Euler's real identity NOT e to the i pi = -1

  Рет қаралды 976,055

Mathologer

Mathologer

Күн бұрын

NEW (Christmas 2019). Two ways to support Mathologer
Mathologer Patreon: / mathologer
Mathologer PayPal: paypal.me/mathologer
(see the Patreon page for details)
I've got some good news and some bad news for you. The bad news is that Euler's identity e to the i pi = -1 is not really Euler's identity. The good news is that Euler really did discover zillions of fantastic identities. This video is about the one that made him famous pretty much overnight: pi squared over 6 = the infinite sum of the reciprocals of the square natural numbers. This video is about Euler's ingenious original argument which apart from this superfamous identity allowed him to evaluate the precise values of the zeta function at all even numbers (amongst many other things :)
I am a huge fan of Euler’s and had been wanting to to make this video for a long time. Pretty nice how it did come together I think. One of the things I like best about making these videos is how much I end up learning myself. In this particular instance the highlights were actually calculating those other sums I mention myself using Euler’s idea (the Riemann Zeta function evaluated at even numbers) as well as learning about this alternate way to derive the Leibniz formula using the zeros of 1-sin(x). Oh, and one more thing. Euler’s idea of writing sin(x) in terms of its zeros may seem a bit crazy, but there is actually a theorem that tells us exactly what is possible in this respect. It’s called the Weierstrass factorization theorem.
Good references are the following works by Euler: www.17centurymaths.com/content...
eulerarchive.maa.org//docs/tra...
The t-shirt I am wearing in this video is from here: shirt.woot.com/offers/pi-rate...
Thank you very much for Marty Ross and Danil Dmitriev for their feedback on an earlier draft of this video and Michael Franklin for his help with recording this video..
Enjoy!
Typo around 16:30: In the product formula for 1-sin x every second factor should feature a (1+...) instead of a (1-...). So the whole thing starts like this: (1 - 2 x/Pi)^2 (1 + 2 x/(3 Pi))^2 (1 - 2 x/(5 Pi))^2 (1 + 2 x/(9 Pi))^2... :)

Пікірлер: 1 100
Euler’s Pi Prime Product  and Riemann’s Zeta Function
15:23
Mathologer
Рет қаралды 377 М.
Euler's infinite pi formula generator
28:57
Mathologer
Рет қаралды 211 М.
MEGA BOXES ARE BACK!!!
08:53
Brawl Stars
Рет қаралды 36 МЛН
He sees meat everywhere 😄🥩
00:11
AngLova
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН
КАРМАНЧИК 2 СЕЗОН 7 СЕРИЯ ФИНАЛ
21:37
Inter Production
Рет қаралды 532 М.
WHO LAUGHS LAST LAUGHS BEST 😎 #comedy
00:18
HaHaWhat
Рет қаралды 18 МЛН
Euler's formula with introductory group theory
24:28
3Blue1Brown
Рет қаралды 2,4 МЛН
Ramanujan: Making sense of 1+2+3+... = -1/12 and Co.
34:31
Mathologer
Рет қаралды 3,3 МЛН
e to the pi i for dummies
15:51
Mathologer
Рет қаралды 3,2 МЛН
Euler's Formula - Numberphile
21:23
Numberphile
Рет қаралды 342 М.
Why e is e (Calculating Euler’s Number)
4:48
Richard Behiel
Рет қаралды 27 М.
What does i^i = ?
7:34
Stand-up Maths
Рет қаралды 1,6 МЛН
The Most Beautiful Equation
13:39
Digital Genius
Рет қаралды 533 М.
The Key to the Riemann Hypothesis - Numberphile
12:38
Numberphile
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
MEGA BOXES ARE BACK!!!
08:53
Brawl Stars
Рет қаралды 36 МЛН