Привет сможешь выложить исходный код игры на godot 4.2.2 которую ты сделал в этом видео?

Hi, can you upload the source code of the game on godot 4.2.2 that you made in this video?

Sorry it's just a test now, it needs a lot work before it could be called complete...

@@Code_It_All Ты все еще можешь это сделать?

Your channel is really interesting Mabel you should consider making tutorials on how to make games like this

first you would have to compile it 😂

what's larvita? I only find pokemon

larvita is one of the earliest versions of what eventually became godot

tried using blender 2.78 and my respect for 3d modellers in the past has increased

@@Okarabouzouklis bruh 2.78 wasn’t that bad

@@potatofuryy nopd

From what I remember Godot was intended to be a mainly 3D engine, so it makes complete sense

@@MrKubaxius Yeah, it seems to have a reputation as a 2D engine, though. I jumped in using 3D at 3.0, so I thought maybe the earlier releases were more focused on 2D.

Thank you!

The code font is a custom font I added myself because the default font was too small for recording, and I couldn't increase the default font size

They should DEFINETLY add some preadded resources and fonts (or maybe add some free marketplace)

Haha, I was so tired editing this video that I forgot to check for typos, thanks for informing!

Also the Label3D node is just a short hand for adding a label to a subviewport and displaying it with a sprite.

Thanks! there's no levels and such so it'll get boring very soon

Okay thats bad, for me it seem like a lot of fun 😅

@@Code_It_All Release

its pronounced guh-do by the people that made it

Tbh it doesn't really matter most people know what you mean anyway. You could say "goo-doot" and you might make sense lol

Why not just set the build tools to v140 or whatever it requires?

@@Sergonizer Older versions are locked behind a Microsoft subscription. Either way I have already found a repo containing very old builds (even pre-1.0) but KZfaq seems to have auto deleted that comment

@@swarkin huh? Probably because I had community msvs 2015 installed before 2019 and 2022 I have them available, but does it really require a subscription now?

@@Sergonizer yeah, microsoft loves making us pay for literally anything

nerd

I did not notice it listening from speakers

That's just the default lighting, you can easily get Godot 4 to look like that by changing some settings

I used three omni lights for godot 1.1 since I couldn't get shadows work properly with directional light. So lighting might look different also I didn't add any World Environment node for 1.1

@@Code_It_All looks great

Underated Channel Great Vid

I disagree. Icons are inconsistent. Color looks bad. Including the code. Text instead of things that should just be icons. 3 looks the simplest and easiest. 4 looks the best

@@RenderingUser why are you bashing on him for an opinion, if you want to say you disagree just say that and stop there. its all opinions afterall.

@@rallicat69 bruh. Should I not elaborate on why I disagree? Nothing of value is contributed by just stating I disagree. Second, he didn't say specifically whether it's his opinion or a claim to objectivity. So you're basically working off a assumption. And lastly, I simply shared my own option and elaborated on that. That's a far cry from bashing

@@rallicat69he wasn’t bashing anyone though?

​@@RenderingUser read your comment back, from how i percieved it the way you were "disagreeing" looked to be very objectively oriented since you were litteraly just saying "that looks bad, that also looks bad, that aswell looks very bad." the entire time. second of all humans work on assumptions and if we didnt assume conversations would be 100% questions since if we dont want to assume we would need to ask the other person if they said every single word right and then ask again since what if they were talking to someone else? if you dont ask again you would be assuming and over and over. working off of assumptions is neccessary so bringing that up as a point doesnt really work, stuff you dont think your assuming are assumptions. you assume your mother is your mother and your dad is your dad. if they look exactly like them and in the context you very much think its them, you dont ask them. you dont ask your parents every single time you meet them if they are your parents or just a random person that looks 1:1 to them, and same with basically everything. you assumed his comment wasnt a joke aswell. and then of course last of all, bash (bashing) from the dictionary google uses (oh shocker assumptions its right???) says that bash means to critisize severely, which if you read it back once again really sounds like what you were trying to objectively do bringing up so many points. then again, im now accidently bashing you, but thats not the point here. finally, for the last time, your first message to the other guy doesnt give value anyways (referring to): "nothing of value is contributed by just saying i disagree" what was the noticeable value in saying that you think the gui is worse than the latest one. even if hes going to make his own ui for anything, 1 person is not even anywhere CLOSE to enough to determine if its a good all around change according to even a minority.

1:56 too (I think it’s intentional but eh)

Really 2:22 but yeah

ok

not funny

Seriously, "fire in the hole" is everywhere in geometry dash 2.2

@@notChocoMilk i have allergic reaction on milk

Not funny

You have complete control over the appearance

@@aden2427 can I make it look like in this video? 😅

@@TheSunriseGames I bet you can get it pretty close. Just go into the editor settings and play around with it. But also you can google around for editor themes that are already made.

Looks fine to me. I prefer it over the old one.