Great video. Do you have one for Components and Cladding? Breaking these topics is so helpful and engaging. Keep it up!
@QuickQuestionEngineering27 күн бұрын
@@JulieFreund Thank you so much for the encouragement. My next one will be on the All Heights MWFRS method and then I’ll get into C&C!
@dcvo8911 ай бұрын
Great video. Wind is so much more complex than seismic. Lucky most of my design is seismic governed
@QuickQuestionEngineering11 ай бұрын
Thanks! I personally think seismic is more complicated, especially due to all the extra detailing and requirements. I guess it also depends on what you do more at work
@dcvo8911 ай бұрын
@@QuickQuestionEngineering true. Way more requirements
@waynewang14235 ай бұрын
very informative and clear video, keep it up man!
@QuickQuestionEngineering5 ай бұрын
Thanks! I hope to post the next videos on this series soon
@waynewang14235 ай бұрын
Great! I just feel like wind load are quite complex maybe I should say tedious. This envelope method I found is like most convenient method. I am probably going to use automation method in STAAD and compare with this simplified method. @@QuickQuestionEngineering
@user-ky4tn8is4b5 ай бұрын
thanks for this video! It 's really useful for me!
@QuickQuestionEngineering5 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@alexgalan13 ай бұрын
Bravo!! for me, It was a perfect explanation. I hope you can show us the other methods or someone else can tell me where I can find them.
@QuickQuestionEngineeringАй бұрын
I posted videos for three methods on this playlist. Only one left now which I’ll post soon. Thanks for watching!
@reyarroyo61973 ай бұрын
thanks a lot!
@venkatesh228510 ай бұрын
Please do topics on connection for all members. How to calculate spacing simpson h2.5a, a34clip, nailing spacing,etc., i have confusion on designing this due to what load to be consider and procedure for calculation.
@QuickQuestionEngineering9 ай бұрын
That’s a great idea! I’ll add this to the list for future videos. Thanks for watching and for the feedback!