What's with your violent hatred of us Boomers? Could it be your Boomer grandfather molested you, Matt? OK, whiny millennial. Have a nice life. Ok, whiny millennial.

Your a racist piece of garbage.. You will burn in hell 1 day buddy.. Good luck with that.. You should go back to school lol

@@bwp714 What do you mean "racist"? I didn't see anything racist on this thread.

Abortion is about equality between men and women. A man and a woman engage in the same act however only the woman has to spend the next 9 months having her body ripped apart. Where is the equality in that? The only way I will become anti choice is if we pass a law that says if a man impregnates a woman he has to spend the next 9 months in a jail cell preferably with a rapist. Because in order to maintain equality a man has to have his body ripped apart like a woman after having sex. Abortion is about giving woman a choice to not go through 9 months of suffering just like a man does not have to go through it. Abortion is horrible yes, but in our male dominated, "boys will be boys" world that we live in, it is a necessary evil.

I would like to mention something related to the last part discussed in this video. The thing about personhood. I feel that the argument that a baby is not an independent person should be considered valid and sufficient for settling the pro-abortion cause. I accept that a foetus is a living thing. Rather i accept it as a member of the human species and being alive. Now to support my argument for abortion, i feel that a foetus in no way or form contributes to the society, and humans living in that society. Rather it acts like a parasite just feeding off of the society(through the uterus in which it is living, as his mother is consuming the resources from the society.). One might say that some old people or people with disabilities might also require assistance, but these people are actually worthy of assistance as they have already interacted with the society or have contributed to it in some sort of way, and even if they are not contributing at that particular moment, they have gathered resources like money or friends, and they use such resources to defend themselves or to tackle their problems. In the case of a foetus, the mother is forced to supply resources to it (without getting anything in exchange), whereas in the case of aged and disabled people nobody has an obligation to take care of them. Let's say if they don't have enough money, the maid might stop working for them, or if they don't have any friends they might have to do all of their work on their own. If they don't have money to pay for the hospital bills, the hospital has a right to stop caring for them. Essentially, if someone is being cared for there is some sort of exchange of resources in this case. Even a newborn baby creates some sort of exchange in the real world that a foetus in the womb cannot. So caring for a newborn baby, at least has some sort of logic, but asking someone to care for a foetus against their will sounds absurd, as the person caring for it literally has nothing to gain.(I am not talking about the people who willingly want to have the baby and definitely see the current womb investment of nine months to be paid off in the form of love, affection, and even monetary support few years down the line.)

yet they want to ban guns. 1.4 million gun deaths since 1968 versus 60 million abortions since 1973

54 million a year globally. New York Times says estimates of war dead in human history combined range from 150 million to 1 billion dead. That’s 2.5 - 18 years of abortion.

Moloch has been taking child sacrifices, unabated for 2000 years. The people who rule us are very religious. Wether you believe or not, they do. And trust me, Jesus is a much better role model, than the side they chose. Ever seen star wars? Of course you have. Ever wonder why so many people followed the old crusty emperor? Well, just ask a Hillary supporter.

Philip Accaria 1.5 billion globally since 1980

It makes Mao and Stalin in the previous century lesser evil.

The difference is a woman wanting the child VS not wanting it. And as long as the child depends on that womans uterus directly, her wants matter.

@@Lexightonportia Are you saying the wants of the child dont? Cause I can assure you, it is a fact that it wants to stay alive.

Elijah Butterfield How do you know it wants to stay alive? Technically before around 20 weeks in utero the fetus doesn’t have the brain capacity to care. It’s central nervous system is not developed thus it cannot feel any sort of way about anything. Regardless, we are all at the mercy of whomever we depend upon.

@@Lexightonportia it moves away from the instrument when its stuck in. It tries to escape. Idk bout you, but to me that says that it wants to live.

Elijah Butterfield Please show me video proof that a fetus before 20 weeks “tries to escape” from a suction. I would love to see that. What I think you mean to say it is responds to outside stimuli, much like a plant or bacteria. Just because something physically responds to stimuli, doesn’t mean it is acting on intentional merit. It only means that it is alive.

Killing a murderer is murder as well

Ken Lukasik Killing animals for meat is murder as well.

@@anitabonghit7606 nope

@@anitabonghit7606 It depends on the situation. If a person is in action attempting to kill another person , that first person is no longer innocent therefore killing as an act of self defense is no murder.

So then every single president post world war 2 should be executed then? I mean Trump's first action in office was authorizing a drone strike that killed an innocent and defenseless 9 year old girl. So Trump is a murderer eh?

fetus is child in Latin

Have you ever been someone whose body parts were taken over by the government?….. Like a woman’s uterus is?…..

@@BrandonNathan-hz4fc How do you say “mind your own uterus” in Latin?

​@hexl702too5 how do u say "murderer" In Hebrew?

@@user-tz9sn2er2h Who knows….. Abortion isnt murder, or there would be around 45,000,000 women in prison….. Instead, they’re walking around free as a bird….

Honestly for me the most incredible thing is how these same people will fight for protections for Bald Eagles eggs, or sea turtle eggs and the habitat that they need to lay those eggs, but the human growing within a mothers womb isn't worth protecting.

well it is about women's bodies when the fetus' right to life comes at the cost of their right to bodily autonomy

@@SuperSupermanX1999 The issue is that they chose to have unprotected sex where the consequence is the possibility of getting pregnant with a baby. When you chose to do that, you have created another life. You don't then get to kill that life out of convienience.

Exactly.. as a woman.. it's my "choice" to kill my unborn and return to normal activities/live life as normal. But shame on me if I choose to not vaccinate my children or if I decide I don't want to pay rent but I'd like to stay in the house for 2 more months. After all my body my choice or woman rights. Nope. It only applies to murdering my unborn. It's disgusting.

SuperSupermanX1999 What about the baby’s bodily autonomy?

And it was so funny that no one laughed. I bet he was so excited to say it too. Sorry to comment 2 years later haha

@@Jestops i laughed out loud lol

So Matt Walsh….. None of that “ALL lives matter” bullshit for YOU, eh?…. 😆 No wonder the forced-birthers failed in the court of public opinion…. they couldn’t sell their own message because they don’t believe it themselves!….

@Brendan Anthony 🤡🌈🤡🌈🤡🌈

@@henrydiaz720 well brendan's not wrong

I was also pro-choice. Perspective really is everything. To me it was easy to emphasize with the women who were poor or young, or whatever stereotype I had for women who got abortions. My friend shattered this for me. She was a mid 20's comfortably employed, educated woman, she wanted children, she had stability and means, she just didn't have a boyfriend because she got pregnant from a one night stand. She killed her baby for her dating prospects because she figured being a single mom wouldn't be good for landing a husband. It felt so selfish to me, I just started questioning everything. I finally was able to see the other side.

Hopefully she still have her job and house cause the second any self respecting man finds out she killed her baby because she thought that it wouldn't help her get a husband they will call her out on BS and if she refuses to accept that she did something wrong leave her

Sushi, do you recall the particular point or points in Stephen Crowder's pro-life reasoning that changed your mind?

Congratulations

same thing for me fam

I believe a little over halfway through the pregnancy the fetus has a higher than 50% chance of survival if removed from the womb... but I could be wrong its been so long since Ive debated abortion

I agree with you.. But tell a mother with a painful difficult pregnancy that 9 months is immaterial… Maybe philosophically, but definitely not medically..

might wanna have a glance of world wide abortion rates and realise its actually the east that aborts. you are probably also rooting for russia at this point.

@@robertalust5466 Pregnancies don't happen at random, you know? There are things that lead to it, and a mature person would know it.

@@bonbonpony lol of course…I know that But you don’t know if your pregnancy is going to be complicated or if there’s going to be a lot of health stuff to deal..and women can’t just not have sex in their marriage because of that risk..would the marriage last ? I’m pro life….so abortion is not the fix for this stuff… But the problem is doctors don’t always listen to women’s health concerns especially during pregnancy… My issue is you can’t just be like “meh it’s nothing” women need support..and that’s often the attitude I hear..

Fish The theme‘s more complex than that

No. No it’s not.

Good vs. evil. That's as simple as it gets.

Lol

Would you call it good or evil if a teenage female was forced to have a child after her uncle raped her?

Lol, the subject matter experts can't answer the question "what is a woman?"

@@makroskonstopolis you are foolish if you dont think the experts know what a woman is, everyone does, except the very few psychotic individuals. they just dont want to offend anyone. if you seriously think the majority of the left dont know what a woman is you are stupid yourself

Well, Matt just got schooled by the voters in Ohio, I guess, lol

The "subject matter experts" don't really know what they're talking about either 😂

@@MarvelGamer2023 I mean, if you don’t think people like Trent Horn know what they’re talking about that’s your prerogative.

Trevor Sampson I’m glad it had an impact on you, but I would make one correction. The fetus is already a person. Otherwise you have to answer the question of exactly when the fetus becomes a person and why. Inevitably, as Walsh says in this video, you would have to come to the conclusion that some people outside the womb aren’t actually people either.

"Homo est et qui est futurus" - irenaeus. Roughly translates to 'who is to be a human being, is a human being!' The quote continues, [for the whole fruit is already present in the seed]. It is an interesting argument that has been used for almost 2 millennia.

Abortion is about equality between men and women. A man and a woman engage in the same act however only the woman has to spend the next 9 months having her body ripped apart. Where is the equality in that? The only way I will become anti choice is if we pass a law that says if a man impregnates a woman he has to spend the next 9 months in a jail cell preferably with a rapist. Because in order to maintain equality a man has to have his body ripped apart like a woman after having sex. Abortion is about giving woman a choice to not go through 9 months of suffering just like a man does not have to go through it. Abortion is horrible yes, but in our male dominated, "boys will be boys" world that we live in, it is a necessary evil.

Boaz V This is, by far, the single most retarded thing I have ever seen in my life. Literally what the fuck.

@@strangelyukrainian7314 Wow you must be some sort of ignorant uneducated backwater cousin humping hillbilly to say such stupid stuff. Are you honestly that blind to what a woman goes through during pregnancy and after childbirth? Incontinence, vaginal tearing, stretch marks, c-section scars, hemorrhoids swollenfeet, sagging breasts, damage nipples, morning sickness, back pain, leg cramps, varicose veins, possible death, not to mention the excruciating pain of childbirth itself. That is what I mean by "ripped apart". When is the last time a man had to go through the same agony because he made the same choices a woman? I am not going to try and make sense of your inane rambling but I will say this, in a world where 55% of the population are woman and yet 80% of absentee fathers are men how is that equal? If we truly want men To be as responsible as women when it comes to their obligations that we need to threaten them with bodily harm not just give him some worthless fine or some meaningless jail time which has little impact. Do you understand that when a man points his pene'us at a women it is the equivalent of him pointing a gun at her when you consider all the bodily damage and possible death that will happen to her because of his choice? How come he is not risking the same damage? Where is the equality in that? So unless you are willing to mutilate a man for making the same choices of woman then you have no right to take away her right to choose to not be mutilated herself.

Except I just found out he thinks Trump supporters are morons ? Daily Wire has a problem they need to address, not delete old tweets

ANDREW STOUT, we may agree or disagree with an individual’s positions or arguments but it still may not invalidate the whole, of you catch my meaning

Corey R ??? Lmao

@@andrewstout5400 Remember the days where presidents of the United States were true statesmen and not absolute clowns? (This also applies to the current one, not just DT) If someone supports a person with an IQ of a potato, that one couldn't be much brighter too, don't you think?

He talks rubbish like he means it but he is fundamentally wrong on all levels

They are. It is called anti communist action.

Sure, clearly "anti communism" has solved hunger.

@@vichomangiola Better than communism ever did!

@@sananton2821 Great, but there are still hungry, unloved and vulnerable children out there, with all of you anticomunists around. Anti communism hasn´t solved sh1t.

@@sananton2821 I'm not convinced you know much about anything

Sperm's life expectancy is 3-5 days. Wherever it is

Sperms are not humans

@@masterbateman2686 neither is the zygote, because it's just a tiny blob with no organs yet.

Neither is the pre big bang universe. Because it is just a tiny blob with no significant galaxys yet.

The pro-life is flawed right from the start when they state that life begins at fertilization. Women's eggs become fertilized after the ejaculate reaches it. But not every fertilized eggs becomes a baby. Because under that logic, any woman who is sexually active and menstruating regularly is a serial killer

Dr. Minty it’s that simple, thank you

THANK YOU

kunntakentay I think the top guy is long gone so will just ask you. If the mother is unable to take care of her offspring or has a pregnancy that is threatening her life is it permissible to have an abortion. I only ask because the dr. Minty is making it sound like, if you get raped are about to die whatever the contexts fuck you you’re have that baby no matter what. This seems a little extreme but what do you think.

DOMINICUS ROMULUS if the mom can’t raise the child, there’s adoption. Abortion is NEVER morally preferable to adoption. Also, this idea of the unborn fetus threatening the life of the mother; with the medicine and hospital facilities we have today; this issue is now virtually non-existent. It just doesn’t happen. But in the 0.000001% chance it ever did, then yes, abortion could be permissible. Of course, the focus remains on saving lives (pro-life) because the intent of it is to save the mother’s life. The intent is not to get rid of an unwanted baby.

@@Randomguy2341 A) If the mother cannot care for the child, the mother *should not be having a child.* I know the argument for "but muh contraception isnt 100% safe" is a common one, the simple solution is funnily enough..simple. Don't get your fuck on if you aren't willing to accept the 0.001% chance that you may become a parent. B) If the mothers life is greatly at risk, and it is a choice between the unborn child and the mother, then I can understand the argument for choosing to save the mother. My point isn't that, if you're a rape victim then you're on your own. I understand that there are severe cases. But people need to understand that these severe cases are, not exactly a majority. Just off the top of my head, 1% of women get an abortion due to rape, and in the case of incest it's less than 0.5% (I may be incorrect). In these dire situations, while I dont condone abortion and feel adoption may be better, I'm not going to hold these women accountable because let's face it... that must be terrifying to go through.

You are assuming those two scenarios are the equivalent though. They aren't. Abortion is the intentional killing of a living and healthy fetus, whereas refusal to donate an organ is leaving someone in their original state, which so happens to be dying. Not to mention biological differences. The uterus is an organ designed for housing another being. Your kidney is not. Your kidney is designed for you to use (though you could be charitable and choose to give it someone). If you are interested you may want to look into Trent Horn's abortion conversations on yt.

@@hgrueber38 they are equivalent in the sense of bodily autonomy. A man and woman make the same choices, but only a woman has to put her body through a 9 month's medical and life-threatening ordeal that includes massive weight gain swollen hands and feet, hemorrhoids, gas bloating fatigue constipation limited movement, and let's not forget the hours of pain associated with labor and risk of death, not to mention postpart pregnancy symptoms such as vaginal tearing or possible prolapse, incontinencs, postpartum depression or psychosis etc, while the man who made the same exact choices as she did does not even have to donate a tiny bit of blood to the baby if it was dying and needed it. How is that equal?

​@@Boaz833 By making this argument you are imparting blame onto the fundamental inherent differences in biology.

​@@ababahajabingo!!!

@@ababahaja How could we do this to you?…. Which one of YOUR organs can be requisitioned and controlled by the state….. in the same way you think a woman’s uterus should be?…. your heart, lungs, liver?… When can the state usurp your body autonomy and physical Liberty, and you just shut up and take it?…..

Luke Andrews maybe they either had an abortion or supported someone who did...

@@Mnpat how do you support someone in the process of killing their baby?

Or mabey they’re like me and had tacobell for lunch 🌮

@@Mnpat Also known as...Not wanting to hear the truth.

Thomas B huh? I am 100% pro-life.

Jack Little - good for you, Daily Wire and Live Action have good videos to watch

Look up Scott Klusendorf on KZfaq.

There is nothing courageous about educating yourself. It's simply not being a dipshit.

Watch the procedure

@@BulletsAndBloomers you don't need to be so rude to her. She's admitted she has kept her head in the sand and she's ready to try and understand. Geez

Okay we'll use "baby killing" if you change "pro-life" to "pro-silencing-controlling-and-harming-women-without-actually-saving-any-lives-especially-those-of-born-children". Or if you prefer the much shorter "forced-birth".

@@millili7980 Troll

A woman is actually a person, not a human incubator.

@@DanT-godofpain Cant she be both? Two things can be true at the same time you know. Why do you think that having a child is so bad?

@@avivastudios2311 No. Do not put words in my mouth.

I've come across several "biologists" who claim that any living cell(including somatic cells such as skin or hair cells) are organisms, rendering the word meaningless .

How has using the word organism benefited you at all when talking to a prochoice person? If at all 🤔🙂

Abortion is about equality between men and women. A man and a woman engage in the same act however only the woman has to spend the next 9 months having her body ripped apart. Where is the equality in that? The only way I will become anti choice is if we pass a law that says if a man impregnates a woman he has to spend the next 9 months in a jail cell preferably with a rapist. Because in order to maintain equality a man has to have his body ripped apart like a woman after having sex. Abortion is about giving woman a choice to not go through 9 months of suffering just like a man does not have to go through it. Abortion is horrible yes, but in our male dominated, "boys will be boys" world that we live in, it is a necessary evil.

​@@Boaz833 Acknowledging Abortion is evil/horrible and then calling it necessary is insane. You've essentially conceded that an unborn child is a human life, and even so you still would call it necessary, especially when it occurs (assuming Matt Walsh's number is correct) in 60 million different cases.

@@yee9574 I concede that an unborn child is a human life. But I also concede that evil is sometimes necessary. Just look at war. It is the most evil and terrible of things and yet it is continuous throughout our history. Innocent people are always being killed by soldiers does that mean that the soldier is a monster? You might make the argument well at least it's not a deliberate killing of an innocent person however we know that innocent people always die in war and yet we always have wars. Why? Because it is a necessary horror in our human condition. As an example the Civil War was fought for equality among the races. Would you argue that the cost of human life was too great and that keeping slavery legal was a better alternative to allowing hundreds of thousands of Americans to be killed? Of course not, because when it comes to equality and justice there is no price too high to pay. And in the same way abortion is a necessary horror as it is a battle for equality between the genders. If you truly want to end abortion and keep things equal between the genders I would suggest you pass a law that says if a man takes it out of his pants without being 100% ready for the responsibility of being a parent then his penis will be surgically removed. That would end most abortions because it would end unplanned pregnancies.

crazy chat gpt response with a "try to identify any fallacies and give a pro choice answer" input. do better.

So you didn’t watch the video. Got it

@linnea falk no, but teach the young responsibility and the responsibility stays with you all your life.

Including the responsibility to not rape, I assume?

I’m pro life as well But if it’s not just the mother’s life and it’s not emergent? What then? I’m not talking about discomfort of course, but severe, chronic complications.. Something that effects quality of life or functionality? Some pregnancies can further complicate chronic health conditions..or reproductive conditions.. I ended up having to have a hysterectomy recently and at 30…because of this.. And that had it’s own complications.. I’m pro life, but it seems this exception really doesn’t consider women’s health..

At least she did it out of her own choice. Busy Phillips said having an abortion at 15 was the best decision she ever made. He talks about inherent value. Would he pay $300 per week in child support for each baby? If not, I guess people don't have value

How confident are you that this is a good argument?

@@bjhcvuaerpigfy in one word extremely. Another person responded to my post with one word: exactly. Right there you are outvoted 2-1, which is consistent with nationwide polls that indicate 65 percent of Americans are not opposed to abortion in the first trimester, which doesn't make sense either way if life begins at conception or if Rights begin at birth. Let me put it to you this way. I don't think my wife is able to get pregnant again, but if she did, she can't work and she can't collect disability because I make too much, but I only make enough to support me, her and our first daughter. If I asked you to pay me $300 per week in child support for the next 18 years. If you don't want to, we will have to abort. What's your decision?

@@user-zw4th2oz3n I'm sorry, my post was directed at Madeira51.

@@user-zw4th2oz3n if you were wrong, would you want to know?

How many children have you killed?

@@mr.d.572 one too few it seems

@@mr.d.572 happy to help. Be sure to post pics of the children you adopt. TC

I haven't taken in any homeless people recently either. Is it okay to kill them too?

@@califtom Looks like we have what could be another terribly brainwashed beta male incel here, pushing for murder rights thinking it's going to land him a girlfriend. Nope, ain't happening.

Mama Bear that’s called being responsible adults making the right decisions waiting until you are ready is admirable and the right thing to do good for you

You are a very wise woman. God bless you and your lives together!

So you're losers. It's just that

@@Shizo-friend Okay so like I have changed over the last four years and I regret my past self's actions but like don't criticize someone who doesn't wanna have sex.

@@mamabear1394 everybody wants to have sex. Everybody normal at least.

Financies don’t excuse killing another human being

@@kingorange7739 what if your mother was raped tho? Would you want a half brother with a rapist of a father? Your mother was helpless and someone put a seed inside her, now she’s forced to give birth? I like how no one in the comment section mentions rape

@@JoshuaCurtin-gs6gb Because rape makes up so little of the abortion cases that to try to constantly mention it without covering majority cases first is blantant manipulation. But I’ll indulge you. Yes I and my mother for that matter (who is also pro life) would want to keep the baby. Because ultimately it’s not the baby’s fault for what happened and doing another crime against an innocent human being doesn’t right the previous one done to you. Should the rapist be castrated or killed? Yes. But ultimately the baby is also a victim like the mother

@@JoshuaCurtin-gs6gb Exactly! Also, no one mentioned that in Switzerland, when the fetus is conceived, they make a DNA test to determine whether they are going to have a healthy baby or not, and in the majority of cases, when tests show that a person will be born with a very bad illness they make abortion. Imagine saying this in the States?

@@JoshuaCurtin-gs6gb Need I say one thing, if you don’t Want the kid, put them up for adoption post birth, let’s stop fucking killing them ey?

Daily Wire and most conservative speakers talk about the consciousness argument you’re using all the time…a person in a coma is not conscious, or when a person beats someone so hard they become unconscious- does this allow us to then kill them? They have no consciousness so it’s not like they’ll know we’re killing them right? There’s no brain activity at least not enough to care… Yeah, no. We don’t kill people and we don’t kill babies. Your desire to kill the unborn does not make you a hero, I have no clue who you’re trying to impress unless you’re worshipping the Aztec sun god or something.

@@THELAW360 I don't think they allow the Islamic conservative speakers on The Daily Wire

@@bulletanarchy6447 they’re firmly Christian denominated so yeah you probably won’t hear much about Islam

@@THELAW360 Not left enough for them

Not rly, I have seen both sides of the arguement have a few and strong valid points.

Lol silly!….. Forced-birthers always think they defeat the abortion argument…. They just can’t defeat abortion itself… They were 63,000,000 in 50 years….. What were you so victorious about, again?…..

I can. The Geneva convention considers any “woman forced to get pregnant, stay pregnant, or give birth; to be a crime against humanity." So most people don't buy into his BS. He is pro slavery. see the evil that he is.

There was no argument, it was just arguments from emotion

Imagen advocating for the goverment being able to force women to stay pregnant. What is this world coming to :/ and the fact is that all of them are trying to give fetuses SPECIAL rights that none else has. A born child doesnt have the right to use their mothers body how ever they want, a parent doesnt even need to give their vhild a kidney, even if it will lead to that childs death. Why should a fetus have special rights none else has?

That is something that can be changed. But it won’t change if it just keeps being used as an excuse to kill the unborn

Do other humans have right to use woman's body without her consent? If the answer is no, then fetus also doesn't have that right.

@@goranmilic442 However, the woman partook in the creation of that other human. If you and your son were playing baseball in the yard and accidentally smashed their neighbor's window, the neighbor would want you to pay. But you say that you weren't meaning to smash their window. But that's the assumed responsibility of the parent playing baseball with his or her kid, same with sex. You may not have meant to get pregnant, but that's the assumed responsibility the couple takes by partaking in it.

@@litterill First of all, if woman was raped, then she didn't partake in anything, did she? So your argument still allows raped women to abort. Next, in your baseball example, you are forgetting that responsibility comes from contracts or crimes or damages. Having sex is neither of those, so it's invalid to compare damaging someone's window and having sex. Woman doesn't lose right to control her body, just because she had sex.

@@goranmilic442 We both agree rape is a horrible atrocious that should happen to no one, however, it accounts for about 1% of abortions that occur. Abortion doesn't solve the pain that the rape did- locking up the man who did and receiving compassionate love and counseling does. During a rape, there are 1 guilty and 2 innocents- the guilty being the man who did it and the innocents being the woman and the baby. Adding more violence to the baby doesn't help anyone. In fact, there are stories of women who have been raped and contemplated suicide, but upon learning they were pregnant gave them a reason to live. I am in no way saying that the rape was a good thing, but just sharing another side of the story. I'm a bit confused about what you meant that responsibility comes from contracts or crimes or damages, could you explain it more please? Partaking in a recreational activity one enjoys but having an unintended consequence of said activity does make one liable. But what about the baby's body? the baby has a right to its body as well. It is its own unique person with unique DNA.

Yup. They care more about bringing a life into the world than the quality of life they'll have. It's well documented that the vast majority of unwanted children suffer greatly and are a net burden to society due to violence, not being able to keep a job, drug addiction, etc. Meanwhile, the forced-birthers distract from the fact the Republicans want to do away with minimum wage, abolish unions who will fight for fair pay, kill off the middle class while transfer the wealth to the ultra-rich, and ensure those without connections pop out as many cheap future labourers as possible (interfering with forced birth = imprisonment). Sounds like a dystopian/autocratic system trying to make cheap labour to the advantage of the very few to me.

yeah nice strawman there. unborn fetuses are just unborn fetuses

@@NEPtune-fy1ug lol how the fuck is that strawman? That is the point of the argument. If it is human, abortion is wrong. It is not about choice, it is about if it is scientifically human.

@@NEPtune-fy1ug So when do you become a human? Because it sounds like you're still a fetus.

@@brianyi2995 a clump of cells isnt human, without any memories or consciousness

@@celestekoluria2695 when fetuses develop consciousness

how about this, is it acceptable for me to use your kidneys without your consent if i was dying and you were the only match?

@@AneurysmXX absolutely not. Why?

The preborn baby develops extremely rapidly. By the time a woman typically finds out she's pregnant, the baby is already well on its way to being visually recognizable as such. And is quite alive. Why do you worship convenience?

@@axelfirestorm2080 Even still, it is not fully human. Also, why would I worship convenience? I am not religious, I don't worship anything. On the contrary, I think that religion often stands in the way of a nuanced perspective.

​@@lucad9667 Worship as in you make it more important than anything else. And yes, an unborn baby IS fully human. His or her DNA isn't anything BUT human. I can still remember seeing my older son's first ultrasound with his mom. He was small but definitely looked like a baby, even at only 8 weeks or so. He was rolling around and everything. Now he's almost 18 and a happy young man.

@@axelfirestorm2080 Great for him, but that's just one example. There are plenty of others where abortion should be an acceptable solution. Recklessly sleeping without protection all the way up to rape, there are plenty of reasons, and it is no ones business but the mother's what to do in that situation.

So you're saying my husband shouldn't be alive? It's still a child. A woman/ girl who is raped still has the choice whether or not to have that baby. My husband's mother chose to have him, and gave him up for adoption at birth. It was a selfless act of pure love for him, knowing what happened to her wasn't his fault and wanting him to have a good life. Nobody forced her, this was her choice. Women just need to know abortion isn't their only option... it is ALWAYS a choice made from a place of disempowerment.

@@RanchMamaFox My god your perception of reality is twisted!! To take a person's life experience and say that you are destroying that by stopping it before it happened as the same thing is not only logically flawed but is repugnant, deceitful, and morally indefensible!! Take a look in the Bible for starts and do a body count on all the little children who were murdered under God's command - see Egypt for starts!

You didn’t get that from pro-choicers…. We don’t think you’re a murderer and you didn’t commit a crime….. That would be the other side….

well, considering pro aborts have never had a coherent argument perhaps it never started

Thomas B They do, but pro lifers are too stupid to understand simple facts.

@@califtom How did you like that vote in Ohio the other day?…. The forced-birthers were trying to make it harder to pass an abortion measure in November…. The voters rejected that!…. The measure will probably pass and ensure abortion rights in the Ohio Constitution!…. Looks like Matt Walsh didn’t end the debate after all….. This is a case of false advertising…..

@@hexl702too5 how’d you like that Dobbs ruling? I hope it made you livid. Baby killers won’t ever turn Ohio into the vile states of California or New York whether that upsets you or not.

Same. I don't see it as the murder of a person, but rather the murder of a potential person. I'm pro choice because I think each person should mind their own business.

@@theomaid I dont think it is as easy as that, this is one of the reasons that i think that no one should define themselves as pro-something, i find abortion as a right, but i also understand that a lot of people would become even more irresponsible if it was legal, my position would be something like a regulated abortion

@@carlosnunes2847 What's wrong with too many abortions? I like the idea of casual sex, free of consequences. It works really well for Bonobos

@@theomaid besides probably not being too healthy for the woman to have too many abortions, I don’t think that free casual sex is any good, it is a possibility that it can actualy be better but I don’t think it is a good idea, not socially at least. Back to the abortion issue I was thinking and probably it should be fully legal, with a limit yearly, if we have a technology to better control births it should be used, for good hopefully Also bonobos are pedophiles as well, they are freaks, I don’t think we should model any sex behavior by them

@@carlosnunes2847 I don't agree with pro life as a way to reduce abortion numbers.

Not sure what you are getting at. Matt Walsh is not a physicalist.

Me, for example. I don't think I should give birth to an unwanted child. There are so many cases in Asia and in my country when newborns are killed by their mothers. Or left on the streets and die from hunger, beaten up to death. In Afghanistan, young girls are raped by the Taliban and forced to give birth to expand the group, and children are killed for illegal organ transplants because of lack of proper medical care and hygiene; women try to make an abortion from untrustful and unlicensed entities, or even to make it by themselves, and end up dying or severely injured after that. Abortion can be banned in the States, but I don't think it should be banned in my country. I don't think some population is ready to take responsibility for not getting pregnant in the first place.

They are all fundamentally incorrect

@@bulletanarchy6447 Just saying "Yeah well you're wrong" is not an argument.

@@KurNorock Good you are alive Saying "it is always wrong" to do something doesn't make that true. The fact his position is so simple means it is so simple to make it collapse because by proving anything he says to be incorrect brings that whole argument down. So he will talk about what pro abortion people will say to attack his simple premise which is an immediate misrepresentation. Being pro abortion means you are in favour of that outcome for all pregnancies when most people are fairly indifferent to the outcome of pregnancies, the interest is in the outcome of those pregnancies being what the pregnant woman wants. There are two main arguments for the availability of abortion 1 That the level of development is not sufficient for it to have the rights of a born child 2 That there are no rights to live inside someone against their wishes Matt Walsh tries to undermine what pro choice will say about the first argument, that it is dehumanising. Human reproduction is a process where a physical part of a woman separates and becomes another person therefore there is always going to be a point before which it is not going to be considered separate. How does a non sentient thing make moral claims for itself ? It doesn't, other people make moral claims for it. Should we spend time on the notion that a human ovum is not human ? The expectations he throwing at pro choice he could not himself address for his own position. Saying "It is a scientific fact the being in the womb is a being, a living being." doesn't make that description scientifically accurate. Then back to all living things have to be a member of some species or another. Yes a human ovum is of the human species. No intelligent person argues that an unborn is not of the species human. They argue that it is not "A human" because it has yet to separate or achieve criteria that would make it deemed separate. Matt Walsh is trying to give the impression that his own stance does not ever have to deem the ovum as not "a human" Answer the questions for an ovum, is it alive, dead or inanimate ? Has he settled that argument ? No Saying that it is not a person is really just a way of saying that it is not considered separate and individual yet. This criteria cannot be applied to a born person, it categorically does not implicate more than just the unborn. It is a reproductive development has not yet reached a stage to be considered separate from what will be its maternal parent. Gestation withing the internal reproductive organs of a pregnant woman is not comparable to infirm or dependent people. It is a personal choice by someone who it uniquely affects, the pregnant woman. An infirm person is not inside my body as far as I am aware. What does it matter if my opinion of someone is that they are not wholly as much as a person as me? I am not personally required to be responsible for their entry into the world. The personhood is innate, not inherent, an unborn has an age of less than zero, the number of children you have increases by an integer at birth, the foundation of modern principles revolves around birth. Our country doesn't revolve around abortion being made illegal. The human rights belong to the pregnant woman, the developing fetus within her is part of her human rights. Her right to be pregnant, her right not to be sexually molested or raped, impregnated against her will, her right to body autonomy, her right to decide if gestation is what she wants to happen and is going to continue. Every ovum is unique, it's part of what makes your siblings genetically different, do ova have inherent value, probably not, because every woman has a million ova. Potentially a woman could have only one ovum left, does that then have inherent value ? to her it might. That is an argument. The arguments of Matt Walsh do not stand up.

​@@bulletanarchy6447Prove it.

@@Namato360 Prove you read what I wrote

You apparently don’t know the difference between needing CARE (which anyone can provide)…. And needing someone’s BODY to live off of, using their blood, oxygen and internal organs… Only the pregnant woman can do that for a fetus…. but if she doesn’t want to, there’s not much we can do about it…. Unless we wanna act like dictators…. 

Why don't you do it then?

We have done much in that regard, in that we have freely available contraception. That is the main way to avoid accidental / unwanted pregnancy.

@@wylierichardson-tu6zs The best way is not to perform the act of reproduction until you are ready to reproduce. I do agree with you that we have gone a tremendously long way in providing contraception.

You can pick any number of reasons to devalue another. “A fetus isn’t conscience so we should be able to kill it”. You’re not conscience when you’re asleep, so I guess we should be able to kill sleeping people too! The illogical of pro-aborts knows no bounds!

But that’s just false. The brain and the heart start working at week 5. That, by definition, means they are fully conscious.

@@thatoneguy5694 the brain does not start to work on week 5. Its developing. But it so underdeveloped that it cannot possibly be used to experience subjective reality of this world( consciousness). The fact that there are a bunch of neurons copiled does not mean its functioning. There needs to be electrical activity, neural circuitry and various areas of the brain developed. If 99 percent of my brain dies with exception of some clusters of neurons, you wouldnt call me alive or conscious. You would call me brain dead.

😂😂be the main one saying give the child up for adoption but never adopt a child . Don’t even want kids to begin with

Pro-life person here. I agree, the government has no right to demand you give up your organs. I assume you are referring to Judith Jarvis Thomson's violinist argument. In it, Judith argues that because it is morally acceptable to unplug yourself from the violinist, it is ok to "unplug" yourself from the fetus. That reasoning would stand if the two examples were relevantly parallel, but they aren't. 1. Abortion and unplugging oneself are very different in nature, with the former being the intentional killing of a healthy human organism, and the latter being leaving someone in their original state, which so happens to be dying. 2. Organs are not meant for giving. That's why we each have our own set of them. We can, through commendable charity, give them to someone else, but in terms of anatomical design, they are meant for us, and us alone to use. The uterus is different though. It is meant to be inhabited. That's its fundamental function. 3. The violinist argument paints the relationship between a mother and her offspring as a stranger/stranger relationship when it is actually a mother/child relationship. Parents have a moral (and legal) obligation to their children, as seen by child support or child neglect laws. In the violinist argument, what if the violinist was instead your two year old daughter? 4. Sex is fundamentally ordered towards procreation. Heterosexual intercourse comes with the very real potential of pregnancy. When you consent to an action you simultaneously consent to all of the potential repercussions or side effects (ex. when you get in your car to buy groceries, you consent to the possibility of being in a fatal accident). Back to point 3, we have a moral obligation to our offspring. 5. If Judith Jarvis Thomson's argument of refusal was accepted, it would be well within a mother's right to refuse to breast feed her child (assuming she had no access to formula and breast feeding was the only option), thereby starving it. There's a lot more to be said on this topic, so feel free to ask! If you are open to it, I would recommend watching some of Trent Horn's abortion discussions or video by Emily Geiger at the Equal Rights Institute! Hope this helps.

A kidney is your body, not someone else’s. The baby conceived in a woman’s womb is not her body, it just needs her body to grow and survive. Abortion is the intentional destruction of human life and is wrong and displeasing to God.

This honestly made my brain lose cells 😂. If the woman doesn’t want to have a baby then why is she having unprotected sex knowing the consequences that could come with it. It’s her own fault so she should have to deal with it.

Stupidest argument I have EVER heard. But I appreciate the effort mate

Completely different topic. What are you on about.

So you're a thumb, hmm....🤔

a thumb has a beating heart, a nervous system, functioning brain and eyes? Did you fall asleep in biology class or are you just really REALLY stupid?

@@califtom a thumb is not self sufficient. Go ask your mom if the meatloaf is ready.

@Wotyagunna Doboutthat thumb.

@Wotyagunna Doboutthat and THERE's your true colors. TC

How are you gonna decide for OTHER people when it’s the right time they should have a child . No one else can or should decide when it’s right to have a child except for the people involved

@@vincentwilliams2314 We have a winner! Exactly!, "No one else can or should decide when it’s right to have a child except for the people involved"

But who gets to decide whose life is more important

How many abortions were done because of rape or incest?

@@georgepierson4920 Mine would had been. The rapist did not get me pregnant. Now, any questions?

How confident are you that this is a good argument?

Science doesn't give a definition of life. Life is a philosophical definition, science cannot give prescriptive statements, only descriptive ones.

slow clap. there's a clear medical difference between terminating gestation and what you're imagining

Ectopic pregnancies are not viable

Ectopic pregnancies are non-viable.

The way I've explained it to people is that the moment that sperm and egg meet that is no longer the mother's DNA and it is no longer the father's DNA. It is a unique and different individual and you do NOT have the right to dictate whether that individual lives or dies. For pregnancies that arise from normal/typical means (consensual sex) I'd say it's a case of "You knew the risks so act like an adult and deal with the consequences." For other cases such as nonconsensual I would still say the baby should live. It is NOT the child's fault what happened to the mother. The child should NEVER be punished for the crimes of the father. Ectopic pregnancies are a medical emergency that would endanger the mother's life and they are not comparable to normal pregnancies. On top of that, the baby would not survive 9 months growing in the fallopian tube. It's not made to house a growing baby. In such cases, the baby is doomed from the start either way. Untreated either the baby would die or the mother would die leading to the baby dying anyway.

@@pcdeltalink036 So you think it's an actual person from conception?

@@maxxam3590 Yes, yes I do.

No because contraception prevents pregnancy when you’re having an abortion you’re already reproduced

What questions ?

Yes, spoken from the heart of someone who is not affected by the laws they’re supporting, who knows that banning abortion doesn’t stop them from happening and is speaking like a life saving hero when they’re just a coward who is doing nothing to actually help the problem.

Killing a child in the womb (for those pregnancies which are viable) is still an immoral act, regardless of how you feel about Matt Walsh.

@@lukenath6983 It might be immoral, but it is not unethical. A women owns her womb and therefore has a right to decide who gets to use it, so she has the right to abort.

Agreed, a right to use it in the sense of whom gets to impregnate, but once that act is committed the growth of the baby there is a product of that choice.

The ONLY instance in which I get “grey” when it comes to abortion is in instance of rape or forced conception of a woman. Other than this I would say it is both immoral and unethical.

Love is omnipresent tho.

All five of his points were drivel