Agreed

Throw in a lil Frank Wilczek and thats a nice noble stew we’ve got cooking :)

You must not watch PBS. This show has been airing on PBS off and on for over 20 years, and continuously since 2008. Most of these videos on KZfaq are actually really old, and the interviews included are often much older than the original broadcast date. You can tell because some of the people interviewed died long before the episode copyright date. David Chalmers is in a lot of these looking really young with long brown hair. Today he actually has short, thinning white/gray. These are OLD.

@@b.g.5869 Well, I used to be a huge fan of PBS but, you're right, I haven't watched it in a few years.

@@b.g.5869 Well, it HAS been a while since I've watched PBS, You're right but, I always seem to be late to the table. :-)

i think this saved my life

@James Haynes Yes. I guess that is true. However, I must rewind/rewatch a dozen times. Max is the real deal.

You realize this episode is over ten years old right?

Neither one of those 2 was in this episode.

Philosophy can and has talked about a lot of things but can’t prove anything! Science can prove it with experimental data and as such proves it’s own importance

@@mikebell4649 The idea of science being different from Philosophy is not very old one. These all branches of knowledge bloomed under the umbrella of Philosophy. The principles, on which science stands, are self-evident in nature, and hence cannot be proved through science. Mathematical theorems derive their truths from the world of logic, that stands on its own. So this argument that Philosophy cannot prove anything is wrong. Philosophy proves the validity of Science, otherwise we are left with no self-standing axioms to rely upon.

Time, space and matter. What about events ?

According to physicists Sorli and Fiscalleti time isn't a 4th dimension but rather a numerical order of change in 3D space.

We know that space, time, and consciousness exist. You can't say the same for an afterlife.

how do you know it doesnt exist how do you KNOW space time exist

😂

@@hyperduality2838 can I frame this?

No, time is an effect, a consequence of motion, the 'shadow of motion', We create our own time, time can only exists in the Mind of the Living Beings.

By the way, awesome episode. Really love it. Great Channel following it for many years.

Time and distance, measurements, stop it happening (in our experience) all at once. The idea goes,..

Well regardless of your name, that IS an excellent comment.

Radio love, friends are electric, I'm radio active, hyperactive, 'cos they're messin with brain, I don't need, I don't need this pressure on me,.. ..., zing went the strings of my heart, an orchestra of angels,.. ..., a natural mystic in the air,... ..., I can hear the grass grow.

@@hyperduality2838 Make up your mind - wither relativistic or dual but not both

@@hyperduality2838 " 2nd Law

Are you being paid to post this?

Determinsim is very much true.

@@8xnnr is that a truth statement..?

They didn't start from a singularity. The concept of a singularity in physics is probably the most misunderstood thing by the average person. A singularity isn't a real physical entity. It represents a point in the equations of physics where you have a zero divisor. It's an indication that there's a fundamental problem with the approach; basically the equivalent in mathematics of a software bug. If a singularity were an actual physical thing, it would be a dimensionless point of infinite density; essentially everything contained in no space. It's not mathematically, physically, or philosophically coherent.

@@b.g.5869 first off, i am NOT your average person. I am very slightly above average in several areas. so maybe the universe didn't start as a singularity and started as a marble instead - space and time were still smushed into the same marble and were thus the same thing.

@@alexusdasia Space and time _are_ the same thing (space-time). The smallest physically meaningful volume we can talk about is the so-called Plank volume, which can be thought of as a 'sphere' with a 10^-35 meter radius. Everything would have been confined within this volume when the universe was 10^-43 seconds old. Current physics can't see further back than this. That's _really_ small but it's not a singularity. The important thing to remember about a singularity is that it's not a physical thing. It's a mathematical abstraction. Some really bad popular science books and documentaries talk about singularities like they're possibly actual objects but they're mistaken about the concept. BTW, anyone who says "I'm not the average person, I'm above average" is almost certainly _not_ above average. That's an incredibly immature and narcissistic thing to say.

When the Greek philosophers discussed existence they proposed being and becoming. In their linguistic argumentation they discovered, through logic, that you could not speak of things with agreement without adding space and time. You could not be sure you were talking about the same thing without this agreement about where it is and when: space and time are necessary for discussing things that exist - if something exists it exists "somewhere" and "sometime". Spacetime is the placeholder for the part of existence called becoming. What a thing is, its essence or being, is different from from where and when it is. What a thing is goes into its creation. Creation is about intention. Linguistically this is translated as cause, purpose, function and form. For, linguistically, what a thing is depends on who created it and what it does and why it does what it does and its form or description. Philosophers could not be sure they were talking about the same thing without this agreement about form and function: description and explanation. They are placeholders for the part of existence called being. But all these "words" are linguistic operations. They are the stratagem of separate beings to communicate their consciousness of themselves and their world to each other. Us. Ultimately what you are or what I am resolves our existence. Our consciousness of ourselves and nature, others, is derivative of our being and integral of our becoming. Our existence is experienced through consciousness. Our consciousness can be expressed through language but it is not limited by the linguistic mind. Time and space, form and function these are the "words" of scientists and philosophers. Direct experience of the world can not always be communicated. Do not let language trap your experience of existence. Language is interesting but it is interesting like porn, not like the girl next door.

@Keramat Ebrahimi: If I were to travel to another galaxy at the speed of light . . . time would change more slowly for me. When I returned to Earth . . . it would be hundreds of years in your future: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation

@@QED_ which is impossible.

He will be in our future in which we or our children live.i am looking for an observer who can see my future right now.

Yeah You're right, the fact is that We are Eternal Living Beings, and basically We dont have a age, so No one can be Younger or Older, and Einstein's youth-cure is pure speculation.

@@holgerjrgensen2166 if future and past exist in my inertial frame then i can say that future and past are as real as now.

very unsettling music

Yaeh, Life is an Inner Affair, but I would exchange 'Intelligent' with Conscious design, even conscious also is intelligent, and other.

How are you so fast to comment ???? I tried to be the 1st one !

@@pooyamazloomi6548 I have the Time stone

Which beginning ?

There is No real dead, it is just the Big Sleep, in the principle the same as your Small Sleep, as We call normal sleep. We are in the Big Sleep about the same time that We used our physical body, so if You 'die' young, You will be back/born again sooner.

Idiot.

@@hyperduality2838 that was fantastic! Really a lot in there. 👍👍👍. Mass is matter content, matter is design in space, so then, time is as well. Then, gravity acts on time as well. Then information / mind / intellect also circles around some central point within us, as we too are matter in space thus have our own gravity! Sounds more like names given to relationships (design)! Relationship / Observing is measurement which makes particle from wave collapse. So we measure / relate to make world? What if we don't measure? On other hand, we are a product of someone's measurement 🤔. Everything sounds / seems just a creation - imagination / imitation.

Derogation is their way of Interrogation. Roga in Sanskrit also means disease or can be interpreted as "Knowing the Direction" as well. Such diseases need Care🤭. Btw, your Duality Expression are in-depth. You do have Impressions! Thank you for your time and thoughts. Appreciate! 🙏

This is absolutely correct!

And remember that if it is a game there is ALWAYS a way to get to the next level! I hope to beat the game !

Woo

😂😂 if i put your post in a logical system i have question mark on each point u mentioned

Stuff is made of genius camouflaged 'Empty Space' which is 'Space-less Space' but it is all the effect of Eternal creation-principles, which have always been. So, Space is tiny Stuff, and Stuff is concentrated/compressed Space. Basically particles is different conditions of the same. Every thing is made of 'Light', little light, seems dark, compare to much light, a candle in the mid-day-sun. Contrast-Principle and Perspective-Principle, are the two 'legs' as make Feeling into sensing.