crazy thing is, that isn't even max performance because they are not allowed to max perform the aircraft at airshows.

Well it’s the F-22 Raptor, the best fighter jet

108-0

we've had help. I find it hard to believe we got so advanced in very short time. without help. on all kinds of things. whether little green men or a breakaway civilization. we had help. flight just over 100 years ago. we struggled with airplanes, then t look what we have now. amazing not to mention exploring the solar system. we didn't get that smart that fast. in my opinion

just think what is being kept from us. hell may even have warp propulsion. Breakaway civilization. It's not as far fetched as it sounds ...

That would be F-16. Except it's 40+ years on.

@@333crypta bang on the money. Wait till you see next 1 rolled out it will make f35 look like a spitfire

It still looks very futuristic to me

Well done! The only involvement I had in it’s development was paying taxes yet I still feel proud every time I see one, so I can only imagine how you must feel when you see one.

Fine job!!!! No bs any envolvement is this jet is absolutely something to be very proud of.thank you.greetings from loomis california

Lol it looks amazing.

Thanks

Well.... Yeah, you can’t really capture movement with a still photo......

@@all-timealien4483 ג

Own way as an invisible tiger and there is no Forbidden sign in the sky for you

the SU is nowhere near the raptor, its so advanced the U.S. can't even sell it to allies.

@@yixe2253 Not really. Russians are not stupid.

Yixe of cause the US delivered them to Europe already - they took part in financing it. SU-35 is more closest competitor on a market today. Turkish President studied SU-57 today in Moscow . But this is not yet ready as a manufactured raptor. Well, 4++ is also good choice , especially regarding ODK engines inside - no one knows who can beat on a battle between F22 and SU35 yet.

@@lsd8497 nobody said there stupid the f22 is just way more advanced then any russain jet out there and the fact that us just made a secret fighter that already broke multiple records is gonna be crazy

Chineses and Russian stealth aircraft are poorly engineered replicas that are more on par with the F117 in performance.

The Lockheed F-22 Raptor Was introduced in 2005.

@@supercarsnaviation6148 but designed in the 90s

Well, the F-22 can kill if it’s armed

@@supercarsnaviation6148that’s the cool thing about their demo team aircraft - they’re picked out of active service randomly. When I talked to “Loco” at a show once, he mentioned “as they sit” there for a demo, you could throw bombs and missiles on them with zero reconfiguring.

so they think..

ripmax333 the f15 (105-0) has never lost a dogfight and the f-16 has only lost one in over 40 years. This plane is so far ahead of even the 15 and 16 that we won't sell it, it's RCS is the size of your left nut and its capabilities are not on the Internet. Ya we know.

Ak situk Until Su-35 arrived

@@user-kz3rc1hx7e su 35 ain't shit! You know it and putin know it too!!

I film with a Sony FDR ax-1

British typhoon better

@@StarzzyJJASD i doubt that.

But i have agree that F-23 was better looking.

Nice. Now we have F-16s in a lot of bases

Lance Winslow love this video in 4K

งยงงย

😆😆😆🤣

Hahahhhhhhh

😁😁😁

Then its worth it!

Women..

Thank you , i appreciate that . greetings

I'd say the Apollo/Saturn V was the pinnacle of human engineering and ingenuity..In my opinion.

BS!!!! Not an Indian or Israeli In the competition to build the new fighter, and in many other advanced technology programs, two master designers who are intense professional rivals but personal friends have spearheaded the development of stealth. One is Ben R. Rich, head of the Lockheed Aeronautical Systems Company's Advanced Development Projects Group. This team, known in the trade as the Skunk Works, gave America its first jet fighter, as well as the U-2 and SR-71 spy planes, the C-130 transport, the F-104 fighter and many other famous aircraft. Mr. Rich directed the design of the F-117A, the trail-blazing stealth fighter-bomber that flew to fame in the Persian Gulf war. At the Skunk Works, named for the illicit distillery in the "L'il Abner" comic strip, Mr. Rich worked for many years under Clarence (Kelly) Johnson, one of the world's most famous airplane designers. Mr. Rich's rival, Dr. John F. Cashen, leads the Northrop design group that designed the B-2 stealth bomber, which is said to be virtually invisible to radar. The B-2, expected to cost some $660.2 million each when production begins, is by far the most expensive airplane ever designed. The two engineers, pitted against each other in the competition between Lockheed's F-22 and Northrop's F-23, came from similar academic backgrounds. Both built and flew model airplanes as boys and became fascinated with aviation, and both took advanced engineering degrees at the University of California at Los Angeles. In their later years, stealth has dominated their careers.

Gracias eres bienvenido

not really... beautiful aircraft but for example Rafale is better and i don't think Rafale is the best fourth generation aircraft.

@@julienr8114 F-22 is not a fourth-generation fighter but a fifth-gen and would for all we know beat the Rafale in a dogfight 8-10 times out of 10. It's also meaningless to compare the two since they are built for different roles.

SPPPPPPEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDDDDDDDD

Glad you enjoyed it! thank you

She posted a TikTok of the cockpit view and she did a TikTok dance while upside down and flying at Mach 2...

WoW what a privilege .

dm me top secret shit. also do they ever actually use full afterburner in the shows? the flame looks short compared to an f16 or f15

And what your collegues talk about pakfa?

F35 is more advanced than the F22 if not as good looking.

Notice how the guy in the high speed turn at 5:18 to 5:24 never uses his flaps at full capacity. This gets me wondering if the F22 has the potential power to turn faster or equal to the T50, but by using the thrust vectoring to pull off, as it's only can do thrust vectoring on 1 axis.

its officially 70,000 lbs at static sea level uninstalled test. But it can reach more than that at certain speeds due to ram air effects specially at lower altitudes. the TVC deflection is 20 degrees, they don't add up for both engines.

Michael D Isn’t SU-57 a better version of F-22?

ya ping Sang - Seriously lol? NO! The Su 57 was never even designed to be as good as the F-22 or be nearly as advanced. But the SU 57 was a failure and the program has been cancled. First off the Su 57 wasn't a true 5th gen fighter because it wasn't very stealthy and lacked the advanced senors and avionics you would find in the the F-22 and F-35. Also the Su 57 had unreliable engines that weren't made for a 5th gen fighter. The engines that the Su 57 was suppose to have weren't available because Russia doesn't have the technology or money to produce them, just like the the stealth, sensors and avionics. Basically all the Su 57 was going to be is a very expensive 4th gen fighter. The F-35 is a much superior and capable aircraft than the Su-57 also. Russia is still several decades behind the US when it comes to fighter aircraft technology.

I have to agree. That is why we all buy American. Phones, Planes, military equipment, oil, lumber, booze....what doesn't America sell that we don't buy? I was going to say weed, but they sell that now too. Ooh America...please let me live in you!

Man, I can't wait to fly one.

Well, that's why the F22 Raptor lost in the red flag competition against the Rafale :) #FrenchTouch

nah russians are better

It's all about Sukhoi

nexus1g true.

Fighter jets aren't supposed to let the pilot pull more than 9G's, so as long as there is a pilot in it you wont see anything more maneuverable than that

In reality it doesn't even need to use it's maneuverability because it will shoot down everything long before they even know the F-22 is there and the same goes for the F-35. Russia can build all the Su 35s they want, but they aren't even close to being able to take on a F-22 or F-35.

yes because if it does any more bye bye wings.

@@ausintune9014 the plane will be fine past 9gs it's the human body that can sustain more than 9-10 for very long before passing out

Thanks .greetings

@P. Doherty I am educated and the 35 doesn't even come close on so many levels

@@robertburns4887 I dont about you but the F-35 definitely looks like it pulls off maneuvers so much easier than the F22 you should try watching the F35 demo team

@@recon_ron7746 Neither is close to the likes of F-16 or F-18 though.

Maui Gold. me to lol

the F-22 made people (in theory) consider it as alien tech the days it was kept hidden

Actually the black budget stuff is in Utah

Muito biem...

not even

Russia uses different criteria ,large numbers over super high tech, durability & ease of maintainence along with surviving attack or accidents.Russian pilots claimed they could have a landing gear malfunction land on their bellies Jack the aircraft up repair the landing gear problem & fly off on another mission that same day !! I believe almost every Russian military aircraft is designed from the first drawings to operate on rural,grass or dirt make do airfields. The US has the C-130,C-117 & the A-10, that's it. Both Russia & China appear to be getting ready for conflict! No matter what,a significant clash is more than likely to bring the word to the brink.Pray cooler heads prevail.

Andrew Porter - Pretty much everything you said is either not true or a myth. I'm guessing you are a civilian with no military background at all. First off lets talk about your first myth, "large numbers". Russia has about 700 fighters of all types, but most of them are older models and only 74 Su 35s, which are their top of the line fighter. The US has around 14,000 plus FIGHTERS! I'm not even talking about some of the attack aircraft like the A-10. That number only includes F-22, F-35, F-15C and E models, F-16, and F-18s. So lets go to your second myth about reliability and ease of maintainence. First off US aircraft are known to be very easy to maintain even though they are much more advanced. As far as being durable, have you ever seen a Russia jet hit another aircraft and lose it's WHOLE wing and still land safely? The answer is NO! A Israeli F-15 had that happen to him and the pilot said after he landed that if he had knew that he lost his whole wing he would have ejected, but the he still had good control over the fighter and landed without any problem. Yes Russian aircraft where designed to operated on poor airfields, but that doesn't mean anything. US fighters are just as tough or tougher when they are in the air. Actually US aircraft are much more reliable because Russian engines aren't built as well. If war did break out between Russia and the US, the Russia air force would not try to engage the US air force or Navy because they would be destroyed. In reality, you could take all the air forces in the world and they still wouldn't fair very well against US air power. Not only are US pilots trained better, they have more flight hrs and a lot more combat experense as a whole. The US would have air superiority where ever they went. The US is several decades ahead of Russia and China when it comes to fighter technology.

Television;-British. Telephone;-British. Jet engine;-British. The all flying tail;-British. Angle deck aircraft carrier;-British. Steam catapult;-British. Yadayada ad infinitum. The only thing America is good at is nicking our ideas!

@@mississippirebel1409 "The US is several decades ahead of Russia and China when it comes to fighter technology." тогда почему вы так боитесь россии и китая? )))

Personally I think the british harrier looks better or the typhoon

Sony FDR AX -1

Hellcat Greg And we all thought the Eagle was huge. Lawd! ' hi HG... what breed of eagle... oh it is F-15 eagle plane... F-15 or F-15se or both... both planes are so great and fast speeding

And heavy. Don't forget heavy.