Mark Godfrey: Gerhard Richter

Mark Godfrey: Gerhard Richter - Panorama (2011)

Рет қаралды 85,201

12 жыл бұрын

Mark Godfrey discusses the exhibition "Gerhard Richter - Panorama" at Tate Modern, London, UK (October 06, 2011 -- January 08, 2012).
Für deutsche Untertitel bitte cc anklicken.

Пікірлер: 48

@RonaldGosses Ай бұрын

AWESOME ! Thanks for showing.

@lucretiaonutube 4 жыл бұрын

This is the clearest overview of Richters work I've ever seen. Brilliant

@Acquavallo 10 жыл бұрын

Great video! This guy os a super curator, and good in front of the camera

@ralphueltzhoeffer9274 10 жыл бұрын

Absolutely great Artist!

@steveb2145 3 жыл бұрын

brilliant presentation..

@lisengel2498 4 жыл бұрын

He seems to be investigating many different aspects and possibilities of figurative and abstract languages interweaving choice and chance into a very deep investigation of experience of significance

@lisengel2498 4 жыл бұрын

Richter is a very interesting artist - investigating all kinds of images and at the same time different ways of exploring all kinds of possibilities of painting and image making

@davidice101artistdavideric7 2 жыл бұрын

Wow 10 years I did visit twice he's in my top 5 of artists

@kokolanza7543 Жыл бұрын

Thank you!

@ScottHaley12 12 жыл бұрын

Some people have poo-pooed Richter's work. Perhaps that's because they haven't seen the full range of his pieces, something nicely presented in this doc. Thanks for the chance to see it. He's a great artist.

@Doppe1ganger 5 жыл бұрын

Richter can do anything, it's all of the highest quality

@Johnconno Жыл бұрын

But of course. Exquisite quality. Der Meister.

@eps6975 5 жыл бұрын

i'm not sure if this is Richter's true intention

@lomps 3 жыл бұрын

How about HD? Come on this is Richter....

@allanswitzer5658 3 жыл бұрын

Incredible exhibition, and ironically Mr. Godfrey has been reprimanded for voicing his displeasure at the erroneous postponement of The Guston retrospective, work that speaks to the the racial injustice crisis.

@hogyishijjakjutu4960 5 жыл бұрын

14:50 I mean come on man... really? a ball?

@peetvader478 Жыл бұрын

😂

@pattywickson9046 3 жыл бұрын

Does he paint over the photos?

@kikomotta7123 2 жыл бұрын

No for the realistic paintings. But theres a series of photographs that he put paint over it, in an abstract way. You can find it on his website

@Johnconno Жыл бұрын

Nein!

@MegaZidzid 2 жыл бұрын

I like Richter's paintings, but just paintings.

@nikitasinowjew3528 3 жыл бұрын

@sergiopiva4340 5 жыл бұрын

i'm painter

@geoffdyer7151 5 жыл бұрын

@michaelmccauslin3676 8 жыл бұрын

How does Richter get away with painting others photos? Isn't that copyright infringement? Great work!

@lawcheukyui 8 жыл бұрын

+Michael Mccauslin copyright infringement ..speaking of which....well ,you should see what richard prince did , lol .

@inosokope8543 6 жыл бұрын

no ist not. or do you get sued whenever you use a Picture from Google in your PowerPoint presentation?

@robertgiles9124 6 жыл бұрын

Try suing a rich artist...you will lose unless you already have gobs on money yourself. And Warhol ripped off photographers left and right and got away with it.

@eps6975 5 жыл бұрын

most photos he took himself

@therobin980 5 жыл бұрын

@@robertgiles9124 He used photographs when he wasn't rich. It has nothing to Do with money. Can you jealous people just hate somewhere else?

@sharadvirulkar7001 2 жыл бұрын

🐺🐦🐎👌🐬

@josevinuelagonzalez5300 3 жыл бұрын

Por el monte corren las sardinas.

@geirbalderson9697 5 жыл бұрын

I am not sure why he would immortalize terrorists. Very odd. Well on to the squeegees!

@allanswitzer5658 3 жыл бұрын

It wasn’t a memorial nor a condemnation , it’s banality is sublime

@johncastle8254 3 жыл бұрын

Always found all his work boring .

@paulscottfilms 3 жыл бұрын

Vile. Not art.

@MatthewBrowne1959 3 жыл бұрын

That's hilarious....you reveal yourself beautifully (though not in a good way) by this statement.

@neilmurphy7554 2 жыл бұрын

Part of growing up as an adult is to recognise that there are more intelligent and capable people than yourself that you must accept in life.ie. your boss at work. Why is it Paul Scott, that you can so shamelessly reject the intellect of an artist of Richter's stature based on something as ignorant as your own own taste and further think that they can state that it is "not art"thus implying that you know what art is. This attitude equates with the narcissistic garbage currently dominating public debate. I reckon if we ever go to war it will be a war against the narcissists. It is a trait of narcissistic personality disorder to disqualify and disparage from any debate anyone claiming a higher authority usually without any evidence. Sadly a desire to be always right diminishes their capacity to see their own stupidity. Your comment does not contribute anything resembling an engagement with the work you are rejecting , a fundamental requirement of any legitimate critique necessary to advance in any educational setting.

@paulscottfilms 2 жыл бұрын

@@neilmurphy7554 I see.I didn't realise I was ignorant and stupid but your drivel on narcissism has helped me understand,

@neilmurphy7554 2 жыл бұрын

Looking forward to your book on "What is Art?'