The words to live by

Only complaint should be "and he won't let me have a go!"

What's so special about bone dust? Is it much worse than wood, plastic or metal dust?

@@YanDoroshenko No: all dust is harmful.

@@YanDoroshenko those are all bad too. But bone being from a body absolutely harbors micro organisms, the kind that metal, plastic, or treated wood probably won't have. But as Jim said, all dust is harmful. Always where a mask or respirator when making lots of it.

@@YanDoroshenko Anything organic that ends up inside the body is more likely to cause problems than inorganic materials.

​@@DIREWOLFx75I'm not sure that's true. I'd rather have wood dust in my lungs than asbestos. Organic things can be broken down, whereas inorganic things can cause problems when tissues respond to them in unfortunate ways e.g. forming cancerous growths.

Also, "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade - make life take the lemons back! Get mad! I don't want your damn lemons, what am I supposed to do with these? Demand to see life's manager." -Cave Johnson

I just fitted one of these to an arrow for my compound bow which is a 50 pound draw at the moment I got 4-5 bounces before the arrow hit the shore i am lowering the draw to see if that ups the bounciness if it doesn’t i will go to my max which is 70

Totally, make it world event (like Olympic game).

​@@Thatoneguy-ju6gqKeep us posted. It will be interesting to know about the progress

Believe it or not, there are official rock skipping competitions.

Can you find it with duck duck go?

More like "Duck, duck, erk!"

Get your tongue further up there it might taste better

Maybe that is why Tod's sleeves are frayed!

Although it's not your intention, that first sentence was a rather rude. I hope you don't mind my bringing this up, but I see this philosophy far too often. 1) It states that Tod isn't getting what he deserves. Not getting what you deserve feels bad. 2) It implies that either people (and/or the algorithm) are fools for not subscribing. That's insulting to the people. 3) It implies that 500k subs isn't an amazing achievement. THAT'S insulting too! 4) It conflates subjective opinions with (ideally) objective justice. This weakens the morals of our culture (and/or is a symptom of weakened morals).

Я пробовал такие стрелы в охоте на уток не добыл, но в них большой потенциал. Надо к ним приспособиться приноровиться

🐔🐔🦆 👀 "Ain't nobody here but us chickens..."

makes sense

I would think that the ducks would not have enough time to react and to get away with one or two bounces. Trying to hit the first one would make more sense in the way that arrow would not have lost as much energy yet as each one of the bounces does drain more energy than traveling through air.

That antenna dagger look like an athropromorphic celtic dagger that lost its head.

Nurse Gladys said that Arkwright used to jer- j- jer- jer- jiggle it. 🤭

And probably easier to see end on too.

@@daveansell1970 Yes, that's part of what I meant by "easier to find."

Thanks - And the missing information is it in on my wall because it has a 70's dance woman with a bow and reading the blurb on the back the bow was hired from Lillywhites in London, where I got my first bow

I'm pretty sure most UK residents don't want animals to suffer due to people "having fun" using them as targets.

@@robertfitzjohn4755 you misunderstood my statement. I was referring to the way we in the Us have less restrictions upon the type of weapons we can own and yes hunting is an enjoyable pursuit. So many folks today have been brainwashed against such things as hunting and even fishing as being torturous to animals.

​@@scotthaddad563- We're on a tiny island and our bloodthirsty ancestors killed off all the interesting wildlife a thousand years ago. Bears, wolves, beavers, wild boar, cattle, goats, killer sheep, elk, haggis, confused kangaroos - all gone. Scottish wildcats are virtually extinct. And I have to disagree about hunting being 'an enjoyable pursuit'; this is me: 🦊 ask me how I know! Recreational hunting - killing for pleasure - is a sad and sick demonstration of human inadequacy. Ooh, look at me! Me go on safari! Me Alpha Male! Me got gun! Me kill elephant/ rhino/ lion/ deer/ whatever from great distance! Me tougher than big angry moose! Yay, me! That's pathetic. I'll change my opinion when you kill a boar or a bear with nothing more than your hands and teeth. If you can't do that, leave the poor bloody things alone. Coarse fishing in the UK is licensed and strictly catch-and-release. The fish aren't killed. Some of our big carp are minor celebrities in the fishing community; people have been catching the same ones, weighing them, photographing them and returning them unharmed for decades. Game fishing (trout, salmon, grayling) can be done for food, but is even more tightly regulated and under (rather expensive) licence. We don't fish with dynamite. Blasting bullets (and arrows and buckshot and quarrels) into anything that moves isn't big or clever, but it's very, very Merkin. 😞

@@scotthaddad563I don't think you're "brainwashed" if you believe that other animals with a highly developed nervous system can feel pain and be distressed by it. I'd argue it's more the case that many Americans have been "brainwashed" to believe that owning guns is a vital part of their "freedom". We Brits prefer the freedom of not having to worry about mass shootings, which are more or less a daily occurrence in the USA. Here in the UK some forms of hunting are permitted. I believe fishing is generally allowed, as is certain kinds of hunting with a gun (though you'll need a licence). Most animals can't be hunted, either for conservation reasons, or because a humane kill isn't likely (e.g. fox hunting with hounds, or amateurs taking potshots with a crossbow).

@@EleanorPeterson calm dow please, you may cause yourself to have a coronary. Sheesh! I will not get drawn into a tit for tat, tedious argument about some comment I made on a video that I enjoyed. Have a good life man and go take a chill pill.

Hmm... 🤔 If only there was some way to combine bouncing arrows with ice hockey...

spheres would not work very well. Imagine stone skipping with a ball.

If I'm understanding the arrow skipping correctly, the angle of the leading face is very important. A well defined edge at the widest point to promote flow seperation also helps.

Perhaps if you're a drinking man.

The crescent shape kept the arrow from going into or under the reeds. It acts as plow.