Plaintiff really been watching a lot of Judge Judy, 😂😂😂 his closing point in this video was accurate to the T😂😂😂😂😂😂

One minute 39 seconds is a very specific amount of time to ask for 😅 For the record, he took 43 seconds

He ATE on his final thought lol Jj about to get into it 😂

She’s friends with his ex girlfriend, Stephanie. She invited Stephanie over and left Stephanie in his house with some man she’d never seen before. She told Stephanie to stay until she got off of work because Stephanie didn’t have a key to lock the door. When she came home Stephanie, the man, the televisions, computer, jewelry, and debit card was gone. Whose fault is it? It’s the defendants. She left her friend there and they burglarized the house.

But the Defendant already admitted to using his credit card. What is JJ on about here?

He is making a solid argument. He didn't give Stephanie access, the tenant did thus Stephanie was her guest not his, regardless of their prior relationship. The defendant had care and custody of his property

I agree with him, if she is the one who let her in then she is the one responsible for what was missing once she let others in to his place period especially if others won't fess up to it.

He does make a good argument at the end. She was a tenant, and she was the only one that had the key where she brings in to the apartment should be her responsibility

JJ really had to try her best at keeping her laughter, this plaintiff was a handful lmao.

Terry is making perfect sense and his reasoning is solid. The defendant was responsible for the home and its contents.

The plaintiff made his case and that “ okay good” along with his shoulders moving took me all the way out! 😂😂

I can see the plaintiff's logic here. If the defendant was left in charge of the apartment, and then she invited the ex gf and some other man, while she is going to work, the defendant is liable for anything that has happened! It's like when a babysitter goes out to party while kids at home doing god knows what, the babysitter is responsible.

I would stop smoking period if I ever sounded like that.

LOOOOL “Fast…one sentence” 😂😂😂

That was actually a pretty good argument I thought that she was in control of his things as she lived there. So what happened to them ultimately while he was away could b blamed on her

Defendant is a con, scammer and liar.

“Stephanie! 🗣” takes me out every time. He’s trying his hardest to follow directions 🤣

My man fighting for his rights on part 3 😆😆😆😆😆it is giving actor lol

It drives me nuts when people say “axe” instead of “ask” 🤦🏻‍♂️

Even if the defendant didn’t take his things and Stephanie did, she is still responsible. She allowed Stephanie and her boyfriend into the apartment as guests while he wasn’t there. He’s right, she’s a tenant and the only one with the key at the time. It happened on her watch.

He sounds like Wolfman Jack

I'm really surprised that Judge Judy didn't pick up on two really glaring things: 1. The first time Judge Judy asked what happened to his property, the defendant didn't say ANYTHING about Stephanie, she tried to blame it on Savion, saying he also had a key to the apartment. The second time she asked, all of a sudden, Stephanie is in the mix. 2. The plaintiff said he got in touch with the defendant after getting out of jail THROUGH Stephanie, so it's clear the defendant and Stephanie are in close contact. The plaintiff dated this Stephanie person YEARS ago, but she gained access to his house through the defendant and had no permission to be there. Whether she took the property or the defendant did, it would still be the defendant's fault. P.S. I'm surprised this plaintiff is only a UPS driver. He's incredibly intelligent and well spoken. Not many plaintiffs would know to ask for "latitude." He's having some trouble being succinct, but I think that's just because he's trying to share all relevant information.

the way that man was blinking looking at her when she answered she was staying in the one bedroom in the plaintiff's bed. Boy I was screaming this case is done .

This is too much.😮

The sweat beads on top of his dome is a wicked sign 😮

Let's have it 😂

What a mess.

I don’t need 38 seconds I need 1 minute 39 seconds to tell you a story!

I actually entirely believe him and his argument is pretty solid. Very intelligent and rational man with some character without being over the top. Also follows instructions well for the most part. Now lets talk about his voice. The many changes in the type of voice he uses is actually impressive and he can make a living off of that!

He needs to be going after his ex-girlfriend Stephanie to find out what happened to his property.

He loves Judge Judy

The defenDANT still let Stephanie IN without permission so she should still be responsible

It's heating up

Hi judge judy,you are the best judge in the world 🌎 ❤shalom ❤

Diddy might need this guy on his legal team 😂. He made some valid points towards the end.

He’s all over the place.

Judge Judy: what did Stephanie tell you about being in your apartment? Plantiff: well she emailed me… Judge Judy: No, no, no.. that’s hearsay. You can’t tell me what she told you.

He sounds like the grandpa on The Boondocks series

1 min 😊 39 seconds 😂

She gives Ebony from Players Club

I mean...he has a good point.

Defendant has a confused look on her face... constantly

Where is part 4?

Something is definitely up with him, not sure what😂

Something is mentally off with the defendant. She even looks and seems sneaky and like a thief!

Stephanie Watts, expert lip reader

when they AXE people... like they cant ASK people

Is there a part 4!

I’ve tried to watch this one… I cannot finish it. That plaintiff is the most annoying person I have ever heard. The way he speaks and goes off on TRIBUTARIES is driving me nuts.

Lol. Smart man. He was short and sweet.

Convicted in 2009 at age 17. Att.murder pleaded to battery w/deadly weapon. Judge Michele leavitt. I was sentenced to 6-15yrs min. First parole denied granted second. Released 3/1/2017. Someone had used my name to obtain an apartment in LV in 2017. They also had used my name to buy homes across the country without my knowledge. All reported in 2017 to the ftc and still haven't heard a peep. -Jaquez Dejuan Barber

if it don't come out in the wash, it should come out in the rinse? my head's in the spin cycle

I think this will be “case dismissed! Good bye”

Okey gcood 😂😂😂😂

So he has a girlfriend and a concubine living in his house . Man got life figured out 😂

The defendants looks like ol girl from *Players Club*

Pride is deaf, it cannot hear rebuke. Pride is blind, it cannot see warning signs. Pride is mute, it cannot speak uplifting words to others. Pride is lame, it cannot walk in the ways of the Lord. Pride hinders the physical and spiritual senses of the body. Rev. Victor Jackson

They always say axed instead of asked

Pretty close to 39 seconds.

Sje need to stop drinking she cant remember nothin smdh

Jesus is the only man I have ever loved 🙏❤️

He should bring his ex also to testify or to join the defendant. Otherwise he has no case, caz all he has is assumptions

She’s totally responsible for who was in the house and what happened to the items in it.