end !
@wysowianka229 жыл бұрын
Very intresting. Could you tell me the aim of this test? It is 100% safe? The temperatures increased very quickly i think (cylinder liners, pistons)?
@marinercj46726 жыл бұрын
the aim is for running in Emergency Conditions.if we take some precautions it is safe and engine have to run only short period(in seconds).the main cause of temperature rise due to main bearings.
@sheridanbaldwin86296 жыл бұрын
More money then brains let's run a engine with no oil! Lol
@scubadivingsince20068 жыл бұрын
Um when they're checking for damage you can see oil running down the right side of the piston connecting rod wrist pun area in front of the guy in red soooo
@larrybav3 жыл бұрын
Large marine diesels have a separate total loss lubrication system for the cylinders. Presumably, they left it running or the pistons would have seized quickly. The crankcase uses a circulating pressurized lube system with a different type of oil.
@LCdrDerrick2 жыл бұрын
A crankcase, which one can enter! A waterfall of lube oil! That's sort of unreal!
@thomashninan67082 жыл бұрын
an oilfall more likely
@entertainmenttimes80266 жыл бұрын
Use full vedio
@AdammP7 жыл бұрын
my guess is this is done to wear in parts or seat things fast and under supervised conditions.
@bigredc2226 жыл бұрын
They inspected the bearing after the run, so I would say it was a test to see how well the Teflon protected the bearing if there's a loss of oil pressure.
@andreyrybak21046 жыл бұрын
It makes my hair curle)
@MrDooftob6 жыл бұрын
why
@Lucius_Chiaraviglio4 жыл бұрын
Now the real trick would be to come up with a design and materials that can run long-term without oil and without cooling, so that you minimize heat losses from the combustion gases to the cylinder walls and piston (adiabatic engine).
@bonkeydollocks18793 жыл бұрын
Bring back steam. Not.
@Lucius_Chiaraviglio3 жыл бұрын
@@bonkeydollocks1879 Adiabatic internal combustion engines have been successfully demonstrated on an automotive scale (but never caught on).
@bonkeydollocks18793 жыл бұрын
@@Lucius_Chiaraviglio prey tell, cost? Too niche?
@Lucius_Chiaraviglio3 жыл бұрын
@@bonkeydollocks1879 I'd like to know the definitive answer myself, but I'll give it a shot. Best I could figure out from scattered articles (they aren't very common) is that back when these were developed in the 1950s, the premium placed on extra energy efficiency wasn't enough to drive further development. In addition, working from general principles, I would hazard a guess that lubrication (or excessive wear without lubrication) would be a problem that would have required further development to solve. If the whole engine is going to run so hot that it glows orange, most lubricants will boil, burn up, or otherwise decompose, and lubricants that don't have that problem will freeze when the engine cools down after you turn it off; graphite might burn slowly enough that you could use it, but replacing that which burns up would be a problem since graphite is a solid (maybe you could apply some type of lubricating oil that would preferentially decompose into graphite faster than it burns up?). (A gas turbine gets around these problems by not having sliding junctions in the highest temperature regions, but you can't arrange this in a reciprocating engine, and a gas turbine is efficient only if run very close to its optimal power rating.) The alternative would be to try to come up with engine materials that can slide without lubrication but still wear out slowly enough to let you get a decent service life out of them (and engineer the sliding parts of the engine to be all easily replaceable for when they do wear out). Finally, it is not trivial to make the high temperature ceramics that can take the full combustion heat without weakening, but have enough toughness not to crack with a heat differential or engine knock (and if you're going the no-lubricant route, slide easily enough not to wear out ridiculously fast). Metals won't cut it, because the ones that have a high enough melting point not to weaken at full combustion heat either burn to make an oxide that evaporates at high temperatures (tantalum, tungsten, rhenium, osmium), or are horrifically expensive (iridium). (In addition, metals tend to conduct too much heat, which partially defeats the purpose of an adiabatic engine, although this matters less when you are at ship engine sizes.)
@bonkeydollocks18793 жыл бұрын
@@Lucius_Chiaraviglio make them out of the bits of dried on frosties that are left in the breakfast bowl, even after a soak they are impossible to get off. They would never wear out I'm sure
@mala77944 жыл бұрын
"dont try this at home"..... yeah ok
@christianmadsen79972 жыл бұрын
😆👍
@vishnuvenugopal18356 жыл бұрын
How much engine oil does a ship use?
@GodGokuSaiyannn6 жыл бұрын
Depends on the Ship! But Roughly 8000 Gallons
@dwimaryadi28086 жыл бұрын
Amazing....but just one word.....i don't want to try
@mackydog992 жыл бұрын
The USS KITTY HAWK CVA63 has 4 main engines, each having 40,000 gals in the main sump.
@ben39894 жыл бұрын
Seems risky. What if there had been damage? Wouldn’t it require a multi day overhaul?
@Genius_at_Work4 жыл бұрын
They just filmed slow turning with the Turning Gear and then sped up the Film. Nice Try though.
@janvisser22233 жыл бұрын
Multi month probably
@rigididiot3 жыл бұрын
@@janvisser2223 Depends... If they catch it in time, replacing all bearing shells and polishing journals should be about 2~3 days work. If you let it run until the journals turn blue, then yup, multi month, drydock, large holes in the hull.
@janvisser22233 жыл бұрын
@@rigididiot Yes, I know👍 45 years in enginerooms of all sizes.
@panagiotiskapodistrias24096 жыл бұрын
Fake.they turn the engine with the turning gear and play the video fast forward.if you see in the temp check point of video you can see the oil running on the con rod
@andrewarmstrong73105 жыл бұрын
This test is done by the main engine manufacturer. It is real and accurate. 1:48 is the amount of oil present with the sump pumps turned on.
@bonkeydollocks18794 жыл бұрын
Correct
@skippyguy34 жыл бұрын
@@andrewarmstrong7310 engine manufacturers do not do these tests at all.
@TRASHGHOST6662 жыл бұрын
But can it fit into a miata?
@solehujang54602 жыл бұрын
ok me good
@faragbenhalim8465 Жыл бұрын
Risky i dont give permission to do it
@Teefs1432 жыл бұрын
FAKE!!! YOU CAN'T START MAIN ENGINE WITHOUT STARTING M/E LUB OIL PUMP AND CROSSHEAD PUMP! IT WILL NOT START! This is a timelapse video played fast forward!
@erikjohansson18146 жыл бұрын
Teflon protected bearings???? Bahahaha, yeah... And pigs can fly.... I call this bullshit.
@danielperdikis55984 жыл бұрын
Definitely fake! Too many flaws in the video. Nice try though ;-)