I've heard a scientist actually state that, not insinuate it... would you like to elaborate further

They often use the argument that when we eat naturally occurring "toxic" items of foods, it is different because we are digesting it, rather than injecting it.

@@John-zb4zr Hi- Thanks for your answer. Would you please explain further? I don't "get it." I'm pro vaccinations BTW.

@@SuperGuanine My brother uses the argument that ingestion is different from injection. When he says vaccinations contain "toxins" I always use the example of a pear. A singular pear contains about 12,000 ug of formaldehyde naturally. When I say this his reply is always "Ingestion is different from injection" is there any truth to that in terms of vaccination?

@@John-zb4zr what exactly is his argument? That digesting things would make them less harmful (because of the gastric acid)?

I just remembered btw, if I am not mistaking they used to use pills as a polio vaccine but switched later to shots bcs the pills had more side effects

U are not studying by yourself if you are watching this.