MATHEMATICAL ERRORS IN THE BIBLE - DR ZAKIR NAIK

  Рет қаралды 116,621

Dr Zakir Naik

Dr Zakir Naik

7 жыл бұрын

MATHEMATICAL ERRORS IN THE BIBLE - DR ZAKIR NAIK
LECTURE NAME: DEBATE : THE QUR'AN AND THE BIBLE IN THE LIGHT OF SCIENCE | DR ZAKIR NAIK v/s DR WILLIAM CAMPBELL
VIDEO CODE: QBLS_USA_8

Пікірлер: 1 700
@whiteholeeducationcenter
@whiteholeeducationcenter 4 жыл бұрын
Allah protect Dr Zakir from his enemies.
@aqsasajjad167
@aqsasajjad167 4 жыл бұрын
@@George-iv1hi I know you angry because your Bible has been proved to be a contradicted book ... But that doesn't mean you will fight here if you want to know the answers ask your priest about these contradictions may be they have answers and if yes then tell me ok friend. I will believe then that Bible don't have these contradictions ☺️☺️☺️
@aboodjasemAlsaeed
@aboodjasemAlsaeed 4 жыл бұрын
George well your god can’t even protect himself ,your god got killed by his own creation
@sheldon2554
@sheldon2554 4 жыл бұрын
@@aboodjasemAlsaeed Jesus died fr our sins, for all the people in the world , not only for Christian's. He is not dead, he rose again from the dead after 3 days. Jesus is the Son of God. And God himself. It's the trinity God the father God the Son and God the Holy Spirit. Jesus is the way to heaven, I pray and I know God will open many peoples eyes soon.
@aboodjasemAlsaeed
@aboodjasemAlsaeed 4 жыл бұрын
Sheldon bruhh your god even said in the Bible “why u call me good there is no good expect god “ referring to one god
@aboodjasemAlsaeed
@aboodjasemAlsaeed 4 жыл бұрын
Sheldon listen we will see who is the true god when u realize that allah the king of Kings is the true god
@countryboyfletcher489
@countryboyfletcher489 3 жыл бұрын
I watched this whole debate 2 times in its entirety. After marking my 3 Bibles and connecting the contradictions. Now It’s as if , I’ve been to a professional crash course on Bible study’s. Thank you Allah AWJ [Mighty & Majestic] for creating Dr Zakir Naik, Ahmed Deedat and the later generations of “Truth Seekers and Speakers. [posted November 10, 2020] ps. Happy Birthday to my eldest daughter Tacarra .
@_Zeozed
@_Zeozed 3 жыл бұрын
1) Was Ahaziah 22 or 42 years old when he became king (over Judah)? Because his father Jehoram had ascended the throne at the age of 32 and reigned for only eight years, it was impossible for Ahaziah to be 42 years old at the time of his father's death (32+8 = 40). In the earliest Jewish chronology (Seder Olam), it is assumed that 42 years is the length of King Omri's dynasty. Omri should then have founded his dynasty in 883 B.C. (i.e. perhaps he would have sired his son Ahab or his daughter Athalia). Ahaziah, son of Athalia (daughter of Omri), ascended the throne (of Judah) in 841 B.C. (883-841 = 42 years). At the time of his ascension to the throne (841 B.C.), he was "a 42-year-old son" (according to the literal meaning of the original Hebrew text) because he was a descendant of his grandfather Omri's dynasty; but he was 22 years old at the time. It is also necessary to present the opinion that we find ourselves here in the rare case of a copyist's mistake. The number 22 (schenajim esrim) and the number 42 (schenajim arba'im) differ in Hebrew only by a few 'dashes'. The following diagram makes it easier to understand: The dynasty of King Omri (dates before Christ): 883 : Omri (Israel) begets Ahab or Athalia. 880 : Birth of Jehoram (king of Judah), who died at the age of 40 when Ahaziah his son ascended the throne. On a date around 865: Joram (of Judah) marries Athalia (of Israel), the daughter of Omri Around 863: birth of Ahaziah (of Judah), whose parents were Joram and Athaliah. Around 849 Jehoram (of Judah) ascended the throne at the age of 32 years and reigned for 8 years. 841: Ahaziah (of Judah) becomes king at the age of 22 (863-841) - 42 (883-841) years after Omri gave birth to Ahab or Athaliah. 2) The difference between the men of Israel (800,000 or 1,100,000) can be explained by the fact that in 2 Samuel 24:9 it is expressly spoken of as "men of war" (in Hebrew isch khajil), i.e. men with experience of war, which is not the case in 1 Chronicles 21:5. Thus there were an additional 300,000 (isch) men who could carry the sword, but were not experienced in warfare and had no weapons of their own. The total number thus amounts to 1,100,000 soldiers. Among the men of Judah, the difference is also clear. In 1 Chronicles 21:5 there are 470,000 men (in Hebrew isch khajil "men of war") who drew the sword, in 2 Samuel 24:9 there are instead 500,000 men (in Hebrew isch). The difference shows that 470,000 men were trained and capable of warfare, while the additional 30,000 men in Judah were not trained and had no weapons. In the other three cases, it is expressly added: "drawing the sword", but not here. Because in Holy Scripture every word is significant, the absence of these words is significant. 3) Michal, the daughter of King Saul, had an older sister named Merab, who was first promised to David as his wife, but was later given to Adriel the Meholathite as his wife (1 Samuel 14:49; 18:17-19). Thereupon David took Michal, who loved him, as his wife (1 Samuel 18:20-21). According to 1 Samuel 25:44, Saul nevertheless gave her to Palti, son of Laish. After his accession to the throne, David demanded the recovery of Michal (2 Samuel 3:13-14), which was done through the chief of the armies, Abner. Palti / Paltiel himself followed his wife in tears until he was sent away. Michal, according to 2 Samuel 6:23, had no children during his lifetime. However, in 2 Samuel 21:8 it says, " ... the five sons of Michal, the daughter of Saul, whom she bore to Adriel, the son of Barzillai the Meholathite" (2 Sam. 21:8). In two ancient Hebrew manuscripts, however, it is written "Merab", which would be better understood. According to rabbinic tradition, the five sons of Merab became orphans at a very early age and were brought up by Michal, and for this reason were called by his name. There remains, however, the difficulty of the expression: "which she had given birth to Adriel". Perhaps God wanted to point out that He did not find David's behavior in his demand for the return of Michal at all good, and that the children, even though they were brought up by a king's wife, did not belong to David but to Adriel. 4)In Matthew 1:16 it is said that Joseph was begotten by Jacob, but it is also said that Joseph was Mary's husband. So we clearly have Joseph's family tree before us. In Luke 3:23 it says, "And Jesus ... being as it was thought, the son of Joseph, of Heli. According to this, Luke's Gospel does not present Joseph's family tree, but Mary's family tree. This family tree goes back to David very differently from the other tree (even though both have a Zerubbabel and a Salathiel). Secondly, between Jesus and Joseph, there is expressly no mention of begetting, for that would have been entirely false (see Luke 1:35), but the Word says: "... being as it was thought, the son of Joseph, of Heli. Similarly we do not read that Joseph was begotten by Heli. On the contrary, the text carefully abstains from it and says very briefly: "of Heli". Heli was not Joseph's father, but Mary's father, and thus he was Joseph's stepfather. Furthermore, the expression "as it was believed" shows that it is simply a matter of public opinion that Jesus was Joseph's biological son. In reality He was not. Jesus saves, Amen.
@cephasdgreat9207
@cephasdgreat9207 2 жыл бұрын
@@_Zeozed God 🙏 bless you for the indepth analysis. More knowledge wisdom and understanding of the scripture I pray through the Holy Spirit for you in Jesus mighty name, Amen
@5arish
@5arish 2 жыл бұрын
What kind of truth speakers all the arguments they made are illogical what kind of logic their arguments have tell me They are doing this to falsify Bible so that Islam spreads this is the technique to spread Islam as more Muslims were becoming Christian and they had to do this illogically cal dramas to spread Islam Forced Marry Christians girls and Hindu and other religion girls and spread Islam
@silkyipod8809
@silkyipod8809 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for good comment. You are most Welcome to islam ❤️❤️❤️.
@cabdirisaaq6523
@cabdirisaaq6523 2 жыл бұрын
Ma sha allah
@abdulrahmanzamani7313
@abdulrahmanzamani7313 5 жыл бұрын
One man army
@the_eagle_eyes2855
@the_eagle_eyes2855 4 жыл бұрын
No gangsters brother. Stop rapping here
@Dark-iv3gm
@Dark-iv3gm 4 жыл бұрын
😃 True
@derekosgood3230
@derekosgood3230 4 жыл бұрын
@@the_eagle_eyes2855 that's not rap lol
@the_eagle_eyes2855
@the_eagle_eyes2855 4 жыл бұрын
@@derekosgood3230 I know but "Splash and Cash"
@jeybinsule3335
@jeybinsule3335 3 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂 1 year but it made my day✋🏼✋🏼😌
@mahakhan3553
@mahakhan3553 4 жыл бұрын
Proud to be a Muslim. And proud to be born in this religion Islam and proud to have the holy book Quran(Alhumdulillah)
@Paakay2024
@Paakay2024 5 ай бұрын
What Doc Zakir is doing to the Bible is not new. The Books in the Bible from the first day they were pen down have been challenged. The Bible is the most challenged book in history. The book always maintains its integrity. In the first century 12 books were written against the Bible.
@ahmedov7082
@ahmedov7082 4 жыл бұрын
Most common mathematical error in Christianity is 1+1+1=1
@AdamtheFreemason
@AdamtheFreemason 4 жыл бұрын
Here's one, STONE worship + IDOL worship = Islamic MONOTHEISM, now that DOES confuse the hell out of me.
@AdamtheFreemason
@AdamtheFreemason 4 жыл бұрын
Just so you know, the Christian Trinity is a very SIMPLE concept for even 5 year old's, shame you Muslims never caught on, the word TRINITY derives from TWO WORDS, TRI- = Three, and UNITY = Together.
@ahmedov7082
@ahmedov7082 4 жыл бұрын
@@AdamtheFreemason shame on you Christians, you have 38 Scientific errors in the Holy Glorious Bible 😊
@AdamtheFreemason
@AdamtheFreemason 4 жыл бұрын
@@ahmedov7082 Name them ALL.
@AdamtheFreemason
@AdamtheFreemason 4 жыл бұрын
@@ahmedov7082 That's about the same, if not MORE in the Quran, with Historical, Biblical, Scientific, Contradictory, self-serving verses as well as being very POORLY put together, in NO chronological order.
@45facial
@45facial 4 жыл бұрын
Even if there is one contradiction, it cannot be the Word of God. God makes no mistake. God's book is perfect. Therefore, any logical mind will come to the conclusion that Qu'ran is the Word of God. There are many fabricated verses in the bible. Many. How do you know which one is true, and which one is false? Yes, the verses which the Qu'ran agrees with, it may be true; however, we do not know about the rest. Jesus (peace be upon him) NEVER claimed divinity. There is no unambiguous, palpable verse in the bible which states that he claimed divinity at any point. It will say things like, "I and the Father are one." Something like that. But, even if we were to agree with such statements, if you look at their context, all it means is that they are one in PURPOSE. After that, he said to his 14 disciples, we are ALL one. Then, there is the verse where he says, whoever has seen me has seen the Father. If you cherry pick the verse, which many Christians do, sure you could use this statement. However, if you look at the context of this verse, you'll see that Jesus (peace be upon him) was conversing with Philip at the time, when he asked Jesus (peace be upon him) to show him God. He said, why don't you just show us God? We want to see God. And in reply he said, you cannot even stand the sight of the sun without going blind, and you want to see God. Afterwards, he says, whoever has seen me has seen the Father. This only means--in the context--that if you knew what Jesus (peace be upon him) was, you would've known what God is. He is NOT claiming to be the Father. Otherwise, he would've clearly said that you're looking at him right now. Why else would he say, that you cannot even stand the sight of the sun without going blind, and you want to see God. Why would he bother saying that? So, it is very, very clear, that he is NOT claiming to be the Father. Every time, you have to look at the context, but the Christians fail to do this. They cherry pick the verse, then make a fool out of themselves. Jesus (peace be upon him)--Isa a.s, his real name--was only a Messenger of Allah. He was only a Prophet of Allah. He used to worship Allah alone. He was only a man. That's all he was. He never claimed divinity. He NEVER said he was "god" at any point. That is what the church teaches. Bible does not teach this. Allah sent down the Qu'ran for a reason. Qu'ran cannot be changed. Qu'ran cannot have any mistakes of any kind; thus, no contradictions whatsoever. Qu'ran is pristine. It confirms the Torah, Zaboor (Psalms of Dawud), and Injeel (Gospel). All you have to believe is in the final testament now, which is the Qu'ran, and follow Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him).
@SilentValley2023
@SilentValley2023 3 жыл бұрын
Humanly speaking, the Bible was written by approximately 40 men of diverse backgrounds over the course of 1500 years. Isaiah was a prophet, Ezra was a priest, Matthew was a tax-collector, John was a fisherman, Paul was a tentmaker, Moses was a shepherd, Luke was a physician. Despite being penned by different authors over 15 centuries, the Bible does not contradict itself and does not contain any errors. The authors all present different perspectives, but they all proclaim the same one true God, and the same one way of salvation-Jesus Christ (John 14:6; Acts 4:12). Few of the books of the Bible specifically name their author. Here are the books of the Bible along with the name of who is most assumed by biblical scholars to be the author, along with the approximate date of authorship: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy = Moses - 1400 B.C. Joshua = Joshua - 1350 B.C. Judges, Ruth, 1 Samuel, 2 Samuel = Samuel/Nathan/Gad - 1000 - 900 B.C. 1 Kings, 2 Kings = Jeremiah - 600 B.C. 1 Chronicles, 2 Chronicles, Ezra, Nehemiah = Ezra - 450 B.C. Esther = Mordecai - 400 B.C. Job = Moses - 1400 B.C. Psalms = several different authors, mostly David - 1000 - 400 B.C. Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon = Solomon - 900 B.C. Isaiah = Isaiah - 700 B.C. Jeremiah, Lamentations = Jeremiah - 600 B.C. Ezekiel = Ezekiel - 550 B.C. Daniel = Daniel - 550 B.C. Hosea = Hosea - 750 B.C. Joel = Joel - 850 B.C. Amos = Amos - 750 B.C. Obadiah = Obadiah - 600 B.C. Jonah = Jonah - 700 B.C. Micah = Micah - 700 B.C. Nahum = Nahum - 650 B.C. Habakkuk = Habakkuk - 600 B.C. Zephaniah = Zephaniah - 650 B.C. Haggai = Haggai - 520 B.C. Zechariah = Zechariah - 500 B.C. Malachi = Malachi - 430 B.C. Matthew = Matthew - A.D. 55 Mark = John Mark - A.D. 50 Luke = Luke - A.D. 60 John = John - A.D. 90 Acts = Luke - A.D. 65 Romans, 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, 1 Thessalonians, 2 Thessalonians, 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy, Titus, Philemon = Paul - A.D. 50-70 Hebrews = unknown, mostly likely Paul, Luke, Barnabas, or Apollos - A.D. 65 James = James - A.D. 45 1 Peter, 2 Peter = Peter - A.D. 60 1 John, 2 John, 3 John = John - A.D. 90 Jude = Jude - A.D. 60 Revelation = John - A.D. 90
@imranshaik5325
@imranshaik5325 3 жыл бұрын
@@SilentValley2023 Did you just say "The Bible does not contradict itself"
@irbiska
@irbiska 3 жыл бұрын
If God is perfect, who added words into todays Hafs Quran, which cannot be found in Sanna manuscript in the same verse? Hmm? kzfaq.info/get/bejne/f7ORaNeiy8qyqqs.html
@larrywatson9400
@larrywatson9400 3 жыл бұрын
You must not read the Koran very often. Surah 20 speaks of the Samaritans during the time of Moses. It is common knowledge that the Samaritans didn’t even exist until many centuries later. Yes! The Koran has numerous mistakes, errors and misplaced words and phrases. A simple online search- ‘does the Koran have errors’ - will prove it has LOTS. Plus, why burn all other Korans after re-writing it if all of them were error free? Doesn’t that in itself prove it had errors thus the need for a complete revision / rewriting? But what is most important here, for both the Bible and Koran, is fulfilled prophecies. The Bible’s prophecies have all come true or are about to (we can see them coming). But Muhammad said the moon was split in half which is a clear false prophecy. At no time in all of human history has anyone anywhere ever recorded that as having occurred. Nor could it have as that would have had devastating effects on earth and everyone on it. So, prophecy, not human errors, prove truth. And the Koran fails miserably but the Bible shines as bright as the sun with no failed or false prophecies. You should become a Christian- where prophecy always come true- and leave the prophecy failing church you’re in- where prophecy fails and proves it was written by a man or men, not God.
@goranmilic442
@goranmilic442 2 жыл бұрын
Qur'an says word of Allah can't be changed. Qur'an also says Bible is word of God, but changed. How can that be? Can it be changed or not?
@subhaanallahiwabihamdihi3985
@subhaanallahiwabihamdihi3985 6 жыл бұрын
All praise belongs to Allah who gave you such knowledge and intelligence, Dr. SubhaanAllah (سبحان الله)…. JazākAllāh (جزاك اللهُ‎)….
@Gassama-lh3rc
@Gassama-lh3rc 6 жыл бұрын
you missed the point if there is contradiction between two books which one is correct? which one is from God? surely one of them is wrong can tell which one ?
@yad_o5654
@yad_o5654 4 жыл бұрын
Kosu 1225 quran is true one
@HC-du8fn
@HC-du8fn 4 жыл бұрын
Kosu 1225 the Quran has no contradictions or mistakes . It has miracles and knowledge that couldn’t be known 1400 years ago. The Bible however , has been proven to be altered countless times and has many errors and mistakes
@SilentValley2023
@SilentValley2023 3 жыл бұрын
@SubhaanAllahi Wa Bihamdihi, Here are some some of the Scientific Errors in Koran!! Sperm: The Qur’an states, incorrectly, that semen originates from a spot between the backbone and the ribs, Surah 86:6-7. However, science has demonstrated that sperm comes from the testicles whilst semen issues from different glands behind and below our bladder. Flat earth: The Quran is laden with verses which hint towards the impression of a “flat” earth. Surah 13:3, 15:19, 50:7, 51:48, 71:19, 20:53 and many more write that the earth is “spread out”, “Laid out”, or “like a carpet”. Yet due to modern scientific discovery we know that the earth is actually in the shape of a circular sphere. Just to further elaborate on this point, ever notice how the Islamic Salat indirectly hints at the idea of a flat earth? Muslims all around the world are instructed to pray towards the Kabba 5 times a day. This would only make sense if we lived on a flat earth. If, however, Islam endorsed the belief in a spherical planet, we would get the following dilemma. All things were made in pairs: Within the Quran, surah 51:49, it writes that all THINGS were created in pairs. Yet, today we know of something called Asexual reproduction. Asexual reproduction is a type of reproduction by which offsprings arise from a single organism. It serves as the chief means by which single celled organisms are formed. Such examples include the Archaea, bacteria, various plants and fungi. Shooting stars are missiles to drive out demons: The Qur’an teaches that stars are fires set up in the sky to guard Heaven against demons. The demons want to hear what God is saying so they try to sneak up to heaven. If they are found, the guardians of heaven will hurl stars at them to chase them off: 15:16-18, 37:6-10, 67:5 and 72:8-9. The dilemma, however, is that the Quran is confusing “stars” with “shooting stars”. Stars, as we know, are actually suns. Shooting stars on the other hand, are meteorites, or galactic debris. If we are to take the Quran seriously, then each time we see a “shooting star” we are to assume that it is actually a sun that is blasting across the sky in the pursue of a demon. The sun settles in a muddy spring: In surah 18:86, the Quran describes the sun as setting into a muddy spring. Yet we know due to modern scientific discovery that the setting of the sun is caused by the circular and rotational properties of our planet. There exists no place where the sun physically “sets”.
@goranmilic442
@goranmilic442 2 жыл бұрын
@@HC-du8fn Qur'an says word of Allah can't be changed. Qur'an also says Bible is word of God, but changed. How can that be? Can it be changed or not?
@ryankhan8263
@ryankhan8263 7 жыл бұрын
BIBLE IS NOW NOT AS REVEALED DURING PROPHET JESUS TIME ..IT CHANGED BY MAN
@mr.clandestine7259
@mr.clandestine7259 5 жыл бұрын
26 different Qurans ? kzfaq.info/get/bejne/b99nmLp2z6imp2g.html
@allahismerciful1645
@allahismerciful1645 5 жыл бұрын
There is only one Quran and Allah is saving it for corruption ,and there is Millions of people who are a saver of Quran , in every family there is a one , my sister is a saver of Holly Quran alhamdullah
@ahmedov7082
@ahmedov7082 4 жыл бұрын
@kanani israel because he knew he would send another prophet after that so there will be another Scripture which is 100% correct and he knew that there will be no prophets after Muhammad peace be Upon him so he protected Qur'an forever Bye ...
@ahmedov7082
@ahmedov7082 4 жыл бұрын
@Linny ChingSimply, it has no Scientific errors like the Bible and there are many Scientific facts in the Qur'an 1400 years ago which were discovered later in the 14,15,16,17,18,19,20 and 21 centuries Soooooo... Bye ...
@ahmedov7082
@ahmedov7082 4 жыл бұрын
@kanani israel Of course Allah ( God )
@donthomson10
@donthomson10 4 жыл бұрын
*لا إله إلا ﷲ* *لا إله إلا ﷲ* *لا إله إلا ﷲ* *لا إله إلا ﷲ* *لا إله إلا ﷲ* *لا إله إلا ﷲ*
@midnight.symphony128
@midnight.symphony128 3 жыл бұрын
There is no god but one ☝️
@THEDHL124
@THEDHL124 6 жыл бұрын
amazing gift of memory by allah.
@koushiknibir8430
@koushiknibir8430 Жыл бұрын
Man this whole Lecture was a legend
@younilad8196
@younilad8196 5 жыл бұрын
Also In the John Chapter 3 Verse #16 " For God Loves the World. " But in John Chapter 2 Verse #15 It clearly says the Opposite, It says " For God does not love the world, and if any man loves the world, the Love of the Father is not into him."
@broj5495
@broj5495 4 жыл бұрын
@Linny Ching truss me and god is God that verse is talking about mankind and the love of the earthly things in a spiritual context.
@broj5495
@broj5495 4 жыл бұрын
@Linny Ching and This clown zakir needs to study and repent this supposed contradiction has been answered constantly for example kzfaq.info/get/bejne/icqDqap0qtKmqXU.html and it doesn't say in chronicals he became king straight after so that's a lie. now I'd like to see him explain these contradictions in the quran kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nLxni7Rlsd7Jn2g.html. He gets exposed for lying constantly 😂😂
@Ray-nq9dk
@Ray-nq9dk 2 жыл бұрын
@@broj5495 u can’t handle the truth
@narutodattabeyo5130
@narutodattabeyo5130 Жыл бұрын
@@broj5495 u can't handle the truth
@redbull__7
@redbull__7 Жыл бұрын
Salam mouhaylikoum brother i want to say at first i am a muslim and i study many other religion books like the bible. I can find John 3:16 "For God Loves the World" but in John 2:15 i dont find anything about what you mentioned it is about people in the temple selling cows, sheep and pigeons.
@navarathnakumar3725
@navarathnakumar3725 4 жыл бұрын
Super explanation , he knows bible better than Christians
@goranmilic442
@goranmilic442 2 жыл бұрын
Qur'an says word of Allah can't be changed. Qur'an also says Bible is word of God, but changed. How can that be? Can it be changed or not?
@Ali-sc7pi
@Ali-sc7pi 2 жыл бұрын
@@goranmilic442 Quran is the only book Allah preserved out of his 4
@goranmilic442
@goranmilic442 2 жыл бұрын
@@Ali-sc7pi So word of God can be changed. Allah has 1 of 4 success rate.
@moramoon9517
@moramoon9517 2 жыл бұрын
@@goranmilic442 the bible was written by 40 men, the new testemant is like ahadith stories prophet jesus said,and his life and how did he live. Not the word of God. In the Quran it's mentioned that there are many contradictions in the bible because it's not in its pure form anymore, human errors. But he said about the quran "we delivered the words and we shall protect it." also ome of the ways it's protected in that we muslims are ordered to memorize the quran or at least some of it,and it has a great reward, so if anybody tried to change it we stop them.hope that clears your mind. :)
@goranmilic442
@goranmilic442 2 жыл бұрын
@@moramoon9517 I see. So Bible is not the word of God.
@ridhuanmohd9618
@ridhuanmohd9618 2 жыл бұрын
Ya Allah, give Dr. Zakir a blessing and big reward towards his jihad with enlightment of Islam for human being.
@mekhrinisokholmuratova7591
@mekhrinisokholmuratova7591 5 жыл бұрын
Guys , i’m also Muslim, to be proud of being Muslim, but we should respect Bible too. Professor Zakir Naik mentioned once, if you follow Bible like Quran , you’ll go to Paradise. Allah is merciful
@god9761
@god9761 5 жыл бұрын
Then what about other religions???
@SalmanKhan-hq6yf
@SalmanKhan-hq6yf 5 жыл бұрын
The things what's matches with Quran I will agree but if not matching with Quran then I won't accept Bible.
@satishmandapati1
@satishmandapati1 4 жыл бұрын
kzfaq.infovideos
@Alexxali63
@Alexxali63 4 жыл бұрын
But bible is Not Injil
@mahamedcusman3402
@mahamedcusman3402 4 жыл бұрын
He never SAID that
@TLP_Faisalabad
@TLP_Faisalabad 4 жыл бұрын
May ALLAH bless u Dr Zakir naik i never see such a intelligent person in present life
@arifruhan8841
@arifruhan8841 4 жыл бұрын
His IQ's estimated the range of 182-188!
@zecon990
@zecon990 4 жыл бұрын
@@arifruhan8841 more than 200 i guess
@maroofjuneja498
@maroofjuneja498 5 жыл бұрын
MATHEMATICAL MISTAKES IN BIBLE (KJV) : (A). 2 Samuel 24:9 - There were 800,000 capable warriors in Israel who could handle a sword, and 500,000 in Judah. NOW, 1 Chronicles 21:5 - There were 1,100,000 warriors in all Israel who could handle a sword, and 470,000 in Judah. (B). 1 KINGS 7:26 - It contained 2 thousand baths. NOW, 2 CHRONICLES 4:5 - It received and held 3 thousand baths. Again, 2000=3000 ACCORDING to bible. (C). 2 CHRONICLES 9:25 - and Solomon had 4000 stalls for horses. NOW, 1 KINGS 4:26 - and Solomon had 40000 stalls of horses. Again, 4000= 40000 ( biblical logic) (D). 2 Kings 8:26 - Ahaziah was 22 years old when he became king, BUT, 2 Chronicles 22:2 - Ahaziah was 42 years old when he became king,
@mr.clandestine7259
@mr.clandestine7259 4 жыл бұрын
(1) *The charge of 101 contradictions, by Muslim apologist, Shabbir Ally refuted!* www.bible.ca/islam/islam-bible-contradictions-refuted.htm (2) *Shocking: Dr.Shabir Ally finally admits the Qur'an has indeed changed!* kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fJyRmrSe1JuzhJc.html
@mr.clandestine7259
@mr.clandestine7259 4 жыл бұрын
@Nick Hasan No, Nick, fools are the one who had believed the lies that there is only one Arabic Quran. Quran says if you have doubts come and ask us, however I gave you Muslim scholars their website and their youtube channel and look at the truth yourself. *(1)Shocking Muslim Scholar Dr. Yasir Qadhi admits Quran is not preserved:* *In the Hot Seat: Muḥammad Hijāb Interviews Dr. Yasir Qadhi* kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bqqTZKt7nbvNlmg.html (Watch the last 30 min of the interview which Hijab deleted from his youtuibe channel) *(2)Shocking Muslim Scholar Dr. Shabir Ally admits Quran is not preserved* *Readings & Manuscripts of The Quran | Dr. Shabir Ally* kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mZaKasJ-psC8ZZs.html
@bestbest91
@bestbest91 3 жыл бұрын
THIS WHOLE VIDEO DEBUNKED: How old was Ahaziah when he began to rule over Jerusalem? Twenty-two (2 Kings 8:26) Yes, correct translation: ’he became 22 during his reign,’ which refers to the beginning of his reign. Forty-two (2 Chronicles 22:2) No, correct translation: ’he became 42 during his reign,’ which refers to the end of his reign. An old mistranslation due to a misinterpretation. No Bible Contradiction In that count how many fighting men were found in Israel? Eight hundred thousand (2 Samuel 24:9). Yes, 800,000 valiant men, means: with battle experience. One million, one hundred thousand (I Chronicles 21:5). Yes, 1,100,000 men; included are 300.000 men without battle experience. See the article: Couldn't Joab count? No Bible Contradiction How many children did Michal have? Published February 26, 2014 Michal had no child. 20 But when David returned to bless his household, Michal the daughter of Saul came out to meet David and said, “How the king of Israel distinguished himself today! He uncovered himself today in the eyes of his servants’ maids as one of the foolish ones shamelessly uncovers himself!” 21 So David said to Michal, “It was before the Lord, who chose me above your father and above all his house, to appoint me ruler over the people of the Lord, over Israel; therefore I will celebrate before the Lord. 22 I will be more lightly esteemed than this and will be humble in my own eyes, but with the maids of whom you have spoken, with them I will be distinguished.” 23 Michal the daughter of Saul had no child to the day of her death. 2 Samuel 6:20-23 NASB Michal had five children. 8 So the king took the two sons of Rizpah the daughter of Aiah, Armoni and Mephibosheth whom she had borne to Saul, and the five sons of Merab the daughter of Saul, whom she had borne to Adriel the son of Barzillai the Meholathite. 2 Samuel 21:8 NASB SAB Contradiction 306 Merab or Michal? In the most authoritative Hebrew texts of 2 Samuel 21:8 Merab is not mentioned but Michal is. We will certainly chose here for this reading (Michal) as also the critics who suppose that this is a serious and undeniable Bible Contradiction. We will see. Previous History Before David conquered Goliath he had heard that the king would give his daughter (Merab) to the warrior that could slay the giant (1 Samuel 17:25). Later on Saul promised David his daughter Merab, but he broke his promise and Merab was given to another: So it came about at the time when Merab, Saul’s daughter, should have been given to David, that she was given to Adriel the Meholathite for a wife. (1 Samuel 18:19 NASB) Hereafter Saul saw that his second daughter Michal loved David and again he promised David that he could be the king’s son-in-law by marrying Michal. So David and Michal became a couple (1 Samuel 18:27). Seeming Problem Isn’t it strange that Michal is said to be the spouse of Adriel and that she got five sons with him instead of her older sister Merab (2 Samuel 21:8 NASB)? For most Bible interpreters this was/is the motivation to suppose that the holy writer mistakenly wrote ‘Michal’ in 1 Samuel 18:27 and that Merab was meant actually. Or is this only an apparent problem? Read and Conclude Let’s imagine what we read. Shortly after his marriage with Michal David was on the run for Saul. When we hear later that Michal had five sons with Adriel, it is clear that Merab died soon after here marriage and that Saul gave his daughter Michal to Adriel. Saul was certainly aware that nothing could hurt David more than this? Of course it also did hurt his daughter Michal, but that didn’t seem to be Saul’s concern. Reunion with David As soon as David became king in Juda and Israel, he was already 37,5 years then, he claimed that Michal would be brought to him as he was her right husband. Unfortunately Adriel was not her husband anymore. Most probably he died; anyway Michal was given to a certain Paltiel and Michal had to divorce again to return to David (2 Samuel 3:15). Reunion or Tragedy? Shortly thereafter the ark of the covenant with the ten commandments was brought to Jerusalem. Michal didn’t partake in the festivities; she looked outside the window and to her irritation she saw David in the poor clothing of a Levite dancing in front of the ark. However she was eager to be present when David turned home to see his family. Then she couldn’t control herself and she humiliated David in public (2 Samuel 6:20 NASB). And then is said that Michal didn’t have children until her death (vs. 23). It is so absolutely clear that the story doesn’t tell about her past, but about the moment of speaking up to the future. Conclusions Yes, Michal had five children. No, after her reunion with David she didn’t have anymore childern. A Bible Contradiction? No way. Who was the father of Joseph, husband of Mary? Jacob (Matthew 1:16) Yes, that is correct. Heli (Luke 3:23) Wrong, Heli was the father of Mary. "23 … Jesus Himself was about thirty years of age, being, as was supposed, the son of Joseph, the son of Eli, 24 the son of Matthat, the son of Levi, …". (NASBu) It is strange to suppose, as the critic does, that Luke is giving here a list of Joseph's forefathers with the introduction "being, as supposed the son of Joseph". Of course we have to read "being - as supposed the son of Joseph - the son of Eli, …" In the old texts no reading marks are given, so we have to deduce them from the text logic. This also implies that Eli was the grandfather of Jesus and the father of Mary. No Bible Contradiction From contradictingbiblecontradictions dot com
@vladimirputin2987
@vladimirputin2987 4 жыл бұрын
Insallah when jesus will come I will ask him if he give me the true knowledge of injeel
@PhantomMelodyinc
@PhantomMelodyinc 4 жыл бұрын
Masha Allah
@AdamtheFreemason
@AdamtheFreemason 4 жыл бұрын
He will say "READ the New Testament, and NOT the Gospel of Barnabas, or the Quran, these are falsehoods, NOT OF GOD."
@vladimirputin2987
@vladimirputin2987 4 жыл бұрын
Insallah when jesus will come back he will break the cross and will tell all Christians to read quran
@AdamtheFreemason
@AdamtheFreemason 4 жыл бұрын
@@vladimirputin2987 But the Quran is from SATAN, remember the Satanic Verses. And YES, I am a Freemason, BUT, Freemasonry is NOT Satanic like you have been lied to, I am a Christian Freemason, and Freemasonry is VERY BIBLICAL. I wouldn't PISS on the Anti-Christ, he can KISS MY ARSE.
@AdamtheFreemason
@AdamtheFreemason 4 жыл бұрын
@@sailingsun4873 Jesus will say what ?, and why am I making a fool of myself, I'm educating you.
@aquinasshojivarghese8315
@aquinasshojivarghese8315 8 ай бұрын
Humanly speaking, the Bible was written by approximately 40 men of diverse backgrounds over the course of 1500 years. Isaiah was a prophet, Ezra was a priest, Matthew was a tax-collector, John was a fisherman, Paul was a tentmaker, Moses was a shepherd, Luke was a physician. Despite being penned by different authors over 15 centuries, the Bible does not contradict itself and does not contain any errors. The authors all present different perspectives, but they all proclaim the same one true God, and the same one way of salvation-Jesus Christ (John 14:6; Acts 4:12). Few of the books of the Bible specifically name their author. Here are the books of the Bible along with the name of who is most assumed by biblical scholars to be the author, along with the approximate date of authorship: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy = Moses - 1400 B.C. Joshua = Joshua - 1350 B.C. Judges, Ruth, 1 Samuel, 2 Samuel = Samuel/Nathan/Gad - 1000 - 900 B.C. 1 Kings, 2 Kings = Jeremiah - 600 B.C. 1 Chronicles, 2 Chronicles, Ezra, Nehemiah = Ezra - 450 B.C. Esther = Mordecai - 400 B.C. Job = Moses - 1400 B.C. Psalms = several different authors, mostly David - 1000 - 400 B.C. Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon = Solomon - 900 B.C. Isaiah = Isaiah - 700 B.C. Jeremiah, Lamentations = Jeremiah - 600 B.C. Ezekiel = Ezekiel - 550 B.C. Daniel = Daniel - 550 B.C. Hosea = Hosea - 750 B.C. Joel = Joel - 850 B.C. Amos = Amos - 750 B.C. Obadiah = Obadiah - 600 B.C. Jonah = Jonah - 700 B.C. Micah = Micah - 700 B.C. Nahum = Nahum - 650 B.C. Habakkuk = Habakkuk - 600 B.C. Zephaniah = Zephaniah - 650 B.C. Haggai = Haggai - 520 B.C. Zechariah = Zechariah - 500 B.C. Malachi = Malachi - 430 B.C. Matthew = Matthew - A.D. 55 Mark = John Mark - A.D. 50 Luke = Luke - A.D. 60 John = John - A.D. 90 Acts = Luke - A.D. 65 Romans, 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, 1 Thessalonians, 2 Thessalonians, 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy, Titus, Philemon = Paul - A.D. 50-70 Hebrews = unknown, mostly likely Paul, Luke, Barnabas, or Apollos - A.D. 65 James = James - A.D. 45 1 Peter, 2 Peter = Peter - A.D. 60 1 John, 2 John, 3 John = John - A.D. 90 Jude = Jude - A.D. 60 Revelation = John - A.D. 90
@najmul2461
@najmul2461 4 жыл бұрын
MashaAllah MashaAllah Allahu Akbar Allah Bless you Dr Zakir Naik Ameen
@kareemi84
@kareemi84 4 жыл бұрын
There is adulteration in the Bible.
@abdulazizsayed5464
@abdulazizsayed5464 6 жыл бұрын
Masha'Allah
@princeroyal5477
@princeroyal5477 3 жыл бұрын
Wonderful lecture. Both helpful & funny.
@Paakay2024
@Paakay2024 5 ай бұрын
The Bible does call man, angles and Jesus as gods. But when referring to Jehovah the exclusive attribute ' Lord God Almighty ' is used . God is not a Trinity. Moslems are right to say that trinity is false.
@ahnafnurulazim7965
@ahnafnurulazim7965 4 жыл бұрын
May Allah safe him from evil eyes
@ibrahimabdullah7793
@ibrahimabdullah7793 6 жыл бұрын
MOSES BOOK SAYS OUR LORD IS ONE BUT JESUS BOOK SAYS NO, MOSES WAS WRONG, THERE ARE TRINITY THREE GODS NOT ONE, FATHER SON AND HOLY GHOST, OLD AND NEW HAVE MANY DIFFERENECES FROM EACH OTHER, ITS SAD HOW PEOPLES BELIVE ON ERRORS,
@binyamina8850
@binyamina8850 5 жыл бұрын
Ibrahim Abdullah Ancient manuscript prove Jesus wasn't crucified. Excerpt from nag hammadi manuscript peters apocalypse. The Savior said to me, "He whom you saw on the tree, glad and laughing, this is the living Jesus. But this one into whose hands and feet they drive the nails is his fleshly part, which is the substitute being put to shame, the one who came into being in his likeness. But look at him and me." But I, when I had looked, said "Lord, no one is looking at you. Let us flee this place." But he said to me, "I have told you, 'Leave the blind alone!'. And you, see how they do not know what they are saying. For the son of their glory instead of my servant, they have put to shame."
@aboodjasemAlsaeed
@aboodjasemAlsaeed 4 жыл бұрын
Ibrahim Abdullah then why does Jesus say there is only one god ?
@sheldon2554
@sheldon2554 4 жыл бұрын
@@aboodjasemAlsaeed Jesus is the son of God and God himself, God sent Jesus in a human form to show us how to live, he has taken away our suffering, that is why when we believe in Jesus all are sins r forgiven when we repent, healing takes place, Jesus is the way the truth and the life. Miracles happen only in the name of Jesus.
@aboodjasemAlsaeed
@aboodjasemAlsaeed 4 жыл бұрын
Sheldon 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 my man your religion is so confusing like wow he died for your sins why god himself come or die for your sins
@sheldon2554
@sheldon2554 4 жыл бұрын
@@aboodjasemAlsaeed God bless and love u, U should read the new testament of the bible it will change ur life, u will find all ur answer's.Peace be with u.
@ArbabCheema-kj6wj
@ArbabCheema-kj6wj 11 күн бұрын
I am Muslim .but when I googled it ,google gave me the verses which were not same as dr.zakir told😢😮
@msama6383
@msama6383 4 жыл бұрын
Let time decide who is true and who is fake Till than just believe in what you think is true ! Rather than pointing out the mistakes of anothers believe Time is the ultimate key to truth Chill ... Wait for the right time #love_Jesus🤗
@drtaha4946
@drtaha4946 4 жыл бұрын
He just answered a question, put your emotion aside and learn how Q&A session works
@esikk2302
@esikk2302 3 жыл бұрын
He found contradictions in your "holy book" what time do you want? Oh yes, you want the time to change the bible again. Islam is the truth. There are scientific, mathematic, prophecies proofs in Qur'an. Supernatural proofs(jinns,black magic). You'll see who's the truth when you see the Angel of Death till than wait.
@user-fq9rz7sg7l
@user-fq9rz7sg7l Жыл бұрын
Dear now as time has decided and placed the mistakes in front of you, you may also use God gifted brain to differentiate truth and lie
@saduuuuuuuuuuu
@saduuuuuuuuuuu 3 жыл бұрын
Searching faults in others and other religions is the way to heaven......
@farhadrana9437
@farhadrana9437 3 жыл бұрын
This was the debate. Dr. William cambel challenged dr zakir naik that in quran there're 30 mistakes. that's why this debate took place. Hope you understand
@saidiahussin3269
@saidiahussin3269 4 жыл бұрын
I bear witness that there is no god worthy of worship except Allah and mohammed and jesus are the messengers of God
@user-fq9rz7sg7l
@user-fq9rz7sg7l Жыл бұрын
جزاک اللہ خیر
@AbdulHakimAbidCCREATIONS
@AbdulHakimAbidCCREATIONS 2 жыл бұрын
BEST BEST BEST BEST BEST BEST! DR. ZAKIR NAIK SIR... YOU ARE THE BEST! I LOVE YOU FOR THE SAKE OF ALLAH.
@Lifeofmohamedansab
@Lifeofmohamedansab 7 жыл бұрын
You are best❤️
@rojinaakhter8394
@rojinaakhter8394 4 жыл бұрын
3:11 cute...May Allah bless him.amin
@yusufkurdi3582
@yusufkurdi3582 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for this ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
@musaalhaj765
@musaalhaj765 2 жыл бұрын
Hey I know you. You also commented on the 10 contradictions in the bible at Ftd facts. Nice to meet you brother.
@yusufkurdi3582
@yusufkurdi3582 2 жыл бұрын
@@musaalhaj765 me too brother 🙂❤
@trongnghiale3749
@trongnghiale3749 Жыл бұрын
Thank you very much
@ibkamofa4084
@ibkamofa4084 4 жыл бұрын
SUBHANALLAH MASHAALLAH
@alrahman1141
@alrahman1141 4 жыл бұрын
@@Bluebirdisfreenow kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bLiEmMt8rMzIc4k.html
@mrdon691
@mrdon691 3 жыл бұрын
The Bible is good I mean WAS good It was good when it was Injeel Then after 2000 yrs it's changed by humans
@AdamtheFreemason
@AdamtheFreemason 3 жыл бұрын
The Quran was good, up until abrogated verses, cancelled verses, missing chapters, and then 1924 came, and it was ALL standardized, and THAT is the version you have today, the 1924 Egyptian Standard Edition.
@courting9759
@courting9759 3 жыл бұрын
@@AdamtheFreemason Again an liar kzfaq.info/get/bejne/l9yootxmq5becWg.html
@aquinasshojivarghese8315
@aquinasshojivarghese8315 8 ай бұрын
Let me clarify something here... Jesus' father Joseph didn't had two fathers. Its the difference in two different versions of genealogy that Matthew and Luke chose to include in their books. Joseph's dad is actually Jacob. However, Heli is the uncle of Joseph. This was because, in Hebrew tradition, when writing down the genealogy, they write down the name of the relative who is more prominent. In this case Heli was replaced for Jacob in the genealogy in the Gospel according to Luke. In Hebrew culture the word "son" is used for both the words "son" and "son-in-law". So please instead of going around criticizing Christian religion and the True word of God, respect it and believe in it. These scientific errors you found has no relation or effect on the message the author is trying to convey. "Wicked looks for small disagreements, but the Wise searches for the greater message"
@Nooralamjabarkhil7
@Nooralamjabarkhil7 2 жыл бұрын
Ahaziah was twenty-two[a] years old when he became king, and he reigned in Jerusalem one year. His mother’s name was Athaliah, a granddaughter
@hafizhasnainashraf3565
@hafizhasnainashraf3565 2 жыл бұрын
Means ??
@reachsulthan
@reachsulthan 5 жыл бұрын
Son is two years older than his father?????????? Wtf??????
@TheAmazighMuslimah
@TheAmazighMuslimah 3 ай бұрын
Doesn’t make sense 💀
@reple489
@reple489 3 жыл бұрын
Dr Zakir naik's intelligence goes way beyond human capacity.
@hushamalhaj5544
@hushamalhaj5544 5 ай бұрын
جزاك الله خيرا ي شيخ وبارك الله فيك
@Ajmolali82
@Ajmolali82 5 жыл бұрын
You can now check out all the mathematical and linguistic miracle of the Quran.
@ashiqueansari6702
@ashiqueansari6702 7 жыл бұрын
Great debater Dr zakir naik
@servantofalmightyallahswt5505
@servantofalmightyallahswt5505 4 жыл бұрын
5 minutes not enough even if they give me 5 days I can go on
@mr.clandestine7259
@mr.clandestine7259 4 жыл бұрын
(1) *Shocking: Dr.Shabir Ally finally admits the Qur'an has indeed changed!* kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fJyRmrSe1JuzhJc.html
@mr.clandestine7259
@mr.clandestine7259 4 жыл бұрын
@FJT I think you are the one who has been sleeping on the recent discoveries that has been coming out and repeating the same old stuff that Muslim apologists have lied to you. Here is the proof , Jay Smith unpacks Dr. Shabir Ally and Dr. Yasir Qadhi's statements when these Islamic scholars say that the Quran fails academic test of preservation and is not preserved. Check *Where is the preserved Word of God? We've got him!* kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rb6Umc2iq8uqeqs.html
@mr.clandestine7259
@mr.clandestine7259 4 жыл бұрын
@FJT *So what is wrong with the Birmingham Folios (M1572a)? Is this really the world’s oldest Qur’an as Muslims claim?* The claim is that it was dated using Radio-Carbon dating to between 568-645 AD, so covering the life of Muhammad. But the problem with *RC14 dating* is that the deterioration of the Carbon in an animal only begins when the animal was slaughtered, after which it begins to slowly decay into a Nitrogen-14. The half life of Carbon 14 is 5,730 years. When one compares it to a fresh sample we can then get the approximate date of the parchment. What's more the contents of the 2 Folios only include 33 verses, out of a total of 6,236 verses in the Qur’an, so only 0.005% of the Qur’an. *So this is not a complete Qur’an at all!* *Sura **18:17**-31* is about the Seven Sleepers of Ephesus, which comes from a Greek story by Symeon Metaphrastes in his "Lives of the saints". Gregory of Tours translated it into Latin. There is a Syriac version by James of Sarug (d. 521), and from the Syriac the story was put into other Eastern languages. So, it’s over 100 years before the Qur’an. *Sura 19:91-98* is a Syriac work borrowed from the Proto-Evangelium of James (145 AD) and the Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew (600 AD), so long before the Qur'an. *Sura 20:1-39* is the story of Moses, similar to that found in the Bible, thus thousands of years before the Qur’an. There are further problems with the early Radio Carbon Dates for these folios: 1) *The scholars don’t agree with the early dates:* *Efin Rezvan (Russian Scholar, Birmingham University, 2015)* says, *“Birmingham Fragments show several textual variants as well as verse numbering differences…The very early dating of all these fragments - before the reign of ‘Uthmān - casts doubt on both the Islamic tradition…The fact that the folios were kept for centuries in an iron box, underground can partly explain the early radiocarbon dating…Parchment was an expensive material. Monastic and state scriptoria, located on the territory of Greater Syria (al-Shām), Antiochia, al-Hīra and Alexandria areas, could store this valuable material (including the donations of the pious laity). These stocks became part of the loot captured by the Arabs in the first years of the conquest. Captured leaves were used for writing the Qur’ān”.* *Emilio Platti (Translation):* *“The Mingana 1572a corresponds perfectly to the text of the ‘Uthmanic vulgate’…pointing out differences with the Ṣan’ā codex - unquestionably the oldest manuscript, which therefore means that this Birmingham fragment is subsequent to the oldest manuscript".* *Dr Alba Fedeli* states that *‘paleography gives a hypothesis’* - it is not exact, and carbon-dating informs us only about the date of the death of the animal Assistant Professor Süleyman Berk (faculty member of Yalova University’s Islamic Studies Faculty Turkish Islamic Art History Department), and collector Mehmet Çebi challenge Birmingham University’s suggestion that it has found the world’s oldest Quran: *“This finding did not cause any excitement in me. It is clear that the Quran pages they have belong to the end of the seventh century and the beginning of the eighth century. We have seen many copies of the Quran written with that script in that era. The Turkish Islamic Arts Museum even has the largest collection of such transcripts… it is clear that the Quranic pages at Birmingham University and the ones that we have belong to the same era”* 2) *Radio Carbon dates* from other labs in Europe: *LYON, KIEL, ZURICH, OXFORD* . The four Sana’a A findings date between 390 - 550 AD. Note: the Life of Muhammad’s dates (570-632 AD), thus these are 80-220 yrs too early. If you take the Birmingham Folio RC14 dates, you have to take these as well. You can't have it both ways. *Conclusion:* -The Ink has not been dated! 568-645 AD only tell us when the animal died -If the dates are correct, then the classical account is wrong! -It may simply suggest that the 3 stories in the folios were borrowed from outside, usually simple stories. These folios could be examples of those earlier sources, written in Arabic. - Scholars like *Rezvan, Platti, Fedelli, Berk, and Cebi* *do not agree with the early dates* . - The 4 laboratory reports on the *Sana’a MS* are dated between *390-550 AD, so 80 - 220* year too early! - Thus, *pre-Islamic* , *pre-Muhammad* , *pre Uthmanic* , & *pre Qur’anic!* *What about the HUSSEINI MANUSCRIPT?* - *Dr. Tayyar Altıkulaç* says, *“This is not Uthmanic’* *’It is dated from early to mid 8th century’* (Altıkulaç, ‘Al-Mushaf al-Sharif’ 2007:36-footnote 14a) - *Dr Francois Deroche* dates it to the *9th century* , since *“Monumental MS are later…so, the bigger the later”* . - It is replete with many later coverings, proving that it has been changed over time. *Conclusion:* It is just too late to be considered as *Uthmanic* , or even from the *7th century* , and with all the later changes it is not important for our needs.
@mr.clandestine7259
@mr.clandestine7259 4 жыл бұрын
(1) *Missing Words In A Quran Manuscript* (Variant Quran - Dr. Daniel Brubaker) kzfaq.info/get/bejne/f7ORaNeiy8qyqqs.html *Buy this book to know more, take it to your top Islamic scholars and ask them to respond:* *Corrections in Early Qurʾān Manuscripts: Twenty Examples (Quran Manuscript Change Studies)* www.amazon.com/Corrections-Early-Qur%CA%BE%C4%81n-Manuscripts-Manuscript/dp/1949123030
@mr.clandestine7259
@mr.clandestine7259 4 жыл бұрын
@FJT I gave you references to debunk the entire thing. See this is an important question concerning your salvation and hence I am giving you the truth. But if you don't believe me, which I understand you have your prejudices, just take this questions to your top scholars and see what you were told or lied to about what the traditional Quran believes. Our goal brother is that we find the truth, nothing else. You can also look at this recent research too and take it to your scholars, (1) *Missing Words In A Quran Manuscript* (Variant Quran - Dr. Daniel Brubaker) kzfaq.info/get/bejne/f7ORaNeiy8qyqqs.html *Buy this book to know more, take it to your top Islamic scholars and ask them to respond:* *Corrections in Early Qurʾān Manuscripts: Twenty Examples (Quran Manuscript Change Studies)* www.amazon.com/Corrections-Early-Qur%CA%BE%C4%81n-Manuscripts-Manuscript/dp/1949123030
@bryanbradley6871
@bryanbradley6871 2 жыл бұрын
1:40 a time traveler. If I traveled back in time to the year 1990 as a 29 year old man, I would be 2 years older than my dad. Also you can be both 42 and 22 because from my understanding depending on the calendar you're using your age will change so with one you're slightly older and the other you're slightly younger.
@mamoon6283
@mamoon6283 2 жыл бұрын
Its a clear contradiction man, 1+1 is 2 not -2
@bryanbradley6871
@bryanbradley6871 2 жыл бұрын
@@mamoon6283 bro if you are 29 and you time traveled to the year in where your dad is 27 you would be 2 years older than your dad also you could be 22 in Earth Years and 42 in Venus years.
@naasirshafee3948
@naasirshafee3948 2 жыл бұрын
@@bryanbradley6871 show me where is time travel possible 😂 just fooling yourselves
@bryanbradley6871
@bryanbradley6871 2 жыл бұрын
@@naasirshafee3948 we are traveling through time right now 😂
@jefferytomi7290
@jefferytomi7290 2 жыл бұрын
@@bryanbradley6871 lol thts actually true we christian all the filth in the quran (the life of mohammed)
@Lionofanamechanger
@Lionofanamechanger 11 ай бұрын
Alhamdulilah…
@massimopellegrinimusic
@massimopellegrinimusic 4 жыл бұрын
Why do Christians priests or even the pope himself never point out errors in other religious Books?
@amalegendoffortnite3861
@amalegendoffortnite3861 11 ай бұрын
Because there isn't one
@Retarded9-11
@Retarded9-11 4 ай бұрын
​@@amalegendoffortnite3861 the sun asks god if it could rise everyday kinda weird since the sun is always rising Here is one error
@mattj1450
@mattj1450 5 жыл бұрын
god bless you dr
@khabibmia4558
@khabibmia4558 Жыл бұрын
EXCELLENT
@theholyquran3102
@theholyquran3102 2 жыл бұрын
صلوا على نبينا محمد
@safiqahmedchoudhury6488
@safiqahmedchoudhury6488 7 жыл бұрын
awesome sir ....
@_Zeozed
@_Zeozed 3 жыл бұрын
1) Was Ahaziah 22 or 42 years old when he became king (over Judah)? Because his father Jehoram had ascended the throne at the age of 32 and reigned for only eight years, it was impossible for Ahaziah to be 42 years old at the time of his father's death (32+8 = 40). In the earliest Jewish chronology (Seder Olam), it is assumed that 42 years is the length of King Omri's dynasty. Omri should then have founded his dynasty in 883 B.C. (i.e. perhaps he would have sired his son Ahab or his daughter Athalia). Ahaziah, son of Athalia (daughter of Omri), ascended the throne (of Judah) in 841 B.C. (883-841 = 42 years). At the time of his ascension to the throne (841 B.C.), he was "a 42-year-old son" (according to the literal meaning of the original Hebrew text) because he was a descendant of his grandfather Omri's dynasty; but he was 22 years old at the time. It is also necessary to present the opinion that we find ourselves here in the rare case of a copyist's mistake. The number 22 (schenajim esrim) and the number 42 (schenajim arba'im) differ in Hebrew only by a few 'dashes'. The following diagram makes it easier to understand: The dynasty of King Omri (dates before Christ): 883 : Omri (Israel) begets Ahab or Athalia. 880 : Birth of Jehoram (king of Judah), who died at the age of 40 when Ahaziah his son ascended the throne. On a date around 865: Joram (of Judah) marries Athalia (of Israel), the daughter of Omri Around 863: birth of Ahaziah (of Judah), whose parents were Joram and Athaliah. Around 849 Jehoram (of Judah) ascended the throne at the age of 32 years and reigned for 8 years. 841: Ahaziah (of Judah) becomes king at the age of 22 (863-841) - 42 (883-841) years after Omri gave birth to Ahab or Athaliah. 2) The difference between the men of Israel (800,000 or 1,100,000) can be explained by the fact that in 2 Samuel 24:9 it is expressly spoken of as "men of war" (in Hebrew isch khajil), i.e. men with experience of war, which is not the case in 1 Chronicles 21:5. Thus there were an additional 300,000 (isch) men who could carry the sword, but were not experienced in warfare and had no weapons of their own. The total number thus amounts to 1,100,000 soldiers. Among the men of Judah, the difference is also clear. In 1 Chronicles 21:5 there are 470,000 men (in Hebrew isch khajil "men of war") who drew the sword, in 2 Samuel 24:9 there are instead 500,000 men (in Hebrew isch). The difference shows that 470,000 men were trained and capable of warfare, while the additional 30,000 men in Judah were not trained and had no weapons. In the other three cases, it is expressly added: "drawing the sword", but not here. Because in Holy Scripture every word is significant, the absence of these words is significant. 3) Michal, the daughter of King Saul, had an older sister named Merab, who was first promised to David as his wife, but was later given to Adriel the Meholathite as his wife (1 Samuel 14:49; 18:17-19). Thereupon David took Michal, who loved him, as his wife (1 Samuel 18:20-21). According to 1 Samuel 25:44, Saul nevertheless gave her to Palti, son of Laish. After his accession to the throne, David demanded the recovery of Michal (2 Samuel 3:13-14), which was done through the chief of the armies, Abner. Palti / Paltiel himself followed his wife in tears until he was sent away. Michal, according to 2 Samuel 6:23, had no children during his lifetime. However, in 2 Samuel 21:8 it says, " ... the five sons of Michal, the daughter of Saul, whom she bore to Adriel, the son of Barzillai the Meholathite" (2 Sam. 21:8). In two ancient Hebrew manuscripts, however, it is written "Merab", which would be better understood. According to rabbinic tradition, the five sons of Merab became orphans at a very early age and were brought up by Michal, and for this reason were called by his name. There remains, however, the difficulty of the expression: "which she had given birth to Adriel". Perhaps God wanted to point out that He did not find David's behavior in his demand for the return of Michal at all good, and that the children, even though they were brought up by a king's wife, did not belong to David but to Adriel. 4)In Matthew 1:16 it is said that Joseph was begotten by Jacob, but it is also said that Joseph was Mary's husband. So we clearly have Joseph's family tree before us. In Luke 3:23 it says, "And Jesus ... being as it was thought, the son of Joseph, of Heli. According to this, Luke's Gospel does not present Joseph's family tree, but Mary's family tree. This family tree goes back to David very differently from the other tree (even though both have a Zerubbabel and a Salathiel). Secondly, between Jesus and Joseph, there is expressly no mention of begetting, for that would have been entirely false (see Luke 1:35), but the Word says: "... being as it was thought, the son of Joseph, of Heli. Similarly we do not read that Joseph was begotten by Heli. On the contrary, the text carefully abstains from it and says very briefly: "of Heli". Heli was not Joseph's father, but Mary's father, and thus he was Joseph's stepfather. Furthermore, the expression "as it was believed" shows that it is simply a matter of public opinion that Jesus was Joseph's biological son. In reality He was not. Jesus saves, Amen.
@martinekwueme3626
@martinekwueme3626 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for setting the record straight.
@MASTER-sj6zy
@MASTER-sj6zy 3 жыл бұрын
Totaly wrong😂
@_Zeozed
@_Zeozed 3 жыл бұрын
@@MASTER-sj6zy argument?
@reubensamuel3795
@reubensamuel3795 11 ай бұрын
In Luke’s genealogy the form is different from that of Matthew’s. Matthew’s list gives the father and who they begot (Greek gennao). In Luke the form is different, where X is the son of Y. But more precisely, the word son is absent in Greek, but only inserted into English so we can better understand it. The only place where son is used in the Greek is in verse 23 where Jesus was the supposed son of Joseph, of Heli, of Matthat, of Levi, and so on. Luke is being very precise. Jesus was thought to be the son of Joseph, who was of Heli. Notice that Luke never said that Joseph was the son of Heli in the Greek. This reduces the alleged contradiction to nothing and shows that Luke’s genealogy is Mary’s-with Joseph’s name listed due to inheritance laws-and Matthew’s genealogy is Joseph’s. These false teachers have to just put a doubt on the minds of the people. That is all. Nobody in that foolish audience will go back home and research what this NUT IS SAYING. They just get a thrill about the lies about the Bible. It makes their day. One has to experience Christ (God) in their lives. These things about genealogy is of little significance.
@spiritualss
@spiritualss 3 жыл бұрын
Dr zakir - this brother asked a very good question
@mckiec.9077
@mckiec.9077 4 жыл бұрын
I have no idea how he could say the bible says in 2 kings that ahaziah is 2 years older then Jehoram his father because the it never say anything even close to that. So that one is just a flat lie dont believe me study it yourself.
@rawishharris9340
@rawishharris9340 4 жыл бұрын
He is giving u reference
@martinatem8957
@martinatem8957 3 жыл бұрын
I had to read all through luke 3 and found out that there are two joseph's . likewise we have many Zakir's with different fathers. Or just like some people will say Zakir's son or Naik's son, which simply means Dr Zakir Naik son. Which ever way you choose this man is not correct.
@abdulazizsayed5464
@abdulazizsayed5464 6 жыл бұрын
Allah bless you, and may Allah guide us all.
@rajirajeswari3759
@rajirajeswari3759 4 жыл бұрын
Yes in Mathew chapter it says Jacob is the father of Joseph and in Luke chapter it says Jacob is the son of Heli.Jacob and Help are wife and husband.If u see the generations in Mathew and Luke there r different names.In one chapter they gave reference about father and in another chapter mother.Nothing more complicated when u read carefully......
@bryanbradley6871
@bryanbradley6871 2 жыл бұрын
If I time traveled to the year 1990, I would be 2 years older than my dad. He would be 28 and I would be 30
@amalegendoffortnite3861
@amalegendoffortnite3861 11 ай бұрын
Wow! Bro where is time travelling possible if Jesus was god why didn't he tell us time travelling miracle everyone would've believed in him right now. Stop fooling urself
@youssoufdiallo3243
@youssoufdiallo3243 4 жыл бұрын
A human computer
@broj5495
@broj5495 4 жыл бұрын
This clown zakir needs to study and repent this supposed contradiction has been answered constantly for example kzfaq.info/get/bejne/icqDqap0qtKmqXU.html and it doesn't say in chronicals he became king straight after so that's a lie. now I'd like to see him explain these contradictions in the quran kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nLxni7Rlsd7Jn2g.html
@AdamtheFreemason
@AdamtheFreemason 4 жыл бұрын
Youssouf, NO Zakir Naik is a JOKE, if you fact-check what he says, your likely gonna find a mistake, he's known for it.
@nombaite2443
@nombaite2443 4 жыл бұрын
Absolutely! It shows that he can't think.
@muhammaduthmanabdurrahmanl5121
@muhammaduthmanabdurrahmanl5121 3 жыл бұрын
Now it has been corrected by them by watching videos of Zakir Naik...XD🤣🤣🤣..I think there is more versions of Bible than iphone
@AdamtheFreemason
@AdamtheFreemason 3 жыл бұрын
Believe it or not, there have found to be 30+ different Qurans, collected by Hatun Tash, so how many versions of the Bible has there been, hmm, same amount as the Quran by the look of it.
@AdamtheFreemason
@AdamtheFreemason 3 жыл бұрын
@Police Man absolutely
@flairluna5077
@flairluna5077 3 жыл бұрын
@@AdamtheFreemason Lmao jesus christ was a human being just like all of us he died and he was praying or oh are you telling me he was praying to himself? no one understands the bible its all been touched and changed believe what you want tho worship a human being wow
@AdamtheFreemason
@AdamtheFreemason 3 жыл бұрын
@@flairluna5077 Jesus, was a divine being, in the flesh, from God, unlike Islam, which STILL does PAGAN practices, of the Quraish, as well as IDOL WORSHIP and STONE WORSHIP.
@flairluna5077
@flairluna5077 3 жыл бұрын
@@AdamtheFreemason FIRST HE WAS A HUMAN And u say FROM GOD as if HE ISNT GOD TO YOU christians we DONT do stone worship whered u get that??
@Wyhhd
@Wyhhd Жыл бұрын
Masha Allah
@bestbest91
@bestbest91 3 жыл бұрын
THIS WHOLE VIDEO DEBUNKED: How old was Ahaziah when he began to rule over Jerusalem? Twenty-two (2 Kings 8:26) Yes, correct translation: ’he became 22 during his reign,’ which refers to the beginning of his reign. Forty-two (2 Chronicles 22:2) No, correct translation: ’he became 42 during his reign,’ which refers to the end of his reign. An old mistranslation due to a misinterpretation. No Bible Contradiction In that count how many fighting men were found in Israel? Eight hundred thousand (2 Samuel 24:9). Yes, 800,000 valiant men, means: with battle experience. One million, one hundred thousand (I Chronicles 21:5). Yes, 1,100,000 men; included are 300.000 men without battle experience. See the article: Couldn't Joab count? No Bible Contradiction How many children did Michal have? Published February 26, 2014 Michal had no child. 20 But when David returned to bless his household, Michal the daughter of Saul came out to meet David and said, “How the king of Israel distinguished himself today! He uncovered himself today in the eyes of his servants’ maids as one of the foolish ones shamelessly uncovers himself!” 21 So David said to Michal, “It was before the Lord, who chose me above your father and above all his house, to appoint me ruler over the people of the Lord, over Israel; therefore I will celebrate before the Lord. 22 I will be more lightly esteemed than this and will be humble in my own eyes, but with the maids of whom you have spoken, with them I will be distinguished.” 23 Michal the daughter of Saul had no child to the day of her death. 2 Samuel 6:20-23 NASB Michal had five children. 8 So the king took the two sons of Rizpah the daughter of Aiah, Armoni and Mephibosheth whom she had borne to Saul, and the five sons of Merab the daughter of Saul, whom she had borne to Adriel the son of Barzillai the Meholathite. 2 Samuel 21:8 NASB SAB Contradiction 306 Merab or Michal? In the most authoritative Hebrew texts of 2 Samuel 21:8 Merab is not mentioned but Michal is. We will certainly chose here for this reading (Michal) as also the critics who suppose that this is a serious and undeniable Bible Contradiction. We will see. Previous History Before David conquered Goliath he had heard that the king would give his daughter (Merab) to the warrior that could slay the giant (1 Samuel 17:25). Later on Saul promised David his daughter Merab, but he broke his promise and Merab was given to another: So it came about at the time when Merab, Saul’s daughter, should have been given to David, that she was given to Adriel the Meholathite for a wife. (1 Samuel 18:19 NASB) Hereafter Saul saw that his second daughter Michal loved David and again he promised David that he could be the king’s son-in-law by marrying Michal. So David and Michal became a couple (1 Samuel 18:27). Seeming Problem Isn’t it strange that Michal is said to be the spouse of Adriel and that she got five sons with him instead of her older sister Merab (2 Samuel 21:8 NASB)? For most Bible interpreters this was/is the motivation to suppose that the holy writer mistakenly wrote ‘Michal’ in 1 Samuel 18:27 and that Merab was meant actually. Or is this only an apparent problem? Read and Conclude Let’s imagine what we read. Shortly after his marriage with Michal David was on the run for Saul. When we hear later that Michal had five sons with Adriel, it is clear that Merab died soon after here marriage and that Saul gave his daughter Michal to Adriel. Saul was certainly aware that nothing could hurt David more than this? Of course it also did hurt his daughter Michal, but that didn’t seem to be Saul’s concern. Reunion with David As soon as David became king in Juda and Israel, he was already 37,5 years then, he claimed that Michal would be brought to him as he was her right husband. Unfortunately Adriel was not her husband anymore. Most probably he died; anyway Michal was given to a certain Paltiel and Michal had to divorce again to return to David (2 Samuel 3:15). Reunion or Tragedy? Shortly thereafter the ark of the covenant with the ten commandments was brought to Jerusalem. Michal didn’t partake in the festivities; she looked outside the window and to her irritation she saw David in the poor clothing of a Levite dancing in front of the ark. However she was eager to be present when David turned home to see his family. Then she couldn’t control herself and she humiliated David in public (2 Samuel 6:20 NASB). And then is said that Michal didn’t have children until her death (vs. 23). It is so absolutely clear that the story doesn’t tell about her past, but about the moment of speaking up to the future. Conclusions Yes, Michal had five children. No, after her reunion with David she didn’t have anymore childern. A Bible Contradiction? No way. Who was the father of Joseph, husband of Mary? Jacob (Matthew 1:16) Yes, that is correct. Heli (Luke 3:23) Wrong, Heli was the father of Mary. "23 … Jesus Himself was about thirty years of age, being, as was supposed, the son of Joseph, the son of Eli, 24 the son of Matthat, the son of Levi, …". (NASBu) It is strange to suppose, as the critic does, that Luke is giving here a list of Joseph's forefathers with the introduction "being, as supposed the son of Joseph". Of course we have to read "being - as supposed the son of Joseph - the son of Eli, …" In the old texts no reading marks are given, so we have to deduce them from the text logic. This also implies that Eli was the grandfather of Jesus and the father of Mary. No Bible Contradiction From contradictingbiblecontradictions dot com
@belshazzarconstantine886
@belshazzarconstantine886 3 жыл бұрын
Very Well. I've just commented the 102 contradictions in Qur'an.
@tunahancanturk6221
@tunahancanturk6221 3 жыл бұрын
Maan, I read your first explaination regarding the issue with Ahasja 42 or 22 years. You are soo ignorant and your arumentation makes literally no sense. You try to solve this clear contradiction by saying that he was 22 years old when he became king and this 42 refers to his age when he ruled already. First of all, this is your ignorant interpretation, because it is clearly in the Bible, that in one place he "became" king in the age of 22 and in an onther place 42. And furthermore it is clearly mentioned in both of these contradicting verses, that he ruled for 1 year in Jerusalem, so your whole argument is debunked.
@khalilrahaman2219
@khalilrahaman2219 2 жыл бұрын
@@belshazzarconstantine886 there are none
@khalilrahaman2219
@khalilrahaman2219 2 жыл бұрын
This is retarded the verses says he ruled for a year
@adinrocks4305
@adinrocks4305 3 жыл бұрын
4:10 😂😂
@apnaphotocopy2037
@apnaphotocopy2037 6 жыл бұрын
Zakir give me date and time to argue with you....live on television...i will show u the glory of god...you are next paul....meet me....challenge
@SalmanKhan-hq6yf
@SalmanKhan-hq6yf 5 жыл бұрын
Hahahahhaha
@manovpradhan9430
@manovpradhan9430 4 жыл бұрын
@Omar Farique You Mean To Say He Wants Publicity...
@drtaha4946
@drtaha4946 4 жыл бұрын
@@manovpradhan9430 what publicity? He doesn't want to debate average joes. His opponent should have at least couple of thousands of followers to prove that he's not a layman and has the ability to debate him. What's so wrong about that?
@AbdEl-RahmanAAzab
@AbdEl-RahmanAAzab 3 жыл бұрын
Actually, Dr. Zakir was wrong at 1:37, because he said even in Hollywood movies they can not produce a son that is older than his father. Well, he clearly did not see Interstellar.
@moramoon9517
@moramoon9517 2 жыл бұрын
TAKBIR
@AdamtheFreemason
@AdamtheFreemason 4 жыл бұрын
There is NO contradiction in the Quran, WHAT A JOKE, there are MANY contradictions in the Quran.
@thehourglassfan3515
@thehourglassfan3515 4 жыл бұрын
Please produce your proof if you are truthful. 🙂
@AdamtheFreemason
@AdamtheFreemason 4 жыл бұрын
@@thehourglassfan3515 So if I produce proof that there are contradictions in the Quran, will you accept it NOT the word of God, OR, if I show that certain verses were conceived from other sources other than the word of God, will you accept it is NOT from God, are you willing to ACCEPT the truth.
@thehourglassfan3515
@thehourglassfan3515 4 жыл бұрын
Adam the Freemason. If this is the case and you can prove to me that this cannot be from God. If your peace is true peace, I will leave my peace and I will join you! 🙂
@lafika1634
@lafika1634 4 жыл бұрын
Adam the Freemason. Listen if you prove that the Bible has no mistakes and quraan i will leave islam
@thehourglassfan3515
@thehourglassfan3515 4 жыл бұрын
Lafika16 Quran is true, Bible has a lot of scientific mistakes and all, even some Christians who know about science admit it.
@muthallibshaik8676
@muthallibshaik8676 4 жыл бұрын
Christians dawah like Jesus died for ur sins!! Astagfirulla!! Greatest lie
@AdamtheFreemason
@AdamtheFreemason 4 жыл бұрын
Muhammad a "prophet of God", an even BIGGER lie.
@jackcrawley7613
@jackcrawley7613 3 жыл бұрын
@@AdamtheFreemason Paul was false prophet whi changed jesus teaching
@AdamtheFreemason
@AdamtheFreemason 3 жыл бұрын
@@jackcrawley7613 Paul WASN'T a prophet, he was an APOSTLE, nice try.
@baderabduallah3311
@baderabduallah3311 Жыл бұрын
@@AdamtheFreemason Pauls was clown
@haz-sh1tq
@haz-sh1tq 4 ай бұрын
Very meaningful
@cabdirisaaq6523
@cabdirisaaq6523 2 жыл бұрын
LOVE FROM SOMALIA
@dilutionxd52
@dilutionxd52 Жыл бұрын
(mathew 4:1)jesus was tempted (James 1:13)god cannot be tempted (John 1:29)jesus was seen (1john 4:12)no man has ever seen god (Acts 2:22)jesus was and is a man,sent by god (Numbers 23:19,hosea 11:9)god is not a man (Hebrew 5:8-9)jesus had to grow and learn (Isaiah 40:28)god doesn't ever need to learn (1corinthians 15:3-4)jesus died (Timothy 1:17)god cannot die (Hebrew 5:7)jesus needed salvation (Luke 1:37)God doesn't need salvation (John 4:6)jesus grew weary (Isaiah 40:28)god can't grow weary (Mark 4:38) jesus slept (Psalm 121:2-6)God doesn't sleep (John 5:19)jesus wasn't all powerful (Isaiah 45:5-7)god is all powerful (Mark 13:32)jesus wasn't all knowing (Isaiah 46:9)god is all knowing JESUS SON OF MARY WAS NO MORE THAN A MESSENGER...
@shuvorahman8178
@shuvorahman8178 5 жыл бұрын
Even Satan has own Bible 😂😂😂
@iammercifulperson9060
@iammercifulperson9060 4 жыл бұрын
see reality kzfaq.info/get/bejne/f9hyosJiqse-cZs.html
@yusufkurdi3582
@yusufkurdi3582 2 жыл бұрын
@@iammercifulperson9060 thanks ❤👍🏼
@yusufkurdi3582
@yusufkurdi3582 2 жыл бұрын
@@iammercifulperson9060scientific miracles in the Quran 👇 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/g9tynqakyrSRpZs.html
@yusufkurdi3582
@yusufkurdi3582 2 жыл бұрын
Scientific evidence in the Quran👇 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/g9tynqakyrSRpZs.html
@abdirahim9988
@abdirahim9988 5 ай бұрын
Errors in bible 2 kings 8:26-- 2chronicles 22:2 ' 2 Samuel 24:9 1chronicles 21:5 2 samuels 6:23 2 samuels 21:8 Gospel of mathew 1:16 Gospel of luke 3:23
@aplaysx
@aplaysx Ай бұрын
those are the ones mentioned in the video?
@Kipkoech_Andrew
@Kipkoech_Andrew 23 күн бұрын
Ahaziah ruled twice first starting at 22 was deposed then became king again at 42
@aplaysx
@aplaysx 22 күн бұрын
@@Kipkoech_Andrew proof?
@khabibmia4558
@khabibmia4558 Жыл бұрын
ALHAMDULILAH
@aliyanzahid7319
@aliyanzahid7319 4 жыл бұрын
Proof Jesus is not god ☆- My father is greater than I [John 14:28] ☆My father is greater than all [John 10:29] ☆I can of my own self do nothing:as I hear,I judge,and my judgement is just;because I seek not my own will,but will of my father hath send me. [John 5:30] ☆Jesus answered them and said,"My doctrine is not mine but his who send me" [John 7:16] ☆He who doesnot love me doesnot keep my words;and the word which u hear are not mine but the father's who send me. [John 14:24] ☆For i have not spoken on my own authority ; but father who send me gave me a command what should i say and what i should speak. [John 12:49] ☆And the father himself , which hath send me, hath borne witness of me .Ye have neither heard his voice at any time, nor seen his shape. [John 5:37] ☆"Their worship of me is empty since they teach instructionsvthat are human rules" [Mathew 15:9]
@AbdulAziz-ql6zx
@AbdulAziz-ql6zx 4 жыл бұрын
In isaiyah chapter 43 verse 10 their is written that 10. Ye are my witnesses, saith the LORD, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me. So it's means that jesus is not God AND GOD NOT HAVE ANY SON.
@aliyanzahid7319
@aliyanzahid7319 4 жыл бұрын
☆While they were still talking about this,Jesus stood among them and said "Peace be with you".They were startled and frightened thinking that they saw a ghost.He said to them"Why are u troubled and why do doubts rise in ur mind?". "Look at my hands and at my feet.It's I myself! Touch me and see me; a ghost does not have flesh and bones as u see I have!"[Luke 24:36-39] (In this above verse it is clearly stated that holy spirit and son cannot be the same) ☆So Jesus said,"I am only with u a little while longer, and then I am going to the one who send me"[John7:33] ●Proof of Muhammad(SAW) arrival ☆Truly,truly,I tell u,whoever beilives in me will also do the work that I am doing.He will do even greater things than these because I am going to my father[John 14:12] ●How many first born of God?? ☆Jacob is God first born son[Exodus 4:22] ☆Ephraim is God first born son[Jeremiah 31:9] ●Top 10 reasons Jesus cannot be a god ☆God cannot be the born,God had no begging,but"Jesus was born" ☆Jesus never said"I'm God" in any religion, Jesus never said "Worship me"no explicit statement ever ☆No one ever has seen God but folks saw"Jesus" ☆During Jesus time most people didnot belive that Jesus was a god. If he was god than peole may have"worshiped him"but there were Jewish people who practiced their own religon and go to synagogue and so on.Jesus never taught trinity.Word trinity no where in the Bible. ☆God don't sleep,eat or drink..etc,but "Jesus ate,slept,drank".Therefore Jesus is messenger of God.Additionally, it is stated clearly in Bible that Jesus was praying,if Jesus was God than why he needs to pray?? ☆God knows everything, but Jesus didn't know everything.In the Bible Jesus claims that God knowledge is greater than of his.Jesus asked about an hour of the day of the judgement,if he was god than he would have known about this?? ☆Jesus explicitly stated in Bible that he is not a god.Bible says:"And eternal life is this:to know you, the one true God and him whom u send Yeshuha the messiah"[John17:3] ☆The title"Son of God"does not make any sense.In fact,Jesus had no father and Mary was virgin.It is stated in Holy Quran"Say that there is no god but Allah.He has no son and has no father"[Chapter:30 Surah:Iqhlaas Verse:1-3] So what do we mean when we say God had a son???Let's make it clear.For instance:Dogs have puppies, cats have kittens,lions have cubs but th a what God's have"Baby gods"this don't make any sense?It is like saying:Hey!I have a son who is a goldfish or I have a son who is me.(I had myself or I made myself)In fact,God does not die,God doesn't have human needs and God does not have a son ☆God don't change.He don't grow old or get tired because God is perfect. ☆God is object of a worship.No matter which religion u follow, and whoever they call God is their object of worship.like give devotion to to the God and pray to God,and give charity in name of the God.so Jesus has been god?he would have told them to worship him,but in fact he did totally opposite as stated in Bible"But in vain thy worship me,teaching for doctrines the commandments of men"[Mathew15:9] ●Proof Jesus is messenger of God This is Jesus a prophet of Nazareth[John 3:14] This is Jesus prophet of Nazareth[Luke 24:19] Jesus prophet of Nazareth[Mathew21:11]
@AdamtheFreemason
@AdamtheFreemason 4 жыл бұрын
Aliyan Zahid Proof, that the Quran says Jesus IS God. John 1:1 “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” John 1:14 “And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.” Quran 3:39 So the angels called him while he was standing in prayer in the chamber, "Indeed, Allah gives you good tidings of John, confirming a Word from Allah and [who will be] honorable, abstaining [from women], and a prophet from among the righteous." Quran 3:45 [And mention] when the angels said, "O Mary, indeed Allah gives you good tidings of a Word from Him, whose name will be the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary - distinguished in this world and the Hereafter and among those brought near [to Allah]. NOTE: The verse below contradicts itself, by CONFIRMING a "Word" from God, then denying it, all in the same verse. Quran 4:171 O People of the Scripture, do not commit excess in your religion or say about Allah except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, was but a messenger of Allah and His word which He directed to Mary and a soul [created at a command] from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers. And do not say, "Three"; desist - it is better for you. Indeed, Allah is but one God. Exalted is He above having a son. Riyad as-Saliheen, Book of Miscellany, Hadith 412 Ubadah bin As-Samit (May Allah be pleased with him) reported: Messenger of Allah said, "He who bears witness that there is no true god except Allah, alone having no partner with Him, that Muhammad is His slave and His Messenger, that 'Isa (Jesus) is His slave and Messenger and he (Jesus) is His Word which He communicated to Maryam (Mary) and His spirit which He sent to her,... SOURCE: muflihun.com/riyadussaliheen/1/412 Jami` at-Tirmidhi, Vol. 4, Book of The Description Of The Day Of Judgment, And Ar-Riqaq, And Al-Wara', Hadith 2433b Abu Hurairah narrated: ...Go to 'Eisa." They will go to 'Eisa and say: "O 'Eisa ! You are the Messenger of Allah and His Word which He placed into Mariam, and a Spirit from Him, and you spoke to the people in the cradle. SOURCE: muflihun.com/tirmidhi/37/2433b Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 9, Book of Oneness of Allah, Hadith 483 Narrated Sufyan: (regarding the above narration) that the Prophet added, "You are the Truth, and Your Word is the Truth." SOURCE: muflihun.com/bukhari/92/483 Sahih Muslim, Vol. 6, Book of Virtues, Hadith 5837 Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger as saying: No child is born but he is pricked by the satan and he begins to weep because of the pricking of the satan except the son of Mary and his mother. SOURCE: muflihun.com/muslim/30/5837 Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 6, Book of Prophetic Commentary on the Qur'an, Hadith 71 Narrated Said bin Al-Musaiyab: Abu Huraira said, "The Prophet ﷺ said, 'No child is born but that, Satan touches it when it is born where upon it starts crying loudly because of being touched by Satan, except Mary and her Son." Abu Huraira then said, "Recite, it you wish: "And I seek Refuge with You (Allah) for her and her offspring from Satan, the outcast." (3.36) SOURCE: muflihun.com/bukhari/60/71 Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 4, Book of Prophets, Hadith 641 Narrated Said bin Al-Musaiyab: Abu Huraira said, "I heard Allah's Apostle saying, 'There is none born among the off-spring of Adam, but Satan touches it. A child therefore, cries loudly at the time of birth because of the touch of Satan, except Mary and her child." SOURCE: muflihun.com/bukhari/55/641 Jesus knows the "Sign of the Hour", like Allah does Quran 43:61 - And indeed, Jesus will be [a sign for] knowledge of the Hour, so be not in doubt of it, and follow Me. This is a straight path. SOURCE: muflihun.com/43/61 Only Allah knows the "sign of the hour" Quran 7:187, 31:34, 33:63, 43:85 **************************** Quran 7:187 - They ask you, [O Muhammad], about the Hour: when is its arrival? Say, "Its knowledge is only with my Lord. None will reveal its time except Him.They ask you as if you are familiar with it. Say, "Its knowledge is only with Allah, but most of the people do not know." Quran 31:34 - Indeed, Allah [alone] has knowledge of the Hour... Quran 33:63 - People ask you concerning the Hour. Say," Knowledge of it is only with Allah. Quran 43:85 - And blessed is He to whom belongs the dominion of the heavens and the earth and whatever is between them and with whom is knowledge of the Hour and to whom you will be returned.
@lafika1634
@lafika1634 4 жыл бұрын
Adam the Freemason. Lol you just copied from the quraan witch they proved jesus is not god You don’t know what are you talking about
@AdamtheFreemason
@AdamtheFreemason 4 жыл бұрын
@@lafika1634 Perhaps YOU aren't reading very clearly, or your in denial. Verse 3:49 and verse 3:45 clearly state that Jesus is Allah's WORD, which refers to John 1:1 "...and the Word was God", show me any other prophet in Islam that is called the "WORD", or Allah's WORD. Also, Jesus knows the "sign of the Hour" (Quran 43:61) like Allah does (Quran 7:187, 31:34, 33:63, 43:85) how can a MERE prophet know the sign of the hour, unless he can "predict the future".
@s.srinivas5768
@s.srinivas5768 5 жыл бұрын
Weast fellow !!! god bless you !!!
@mysteriesmadeknown2874
@mysteriesmadeknown2874 10 ай бұрын
Aramaic in Plain Engli 2 Chronicles 22:2 Ekhazyah was a son of twenty and two years when he arose in the kingdom, and he reigned one year in Jerusalem, and the name of his mother was Thalyah, daughter of Amri.
@Masumabegum334x
@Masumabegum334x 6 жыл бұрын
Jesus never said him self that he is god and to worship him plus in the bible he prayed and prostrated who is he praying to HIM SELF???
@abdelrahmanekitouni5272
@abdelrahmanekitouni5272 3 жыл бұрын
son older than his father 🤣
@AdamtheFreemason
@AdamtheFreemason 3 жыл бұрын
Two sons called the same, Naik got them MIXED up, like Muhammad and his Quran.
@abdelrahmanekitouni5272
@abdelrahmanekitouni5272 3 жыл бұрын
@@AdamtheFreemason just stop zakir naik exposed the bible
@AdamtheFreemason
@AdamtheFreemason 3 жыл бұрын
@@abdelrahmanekitouni5272 NO, Zakir Naik, has NOT done the research, the two "sons" come from different fathers, but are cousins, because of the mother. One is OLDER than the other, and BOTH have the same first name. Zakir Naik, has done what Muhammad did to Mary (Mother of Jesus), and Miriam (Sister of Moses), GET THEM MIXED UP, lol.
@abdelrahmanekitouni5272
@abdelrahmanekitouni5272 3 жыл бұрын
@@AdamtheFreemason ok fine you are not sure. I think you should watch dr zakir naik debate bible and the quran in the light of science he gives many proofs the bible is rong and the quran is the word of allah
@AdamtheFreemason
@AdamtheFreemason 3 жыл бұрын
@@abdelrahmanekitouni5272 If the Bible is WRONG, then WHY does the Quran CONFIRM the "previous scriptures" in verses: 2:41, 2:89, 2:91, 2:97, 2:101, 3:3, 3:50, 3:81, 4:47, 5:46, 5:48, 6:92, 10:37, 12:111, 35:31, 37:37, 46:12, 46:30, 61:6. Also, if the Quran is supposed to be from God (word of Allah), WHY does it BORROW numerous folklore tales from Jewish traditions, and BORROW from Christian Infancy Gospel Apocrypha's. WHY does it get Mary (mother of Jesus), mixed up with Miriam (sister of Moses), WHY does it have convenient revelations that ONLY serve Muhammad and NOT mankind. The debate "The Bible and the Quran in the light of science", was between author and scientist Dr William Campbell, (who is NOT a Christian Debater) and Zakir Naik, which proved that the Quran is WRONG on the development of fetuses in the womb.
@samuelmathew7387
@samuelmathew7387 6 жыл бұрын
Zakir Naik, If i show the contradictions and errors in the book quran. Do you quit Islam ? and throw away the book quran ? Yes ? or No ?
@MA-cr4gg
@MA-cr4gg 6 жыл бұрын
Samuel Mathew tell me any contradiction in the Quran
@samuelmathew7387
@samuelmathew7387 6 жыл бұрын
66:12 Maryam, daughter of Imran, whose body was chaste, Therefore We breathed therein some thing of our spirit. 1 . Do you know through with part of her body Allah breathed Allah's spirit ? (1) Ear ? (2) Nose ? (3) Mouth ? (4) Vagina (5) Anus ? Or through which part of her body Alloah breathed Allah's spirit ?. 2 . Muslims are say man cannot see Allah, But Maryam saw Allah. (1) Allah came near Maryam . (2) Alah removed her cloth . (3) Allah breathed Allah's spirit into (therein) her body . Who is great ? Muhammad ? or Maryam . REMEMBER, Allah himself cane down from Allah's heaven for breathing Allah's spirit into (therein) the body of Maryam . But the same Allah himself did not came to Muhammad for gave a single message . Do you quit Islam ? And throw away quran ?
@MA-cr4gg
@MA-cr4gg 6 жыл бұрын
Hahahaha u most be a joker .Which kind of English do u speak .I don't think u will understand d Quran anymore because u can't understand simple translation..we breathed our spirit into her is it the same as I came from heaven to earth to breathen my spirit into her.And that is not even a contradiction .Allah use to send an Angel to Allah's messengers .u have to read the bible properly. If that contradicts Islam then it contradicts Christianity also because Allah didn't came to Jesus ( pbuh)to preach d gospel but he rather communicate to him through angels
@samuelmathew7387
@samuelmathew7387 6 жыл бұрын
Ismaila Jadama, If you understand the book quran : Why do you not answer my question ? Read again quran 66:12 and answer the question . Through which part of Maryam's body(Therein) Allah breathed ? Ear ? Nose ? Mouth ? Vagina ? Anus ? or through which part of her boy (Therein) Allah breathed Allah's spirit ?
@MA-cr4gg
@MA-cr4gg 6 жыл бұрын
U can't understand d Quran as u don't even understand d bible u claimed to be a follower of ..many churches if not all in fact contradicts d teaching of Jesus today ..we always obey him but most of u don't obey his commands today.he says don't have pork u says no and most u eat it still it is mentioned in Deuteronomy 14:8 he also said that we shouldn't have alcohol and many Christians have alcohol because their church teaches it read book of proverbs 20:1 U pple and your churches disobeyed Jesus's commands in many verses even in Luke 2:21 He had said in John 16:12-14 he described the coming of someone as he uses masculine pronoun for 8 times in the verse which indicates that is a man and u say is the holy spirit, in fact the holy spirit is there before Jesus (pbub )so why will he says after me when the holy spirit is there before his birt. The worst of all is that he say he will not speak on his own he will speak only what he hears and he will tell you what is yet to come..now can u tell me since the departure of Jesus from this world is 2018 years now what did the holy spirit bring new to Christianity what did the holy spirit said about other religions what did he says about race problems in the today what did he told us about Jesus death or not what did he says about the future what did he says about Jesus whether he is God or not what did he says about himself whether he is also God or no which church in the world did holy spirit went to glorify Jesus which book had he written as Jesus say he will glorify him and guide you into all truth and is 2018 now still the holy spirit did not speaks to the church or u want to tell me that those verses are false ? the bible tells us that Jesus said that : O PEOPLE OF ISRAEL THE LORD OUR GOD IS THE ONE AND ONLY LORD. MARK 12:29 now if the church said that he claimed divinity then the church disagreed with him in this verse The problem with u pple is that u don't understand the bible that why u follow the churches more than Jesus and now u want to tell me that you understand the Quran Why do you follow the church instead of Jesus because u and your pastor don't read and understand the bible and now u want to tell me that there are contradictions in the Quran when u can't even understand simple bible verse which are been translated in modern English U better stop contracting what Jesus teaches the Israelite at his time and stop bringing your own ideas to the religion Today most of you Christians always disobeyed disobeyed what Jesus had teaches and you start to follow your own ideas and churches claiming it to be the religion of Jesus;he said he came not to break the laws of other prophets before him but to fullfill and now u Christians say that he had claimed divinity in that sense he had breaked the laws of the prophets because no prophet had ever claimed divinity therefore u disagreed with Jesus in that verse Why don't u stop disagreeing with what Jesus had said ...then u don't know all this in your language and now you are pretending that u understand that verse of the Quran and bringing your own ideas to it why can't you pple and understand rather than bringing your own ideas into issues u have no idea of . MAY GOD BLESS YOU AND MAY HE SAW YOU THE RIGHT PATH RATHER THAN DISAGREEING WITH WHAT JESUS HAD TEACHED HIS PPLE AT HIS TIME.
@thediuslobo1374
@thediuslobo1374 3 жыл бұрын
The message of Lord Jesus Christ Matthew 10:32 If anyone declares publicly that he belongs to me, I will do the same for him before my Father in heaven 33 But if anyone rejects me publicly, I will reject him before my Father in heaven.
@martinatem8957
@martinatem8957 3 жыл бұрын
I think only God has the power to reject or accept anybody in heaven.if jesus has that ability to accept or reject anybody in heaven then what you are saying is that,Jesus is God.
@8thdayadventist911
@8thdayadventist911 4 жыл бұрын
The differences in the verses about the battle mentioned in 2nd Samuel 24:9 is a difference of total soldiers being of 1.1 million or 1.3 million. Saying that this is somehow a huge contradiction is ridiculous. I understand calling something a contradiction over doctrinal issues in writings, but recalling the exact number of soldiers and calling that a contradiction is dumb. It actually makes the Old Testament even more authentic because instead of burning it's earlier sources like how the Quran did, the Old Testament scribes kept it to preserve it. It's better to have 2 sources than to have non.
@noorhassan4361
@noorhassan4361 2 жыл бұрын
How silly is that statement? You believe something as divine yet believe it can have contradictions
@8thdayadventist911
@8thdayadventist911 2 жыл бұрын
@@noorhassan4361 Did you watch David Wood's latest debate about "whether Muhammad's marriage to Aisha was immoral or not"? You should watch it. Look up Acts17Apologetics on KZfaq. It's an awesome debate.
@noorhassan4361
@noorhassan4361 2 жыл бұрын
@@8thdayadventist911 Yes that argument is a proper outdated washed up Christian argument. The actual age is disputed, Arabs and Jews had different method of counting ages and once a person went into there teen years then they began to count with the cardinal numbers ie 1,'2,3,4 etc. Thus why some said 9 = 19, as in the Bible you have stories of one part of it saying of a certain king ruling when he was 18 and another part saying 8. Others have mentioned how no one even raised the objection till the 19th century not even the beloved Prophet Muhammad allayhislam enemies did. Therefore how can you come along and put a 21st century understanding of what a women is on a 7th century understanding? It's a outdated argument to say the least
@unitedummah8292
@unitedummah8292 4 жыл бұрын
Christianity 1+1+1=1 Athiesm 0+0=1. :/
@Aris-lb9zv
@Aris-lb9zv 4 жыл бұрын
Christianity 1x1x1 = 1 Islam 1+1+1 =3 Clear?
@footballicons4424
@footballicons4424 4 жыл бұрын
Aris you have no idea what your on about what do you mean Islam 1+1+1=3 we use our intellect that allah has given Us and we don’t act blind and don’t run away when the truth is brought cause indeed then we would be hypocrites so use your intellect and don’t be a arrogant person and do not mock the truth because you will be punished when the appointed time comes so change don’t be arrogant hope you are guided and may allah give you hidayah
@AdamtheFreemason
@AdamtheFreemason 4 жыл бұрын
United Ummah Think of Christianity's "TRINITY" like this: 1 Head, 1 Body, 1 set of limbs (arms and legs) = 1 WHOLE The word TRINITY combines TWO words TRI- = Three, and UNITY = together.
@unitedummah8292
@unitedummah8292 4 жыл бұрын
@@AdamtheFreemason But father and son story came from where? And tri-nity is never mentioned in Bible!
@adnanalshaer99
@adnanalshaer99 4 жыл бұрын
@@Aris-lb9zv Okay..lets use this equation: 1x1x1= 1 God, so according to Christians the second person of the trinity died then equation will be 1x0x1= 0 God 😂😂🤔
@aig1111
@aig1111 5 жыл бұрын
Don’t believe in this con man. He is full of errors n uses his knowledge n his own interpretations to deceive the common people. He don’t even dare to debate other scholars
@facts8881
@facts8881 5 жыл бұрын
He has debated with other scholars and why not other scholars debate if they think he is wrong
@aig1111
@aig1111 5 жыл бұрын
Mariam saad before I said he is wrong, the Quran itself indicates it’s a man created book. The contents is totally ridiculous n copied from so many sources as compared with the bible. Stay away from Islam
@facts8881
@facts8881 5 жыл бұрын
@@aig1111 Have you even read the Qur'an. And even if you have then did you understand it properly. Again how can you say that its ridiculous without proof.
@facts8881
@facts8881 5 жыл бұрын
Secondly bible is also written by god. No argument on that. But its been changed so many times that the people ended up having mistakes found in it
@aali9312
@aali9312 5 жыл бұрын
He already debated multiple scholars of different religious
@imrulhasan5967
@imrulhasan5967 5 ай бұрын
Waiting for brother Sam's reply.
@cabdirisaaq6523
@cabdirisaaq6523 2 жыл бұрын
@apnaphotocopy2037
@apnaphotocopy2037 6 жыл бұрын
Zakir is a true liar....
@apnaphotocopy2037
@apnaphotocopy2037 6 жыл бұрын
Faizan Qadri u people originated from ismail(son of hajira).hehehe
@alv2724
@alv2724 5 жыл бұрын
He is refering that from your bible, so you just said that youe bible is a true liar
@juwiempire8933
@juwiempire8933 5 жыл бұрын
@@alv2724 we don't have an bible
@alv2724
@alv2724 5 жыл бұрын
@@juwiempire8933 lol u must be joking
@Kipkoech_Andrew
@Kipkoech_Andrew 23 күн бұрын
The 5 sons of michal were from her first marriage but soon after finally marrying her soulmate David she mocked him for dancing to God saying he humiliated himself then a curse falls on her and she never had children by David
@reubensamuel3795
@reubensamuel3795 11 ай бұрын
"Michal had no children to the day of her death, nor was she the wife of Adriel, but Merab her sister, (1 Samuel 18:19); wherefore these sons were not whom she "bare", as the word used signifies, but, as we rightly render it, whom she "brought up" or educated, so the Targum, her sister being dead; and SO THE JEWS SAY MERAB BROUGHT THEM FORTH, AND MICHAL BROUGHT THEM UP, THEREFORE THEY WERE CALLED BY HER NAME."
@AbdulmejidArebo
@AbdulmejidArebo 2 жыл бұрын
How can a son be two years older than his father
@tryharder1752
@tryharder1752 3 жыл бұрын
Hereee
@syedsyed551
@syedsyed551 Жыл бұрын
If there are mistakes in the bibles means.. the bibles in not the words of god.. because God is perfect will never make mistakes.
@keithbhebhe7240
@keithbhebhe7240 4 жыл бұрын
Bible says the son became ruler at 42 years old not he was two years older but it simple tells us when he began king only
@miriqbal9642
@miriqbal9642 4 жыл бұрын
You are right Keth. Infact Johram had another son , Amaziah, who ruled in the Interregum. Then came Azaziah, who was 42 years old that time.
@miriqbal9642
@miriqbal9642 4 жыл бұрын
@@mohamedmowgli : you are wrong
@keithbhebhe7240
@keithbhebhe7240 4 жыл бұрын
@@miriqbal9642 yeah its key to read everything for yourself some of these people are just out there to discredit other religions and people believe them without full details
@miriqbal9642
@miriqbal9642 4 жыл бұрын
@@keithbhebhe7240 : Absolutely...first hand reading is a must, if one really wants to know. ❤
@keithbhebhe7240
@keithbhebhe7240 4 жыл бұрын
@@miriqbal9642 I have learnt to pray and ask God to help me understand and God really helps those who are seeking the truth sincerely and I have been lucky to get answers
@similesmash3459
@similesmash3459 4 жыл бұрын
Poor Muslim who don't know how numbers are named in Elizabethan in comparison to modern English
@naz8445
@naz8445 2 жыл бұрын
"how can the son be older than father"😂
@MustafaAli-iv3yz
@MustafaAli-iv3yz 2 жыл бұрын
Christopher Nolan. Hold my interstellar
@thediuslobo1374
@thediuslobo1374 3 жыл бұрын
On the judgement day no one will be able to deceive Lord Jesus Christ Son of the Most High Living God for the Heavenly Father has given the authority to his beloved Son Lord Jesus to judge all mankind on Judgement day
@thestoryteller9327
@thestoryteller9327 5 ай бұрын
Without lies Christianity dies 😂😂😂
If everyone’s God is the same, then why many Religions? by Dr Zakir Naik
13:21
WAS THE QUR'AN COPIED FROM THE BIBLE? - DR ZAKIR NAIK
7:04
Dr Zakir Naik
Рет қаралды 140 М.
THEY WANTED TO TAKE ALL HIS GOODIES 🍫🥤🍟😂
00:17
OKUNJATA
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Универ. 13 лет спустя - ВСЕ СЕРИИ ПОДРЯД
9:07:11
Комедии 2023
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
How to win a argument
9:28
ajaxkmr
Рет қаралды 208 М.
Who is Deceived by the Satan, Christians or Muslims? Dr Zakir Answers
23:45
Prohibition of eating Pork in the Bible - Dr Zakir Naik
13:59
Dr Zakir Naik
Рет қаралды 1,8 МЛН
An Atheist Debates with Dr Zakir
24:48
Dr Zakir Naik
Рет қаралды 1,5 МЛН