Get Your Sheets: www.mymiraclesheets.com

Notice how "Ethan" (biological female) was able to remember exactly how long they had been together and how many years they've been married. And Addison, (biological man) didn't remember

The problem I have with the gender trans issue is the assault on vocabulary. Also, the obsession with exposing the ideology to children.

The fact that they said they felt attacked and blamed Dr. Phil was hilarious. It was 3 people against Matt Walsh. They had the advantage. They always feel attacked just having a conversation, literally just talking causes trauma. My only issue with Matt is he gave them a victory when he said a female is a person who can have kids, cause they will always bring up women who can't have kids due to a condition or medical issue. He should have said a human who has two X chromosomes.

Props for standing up for fair use. Too many content creators let themselves be bullied.

“… you wanna turn it into a costume that can be worn…” That was the most beautifully devastating line in the whole segment, in my opinion.

You have to say that Matt Walsh went on Dr. Phil to debate a confused heterosexual couple.

Imagine if a trans activist was the only eye witness to who committed a crime. Detective: did you see a man or woman? Trans activist: I don't know...maybe. Not for me to say.

It's crazy that they're all about rights while stepping all over everyone who disagrees with them rights.

I'm convinced if you go far left enough, not only do you want to obliterate the idea of categories, but you can't even comprehend what a category is.

I like how it's been 2 weeks and all we have heard as a response to Walsh is "Hes hateful and needs to censored" instead of an actual argument. Really does show their confidence in this ridiculous idea.

The thing is, if they do define what a woman is, they would be defining what a woman ISN´T. And yes, that totally obliterates their agenda.

Serious philosophical question, how could somebody be non-binary and a transgender at the same time?

Matt Walsh debates through the Socrates Method, he asked the question that they knew they couldn’t answer because it lacks logic

If a woman with a beard isn't attention seeking, I dont know what is

These people always say they want to have a "conversation" but what they really want is for you to shut up and appease their nonsense

Matt Walsh is here to say the "Emperor has no clothes."

What people dont want to admit is that these people are off balance and their enablers want sane people to go along with this delusional behavior..

I love how nobody has the authority to define what a woman is, unless they are men dunking on Harry Potter's author.

"But what if the woman can't reproduce?" Just because you are suffering from some disease or genetic defect doesn't mean you are a totally different thing. A human walks on two legs. If you lose a leg, you don't stop being a human.

You cannot have classifications without criteria, there cannot be catagories like man and woman if there are no criteria to be in those catagories.

They’re having nightmares because they found out their life is a lie..

Okay. "A woman is up to each individual who identifies as a woman to define" This person is conflating the biological description of a woman with the largely undefined description of how does a woman behave. Each woman is free to decide how she will live and what her likes and dislikes will be, which is true, but that also has nothing to do with the actual definition of what a woman is. To put it simply: A may do B, C or D, but A is not B, C, or D. A woman can fly in a plane, but a woman cannot be a plane. Horses can have the strength of an elephant. Horses are not elephants. There is no room in the definition of horse or elephant for either of them to be interchangeable.

How do you get nightmares over someone asking you questions? Have they never had a valid discussion about the matter in their entire lives?

While I'm not a fan of Matt Walsh for the most part, he did well here, and Sean is absolutely correct here about Walsh's method. Everything has a definition, and that definition is based on its characteristics, and what makes it unique from other things or creatures. If anyone can make up a definition based on what they "believe", rather than factual information, then we have no common ground, no mutual understanding off of which to act. If that common understanding can't be established, then nothing will ever be accomplished by interaction. That's the simple reality of life.

You know, at a glance, I almost couldn't tell if either of them were trans. ALMOST. There's just a tiny, hairline detail about one of them that tipped me off, but I can't quit put my finger on it. It's a real chin scratcher.

I'm not religious at all and still watch Matt almost everyday. He's hilarious.

"I know that almost everyone at the daily wire is a big Christian guy" Ben "the little Jewish guy" Shapiro: am I a joke to you?

"I DEMAND YOU RESPECT MY INSANITY. HEAR ME ROAR"

I saw a trans person who said to the Walsh’s question “woman is someone who identifies with female sex that’s all there is” all smug like that didn’t literally prove the point.

Has any one brought up the fact that them saying they had nightmares just over a conversation just proves the lack of their mental stability?

All Matt Walsh did was say the truth. I guess truth is a bitter pill.

The reason these two are having nighmares, is because deep down they KNOW that living this infinite gender thing is lie. If not, they wouldn’t feel the compulsion to convince others,

"Who cares about this nonesense they're associated with?" people with children, Sean. Or really anyone who is against grooming.

I personally think Dr Phil tried to help them when he asked Matt "Do you think they're delusional?" I think he expected Matt to back away from that hill, as it kind of implies they're crazy lol but Matt dgaf.. he was on fire! 🤣

Addison - it's not my place to define a woman because I do not identify as a woman. Me - I don't identify as a pineapple but I can still define one.

I honestly didn't expect you to cover this topic. Man has it been a good laugh! Good stuff, my man.

The Matt Walsh Blog was what originally made me start really looking at the culture and at feminism critically. I loved his blog and I love him on the Daily Wire. Matt Walsh is so great because he just does not give a F. Side note: The beard looks better on Walsh 🤣

I absolutely love those moments, when one simple and short question from one side makes the other side either refuse to respond or respond in ridiculous and self-embarrassing way. Also, that was my first time seeing Dr.Phil show, but I really like that idea of showing definitions.

i watch matt almost everyday since he had like 10,000 subs... the dude has dry humor that connot be matched.

trans people: i am a woman matt walsh: what is a woman? also trans people: well its not really something like, you can like, define like, its like a conceptual augmented fragmentation of reality in which parallel dimensions diverge upon superseding bicontinental planes of existence, and scientific sounding stuff, so therefore....i identify as a woman

One thing about their reaction that strikes me as funny every single time: They claim they were unprepared for the conversation. Guys (gals... whatever), you live the life. You surround yourself with other like-minded people. You are so into it, you're going on national TV to talk about it and display it. How in the ever-loving hell could you feel unprepared to talk about transgenderism? Look, I get that you aren't an expert in all things connected to the issue (Lord help me if I ever get bold enough to sit with other accountants on national TV because I'd be terrified of looking like a know-nothing man-child despite the fact that I'm pretty sure I'm decent enough in my profession), but you have to be prepared to answer stuff like "what is a woman?" when you say "I am a woman". Fine, everyone defines it differently. I'm not asking everyone. I'm asking you. What. Is. A. Woman. When. You. Claim. It? Unprepared? No. Unchallenged in their circles until that day. To claim that they are persecuted (aka challenged) routinely in life and then also claim that they weren't ready for one dude with questions... I just ... I can't understand it.

The literal and actual correctness of what Matt says is what is so compelling. He refuses to get drawn into the rabbit hole with them. He also doesn't intentionally degrade them or insult them. He just speaks plain truth, which doesn't support any of their arguments.

Give me a break they weren't traumatized or whatever. They were attempting to get those ever precious extremely valuable victim points before promoting and humble brah their appearance. Jesus everyone else runs off 87 octane and Matt Walsh runs off if rocket fuel.

Always love when they do the "some women can't have babies" argument. As if that means a man with xy chromosomes is just as much of woman. What planet is this?

They seem to just want to live in a fairy tale where the world just shifts to their whims. Woe is me, victim mentality bullshit.

What do you mean “who cares about this nonsense?” This is affecting every single one of us and all of our kids. We can’t just let these people do what they want. We need to stand up for reality

I don’t agree with some of Matt Walsh’s views but damn, he is so on point here!! Keep it up, Matt!!!!

He didn't say anything spectacularly clever. Just stated the obvious.

Matt was set up for a defeat and he still came out on top, it was a 1v2 "debate", and there was obvious editing in the video to benefit the activists, they even got a long introduction to humanize them to the audience. The only thing working in Matt's favor is he had facts and logic on his side and he was going up against people living in a fantasy.

There was a time in history when that would be a bearded lady in a freak show. Looking at these daytime talk shows nothing much has changed.

"Matt Walsh Destroys a Man" There, fixed the title for you

All I hear from those two clowns are ‘since our argument was crumbling in front of us, and despite having the entire audience on our side and having it 2 v 1’…give us attention, reaffirmation, additional spots on TV and of course…money’.

According to the activists, you can't define "woman" unless you claim to be one, and then any definition you give for "woman" is valid. So if I say I'm a woman and then define "woman" as a VW bug, how many MPG do I get?

The notion that "gender is a social construct" has a complicated history, but not a very long one. It goes back to France in the late '40s and early '50s, when Simone de Beauvoir popularized the first horribly wrong turn with the line: "One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman." This is in keeping with the fashionable intellectual trend of the day known as "existentialism," based on the work of the man she was in a long-term open relationship with, Jean Paul Sartre. After this first horribly wrong turn, a number of emergent ideological trends split off into a variety of conflicting doctrines, each of which then traveled 10 million miles in the wrong direction down their respective blind allies of social constructivist theories. To skip over the particulars of this complex history, we now have four distinct ideological positions, each of which turn upon their respective definitions of the term "gender." These positions are: the traditional position of biological essentialism, second wave feminism (or 'the TERF position'), trans ideology (which affirms the so-called binary), and Queer Theory (which rejects the binary). Matt Walsh holds to biological essentialism, while the two trans guests hold to Queer Theory. Queer theorists are postmodernists who hold that all definitions, all fixed senses or meanings whatsoever, are oppressive restrictions upon individual freedom. "Gender" is whatever you want it to be. They realize that this makes no sense and they're pleased by this. To make sense is to uphold the structures of the system of cis-heteronormativity. But, as this encounter on Dr. Phil shows, they get stressed out by those who affirm the intelligibility of the real world. This is why they attempt to undermine Walsh's argument by suggesting that his own use of the word "woman" is just as meaningless as theirs. I hold the same position as Matt Walsh, but I think he could make a stronger case if he sharpens his use of language. The gender terms "male" and "female" are adjectives which classify beings by their generic sexual identity. These adjectives are especially useful when we define and classify sexually reproductive animals by their specific sexual identities. For example, the animal we identify by the noun 'doe' is defined as an 'adult _female_ deer.' A natural language like English is flexible enough for us to successfully communicate when we use words like "gender" and "sex" interchangeably, or when we use a word that's traditionally employed as an adjective ("male") as a noun ("straight white male" instead of "straight white man"). I never play the role of grammar nazi, nor can I stand those who do, but I do make a point of speaking with this degree of formal precision on this issue. When the bearded trans activist turned his own question against him, Walsh defined a woman as "an adult _human_ female." When he/she/they/etc. then asks Walsh to define "female," he gets a little tripped up and uses the word "female" again in his definition. Just as it sounds off to define a doe as 'an adult deer female' rather than 'an adult female deer,' so too a woman is 'an adult female human.' Women and does are female mammals, that is, those mammals classified by their possession of the set of reproductive organs required to give birth. And because animals are finite natural beings and not geometrical shapes, they exhibit a wide variety of discernible characteristics, which may include birth defects, severe injuries, or other abnormalities which prevent their reproductive organs from developing or functioning properly. So a "woman" is an "adult female human," regardless of whether or not her reproductive system develops the capacities to conceive and birth a child. That covers what the trans activist says in this encounter. I agree that Walsh handled them with ease, but I think it could be even easier. This KZfaq comment is already long enough for most people to say "oh fuck this" after clicking on 'Read more,' so I'll leave it at this.

Every leftist post I’ve seen cover this ignores Matt’s main argument about womanhood and instead focuses on his weaker arguments and proclaims he is making a straw man without explaining what the straw man is. Then they whine about how “humAn RigHts arenT up foR DebatE” and censor you for questioning them. Glorious job mr Walsh.

Sean I seriously have to ask where the hell do you find these sponsors? Like I wasn’t expecting todays sponsor at all

It’s kind of like Matt Walsh activated his sharingan right before the show started and now those two activists are still in the tsukuyomi (Nightmare realm). Loved the Naruto reference.

“Please send us good vibes.” Sounds a lot like “Please pray for us.” Funny how many atheistic ideologies continue religious traditions by a different name.

Matt Walsh is fucking awesome

I love that adjective/pronoun statement XD I wanna use that as my default response: "I identify as a man, and my pronouns are Handsome & Brilliant!"

The killshot was when Matt said we can dig up your bones 100 year's and tell if you are male and female destroy anything the can possibly say.

"Minor confrontation has set us into anxiety fueled nightmares, that's how you know we are the sane and rational party of this debate"

Please Addison, show me the exact moment that Matt was "being hateful"?

Idk why people hate Matt because he's a conservative Christian who actually espouses what he believes. 80% of the time he is saying normal things that are basic common sense. The other 20% is sarcastic entertainment and he is the King of Sarcasm

Bro you’re putting out so many videos I’m having trouble keeping up… and that’s a good thing! Keep grinding bro. Notifications that a new AJW video has come out is one of my new fav things! Keep it up 👍🏻.

Sean is absolutely ON FIRE! I have never seen this upload speed for this channel. Gotta love it!

Addison had that male aggressive energy going on. And Ethan was submissive to alpha Matt Walsh. I see them…

Pronouns are usually used when the person being referred to by the pronoun isn’t present. So, it’s forcing yourself into a conversation you’re not a participate in and defining how that conversation will proceed. That’s just bullying and totalitarian.

Just discovered your channel and I’m in love. very clean and professional videos.

This is your best ad! You made me want those sheets. I like playing with my sheets and you made me giggle, so it's worth it :)

3:55 Sargon has brought this point up several times in the last couple years at least. Walsh just took the paradox to the tv.

"womanhood looks different for everybody" Congrats, you just legitimized Zuby as the record holder of woman's deadlift.

These people remind me of the villain “two face” from Batman. They want to be 2 beings at once.

Dude, I like your show. Everyone judges, all the time, about everything. What you mean is - you won’t say your judgements. It’s evolutionary to judge situations, people and their choices - it’s human nature. That doesn’t mean you have to hurt their feelings. I don’t care about trans peoples decisions until their decisions affect me and children. They need to leave the kids alone.

The bearded lady was laughing at Matt like he was the crazy one.

Here's the thing, I have my beliefs they have theirs and that's cool. The problem is when they demand my beliefs should align with theirs. That's not cool no matter what the topic.

It's such a cop out to just answer "I can't explain that because it's not my place to define what a woman is." I can't define what a car is, because I'm not a car. Utterly useless.

The dumb thing about this -- and there were a *lot* of dumb things with this -- is that after that segment, the show then brought out a "gender expert". Except, how can someone be an expert in what doesn't exist? And isn't defined? If there are "no genders" and "genders are whatever someone says they are", then how can someone be an expert in that? Where do you even get a certificate for that kind of expertise, from a Cracker-Jack box??

That must suck to be so fragile that if someone uses facts to support why they disagree with you it gives you nightmare's

A conversation completely destroyed their mental stability. Says a lot about their mental health...

I love you!!!! Showing the clips and willing to fight dr phil! Doooo it for usss!! We neeed more of thisss!!

I love Matt Walsh. I literally bought daily wire for his show and SBG. Then fell in love with their other shows. They get me through my work week.

When I was a kid, even thought the term did not then exist, you could see a trans woman at the annual fair or carnival. They were called bearded ladies.

"The *normal* trans" Obviously I cannot respond to this because of YT's advocacy of free-speech and discourse... All I will say is that I disagree with this statement.

I usually don't care for your ad transmission in the beginning but this one was good

"if you want a personal pronoun, that's your name", that's great, I'm stealing that.

Its difficult to see the logic in saying “trans-something that cant be defined ARE something that cant be defined” thats a real brain teaser 😵‍💫

What is a sheep? Define it

Keep up the good work brother man! Wish you got to this sooner!

They’re having nightmares? Sounds to me like their whole fantasy world is coming crumbling to the ground!

As a Christian we must stand in truth. This is why I appreciate Matt❤️

Matt's a genius with an awesome deadpan delivery! LOVE HIM!

I have to say that is officially your best transition to a commercial well done good sir if you could only do that everyday you could make it until television marketing

Imagine how hard life must be when you can describe what you want to eat because nothing has a definition.

I love how they are like "it's about breaking the assumption that we can tell someone's idenitity/story/pronouns just based on how they look", yet everyone can *clearly* tell that these two are the types to demand being called "they/them", we can tell their political belief, and how sensitive they are *just* by their appearance alone.

I rolled my eyes at "depression spirals" 😁

Subbed when you said “or myuh or myuh” just like Cartman lol

I like Matt's basic point that we cannot have any real conversation about Mario unless we at least start from the base point that we are both talking about an Italian plumber in a Nintendo video game franchise.

“In a save space” Save spaces are not a real thing, especially when you are talking to someone you disagree with as they will actually challenge your ideas, unlike your echo chambers.