Malaysia Opposes Philippines' Continental Shelf Claim Over Sabah Sovereignty

  Рет қаралды 16,382

Pivot Point: Philippines & Beyond

Pivot Point: Philippines & Beyond

27 күн бұрын

Malaysia has formally opposed the Philippines' submission to the United Nations for recognition of its undersea continental shelf, citing sovereignty over Sabah. Learn more about the diplomatic tensions and what this means for the South China Sea territorial disputes. Stay informed with the latest updates on this critical issue.
🔔 Don't forget to subscribe for more updates: / @pivotpointph
👍 If you found this video informative, please like and share it with others.
📱 Follow us on social media for the latest news: x.com/pivotpointph
#Philippines #Malaysia #ContinentalShelfClaim #SabahSovereignty #UNCLOS #SouthChinaSea #DiplomaticTensions #BilateralRelations #MaritimeJurisdiction #GeopoliticalNews
Ocean Floor by Audionautix is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. creativecommons.org/licenses/...

Пікірлер: 178
@markrivera8587
@markrivera8587 23 күн бұрын
We the supersultanate of the philipines own sabah
@kevar394
@kevar394 20 күн бұрын
no
@markrivera8587
@markrivera8587 20 күн бұрын
@@kevar394 yes we do ask the sultanate of sulu
@kevar394
@kevar394 20 күн бұрын
@@markrivera8587 no..
@kevar394
@kevar394 20 күн бұрын
@@markrivera8587 why not ask us Sabahan? citizen of Malaysia
@pivotpointph
@pivotpointph 19 күн бұрын
It's great to see your passion for this topic!
@JohnCarloLegad-vm5qe
@JohnCarloLegad-vm5qe 20 күн бұрын
Malaysia should leave Sabah and pay their rent.
@pivotpointph
@pivotpointph 19 күн бұрын
Thanks for sharing your perspective on this topic.
@hopelope1703
@hopelope1703 19 күн бұрын
Where is the agreement?
@edenmalapit-to1jc
@edenmalapit-to1jc 12 күн бұрын
You only renting sabah​@hopelope1703
@yogasetiaone
@yogasetiaone 8 минут бұрын
Support Philippines brother from Indonesia ❤️🇮🇩🇵🇭
@yunusjhon651
@yunusjhon651 20 күн бұрын
The Sabah people were new comers in the colonial British era.North Borneo was leased before the comers and permanent place in North Borneo.These were came from China,Thailand,Burma,idia,pakistan and indonesian.they claim North Borneo are their ancestors land,although the land has the owner under the lease agreement with Charter d company who paid 500 thousands anually.meaning these people got an independent and recognition on the land of other .
@kevar394
@kevar394 20 күн бұрын
500 hundred thousand annually? new comers from China, Thailand, India, Burma, Pakistan, Indonesian ? which Disney movie are you referring to?
@pivotpointph
@pivotpointph 19 күн бұрын
It's like a real-life game of Monopoly, but with a lot more complexity!
@pivotpointph
@pivotpointph 19 күн бұрын
Disney should start a new movie series called "Immigrant Adventures" with all these new characters!
@DamoclesHurles
@DamoclesHurles 20 күн бұрын
Kung meron lang sana tyong sapat na sandatahang lakas pwede sana nating habulin yan sa diplomasya o sa digamaan ang kaso wala tyong ganun kung ung sa wps nga hindi pa natin mabawi sasabak na namn tyo sa panibagong gusot na hindi naman natin kayang ipanalo
@pivotpointph
@pivotpointph 19 күн бұрын
Who needs a magic wand when you have a strong military, right?
@sadik1588
@sadik1588 19 күн бұрын
Parang gusto nggobyernong ito na matabunan ang nangyayari sa ating wps at ang pambubully ng China kaya ibinaling saalaysia ang isyu Isa Isa lng dapat iyan ang kasakiman sa kapangyarihan at mga gahaman sa pera ng kaban ng bayan kaya hindi lumakas ang military natin dahil sa coruption unahin nyo ang problema da china lalo na sa kalupaan sa pogo bago ang iba ng problema
@DamoclesHurles
@DamoclesHurles 18 күн бұрын
@@pivotpointph yeah
@MerianRamoza
@MerianRamoza 17 күн бұрын
hinayaan Kasi ng mga nakaraang,,pangulo Ang sulo na pabayaan lang,, kaya hahit Muslim gusto na bumuwag, sa pinas
@merchanthandson5271
@merchanthandson5271 17 күн бұрын
Natulog na sa pansitan ang Pilipinas mula sa Cory Aquino admin in terms ng military and sea ships.
@jhonargarcia8735
@jhonargarcia8735 17 күн бұрын
Yes United Nations History Sabah, Sultanate of Sulu, Philippines
@rod.chvrr1425
@rod.chvrr1425 3 күн бұрын
Malaykosyo,,, amin yang Sabah,,,,!
@jefrey123
@jefrey123 20 күн бұрын
Sabah is for the Philippines. Sabah is rented to Muslim princess
@pivotpointph
@pivotpointph 19 күн бұрын
Well, that's one way to put it! 😄
@hopelope1703
@hopelope1703 19 күн бұрын
Show me evidence Sabah belongs to Sulu?
@Jhance05™
@Jhance05™ 17 күн бұрын
​@@hopelope1703Just Read In the Google. To know who is the owner of Sabah. Even google say sabah is from philippines..
@wilfoxreal8641
@wilfoxreal8641 24 күн бұрын
See, I told you, they are majority Chinese locals are like the foreigners there.
@yunusjhon651
@yunusjhon651 20 күн бұрын
Before the new comers.and made permanent home/place in North Borneo.
@pivotpointph
@pivotpointph 19 күн бұрын
Thank you for sharing this piece of history with us, it's fascinating to see how things have changed.
@hopelope1703
@hopelope1703 19 күн бұрын
Show me your evidence Sabah belongs to Sulu/PH.
@paquitolunario7424
@paquitolunario7424 18 күн бұрын
Sabah is part of the Phil,,
@hopelope1703
@hopelope1703 17 күн бұрын
Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol of 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.
@theodorelambert341
@theodorelambert341 25 күн бұрын
Sabah is part of the Philippines period. Malaysia should give up it's imagination that Sabah is Malaysia.
@calmtask
@calmtask 25 күн бұрын
Same situation with China, they do not acknowledge the Philippines' claim. However, they continue to pay the sultanate of Sulu up to the present day, on an annual rent basis. Please correct me if I am mistaken.
@WellnessMinimal
@WellnessMinimal 25 күн бұрын
Agreed. Malaysia is still required to pay the Sulu sultanate up to the present time.
@hopelope1703
@hopelope1703 24 күн бұрын
@@calmtask If you called it rent, where is the agreement between Sulu and Malaysia? If none, it is just like what pirates and mafia do for a living. Why in the 1878 agreement, was Malaysia not mentioned? Is there any clause in the 1878 agreement that Malaysia has the responsibility to continue paying Sulu? Why do the receipts in Sulu's possession not mention the money is for the rent? Why is the amount so small and not what has been stipulated in the agreement? One Mexican gold dollar (coins) in 1878 weighed 1.7 grams of gold. So, 5300 X 1.7/1000 = 9.01 kg of gold. Compare the value of 5300 Malaysian dollars to 9 kg of gold. Giving away money is not an offense. Can give or stop giving any time.
@Liboch
@Liboch 24 күн бұрын
They paid until 2012. When the heirs of Sulu attacked Sabah in 2013, Malaysia stops paying.
@hopelope1703
@hopelope1703 24 күн бұрын
@@Liboch Ha ha ha ha. That not a good excuse. You need to show the agreement which is binding. Not hearsay.
@PeaceBeWithYou1991
@PeaceBeWithYou1991 19 күн бұрын
Now im hating malaysia too. Sainyo nayan lahat wag lng kau iiyak malaysia huh?
@jimplacer1307
@jimplacer1307 25 күн бұрын
Borneo is Phillippines. Not Malaysia the world and united nation know that.
@hopelope1703
@hopelope1703 24 күн бұрын
UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.
@kevar394
@kevar394 23 күн бұрын
borneo is the whole island, when did that happen..
@bsitp
@bsitp 19 күн бұрын
​@@hopelope1703Wow Malaysia mahiya kakatayo lang ng bansa mo kaysa sa aming mga pinoy Wala na kayong hawak sa UK kapal haha ipinagmalaki pa yung pagkalaya Wala kaming paki dyan sa independence ninyo be respect naman sa aming mga pinoy na mas naunang naging bansa at matagal na binabawi Yan simula nung makalaya kayo sa Britain ang usapan ay usapan kung Renta renta lang pero Wala kayong karapatan sa inyo Yan nagrerenta lang kayo.
@hopelope1703
@hopelope1703 18 күн бұрын
​@@bsitpHa ha ha ha. If rent, ehere is the agreement? Don't tell me you have nothing to show. Furthermore, how do I know Sabah belongs to Sulu/PH? Show me your evidence.
@Jhance05™
@Jhance05™ 17 күн бұрын
​@@hopelope1703Just Read the History in google. Even google say sabah is from philippines. You only Rent that sabah. Then u claim that you own the Sabah. Do you have shame on ur self??.
@milfredcardeno7777
@milfredcardeno7777 8 күн бұрын
Hatiin nalng natin ung saba
@pivotpointph
@pivotpointph 4 күн бұрын
Thank you for your suggestion!
@aldomartindeoca3297
@aldomartindeoca3297 13 күн бұрын
Simple lang ...isuli sa kung sino ang totoo at original na may Ari ....mabuhay ang Sultanate ng Sulo.... Let the British empire settle this matter...
@hopelope1703
@hopelope1703 13 күн бұрын
The ownership of Sabah by Sulu can be disputable. Because Brunei Sultanate (original owner) granted North Borneo (Sabah) to BNBC dated 29/12/1877. Much earlier than the 1878 agreement. How can it belong to Sulu if Brunei can give it away? Sulu Sultanate relinquished its territories to the Spanish under the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement on 22/7/1878. Sulu has nothing left. Thus the 1878 Sulu-BNBC Agreement dated 22/1/1878 is null and void. The cession of Sabah from Sulu to PH in 1962 is invalid.
@bernardfernando7831
@bernardfernando7831 3 күн бұрын
PBBM is so wise, bright, at any side, makaysia will loose, f malaysia submits evidences & facts, hearing must b held, f malasia doesn' t submit its claim, decisions r made & malaysia will loose by default. Wisdom of PBBM niw enligthen us .
@hopelope1703
@hopelope1703 3 күн бұрын
I can guarantee that the UN will reject or keep the PH submission on the continental shelf aside. The problem is that the submission was inclusive of Malaysia's EEZ and continental shelf, particularly in the state of Sabah, which the UN has recognized in Malaysia since 1963. The UN cannot be contradicting itself.
@jeanlonggumapac2209
@jeanlonggumapac2209 17 күн бұрын
Kahit pa gusto ng mga tao sa Sabah na gusto nila magpasakop sa Malaysia,Hindi parin yan honor,kasi sakop naman talaga ang Sabah sa Pilipinas,ngayon sasabihin Kong magpasakop ako sa USA dahil mayaman na bansa,pwede naba yon na dahilan?gusto nila sa Malaysia talaga Kong may plebisito kasi maganda ang pamamalakad ng gobiyerno ng malaysia.,dahil lang yan sa economy.
@hopelope1703
@hopelope1703 16 күн бұрын
Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol of 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.
@seekersoul3439
@seekersoul3439 15 күн бұрын
Philippines should dissolved and return to Sultan of sulu.
@LYNDN
@LYNDN 13 күн бұрын
malaysia know the history of sabah,,,,they just renting sabah not the owner,,,its owner is the sultanate of sulu,,,malaysian leader know it,,
@hopelope1703
@hopelope1703 13 күн бұрын
The ownership of Sabah by Sulu can be disputable. Because Brunei Sultanate (original owner) granted North Borneo (Sabah) to BNBC dated 29/12/1877. Much earlier than the 1878 agreement. How can it belong to Sulu if Brunei can give it away? Sulu Sultanate relinquished its territories to the Spanish under the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement on 22/7/1878. Sulu has nothing left. Thus the 1878 Sulu-BNBC Agreement dated 22/1/1878 is null and void. The cession of Sabah from Sulu to PH in 1962 is invalid.
@hopelope1703
@hopelope1703 10 күн бұрын
If you called it rent, where is the agreement between Sulu and Malaysia? Why in the 1878 agreement, was Malaysia not mentioned as one of the parties? Is there any clause in the 1878 agreement that Malaysia has the responsibility to continue paying Sulu? Why do the receipts in Sulu's possession not mention the money is for the rent? Why is the amount so small in value and not what has been stipulated in the agreement? Why did Malaysia give the money from 1963 until 2013? But the agreement was dated 22/1/1878. When Sulu relinquished its territories and dependencies to Spain on 22/7/1878, it left Sulu with nothing. That 1878 Sulu-BNBC agreement automatically became invalid as Sulu lost its ownership. Why must we pay when Sulu is no longer the owner? Why did Sulu never complain about Malaysia not adhering to the above agreement? In 2013, when Malaysia stopped giving the money, why did Sulu never bring the matter to court? Giving away money is not an offense. Can give or stop giving any time
@izafri
@izafri 8 күн бұрын
Pirates claiming to be Sultan of Sulu.
@pivotpointph
@pivotpointph 4 күн бұрын
It's concerning how some individuals misuse historical titles for their own gain.
@wilfredobigo
@wilfredobigo 13 күн бұрын
dapat bawein nyan
@hopelope1703
@hopelope1703 24 күн бұрын
Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol of 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.
@efaizariff3145
@efaizariff3145 14 күн бұрын
Sultan Sulu is not recognised by the Republic of Phillipines so how on earth they ask the descendents of ex Sultan to claim Sabah? Well, they only see Sabah as oilfield to complement their empty pocket. Poor pinnoys. Nobody buys their story.
@izafri
@izafri 8 күн бұрын
Sea nomadic chief of Sulu people claiming to be Sultan of Sulu and claiming Sabah is theirs . 😅😅😅
@pivotpointph
@pivotpointph 4 күн бұрын
Thanks for sharing this insight into the Sulu people's heritage and historical claims.
@clarkbenitez1280
@clarkbenitez1280 9 күн бұрын
The issue of Sabah's ownership is a complex and contentious matter involving historical, legal, and political dimensions. Here are the key points regarding the claim that Sabah is part of the Philippines and was Philippine territory before the formation of Malaysia in 1963: 1. Historical Context: - The claim that Sabah is part of the Philippines is based on historical events, including the lease of Sabah by the Sultan of Sulu to the British North Borneo Company in the 19th century. The Philippines argues that this lease was not a transfer of sovereignty, and thus, the territory remains part of the Sultanate of Sulu and, by extension, the Philippines. 2. Philippine Claim: - The Philippines claims Sabah based on the historical rights of the Sultanate of Sulu over the territory. The Philippine government has maintained that Sabah is part of the country's territory and has pursued diplomatic and legal avenues to assert this claim. 3. Formation of Malaysia: - Sabah, along with Sarawak, Singapore, and the Federation of Malaya, formed Malaysia in 1963. The inclusion of Sabah in Malaysia was a result of agreements and negotiations between the British, Malayan, and Bornean authorities. 4. Legal Disputes: - The Philippines and Malaysia have had ongoing disputes over the sovereignty of Sabah. The matter has been brought to international forums and courts, although a resolution has not been reached. 5. Current Status: - Sabah is currently part of Malaysia and is known as the Sabah state within the Malaysian federation. It is administered as an autonomous region within Malaysia. In summary, while the claim that Sabah is part of the Philippines has historical roots, the territory is currently under Malaysian sovereignty. The complexities of the historical lease agreements, the formation of Malaysia, and the legal disputes between the Philippines and Malaysia contribute to the ongoing debate over the ownership of Sabah.
@hopelope1703
@hopelope1703 6 күн бұрын
There is a court case recorded in 2001 by ICJ (International Court of Justice, The Hague) about the Philippines' claims on North Borneo. It is a special 37-page report by ICJ published in 2001 and is easily accessible from the ICJ official website. It was a trial within a trial in the main court case between Malaysia and Indonesia over the ownership of the islands of Sipadan and Ligitan in Sabah. Philippines which is not a party to the trial requested permission to intervene. To comply with Article 62 of the Statute of the Court, the Philippines stated the objectives for the intervention (Section 7 & 84) namely, to safeguard and preserve the Philippines' historical and legal rights (only found in the 1973 PH Constitution) over North Borneo and to inform the court of the effect or effect of the court outcomes of the trial on its claim to the territories. In that trial, Philippines lawyers explained their case especially the Sulu-Ovenbeck 1878 agreement (primal reference) and related information to the court (Section 44 & 83). The same 15 main court judges were sitting at the bench and Malaysian and Indonesian lawyers too were present. On 23 October 2001, by a 14 to 1 vote, the court rejected the Philippine's request that there is “no interest of legal nature” (Section 93). (Meaning Sulu/PH claim on Sabah is null and void) Type the statement below and go to the official ICJ website (a 37-page report): INTIZRNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS CASE CONCERNING SOVEREIGNTY OVER PULAU LIGITAN AND PULAU SIPADAN APPLICATION BY THE PHILIPPINES FOR PERMISSION TO INTERVENE JUDGMENT OF 23 OCTOBER 2001 Notice the PH objectives in the intervention, its primary reference, and the verdict by the court. The 1878 Sulu-BNBC agreement is not valid.
@hopelope1703
@hopelope1703 6 күн бұрын
Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporated it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol of 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.
@hopelope1703
@hopelope1703 6 күн бұрын
How do you explain the existence of two agreements related to the ownership of North Borneo (Sabah) namely between Brunei Sultanate & BNBC (29/12/1877) and Sulu & BNBC (22/17/1878)? The only existing agreement involving the Sultanate of Brunei (original owner) is that agreement that Brunei granted and ceded North Borneo to BNBC on 29/12/1877. If the Brunei Sultanate had given North Borneo to Sulu much earlier, his majesty would not have signed that 1877 agreement. The signing confirms North Borneo belongs to Brunei and not Sulu. Why is there no protest from Sulu to Brunei for signing the 1877 agreement? Why was the Sulu & BNBC agreement not signed earlier in 1877 but 3 weeks later (1878) after the signing of the 1877 agreement. The original agreement in Tausug is missing during His Majesty's trip to Singapore, Thus, the validity of Sulu ownership of North Borneo is doubtful. How on earth can Sulu own North Borneo if there is no undisputable proof that the Brunei Sultanate gave it to them earlier? Unless there is a possibility the British had been scammed, deceived, or intimidated by Sulu into signing that 1878 agreement? The first agreement (1877) with the original owner is more valid in court.
@pivotpointph
@pivotpointph 4 күн бұрын
Thank you for sharing your insights on the historical agreements related to North Borneo. It's always interesting to delve into the complexities of such historical events.
@pivotpointph
@pivotpointph 4 күн бұрын
Thank you for sharing your detailed insights on the legal aspects surrounding the claim on Sabah. It's important to consider all angles when discussing such complex issues.
@ciscosebanes
@ciscosebanes 18 күн бұрын
Malaysia has been giving the Philippines misery since ancient times.
@ramiloparreno3957
@ramiloparreno3957 17 күн бұрын
SABAH DIHA.!😢😂😂
@mohairmohammad8095
@mohairmohammad8095 24 күн бұрын
Sabah was once a territory of the now defunct Sulu sultanate, and the Philippines is not a successor state of the Sulu sultanate, hence, it doesn't have the right to claim Sabah as its own. The majority of the people of Sabah are Muslims, and I am pretty sure they would rather live in Malaysia where they could practice their religion more perfectly than here in the Philippines.
@edzelsongcoestaris4938
@edzelsongcoestaris4938 23 күн бұрын
Brother,Better read and learn the history first before giving your personal opinion, peace be with you..
@markrivera8587
@markrivera8587 20 күн бұрын
@@mohairmohammad8095 they are piliponos firsthen muslims
@FBReelTime
@FBReelTime 20 күн бұрын
thats simple , if they dont want to be under Ph hovt ..they have to leave sabah then go to Malaysia ...
@mohairmohammad8095
@mohairmohammad8095 20 күн бұрын
@@edzelsongcoestaris4938 you need that advice more than I do. Keep your peace
@kevar394
@kevar394 20 күн бұрын
​@@FBReelTime Sabah is already in Malaysia federation.
@maryanncarbon3372
@maryanncarbon3372 17 күн бұрын
Why to many greedy with our own west phils.sea
@shurenraorao4850
@shurenraorao4850 25 күн бұрын
Sabahan are malaysians. Not a single Phinoy can change that
@sothatsKARL-xxx
@sothatsKARL-xxx 24 күн бұрын
Doesn't matter, just the MERE FACT that malaysia STILL pays the Sultanate of Sulu for the RENTAL of SABAH region is the strong and legitimate proof that SABAH is indeed part of the Philippines. Just so you know, SABAH region is NOT RENT-TO-OWN.
@hopelope1703
@hopelope1703 24 күн бұрын
@@sothatsKARL-xxx If you called it rent, where is the agreement between Sulu and Malaysia? If none, it is just like what pirates and mafia do for a living. Why in the 1878 agreement, was Malaysia not mentioned? Is there any clause in the 1878 agreement that Malaysia has the responsibility to continue paying Sulu? Why do the receipts in Sulu's possession not mention the money is for the rent? Why is the amount so small and not what has been stipulated in the agreement? One Mexican gold dollar (coins) in 1878 weighed 1.7 grams of gold. So, 5300 X 1.7/1000 = 9.01 kg of gold. Compare the value of 5300 Malaysian dollars to 9 kg of gold. Giving away money is not an offense. Can give or stop giving any time.
@TheRavenkroft
@TheRavenkroft 18 күн бұрын
Only the owner of the land, not the tenant, can decide.
@hopelope1703
@hopelope1703 18 күн бұрын
@@TheRavenkroft Ha ha ha ha. What evidence do you have that Sabah belongs to Sulu/PH?
@audymingoa6149
@audymingoa6149 Күн бұрын
Just like Hongkong the British returned the control to china Sabah should be returned to the phil. under supervision of the heir of sultante of Sulu
@hopelope1703
@hopelope1703 Күн бұрын
What is the evidence Sabah belongs to Sulu? Regarding Hong Kong, there is an agreement with duration of occupation by the British.
@terayskie6619
@terayskie6619 14 күн бұрын
They cannot even retur sabah..potpot kasi mga aquino
@jmgamer7332
@jmgamer7332 18 күн бұрын
Sabah, Philippines
@hopelope1703
@hopelope1703 17 күн бұрын
Show the evidence.
@user-dq8pc4kr4z
@user-dq8pc4kr4z 19 күн бұрын
Malaysia Return SABAH, to the Philippines. You know that Sabah Belongs to the Philippines. That is Haram...! Allah Malum...!!!
@hopelope1703
@hopelope1703 19 күн бұрын
Do you know claiming something not yours is "haram". So show me evidence that Sabah belongs to Sulu.
@madrigaltomas4602
@madrigaltomas4602 18 күн бұрын
SABAH IS NOT PART OF PHILIPPINES LIKE MINDANAO IS NOT PART OF PHILIPPINES
@NoeOrcine
@NoeOrcine 17 күн бұрын
​@@madrigaltomas4602who told you that mindanao is not part of the Philippines? you must be high of pentanyl. Yawaaaaa !
@TeensLog6949
@TeensLog6949 10 күн бұрын
ASEAN nation have no oceans. Nine Dash line 🇨🇳..😅😂
@pivotpointph
@pivotpointph 4 күн бұрын
That's an interesting observation about ASEAN nations and the Nine Dash Line!
@khrysztoffe27
@khrysztoffe27 20 күн бұрын
Karma will eventually find its way and time will finally say...
@pivotpointph
@pivotpointph 19 күн бұрын
That's so true! Trust in the process and keep doing good.
@seekersoul3439
@seekersoul3439 15 күн бұрын
Sabah is Malaysia. Period.
@rod.chvrr1425
@rod.chvrr1425 3 күн бұрын
SIRAULOKA!!! Samgapilipinosulatanate ng Sulu yang Sabah!!!
@hudsonmalabaguio5867
@hudsonmalabaguio5867 19 күн бұрын
Week up Malaysia,, that's not yours. You the same China!!!
@hopelope1703
@hopelope1703 19 күн бұрын
What evidence do you have?
@madrigaltomas4602
@madrigaltomas4602 18 күн бұрын
HND ako papayag na makuha NG PILIPINAS Ang SABAH KC KURAKOT Ang GOBERNO NG PILIPINAS Malaysia AY malinis HND TULAD NG PILIPINAS marumi Ang systima NG politics
@Jhance05™
@Jhance05™ 17 күн бұрын
​@@hopelope1703Even google say sabah is from philippines. Just search the history of sabah.
@MerianRamoza
@MerianRamoza 17 күн бұрын
​@@hopelope1703 Malaysia now is a province of china,,look their representative of their sports what kind of Malaysian is that,,
@stunstar4553
@stunstar4553 14 күн бұрын
@@MerianRamoza The Philippines wants to become a province of US, but Americans are not interested and show disdain
@madrigaltomas4602
@madrigaltomas4602 18 күн бұрын
BIGLA MONG SASAKUPIN ANG SABAH DAPAT TANONGIN MO ANG MG NKATIRA SA SABAH HUWAG KANG MAG CLAIM KAAGAD DAHIL GULO ANG KALALABASAN
@larrybonbon8016
@larrybonbon8016 19 күн бұрын
We need to buy more arms, navy and air force assets so that our neighbors will respect our rights
The Philippines' NEW STANDARD MAP that  Countered China's 10-Dash Line
12:09
Женская драка в Кызылорде
00:53
AIRAN
Рет қаралды 418 М.
Looks realistic #tiktok
00:22
Анастасия Тарасова
Рет қаралды 105 МЛН
Now THIS is entertainment! 🤣
00:59
America's Got Talent
Рет қаралды 39 МЛН
Эффект Карбонаро и нестандартная коробка
01:00
История одного вокалиста
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН
Sadhguru makes a foreign anchor speechless | Best reply
11:00
Varun Sharma
Рет қаралды 2,5 МЛН
Prophet Muhammad and Aisha's Adultery (Al-Ifk)
16:31
Nabi Asli
Рет қаралды 634 М.
Женская драка в Кызылорде
00:53
AIRAN
Рет қаралды 418 М.