I agree.

You're not even making any sense and I just wonder what kind book you've written. You didn't hear what you would have loved to hear that's why you're trying to attack him otherwise, his submission was great.

His submission is fairly unbiased and Ben though he His an Asante and from the Royal family of Oyoko. It’s true the are certain areas that he’s not properly enlightened at which I see is with every historian because the true history is only passed down through the chieftancy line and would never be known by outsiders. So let’s appreciate what we get because that’s the best you’ll ever have. And you don’t history more than any chief in Ghana so relax waiiii…. What u know May be grossly diluted 😂😂😂😂

That’s it

That's exactly what lawyer anokye said. You guys should torn down. It is wrong to always assume that someone has an agenda; lawyer anokye means well, he does not seek to demean or devalue asantehene but had to explain based on the question he was asked. So my brother lawyer anokye has not said anything different from what you just wrote.

For Asante, nobody can argue, but the entire Ghana no

@@amoahfrank5162 good you can think for them but not for yourself.

@@volta3528 wo di3 wo gyimie no..

yep,

Lie lie ! Ghana > any tribal leader

You forgot to mention Fantis

He said and I repeat…. After Prempeh the 1st was brought back, the Asantes appealed to have all their conquered states return to the Ashanti Confederation so the British asked all those states including dormaaa to sign and return but some of them refused. Among those were dormaa, kumawu but then they had to be persuaded further and finally dormaaa agreed to join but when Kwame Nkrumah came and he separated the region, then dormaaa once again declared his independence.

Please kindly bring out your own if what he is saying is, his own words so that we can learn from it

Research and read, it’s that easy 🙏🏿

The King can also remove the Prime Minister under certain circumstances. Did you know that?

This Obiri yeboah will be very dissapointed in his grave, that because of supremacy, his own people are making his sacrifice a useless one. if he was a chief for the people who became the asantes and the same stool which Osei tutu is occupying now, what difference does it make to call him an asante chief

Even you don’t think you are mad… little boy relax waaiiii na when Kings are fighting their battles don’t interfere blindly because at the end you’ll be and unnecessary casualty. You don’t know any history more than Dormaahene and Asantehene so shut up and learn

To be an asantehene, u must be an occupant of the golden stool. obiri yeboah preceded the golden stool and so how can he be an asantehene?

​@@ugochukwumartins5167please u need to b humble to learn. Why is the Greek empire attributed to Alexander the Great or the Roman empire attributed to Julius Caesar? Does it mean there weren't leaders before them? Please "Asante" simply means "because of war" and it symbolizes the unity of twi speaking settlements within those areas who were living in smaller groups but decided to come together to fight a common enemy called Denkyira at the time. Before this confederacy was formed, there wasn't anything like Asantes but there was Kwaman, Juaben, Ejisu among other smaller groups. Dormaa pple who lived at Suntreso those days overcame Kwaman wen Obiri Yeboah was chief and in revenge, Osei Tutu who succeeded Obiri Yeboah his uncle came to overcome the Dormaa pple as chief of Kwaman. The confederacy whc became known as Asanteman was formed after Osei Tutu had conquered Dormaa as chief of Kwaman so technically there wasn't anything like Asante before then so it'll be wrong for anybody to suggest dat Dormaa defeated n killed an Asante king or chief.

Tell them. England is part of Great Britain. Doesn't England still have a King?

They cannot change history.

This matter hmmm

Grow up. Lawyer anokye knows that. It is not you who will teach anybody that king is not our language, however the contest is to show by law the difference of the authority (difference between king and chief even if it means the same in our language). Just take recounted history in good faith, it doesn't spoil anything.

Chief, stool (😢?) is also not akanese. This man is talking very well teaching the masses. Well done bro.

If u had a brain to understand the definition and responsibility of the WORD you would not be in a haste to display ur arrogance and illiteracy. Help yourself with some education and then come back again with ur submission. It’s not even worth it to have an intellectual discourse with you 😩😩😩

Lawyer Anokye said on records that he's Dormaahenes classmate so I understand why he's trying to distort history😂😂😂😂

Otumfour is more powerful than king

Fo your research and see if any country or nation has ever had 2 kings before? We only have 1, and that person is the only one the entire nation pays homage to. As if the Asantehene can distool any other chief apart from those in Ashanti

​@@Loveforfamily_5050some of you got really serious issues oo😂😂. Asanteman means Asante nation and it has a leader who has many sub chiefs under him so it automatically makes him a king. His nation pays homage to him and ours appears different bcos it was a choice dat Asantes made to be part of Ghana bcos even during colonization, the British rulers treated the Asantes as a different territory from the Gold Coast territory. If they so wish, they can revert to their previous state and nobody can stop them, they will have enough resources to resist the govt of Ghana if it opposes their independence. Please you people should just stop tickling yourselves 😅😂😂

No he doesn't hate Asantes. He is half Asante and half Nzema. He is using the Ghana law to explain issues.

Truth hurts

Another donkey ass, his definition of king is according to laws of gh. .😅 .. eii ..

What is the difference between Gold Coast and Ghana? Only name change, right?

​@@Loveforfamily_5050ha ha ha

Well yh yh. But kwaman and asante small difference dey.

You are right that is why the proper recorded events had to be compared side by side. You see, because of the objectivity of lawyer anokye people are hating on him, thinking he has some agenda. The man is genuine in his account without bias even if some people won't be happy.

Listen to history and stop your arrogance.

Do Asantes pay taxes to Him or to the government of Ghana? all Ghanaians pay taxes to the government of Ghana and that includes Otumfour…. So who does Ling Charles pay taxes to? So who is the hypocrite now 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Democracy came to meet kingdoms.

Hypocrite!!! Dude rightfully choose your words. I guess you have to up your game in law to comprehend the wisdom before you

You made very good submissions, but I disagree with your conclusion to some of the facts you mentioned and explained, saying the Ga story should be told by them. Yet you are telling a story about a war against the British and the Fanta against the Ashanti’s to liberate black people and to unite them under one kingdom and authority in order to be more powerful and to give better living to its people, which your chiefs supported that white man rather take over. I don’t agree that the GA’s then were powerful compared to the Ashanti's, who had many allies like the Northern, Akwemu, etc., who are more powerful in singles against the GA's, who have fewer people. You are making up stories against a then-feared empire that had not signed any documents of allegiance to the British, as the GA’s and the rest of the Coastal, including Akyim Forget about the Akatamanso war by thinking it was Ga against Ashanti’s It was after Ashanti defeated Dormaa at the Germain War that the fanatical news papers led by the British started spilling propaganda saying the Dormaa rather won, which the Ashanti military went in for them, not knowing it was a military plan. Led by the British, who had succeeded in bringing troops from India, 🇮🇳 Burkina, Jamaica, Nigeria, etctc who we’re all under British superiority against the Ashanti of which Ga,s werpart,rt excluding thAnglo,lo who were Ashantalies,es anAkwamu,mu who later helped secure thchildren'sen stool that the Ashanti’carriedry to w,nd claiming it means they’ve lost I ask, if GA’s defeated the Ashanti's, then why didn’t they take their golden stool and either kill their king, but the British were rather the ones that later captured their king and brought him back later, meaning the empire still stands. They became part of Ghana again because you guys from the coast lied again with the corrupt white man and advised that he sign to be part of Ghana so he will be made a king just like the British when they were their own kings in the African belief systems and later want to debate his kinship.

Ga’s defeating Asantes in battle doesn’t mean they conquered them. Conquering someone means they now submit to you. Asantes defeated Ga’s and all other tribes along the coast in numerous battles and wars. They just never wanted to stay. They preferred the forest zone because it served as an impregnable fortress as they felt the coast would expose them to European attacks. How do you think they easily had access to the coast to trade with the europeans if they didn’t conquer Ga’s, Fantes etc. learn history madam and stop chatting with emotions. I smell envy and hate in your write up. Shame on you!

Lol. Pls it can never be true dat d best to narrate their own history is the pple demselves. They can't be totally objective. Asantes history is not told only by d Asantes but generally, many historians who aren't Asantes so pls don't b delusional

Lol. Pls it can never be true dat d best to narrate their own history is the pple demselves. They can't be totally objective. Asantes history is not told only by d Asantes but generally, many historians who aren't Asantes so pls don't b delusional

Not the opposite but the feminine

In Anglo-Saxon world, the Monarch or Regent can be male (King Henry 8th). If there is no male heir then female child inherits the Crown. Also the wife of a King is Queen (consort). The nephew is not heir for Anglo-Saxons. Human sacrifice was a biig no-no for Anglo-Saxon, though our Asa-nti Asa-nti forebears needed this for seemed regular for important occasions. So Anglo-Saxon world and language should Not confuse us. We don't inherit Crowns, don't behead the Queen for not bearing a male heir (Henry 8th). Basic point. Relax. King, Queens, The Crown, heirs, dukes, and dutchess etc doesn't apply. Things fall apart.😢 Clearly, It was and remains a different world. We all live in the Gold Coast Ghana (2024) not Ancient Ghana.

No he didn’t u got it wrong if education is anything to write home about then he didn’t get it wrong 😂😂😂😂

The man is speaking academically, and as such the King of Asante is not the king of Ghana, however the King of England is the King of UK and apart from Him, the next highest office, is the Prime Minister

@benbondzie6412 Even from an academic standpoint, he was wrong. Proper use of words is significant academically, isn't it? As I said, what he should have said is that the Asantehene is not a monarch. A king doesn't have to necessarily be a king of a country to be called a king, so any way you slice it, he is wrong.

@@multyz1 u are still wrong unfortunately because a monarch is another word for King/Queen and by dictionary definition is the ruler of an independent state. Former Asante Empire was an independent state because it controlled its own affairs politically, economically, socially and so you could call the Asantehene a king. However after the formation of Ghana no King has an independent state, they’ve all come under Ghana and their head is the President. That is why again the UK nations don’t have Presidents but Prime Ministers because the Monarch of The England is the President of those nations however in Ghana it’s not so, the Asantehene is not the Monarch of Ghana but Asante and they are all governed by the constitution of Ghana. So yes academically it matters how u slice it because words are used to communicate a thought or idea and in this case the Word King is inappropriate to define or describe the Position of Asantehene within the government of Ghana. Don’t get me wrong, Otumfour is a King in His own territory but as long as he is under Ghana, constitutionally he is not a King because it wouldn’t be accurate politically.

I wonder

Dude are u stupid? Does England or even any of the UK nations have a president? The highest political office is the prime minister and the heard is the King/Queen. Educating u guys is very tiring, ur teachers really suffered 😂😂😂😩😩😩😩

Another banter ! Priest of volatrians are called Togbe not okomfo. Consult the spirit of Okomfo Obiri Kwame frimpong Anokye let him educate you.

Shut the hell up, boy. Elevate yourself and be interviewed then

What shows u are saying the truth 😂. History is not one sided. Let everyone keep the knowledge he knows lidat wai

Jonky

I guess ya are on weed, choose your words right

He is recounting history. Grow up! that is how history is recounted, it doesn't mean he does not know that at that time there was no asante. What wrong with you guys? Just because lawyer anokye is dissecting history, you guys want to insult him. It is not fine. Desist from that.

@@amoahfrank5162there was no asante by then the first asantehene was osei tutu

@@samuelosei3808 Young man read to understand, everybody knows Asante was established relatively in late 17th century...But since Asante has an ancestory before 1695, when recounting history, it is the name of the current people that will be used to reference the past (i.e before 1695): even if at the time (before 1695) they were not called asante, the mention of asante is just a reference of those people in the past. That is how history is recounted so that the listener understands the reference point. it doesn't mean that the person talking doesn't know. The same way, at the time (before the 17th century), there was no dormaa people, but yet when Lawyer Anokye mentions Dormaa we know exactly those he was referring in the past even though at the time they were not called Dormaa... I hope you get it now...

@@amoahfrank5162no he should say kwaaman