The books by Brian Greene

Madeline Monahan The Elegant Universe

my life i am any thing see ok mr

The Fabric of the Cosmos

I'm reading the elegant Universe by him, absolutely fantastic in every way.

Einstein was a known weasel. Greene is knowingly and deceitfully lying about physics. WHY E=MC2 IS NECESSARILY F=MA (ON BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity AS SPACE ON BALANCE: TIME DILATION ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Hence, the Earth AND the Sun are CLEARLY E=MC2 AND F=ma IN BALANCE. (The sky is blue, AND the Earth is ALSO BLUE.) A PHOTON may be placed at the center of WHAT IS THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light (c); AS E=MC2 IS F=MA !!!; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ("Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!!) Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=mC2 IS F=ma IN BALANCE !!!; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. (Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE.) E=mC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Great !!! Again, BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. By Frank DiMeglio

Marcela K. Preininger It's funny, I was thinking the same thing. He must've memorized his speech and practiced several times. I also noticed that he told a few jokes that the audience didn't get. After a while he started having to explain his jokes. I guess they were too intrigued by his demonstration.

+Carnelle Reynolds absolutely - they have only 17 minutes for the talk. its the elevator pitch for string theory. mr. greene, i'm sure, has given this talk many times. it may be a subset of the 'elegant universe' material that brian did for nova.

+Marcela K. Preininger Made me think of this quote Albert Einstein - 'If you can't explain it to a six year old, you don't understand it yourself.'

+Marcela K. Preininger Brian Greene has written several books on string theory and his exceptional talent as a communicator brings string theory to everyone.....although an understanding of a little quantum theory and General relativity help! The LHC is just about to wind up to full power of about 14 TeV ( Terra electron volts ) and at these energies we may see some of it disappear into the hidden dimensions.

Brain Greene is actually misleading people. He was time & again asked to read the link www.linkedin.com/pulse/adopted-paradigm-physics-incorrect-shafiq-khan?trk=pulse_spock-articles before he talks about physics in any forum. Einstein was the greatest scientific trickster ever. Theories of relativity lead to Big Bang Theory whereas under Big Bang paradigm there is absolutely no possibility of existence of God for following reasons. 1. Philosophically for existence; it has to be some substance (visible, invisible, perceivable or not perceivable) and this applies to God also. Substances occupy space but there is absolutely no space for God to exist at the time of Big Bang & before. 2. Four things come out of Big Bang namely space, time, matter & light/radiation. We cannot look for eternal God in space & time as both had the beginning; secondly humans are in a position to produce all types of light/radiation and something which humans can produce could not be the God and since matter is made up of electrons, protons & neutrons these too could not be the God. However Big Bang Theory including Cosmic Inflation has been mathematically, theoretically & experimentally proved as baseless in the published paper "Experimental & Theoretical Evidences of Fallacy of Space-time Concept and Actual State of Existence of the Physical Universe" which is available at the journal site at indjst.org/index.php/indjst/issue/view/2885.

Just us the update?

Could they have withheld their findings?

PowerStrokePepe probably

Dyzo. Why would they do that?

Yeah CERN found absolutely no proof of extra dimensions or supersymmetry. Two String Theory failures.

Laughing at this at 4am.

Hehe, in some sense, Brian Greene is the Steve Jobs of physics. :D

Best comment of the day 😎🏆👍

holograms?

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Y6txZamCvdmYlKs.html You are welcome 2019yr

superstringcheese I

A bit like proving god does or doesn’t exist do you think

There is a principle of science that it is impossible to prove that something does not exist. Even finding an alternative theory, and being to prove it, does not prove the non-existence, or total error of the previous theory.

@@nealW2904 To me, a lot of this stuff is like searching for a god. It has the same sort of endlessness to it....and the same problem that you can't prove the lack of something.

555

Greene 💰 is knowingly and deceitfully lying about physics.

that always happen with "TED"

same

but many newer ones are boring in comparison with this

Akbar Raza Syed This was

newdhia hassen is that fucking guy who plays

... yrs ... GOD BLESS EVERYONE BLESS EVERYTHING ALWAYS AMEN*XOX*the ROCK OF PHAGES ...

Norbit CleaverHook They did one, if space could tear, an einsteinian law if I am not mistaken, says that space can be warped, but not torn, they relatively recently did a calculation in which the first few times they mucked up the solved it correctly, the answer inferred that space could be torn if of course string theory was right.

+FrankCoffman lol you are nowhere near educated enough to make that kind of assumption but everyone has the right to their own opinion no matter how bad.

FrankCoffman This article you posted is from 2007. The scientists at CERN have discovered the Higgs Boson last year. This proves that the mathematical theories of String Theory are accurate as their experimentation meet their projected calculations. We have the Standard Model of Fundamental Particles because of String Theory, and as time goes on, we are finding more and more particles that we are expecting to find from this theory. If this theory is wrong, then why are we keep finding good results and able to make practical use from it under the assumption it is correct? Now I will admit that my level of understanding of physics isn't high enough yet to fully understand String Theory (still an undergraduate in college), but from my understanding, this is new stuff that the scientific community is just starting to accept as fact in an age where all physics textbooks are wrong, as Michio Kaku points out, because they all say "The Universe is mainly made out of atoms," when we know that about 96 percent of it is Dark Matter and Dark Energy.

+FrankCoffman Let's presume you are right. If string theory is wrong, which science always will stay open to, it will not really do any harm to have tested it. It's not like creationism which is plain stupid because it's based on an old unscientific book, this is resting on and derived from the body of science. I mean, it must be the best current explanation since a lot of very smart people, who understand stuff that you and i don't, dedicate their time and carrier to it. Even if not all physicists agree with it, it is still unwise to dismiss it before giving it a fair trial. AND if it turns out to be wrong, some smart people would have spent their time, thinking about a major theory for some time for a scientific reason, and i don't really see how that is a problem. If you have any VALID argument for ridiculing the super-string-theory, bring them on. I don't think you have.

I agree, noone should present something unproved as a fact. :) I hope the research will teach us something, and i'm 99% confident they will eventually find a solution to the problems from which the string-theory arose. But you seem like you have been following the development on this issue a little, do you know where to view some of the test results?

Well...English is his first/main language. It would be rather disconcerting if he didn't speak it well.

@@1BeGe I find his precise elaborations very comprehensive.

You may know they are proposing a more massive collider in the order of 100 kms around so that higher energies can be produced to make more energetic collisions. If built it could possibly provide the evidence. Question is will 100 kms do it or 1,000 ...

dmt users lmao

Nice to hear, but don't touch this Stuff anymore please, Ok?! 😂😂😂

Well no, just because we are built by the same means does not mean we are the same consciousness, sorry but no.

I am trying to understand this theory. Do you have a video or an article that explains this »we are built by the same»?

Here is Tom with the weather!

raptorekpl bill hicks

That is exactly what Einstein was trying to say, if you crushed a whole lot of energy down and therefore slowed it's vibration, you would have a mass, like a doughnut or a couch or a pair of glasses but that mass would still retain the same amount of energy if the process could be reversed. The man on ACID got it right.

Joseph Sewell illuminati confirmed. Well done sir...

Joseph Sewell - though it's not as impressive as the fact that it took almost 3 years before one of those "illuminati confirmed" messages appeared in this thread.

spooky

illuminati confirmed

Too coincidental!

He also used the same animations to show how gravity warp space-time.

I also saw him yesterday at brazzers

@@captain6876 I am sure you did!

The LHC has not revealed hidden dimensions, unfortunately. It has made lots of other discoveries, but not along string theory.

There's a movie about this very experiment he's describing called PARTICLE FEVER - on Netflix, I believe (at least, it was a few years ago when I watched it). To my recollection, it doesn't discover or unveil these extra dimensions, but it does chronicle the discovery/proof of the existence of the Higgs-Boson particle, the so-called (and so-feared) "God particle." For a documentary about a topic most people would find tedious and boring, it's actually a well-paced and rather suspenseful film; and like Dr. Greene, it makes an enormously complex topic very accessible to those of us for whom such topics are above our intellectual pay grade. Give it a watch - if you like this TED talk, I'd be surprised if you didn't find PARTICLE FEVER equally compelling. Cheers!

David S. Thanks for recommending! I couldn’t find it on Netflix but it’s on Amazon Prime Video for free for me. Watching now.

They’re stringing it along. All governed by the equation no conclusions yet = more grants = rich scientists.

Benzknees love the pun. Is there any way to verify this doubt. Not to be rude but what gives you the ability to say that a fundamental theory is just being strung along for funding?

And some popcorn!

I was thinking the same. I would like to do some LSD and listen to this vid again.

rather a bottle in front of me, than a frontal lobotomy

Three years later, but I noticed the comment for a reason I think. Drop acid and you will see it clearly. Maybe only in your own head but what an experience.

@Seditia Rose Dude just noticed your reply. I am late to the party.

Richard Finkelstein in this dimension 🤷🏼‍♂️🤷🏼‍♂️

If you think about discoveries about stuff quantum is probably being made since soon after the LHC was started. But I wouldn't be holding my breath in expectation of detailed info about these discoveries coming out anytime soon; I just t couldn't be risked that, for example,a rogue group could, possibly, potentially, however remotely, acquire enough knowledge to, for instance, unleash a maybe a tiny black hole that could destroy life as we know it,.

Brian Greene is one of the merchants of hype bordering in dishonesty and milking the cow of social gullibility with fairytale physics with zero testable predictions and far detached from Reality.

@@MiamiUFO Who else would you qualify in this group?

Almost all promoters of String Theory as a "scientific theory", the people talking about "post empirical science"(very convenient when their ideas are not supported by empirical data), etc; these people are not hard to spot; their signature is hype. Some people call this fairytale Physics. It

Ahmed Yousuf results is higs bosan

It's now been 13 years since the video was made. That was in 2005. It's now 2018,

+ Ahmed Yousuf It may be 50 or 100 years before you have your answer. Do not be impatient. Science is not like that.

Black hole or arsehole ?

@@VestigialHead so true! Also, what says that our perception of time is only because of 1 definition. 10 years in our earth time is only a slight fraction of time if we get to Mars, their definition has to be different and that's just using our fundamental measurement system.

And be no smarter at the end of it.

thinh thai Do you mean that there will be loss of energy? if i understand correclty it would still exist in the other dimention?

@domhanda jcb vfc cc cc DC cc ss z ex ex sa was vvt CRT CRT databases b.c. cc guy5 mm by vvt case access cree floop pop o9 ui is

12

Easy to listen to because he is talking so much bullshit. You don't really need to pay attntion to it

@@WSCLATER Maybe you think it's bullshit from your perspective because you can't wrap your mind around it.

He's talking about spatial dimensions

Time is considered a dimension isnt it?

@@reinman1987cancer Einstein said that time is a dimension too, in his special theory of relativity.

Not yet. I will check again after 11 years.

They are waiting for the James Webb telescope to launch to ensure every human possible vantage post can be high alert B.O.L.O. for ANY extra dimensions trying to hide still.....'Not Today Satin'

My question exactly. Part two please!! Wondering too, when the religions of the world will step in and claim that their God is the String Builder. Sorry, could not help myself.

David Burns what would be wrong with saying that God is the string builder? Logically speaking, Christians or other religions believe that God made the universe. They don’t explain how he made it or how it works. That doesn’t mean it’s false, right? If string theory is true that doesn’t disprove God. Just because the Bible never said the earth wasn’t flat but spherical, that doesn’t mean that the Bible is wrong because it never said that the earth wasn’t spherical. Same principle for this in my opinion. If string theory is the most logical explanation for laws of the universe, seems to me that that’s just how God designed it to work. I just don’t think the concepts of science and God are mutually exclusive. In fact, the fact that everything is so orderly and logical seems to point more towards an intelligence than not in my opinion. Anywhozzles😂im sure you weren’t looking for a rebuttal.

Definitely not looking for a rebuttal, but I accept it willingly. It allows me to ponder this about myself, "In order for me to know how little I know, wouldn't I have to know something?" ... not 'believe' in something, but actually 'know', as in scientifically provable repeatedly, not assumed because there's a Sky Fairy, cheers!@@maxmoseley7490

They couldnt find anything in matter that relates to the String Theory so far. Thats the current standing. Usually the approach is: Physics suspect to find something and then they go and look for it. If they find traces of it they look further until their theory is proven.

It's impossible for us humans to find or understand more than 3 dimensions.

It was 2005...uploaded 2008

Yes, that is gravity in a nut shell

Nope, you won't effect anything you don't directly touch. Unless you're in space, all other forces are superior to gravity. Not even the earth's gravity can dislodge an atom. If there was no nuclear attractions, or friction, and you stood still for a few weeks, you might notice small objects have made the smallest of movements towards you. But that is not the case, the light waves that just bounced off of you and back into outer space will have more of an effect on something than your gravity.

Isaiah Phillip well, in theory, we never touch anything, it's just a repulsion between electrons we feel Regardless, what the guy is trying to say is that we apply a 1x10^-99999 N (not real number, in other words, tiny) force on every object in the universe simply because we exist And if there were no nuclear attractions (which by I presume you mean electric forces) we would return to a singularity point, since there is nothing pushing us out and we'd all collapse onto ourselves

Having re read his comment, I forfeit my defense towards him, but my corrections stand

Lol

Shadow747 is it vr?

@@ajk9420 yes

Yes. For those with limited curiosity.

lu see don't mind me.. Just waiting for answer together with you..

@@ShudiadWaiyantun Jim Baggott book "Fairytale Physics"

Jim Baggott book "Fairytale Physics"

quick question Azuli

Curiosity is good. But curiosity without skepticism is not.

You are a girl, you cannot feel curious

Nop!!! So sad

String theory has become even greater but no evidence still!

Its from 2005

And meaningless to boot. Don't mistake eloquence for sense.

+Anoop Toffy "what causes it to vibrate?" I am going to try to answer that. Answer: energy. Somewhere I got the concept of what happens inside a quark (2 up quarks and 1 down quark makes a proton) is the most radical lightening storm you could ever image. Also, I got the concept somewhere of what goes on in each of our cells (muscle, skin, etc.). Molecules are zipping around fast and furious. Not like the images that you see everything moving slowly along. Things in the sub-atomic level works different than our everyday experiences. That would be my pseudo-intellectual answer.

GReaperEx, thanks for doing some research. Now, if Richard Feynman couldn't explain what energy was to any satisfaction, why are you asking joe blow on the Internet that question?

GReaperEx, In 1928, Paul Dirac predicted the possibility of anti-electrons based on theoretical evidence. In 1928, would you have discounted this whole notion of anti-matter? I think you would. You wouldn't be alone. Positrons were discovered in 1932 and Dirac received the Nobel Prize in 1933. One case in a million. Most theories go in the trash can. So what? Are you going to fault every scientist for working on theories that you have not a clue if it's right or wrong. I still don't understand why this theory bothers you.

+GReaperEx Modern science is to pompous to admit they are delving into what they used to call 'pseudo-science' or 'mysticism' to find answers. Nikola Tesla said,. "If you want to find the secrets of the Universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration." but what made out to be a nut. If you go through the history if scientific discovery you find that all the big names speak highly of ancient teachings, but of course this is rarely, if ever, mentioned these days. Look up the Vedas or Vedic science and see how many scientists attest to their teachings.

+Anoop Toffy >>vibrating strings of energy >>what exactly is vibrating? Energy. >>what causes it to vibrate? Energy Energy is the capacity of a physical system to perform work.

Jim Baggott book "Fairytale Physics"