Medieval Swords Were Only For Stabbing, The Hussars Were Idiots, Swords Were Only Meant To Stun

  Рет қаралды 76,778

Metatron

Metatron

Жыл бұрын

Grab Atlas VPN 3-year VPN plan for USD 1.83/mo + 3 months extra with a 30-day money-back guarantee.
before the deal expires! atlasv.pn/Metatron
Get ready! As we read several more articles about "truths" on the Medieval Period, Feudal Japan and more! Also if you are Polish I'd suggest you skip this one my friend.
#cracked #medievalhistory #atlasvpn
The Polish hussars, also known as the winged hussars, were a heavy cavalry formation active in Poland and in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth from 1503 to 1702. Their epithet is derived from large rear wings, which were intended to demoralize the enemy during charge. The hussars ranked as the elite of Polish cavalry until their official disbanding in 1776.
The hussar dress was ostentatious and comprised plated body armour (cuirass, spaulders, bevors, and arm bracers) adorned by gold ornaments, a burgonet or lobster-tailed pot helmet and jackboots as well as versatile weaponry such as lances, koncerz, sabres, backswords, pistols, maces, and hatchets. It was customary to maintain a red-and-white colour scheme, and to be girded with tanned animal hide. The wings were traditionally assembled from the feathers of raptors, and the angel-like frame was fastened onto the armour or saddle.
The early hussars were light cavalry units of exiled Serbian warriors who came to Poland as mercenaries in the early 16th century from Hungary. Following the reforms of king Stephen Báthory (r. 1576-1586), the Polish military adopted the unit and transformed it into heavy shock cavalry, with troops recruited from the Polish nobility. The Polish hussar differs greatly from the light, unarmored hussars that developed concurrently outside Poland.
The hussar formation proved effective against Swedish, Russian and Ottoman forces, notably at the Battles of Kircholm (1605), Klushino (1610) and Khotyn (1673). Their military prowess peaked at the Siege of Vienna in 1683, when hussar banners participated in the largest cavalry charge in history and successfully repelled the Ottoman attack. From their last engagement in 1702 (at the Battle of Kliszów) until 1776, the obsolete hussars were demoted and largely assigned to ceremonial roles.
A sword is an edged, bladed weapon intended for manual cutting or thrusting. Its blade, longer than a knife or dagger, is attached to a hilt and can be straight or curved. A thrusting sword tends to have a straighter blade with a pointed tip. A slashing sword is more likely to be curved and to have a sharpened cutting edge on one or both sides of the blade. Many swords are designed for both thrusting and slashing. The exact definition of a sword varies by historical epoch and geographic region.
Historically, the sword developed in the Bronze Age, evolving from the dagger; the earliest specimens date to about 1600 BC. The later Iron Age sword remained fairly short and without a crossguard. The spatha, as it developed in the Late Roman army, became the predecessor of the European sword of the Middle Ages, at first adopted as the Migration Period sword, and only in the High Middle Ages, developed into the classical arming sword with crossguard. The word sword continues the Old English, sweord.[1]
The use of a sword is known as swordsmanship or, in a modern context, as fencing. In the early modern period, western sword design diverged into two forms, the thrusting swords and the sabres.
Thrusting swords such as the rapier and eventually the smallsword were designed to impale their targets quickly and inflict deep stab wounds. Their long and straight yet light and well balanced design made them highly maneuverable and deadly in a duel but fairly ineffective when used in a slashing or chopping motion. A well aimed lunge and thrust could end a fight in seconds with just the sword's point, leading to the development of a fighting style which closely resembles modern fencing.
The sabre and similar blades such as the cutlass were built more heavily and were more typically used in warfare. Built for slashing and chopping at multiple enemies, often from horseback, the sabre's long curved blade and slightly forward weight balance gave it a deadly character all its own on the battlefield. Most sabres also had sharp points and double-edged blades, making them capable of piercing soldier after soldier in a cavalry charge. Sabres continued to see battlefield use until the early 20th century. The US Navy kept tens of thousands of sturdy cutlasses in their armory well into World War II and many were issued to Marines in the Pacific as jungle machetes.
Non-European weapons classified as swords include single-edged weapons such as the Middle Eastern scimitar, the Chinese dao and the related Japanese katana. The Chinese jiàn 剑 is an example of a non-European double-edged sword, like the European models derived from the double-edged Iron Age sword.

Пікірлер: 1 000
@metatronyt
@metatronyt Жыл бұрын
Grab Atlas VPN 3-year VPN plan for USD 1.83/mo + 3 months extra with a 30-day money-back guarantee. before the deal expires! atlasv.pn/Metatron
@cristinacristescu1173
@cristinacristescu1173 Жыл бұрын
Hi! I've been following your content for a while as I'm fascinated with history. I'm from Romania, and I was just wondering if you could (and if you want ofc) ever do a video about Dacians and how Romanians are descendants of Dacians and Romans. I'm sorry if my grammar is all over the place, English is not my first language. Keep up the good work!
@Ordo1980
@Ordo1980 Жыл бұрын
My main problem with these articles are not even the non factual things itself but the language. It feels like the self reflecting fake humor of Marvel movies with a sprinkle of "how do you do fellow kids".
@alexgoldsmith8598
@alexgoldsmith8598 Жыл бұрын
metatron you've gotta stop reacting to these kinds of articles, it's gotta be bad for your blood pressure
@krislamb613
@krislamb613 Жыл бұрын
It wouldn’t surprise me if all the garbage articles written by chat, GPT
@ezrafaulk3076
@ezrafaulk3076 Жыл бұрын
*New* depths of a complete lack of *basic logic* , and a drug trip of *presentism* ; just when I thought they couldn't get any worse than the articles you debunked in the *last* video! First off, does this freak *actually respect* modern "leaders" for sending people off to die in battle while they hide and party in the safety of one of their many mansions?! A *real* leader leads by *example* ; *that's* why they were always leading the charge into battle! You should've mentioned that; that's why I'm in *agreement* with you about respecting medieval, Renaissance, etc leaders for that! Second, as much as I *hate* to admit it, I *used* to be one of those types that thought putting horns and/or wings on a helmet meant for *battle* (though not *other* protruding decorations for some reason), or wearing a draping like a cloak or cape in a fight was a *stupid* idea that wasn't actually done because of a *hyperbolized* potential danger in some way; but I've learned *much* better in the years since, and that's why I've since *defended* the idea of wearing things like that in live combat. Hell, even *metal* ones can be done in a way where they're not so much of a danger *or* weight hindrance; just make the sheets used to make the horns *thin* and *hollow* , or make the horns *short* ; *both* those things are what Renaissance era Persian warriors did with their horned Khula Khud: upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/af/0710_Waffen_und_R%C3%BCstungen_aus_dem_Historischen_Museum_in_Sanok.JPG fws-files.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/website/auctions/items/full/4148012_1.jpg No *smart* person would try to hit one of those horns or *another* decoration with a weapon, not even a *top-heavy* one because it wouldn't transfer the impact to the wearers *head* , which's what you *wanna* do, even if it *did* hit it; and only a total *dumbass* would try to *grab* one of them because even if you somehow *succeed* , not only could you *not* really do anything useful with it as long as the wearer's *resisting* , but *best* case scenario, you're using your *main* hand to do it, and so can't really use your main-hand weapon anymore, and *worst* case scenario, you're using your *off-hand* to do it, and so opening yourself up to their attack! Sounds pretty *stupid* doesn't it?! If anything, a warrior wearing a helmet decorated in such a way is a *smart* warrior because they're making it *way* easier for them to kill the *stupider* of the combatants they might have to face! That's even *more* the case with the wings the Hussars had attached to their armor, considering they're attached to the *back* ! Whoever the Hell wrote that article really *does* need to apply that statement about learning from history to *themselves* ! Sorry for the wall of text; sometimes (by which I mean *oftentimes* ), I *need* to write a mini essay to get all my thoughts out.
@ShinForgotPassxXx
@ShinForgotPassxXx Жыл бұрын
As an Austrian, from vienna, I am taking this personal. Sobieski is a hero in my eyes and making fun of the Hussars is a crime!
@balintkovacs4089
@balintkovacs4089 Жыл бұрын
And not just Polish hussars but hussars in general. To quote Napoleon: "Give me French infantry, Austrian gunners and Hungarian cavalry, and I will conquer the world." Of course the Russians did disprove him on that, but kudos for giving us credit despite being his enemies.
@orrykisoznka6274
@orrykisoznka6274 Жыл бұрын
Dude who wrote the article is probably just a salty turk.
@nicksweeney5176
@nicksweeney5176 Жыл бұрын
Oh, Hussars.🤷🏻‍♂️ I poo-poo at your Hussars.
@Tovalokodonc
@Tovalokodonc Жыл бұрын
Winged Hussars*
@nicksweeney5176
@nicksweeney5176 Жыл бұрын
@@Tovalokodonc They weren't real wings and they couldn't really fly. They could only ride horsies.🙄
@platonios4666
@platonios4666 Жыл бұрын
"A medieval Sword Fight is like boxing with giant Knifes" Yeah sure,and a modern shooting is like Karate with big Sticks.
@oz_jones
@oz_jones Жыл бұрын
This is my boomstick
@Jake-dh9qk
@Jake-dh9qk Жыл бұрын
What it means is you're hacking away at your enemies instead of doing fancy sword fencings. If you watch real machete fights in real life people hack and slash until the other person runs away or dies. There's no such thing as fancy sword fencing in real combat.
@platonios4666
@platonios4666 Жыл бұрын
@@Jake-dh9qk Well,but Machetes are chopping weapons, most other swords were not. And fighting an opponent in armor also just requires you to not chop aimlessly at them,because you need to get the weakpoints in this scenario. And even if fights were just chopping all along,its still stupid in my opinion to compare that with boxing. And of course, modern fencing does probably not compare to medieval sword fights,but I also don't think, that there was no more elaborate stuff involved than just hack away until the other is dead. To stay with my comparison,a modern shooting is also probably not done with a snioer level of accuracy, but you at least have to aim in the opponents general direction.
@Johnlanzer
@Johnlanzer Жыл бұрын
@@Jake-dh9qk As you've said, you watched fights with machetes. Primarily for hacking at one another. It's like using a fight with a shotgun to explain how snipers fight.
@Admiral45-10
@Admiral45-10 Жыл бұрын
That would be bayonet charge - but noone has ever done it since 1982.
@kevinmorrice
@kevinmorrice Жыл бұрын
the hussars were also the most well trained heavy cavalry at the time, there wings and exotic animal furs were symbols of there strength
@balintkovacs4089
@balintkovacs4089 Жыл бұрын
And the wealth of Poland at the time, since the winged hussars as seen in their most iconic form were a royal army. Although the whole affair is kind of ironic as hussars as a military unit were originally light cavalry.
@Intranetusa
@Intranetusa Жыл бұрын
Yeh, an originally light cavalry based on steppe nomadic horse archers (eg. probably influenced from Mongol invasions of Hungary), combined with European knights and turned into a unique heavy cavalry.
@lamwen03
@lamwen03 Жыл бұрын
It was also 'shock and awe'. If you are leading or in an opposing army and you see the Winged Hussars coming, you might well decide you want to be somewhere else. Fast.
@comdo831
@comdo831 Жыл бұрын
We're not so sure about the wings. If you try to use your imagination, carrying such contraption attached to your back in battle, when unrestricted movement is highly desired, may not seem like a good idea.
@Justin-pe9cl
@Justin-pe9cl Жыл бұрын
@@comdo831 It isn’t restricting.
@DG-ew9wb
@DG-ew9wb Жыл бұрын
As for hussars, the warhammer quote springs to mind: You wear dark colors in hope that what the enemy can not see, he can not hit. We wear bright colors becuse what the enemy can see, he will soon learn to fear.
@ms-ht1cj
@ms-ht1cj Жыл бұрын
I wonder if XIX British soldiers with their ridiculous RED uniforms agree to that. 😂
@3volution636
@3volution636 Жыл бұрын
Seems like a quote fitting for the landsknechts. Lol
@fransthefox9682
@fransthefox9682 Жыл бұрын
"Swords were meant to stun" Yeah, and sniper rifles were meant to be melee weapons.
@miceliusbeverus6447
@miceliusbeverus6447 Жыл бұрын
It's pretty obvious! I mean, all this telescope is just to distract your attention from the long muzzle, which the sniper grabs to deliver a powerful blow with the butt of the gun. Absolutely stunning. 😎
@dantefajfer9529
@dantefajfer9529 Жыл бұрын
​@@miceliusbeverus6447 l
@ManiacalForeigner
@ManiacalForeigner Жыл бұрын
I felt a great disturbance, as if millions of kurwas were suddenly cried out in righteous fury
@canadianeh4792
@canadianeh4792 Жыл бұрын
We remember In September The night Vienna was freed WE MADE THE ENEMY BLEED
@Justin-pe9cl
@Justin-pe9cl Жыл бұрын
THEN THE WINGED HUSSARS ARRIVED!!!
@ShinForgotPassxXx
@ShinForgotPassxXx Жыл бұрын
Sobieski is a hero!
@ragejackson7136
@ragejackson7136 Жыл бұрын
​@@Justin-pe9cl COMING DOWN THE MOUNTAIN SIDE!
@kevinboros7427
@kevinboros7427 Жыл бұрын
@@ragejackson7136 COMING DOWN THEY TURNED THE TIDE!
@andrex02scout
@andrex02scout Жыл бұрын
Stormclouds, fire and steel Death from above made their enemy kneel - Shining armour and wings Death from above, it's an army of kings - We remember In september When the winged hussars arrived!
@augustofioretti6938
@augustofioretti6938 Жыл бұрын
"Swords are only for stabbing".. "Swords are used to incapacitate" *Glancing at my Dacian falx* - definitely a non-lethal poking tool.
@dikkie1000
@dikkie1000 Жыл бұрын
Ah well, "dead, or nearly so" is also incapacitated, so technically not wrong.
@AngloSaxonWheatFarmer
@AngloSaxonWheatFarmer Жыл бұрын
“Sorry mate, just meant to lightly bonk ya with this warhammer” - Man at arms.
@JacekKrajalnica
@JacekKrajalnica Жыл бұрын
Gotta stab 'em gently. :D
@Nalan_LLP
@Nalan_LLP Жыл бұрын
Slow and steady fellas, slow and steady~
@oscarandreas1431
@oscarandreas1431 Жыл бұрын
@@AngloSaxonWheatFarmer me: **lies dead on the floor with my skull bashed in leaving a pulp**
@juanfisi
@juanfisi Жыл бұрын
wingged hussars were some of the most badass looking units in all of history. Also, camouflage wasn't a thing back then, you wanted to be very visible so you could keep cohesion in your army, and also intimidate the enemy. (obviously im not an expert, could be wrong)
@kevintemple245
@kevintemple245 Жыл бұрын
Yeah, nah, you pretty much got it figured. Also, leaders tended to stand out even more so the troops could see them. Hard to direct a battle if the men don't kmow where you are. Same reason battle flags were still used even into Midway through the last century. Generally that's where the guy in charge is at.
@mateuszbanaszak4671
@mateuszbanaszak4671 Жыл бұрын
*Sees that somebody insults our Angels of War : *KURWAAA!*
@TheBobes
@TheBobes Жыл бұрын
Did whoever wrote that "Ridiculous outfits" bit never hear of intimidation or fear factor? See guys with feathers or wings on their helmets? Shit, it's the famed Hussars! Dude with deer antlers pops-up on the battlefield? It's the immortal super warrior. Run for your lives!
@Intranetusa
@Intranetusa Жыл бұрын
Yep. Ancient and medieval Chinese generals and officers also used to wear wings, feathers, leopard skins, antlers, plumes, etc on their helmets. Ancient Romans wore feathers and plumes as well. It seems to be a tradition around the world to add more and more bling to your kit as you get richer and more powerful...both to display your wealth and rank and also to intimidate the enemy.
@yokai333
@yokai333 Жыл бұрын
It's even part of tlingit and tsimshian warfare. Chiefs even wore winged helmets
@rockoorbe2002
@rockoorbe2002 Жыл бұрын
I could say the same about the Janissaries with their ridiculously big turbans, and yet at least for a while they were very effective
@Tovalokodonc
@Tovalokodonc Жыл бұрын
Winged Hussars*, stop refering to them as simply "Hussars"
@TGPDrunknHick
@TGPDrunknHick Жыл бұрын
@@Intranetusa also to be noticeable to your own forces. helps you own people know to listen to you.
@fnts7431
@fnts7431 Жыл бұрын
Polish Hussars is a topic for a book and in fact I got one in home. Between like end of XVI century up to around times before The Swedish Deluge (so around 1650) in terms of combat efficiency they were simply like if you take the most elite special force in the world now and multiply that by around 10. In times of The Swedish Deluge their power started to decline and they started to loose against reformed Swedish infantry. However they were still significant force until like the end of XVII century. For example some facts about Hussars that will blow your mind: 1) Average hussar trained horse value was several villages and each hussar had to have 2 of them ready at any time. Hussar horses were trained so if they get hit by a bullet they continue to run until they fall down dead or from exhaustion. This gave the enemies impression of the "immortal horses" and that even if you hit a horse with a firearm shot, the hussar won't be stopped. 2) Hussars had a technique of attaching extremely long lances for the charge - up to 6m long, so they could outreach pikes. 3) Hussars carried a whole arsenal with them so they could engage different type of enemy forces. Lances obviously broke quickly after impaling some enemies in first charge, so then they could pick a most suitable weapon, not only Polish saber. 4) They had trained charge tactics to minimize human casualties during open charges on enemy infantry with firearms lines. So generally the combat value of a single Hussar was extraordinary. And you can check what were the numbers in many battles won by Poland-Lithuania in that times. Like 1:10 was the standard. How was that possible ? That is because in XVI century Polish nobility was both very rich on average and there were not yet many oligarchs present, so no extreme wealth differences between nobility. There was none or very weak army payed from crown treasure, taxes were extremely low. But because of that and high sense of duty, discipline, nobility felt obliged to be combat ready with highest standard possible. And thus many nobles simply transformed into combat ready elite hussars in times of war. Unfortunately due to lots of reason this system started to collapse after mentioned half of XVII century and the hussar combat strength training was weaker and weaker, both in numbers and quality. Poland was in general also not that powerful and rich as in XVI century. For example one of such reasons is that during Zygmunt Waza reign, the richest class of nobility emerged. There was general decline in middle class and nobles started loosing both wealth and discipline which was needed to be a high value combat ready hussar.
@szeleddie
@szeleddie Жыл бұрын
Well written and truly said sir!!! It is NOT accidentally they was called Angels of Death!!!
@td5269
@td5269 Жыл бұрын
How did they train the horses? Bye Shooting them??😂 I dont believe this at all
@almarian6585
@almarian6585 Жыл бұрын
​@@td5269 When the horse is galloping, you can only kill it quickly by a shot in head/leg. But when you shoot in torso, horse could survive that and still atack to end the charge. Of course horse will be dead, after a charge. The reason he lasts so long on a deadly gunshot is adrenaline
@jumapl9706
@jumapl9706 Жыл бұрын
@@td5269 blood loss during gallop, not hard to do, just stab could do the same and teach the animal to ignore it. You dont have to belive in everything for it to be true :V
@miceliusbeverus6447
@miceliusbeverus6447 Жыл бұрын
I'd add to it that Polish hussars almost never truly lost... And they went on decline mainly because of lack of money and discipline, much like Roman legions... Otherwise they might have easily made their way even to the Napoleonic era... especially, that they weren't particularly bulky or heavy; their armour was relatively light, just strategically placed.
@johndaybreak1317
@johndaybreak1317 Жыл бұрын
The wings of the polish hussars made a huge inpact on the enemies moral since if you saw those wings rise behind a hill you knew what was coming. It is the same effect the Red Baron had in ww1 when his red plane was spotted by an enemy plane.... everyone noticed him but that was the plan all along.
@k.f.m6901
@k.f.m6901 Жыл бұрын
Skallagrim would be fuming if he saw that
@ColossalSwordFormAndTechnique
@ColossalSwordFormAndTechnique Жыл бұрын
Skallagrim is too scared to hand sharpen his own swords 😂
@theskycavedin
@theskycavedin Жыл бұрын
I love the people who say "the Winged Hussars actually sucked and were terrible" and then they bring up the rump Hussars that fought with Napolean. You're like three or four hundred years off from the correct time period!
@piotrbrzozowski6696
@piotrbrzozowski6696 3 күн бұрын
200..:)
@michaelshelton5488
@michaelshelton5488 Жыл бұрын
and then............the Winged Hussars arrived!
@skoczek777
@skoczek777 Жыл бұрын
I didn't ever expect Metatron to talk about winged hussars. Just not that time period that he mostly talks about. But as a Pole, I'm glad. Polska gurom!
@danmitchell1955
@danmitchell1955 Жыл бұрын
Polish military was very good upto 17th century if my memory serves me correctly. You don’t exist from 9th century until nearly 1800s surrounded by rivals and enemies and survive
@henoch44
@henoch44 Жыл бұрын
"gurom" ?? Oj polaku....
@skoczek777
@skoczek777 Жыл бұрын
@@danmitchell1955 First of all, Polish military was in some ways different compared to medieval western European monarchies. We had a sort of technological lag, but also the environment was a bit different, it's a massive flat land that can easily be invaded. So it meant more cavalry, because this was the decising force in central and even more in eastern Europe on sparsely populated steppe. I need to correct, Poland do exist in this shape or form since 10th century and it was "dismantled" by its neighbours at the end of 18th century to be completely removed in 1795. What is true is that we were able to survive. That may be the case, because in the early centuries of its existence was super-aggresive, on the edge of collapse, rebuilding and reconquering lost territories, fragmentation to various duchies constantly fighting each other, got rekt by the Czechs to finally be partially united in 14th century and starting building its influence.
@matthaeusdecuiavia8637
@matthaeusdecuiavia8637 Жыл бұрын
​​​@@danmitchell1955 the peak of the polish military power was the time from 15th to the end of 17th century (basically the period of time from the battle of Grunwald to the battle of Hodów). Earlier Poland was a pretty powerful country during the reign of it's first catholic rulers, Mieszko I, and Bolesław I The Brave.
@danmitchell1955
@danmitchell1955 Жыл бұрын
@ Matthaeus de Cuiavia I’m aware of that but what John iii did at battle of Vienna is bit long lives in my mind . And grunwald was also epic achievement
@HypnoticChronic1
@HypnoticChronic1 Жыл бұрын
I appreciate you defending the good name of the Husaria Metatron, as a Pole it does me proud to hear/see people recognize their combat prowess and accomplishments.
@PagemanX
@PagemanX Жыл бұрын
I think owning a war-horse would be the equivalent to a jaguar honestly.
@thechronicler1453
@thechronicler1453 Жыл бұрын
Not quite but it was pretty expensive
@alexeyserov5709
@alexeyserov5709 Жыл бұрын
Depends on what you consider "war horse". If it's a horse for heavy cavalry like winged hussars then yeah, and together with well trained rider and his armament it's a full fucking jet fighter in modern context. On the other hand nomad horses suitable for horse archers were fairly cheap.
@Jasmixd
@Jasmixd Жыл бұрын
@@alexeyserov5709 Makes sense, one of those has to be able to go completely against instincts and charge into a row of very pointy sticks, while the other simply ought not to get too spooked while it hovers around the enemy. Although I'd guess breeding played a part as well, I don't know enough how it compares with training when it comes to a horse's value.
@rosomak8244
@rosomak8244 Жыл бұрын
@@Jasmixd Breeding and expensive training is what made those horses special. There is a documented death penalty involved for selling a polish husar horse abroad.
@stalhandske9649
@stalhandske9649 Жыл бұрын
This is becoming a kind of shared pain experience. Like Metatron himself opening these articles, I as a viewer know full well (seeing the title) what kind of stuff I am going to subject myself to. Yet I find myself coming back for more. A very specific form of masochism.
@OptimusMaximusNero
@OptimusMaximusNero Жыл бұрын
Web pages: "Hussars were pathetic!" Germans: "A faithful husband who leaves the battlefield just to attend and say goodbye to his dying wife is everything but pathetic!" *Der Treue Hussar begins to play*
@SergioLeonardoCornejo
@SergioLeonardoCornejo Жыл бұрын
I swear there's an ideological agenda in those articles.
@Justin-pe9cl
@Justin-pe9cl Жыл бұрын
I think those are different hussars.
@The_Gallowglass
@The_Gallowglass Жыл бұрын
Stupid Article: The hussars were stupid! Vienna: ........fuck you.
@OptimusMaximusNero
@OptimusMaximusNero Жыл бұрын
​@@Justin-pe9cl Germans: "A HUSSAR IS A HUSSAR!!!"
@TheAzureNightmare
@TheAzureNightmare Жыл бұрын
​@@SergioLeonardoCornejo Oh there is! Glorifying Africa and The Middle East, against the Frankish Europeans, as vengeance for their loss at Tours all those years ago. Or maybe they're just communist shitstains with *nothing* to be proud of.
@JankyToe
@JankyToe Жыл бұрын
Remember, after accumulating enough sword-stun damage on your opponent, finish them off with a blunt weapon for maximum XP and money. Also, if you're a tank, don't forget to equip your horned helmet for maximum aggro.
@dafyddthomas6897
@dafyddthomas6897 Жыл бұрын
Japanese general was not the only one to wear elaborate decorations on his head. Indeed, but I am sure that the general's bling was shinier than colonels' bling. General being in the thick of battle is good for morale
@Intranetusa
@Intranetusa Жыл бұрын
Yep. Ancient and medieval Chinese generals and officers also used to wear wings, feathers, leopard skins, antlers, plumes, etc on their helmets. Ancient Romans wore feathers and plumes as well. It seems to be a tradition around the world to add bling to your kit as you get richer and more powerful.
@nuclearsimian3281
@nuclearsimian3281 Жыл бұрын
Oda Nobunaga fought in the field with his men and he used a fucking nodachi. His favorite technique was basically just to spin around in circles when groups of people came up to him to try to easily kill or overwhelm the enemy general.
@dantreadwell7421
@dantreadwell7421 Жыл бұрын
Swords not meant for slashing. . . I think my Falchion and my Saber have something to say about that. . . And totally agree with you about the Winged Hussars. Not a group you wanted to feck with.
@Duothimir
@Duothimir Жыл бұрын
Their comments about Lord of the Rings tell me they never actually watched the movies, much less read the books. Those huge conflicts between armies of hundreds of people were only a small handful of the battles that took place, and were always striking at major strongholds where the majority of the defenders' forces were gathered, or in the case of Aragorn leading his army to the gates of Mordor, it was a deliberate ploy to distract Sauron away from Frodo and Sam.
@geargrinder7714
@geargrinder7714 Жыл бұрын
I just realized: does metatron keep making these videos as a form of venting his frustrations at this stupidity like someone might scream into a pillow?
@metatronyt
@metatronyt Жыл бұрын
Godh this one is great 😂
@Northerner-NotADoctor
@Northerner-NotADoctor Жыл бұрын
@@metatronyt 👍
@SirAtesh
@SirAtesh Жыл бұрын
As a Turk i want to console my Polish brothers who was unfortunate enough to be exposed to this article. I will go listen to Sabaton now if you excuse me.
@AcidifiedMammoth
@AcidifiedMammoth Жыл бұрын
You sir, have a great taste in music. 🍷🤘🏻
@secretname2670
@secretname2670 Жыл бұрын
It gives me the heebie jeebies, back in the day there was... well less than brotherhood between polish and turk. We basically drove you out of central europe with cavalry and professional ambushes. But nowadays, yeah feels nice to have buried the bone with the turks when there is more important matters to attend.
@edstar83
@edstar83 Жыл бұрын
I like Turks. They are hard working and friendly. And they have respect for Polish people for kicking their butt. That shows Turkish people have honour. Heres some Sabaton. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ndqSlaxznJ2am6c.html DEUS VULT! from Spain.
@rockoorbe2002
@rockoorbe2002 Жыл бұрын
What's interesting is that after reading the book Crusades by Dan Jones, I discovered that in fact, when the First Crusade was fighting the Seljuks in Anatolia, the knights themselves were actually picking up scimitars left by the Turks in the battlefield. It may have been partly as a souvenir for the same reason American GIs in WW2 were picking up German Luger pistols. But also just like Lugers, scimitars might have also been valuable for their quality. I suppose mostly for slashing. If anything even back then soldiers would have been open to try new weapons. Who knows, they might have had their traditional straight sword and a scimitar with them. Also, who goes into battle with the idea that you're going to stun rather than kill your enemy? To be fair, the Aztecs went into battle mostly to capture enemies for sacrifice. And the Spanish skill and tech aside, that didn't go well for them
@colbunkmust
@colbunkmust Жыл бұрын
During the First Crusade most of the swords being used by the Seljuks were straight swords, curved sabers don't really become popular in the Middle East until the 13th century. Even the ones during this period that are curved are barely so, more akin to types of falchions already available in the west. I'm guessing the weapons that were being scavenged were ones that were richly decorated or deemed to be particularly finely crafted.
@fabiovarra3698
@fabiovarra3698 Жыл бұрын
Looting the enemy camp after the battle was a major caraterestic of the war up till the 19th century, and even during the two world war the armies always looted enemies weapons, ammunitions, transports ecc.
@TheRogueJedii
@TheRogueJedii Жыл бұрын
Honestly, at the time all swords were valuable. Normal peasants couldn't afford one, it was a mark of a higher class, wealthy man.
@thechronicler1453
@thechronicler1453 Жыл бұрын
@@TheRogueJedii now I wouldn’t go as far as a wealthy man. A plain sword would be more than affordable by a man at arms as Metatron said, and they were not of any higher class, they were just skilled fighters. A jewelled or gold encrusted sword WOULD be a sign of a noble, or a gilded sword.
@colbunkmust
@colbunkmust Жыл бұрын
@@TheRogueJedii That's not really true. Swords in the middle ages were available at all price points. This is especially true in the high and late Middle Ages. Matt from SG has talked about this and cited period prices from inventories.
@ShieldWife
@ShieldWife Жыл бұрын
If your helmet has a large and elaborate decoration on top, then an unwise enemy might be trying to knock it off while you’re actually trying to kill him.
@editorrbr2107
@editorrbr2107 Жыл бұрын
*THEN THE WINGED HUSSARS ARRIVED*
@AcidifiedMammoth
@AcidifiedMammoth Жыл бұрын
*COMING DOWN FROM THE MOUNTAIN SIDE*
@Zetact_
@Zetact_ Жыл бұрын
Of course the sword's most effective option wasn't slashing. It wasn't stabbing either. The key is in the pommel, see, once you unscrew it...
@dan_mer
@dan_mer Жыл бұрын
All swords have both stun and kill settings. There is a button on the left side. If you press the button and then you hit a person on the neck,the sword will bounce back, and the person will fall unconscious, unless he is a Borg drone and adapts to stun settings.
@oligultonn
@oligultonn Жыл бұрын
I'm only a few seconds in but the title suggests a major bruh moment upcoming.
@marcello7781
@marcello7781 Жыл бұрын
If I remember correctly, the wings of hussars were made that way so when flapping they could create a tremendous noise that would scare enemy horses. If that's the case then it was definitely a good mix of badass and practical.
@Justin-pe9cl
@Justin-pe9cl Жыл бұрын
That is one theory but it’s not known for sure.
@The_Gallowglass
@The_Gallowglass Жыл бұрын
That and it made them look like mounted angels.
@Askorti
@Askorti Жыл бұрын
It's unlikely that the noise made by the wings would be louder than the general noise of battle, with all the guns, cannons going off, war cries and so on. But what is absolutely certain is that the wings made the humans on the enemy side scared shitless. I do not know if it's true, but I've read an anecdote that in one instance when they heard that they will be facing off against the winged hussars, enemy infantry refused to fight, and had to be convinced with double pay.
@Tovalokodonc
@Tovalokodonc Жыл бұрын
The wings of Polish hussars*** Fixed that sentence for ya
@adambielen8996
@adambielen8996 Жыл бұрын
That is a myth. There have been no replicas that have produced such noises when worn by reinactors.
@balintkovacs4089
@balintkovacs4089 Жыл бұрын
On the topic of "swords were not meant to slash" and since hussars are also mentioned: earlier this month there was a movie about hussars in the Seven Year War period. Guess what they used? Sabers. A type of sword. Guess what sabers are great at? Slashing. Yes, I am being sarcastic towards the articles, obviously, not towards Metatron. That said, the movie was recently purchased also, among others, for Italian dubbing so theaters in Sycilly can put it on their schedule. If you get a chance to check it out once it's released - idk when, but working in dubbing myself I'd guess about a month or so - the movie is called Hadik.
@brakdanych4329
@brakdanych4329 Жыл бұрын
also hussars had a dedicated weapon used for stabbing called koncerz
@jordinagel1184
@jordinagel1184 Жыл бұрын
@@brakdanych4329was that their really big lance-sword?
@Rauser142
@Rauser142 Жыл бұрын
@@jordinagel1184 an estoc like sword
@colbunkmust
@colbunkmust Жыл бұрын
I just wanna point out, "boxing with giant knives" is literally the definition of fencing...
@martonmakhult3416
@martonmakhult3416 Жыл бұрын
All manner of cultures used such ellaborate designs in battles trough history for good reasons. They give the wearer a kind of a visual momentum. Its not just about inciting fear in your enemies, but it also makes the wearer feel more powerful and confident, if he knows he looks badass. Besides.. Imagine a guy in plate armor riding towards you on full speed with huge wings at his back.. It would be like the angel of death itself would come to take you. If thats not initimadting enough on a battlefield than i dont know what is..
@matthaeusdecuiavia8637
@matthaeusdecuiavia8637 Жыл бұрын
There is a discussion still going about the wings. Most of the historians in Poland agree, that probably they weren't used in the actual battle, and If they were, they still were kinda useful, as an additional protection of the hussar's back, and the way to intimidate the opponents (nobody really wanted to fight hussars, and those wings made them, as we know, quite recognizable). Also, it's not clear if they were actually attached to the back of the rider, because there are paintings and pictures (for example the Stockholm Roll) that show hussars with the wings attached to the saddles, which was way more comfortable to the rider - as many polish history reenactors and historians are proving today. It is totally possible that it was a matter of personal choice of an individual hussar rather than a general rule.
@sovijus
@sovijus Жыл бұрын
While there is some evidence for smaller wings that were attached to the saddle in contemporary (for the period) paintings and found gear, there is no evidence for the big, curving above head wings, that you see in modern movies or games that depict Winged Hussars. At least not untill second half of 18 century, when Winged Hussars stopped being used in actual war. Polish historians somewhat mockingly call them "funeral wings", because they were used only in parades or funerals as a part of ceremonial uniform.
@LiezAllLiez
@LiezAllLiez Жыл бұрын
One reason for using something similar, but not, wings: Polish-Lithuanian skirmishes on their south-eastern border. Tatars/Mongols had a tendency of using lassos to drag a rider off his horse. Back then, cavalry had sticks mounted on their saddle, reaching above the rider. Was it decorated with feathers or similar? Probably not, but the sticks function was to catch the lasso as it traveled towards the rider - the rider would duck, the lasso would catch the stick, and then the rider would do a "reverse uno card" on the opponent, by pulling the rope with the Tartar/Mongol attached. In short: Wings? Nah. Function? Yes. Only in ceremonies would hussars wear those wings, is my guess anyway.
@JannetFenix
@JannetFenix Жыл бұрын
In museum i was once it was mentioned that the wings were originally flags, standards. When charging, second row of cavalry held poles with standards low, which fluttered heavy in wind. In rush, they seemed to enemies like wings flapping behind backs of the soldiers. The idea was glorious though. Sctual wings were decorative and used actual decades later.
@hyperhumana
@hyperhumana Жыл бұрын
Jestem z Tobą Panie Bracie!
@libertycowboy2495
@libertycowboy2495 Жыл бұрын
Regarding "being recognizable on the battlefield", even Gaius Julius Ceasar wore a distinctive cloak into battle. If you're in charge, you need your people to know it at a glance.
@CT-3247-Alpha
@CT-3247-Alpha Жыл бұрын
9:33 The winged hussar armor was very complex and modern in the times it was used
@Aqsio
@Aqsio Жыл бұрын
*wakes up *Dresses armor *Breakfast
@biornr.4031
@biornr.4031 Жыл бұрын
I'm half Polish, and I stuck around after your warning. Biggest mistake of this month...
@magicpyroninja
@magicpyroninja Жыл бұрын
Got to love it when someone knows just enough information to make themselves look like a fool trying to explain something
@cocacola4blood365
@cocacola4blood365 Жыл бұрын
Samurai armor are works of art! As beautiful as they were effective! Respect to Metatron for handling that article maturely.
@granudisimo
@granudisimo Жыл бұрын
I love you used the falchion example, since it's the kind of sword that's precisely designed to "slash" and "chop" at an armored opponent, rather than stabbing or "murderstroking", with its compromise between the greater mobility of a long sword, and the heftiness of an axe/hammer.
@vonakakkola
@vonakakkola Жыл бұрын
in this video kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qLuhiqupmtGViqM.html Matt says the opposite: falchion are made to be used against unarmoured opponent maces and warhammers are for armoured opponents, and even axes against some type of armour
@granudisimo
@granudisimo Жыл бұрын
@@vonakakkola Of course you're better off hitting an armored opponent with an axe, a hammer or a spear. But we're talking about cutting with swords to debunk the CrackedHead article's assertion that swords weren't made for cutting; which is why I liked Metatron's mention of the falchion, because if there's a sword that would perform better than others when swinging at armored opponents, that'd be a falchion. Granted my modern bohurt fighter's perspective is biased since the falchions I used (and had used on me), are thicker, modern reproductions that have to be blunt by regulation, so, yeah. like Matt says in the very video you mentioned, nobody really knows what falchions were used for, but the mowing down thick gambesoned peasants/breaking bones under mail theories makes a lot of sense.
@kjaldir1089
@kjaldir1089 Жыл бұрын
Actually I would love a video dedicated to the winged hussars.
@giorgospapoutsakis5271
@giorgospapoutsakis5271 Жыл бұрын
He already has made one a year ago
@kjaldir1089
@kjaldir1089 Жыл бұрын
@@giorgospapoutsakis5271 really? I have to check it out, thanks.
@KalNertea
@KalNertea Жыл бұрын
Polish Hussars (actually in Poland we are just saying Hussars, we never call them "winged") had no consistent uniform Only thing that was required of them to be consistent were horse and basic set of weapons (especially lance) All of equipment they had to buy with their own money and they were using it show-off. EVERY Hussar looked different. So yes, some might ride to battlewith wings attached to their saddle It was all psychological warfare. Just imagine that you are regular soldier that have never seen leopard or so and you are said to hold the line against terrifying formation of perfectly trained mounted warriors clad in monstrous skins and with angelic wings. Yeah, apart from "just" crazy amount of super effective weapons, top grade armor, special breed of warhorse and well designed and executed tactics... Hussars also were capable to destroy morale. They were able to win impossible odds. Like Battle of Kircholm
@vladprus4019
@vladprus4019 Жыл бұрын
"actually in Poland we are just saying Hussars, we never call them "winged" Well, it's because in Polish there is alraedy the distinciton betweeen "regular" hussars and "winged" ones - the ones that don't have adjective in English are "Huzarzy" while those who got adjective "winged" are "Husarze/Husaria"
@secondaryfront
@secondaryfront Жыл бұрын
A single hussar wing attached to saddle was a norm in XVI-XVII c. The pair of wings were common as the ceremonial outfit in XVIII century. Also while wings were used in battles - and there are direct proofs of that which some polish historians dismiss out of hand for...whatever reason, in XVII century most of hussars just skipped wings during the battles and were fighting just in their armour + feathers on helmets.
@DeathsHood
@DeathsHood Жыл бұрын
My issue with the "swords were expensive" bit, is that any average soldier could go find a _used_ sword for, like, a days pay. Or one of the *_many_* swords that a blacksmith made en-masse specifically _for_ selling cheaply. Or those created by an apprentice craftsman, which tended to be cheaper due to little flaws and such. Not all weapons were crafted specially for a person, nor were they all master-craft weapons forged to perfection. Sometimes, an ok sword is just an ok sword, lol.
@Jasmixd
@Jasmixd Жыл бұрын
Hm, were those sword basically backups for when the spear broke, or were men-at-arms units armed primarily with swords actually a common thing? Always thought the sword for the common soldier was a weapon of last resort.
@DeathsHood
@DeathsHood Жыл бұрын
@@Jasmixd What does this have to do with what I said?
@Jasmixd
@Jasmixd Жыл бұрын
@@DeathsHood Well, you were talking about relatively cheap swords made for the common soldier, so I wondered how they were used. I'm not trying to argue against your points or anything like that.
@DeathsHood
@DeathsHood Жыл бұрын
@@Jasmixd They were used the same as almost all swords: as a secondary or backup weapon. Most if not all soldiers _could_ afford to buy a cheap/used sword as a backup. Hell, even _archers_ had swords for when they inevitably ran out of arrows.
@Pijawek
@Pijawek Жыл бұрын
'Hussars were stupid' KRZYSZTOF GET THE WINGS
@RaspK
@RaspK Жыл бұрын
Ironically, the myth of Excalibur *_is not_* the origin of all later representations of swords as mythical things; mythical swords have been a thing since way before Excalibur. (Also, Excalibur was OK, it was the *_scabbard_* that was more significant.)
@TGPDrunknHick
@TGPDrunknHick Жыл бұрын
sword was basically a fancy glow stick if I recall correctly. Scabbard made him basically immortal on the battlefield.
@RaspK
@RaspK Жыл бұрын
@@TGPDrunknHick Most importantly, it is never shown to have any specific powers, but the original name of the sword on which Excalibur was based would suggest a sword that would cut through a shield or maybe armour. Impressive, but that description is not quite the stuff of legends that most people associate with it. Instead, as you rightly point out, the scabbard would prevent serious injuries or bleeding.
@TGPDrunknHick
@TGPDrunknHick Жыл бұрын
@@RaspK as I recall the sword is supposed to be radiant and possibly blindingly bright in some stories but, yeah it was a symbol.
@TheGodofChaosItself184
@TheGodofChaosItself184 Жыл бұрын
Why was the scabbard more significant than the excalibur (just curious).
@commandopengi
@commandopengi Жыл бұрын
@@TheGodofChaosItself184 Any wounds sustained in battle would not bleed. King Arthur's death in battle is directly linked to the loss of the scabbard of Excalibur.
@gregghelmberger
@gregghelmberger Жыл бұрын
One point the article on the rarity of battles did make is that they qualified their statement by saying "big" or "huge." By the standards of the great classical battles or the battles of later ages, most clashes described as "medieval battles" would be considered small skirmishes. A large number of the battles on the Wikipedia page Metatron showed had a total number of combatants of ~5K or smaller, both sides included -- large by the standards of the time, but not the standards of other ages. If all the combatants of your battle can comfortably be seated in a corner of the grandstand at the Minnesota State Fair with room for two more battles of the same size, you aren't engaged in a BIG battle. Of course there were larger battles, but the number of fights that would make a modern person say, "Holy crap that is a big battle" is relatively small. In that way -- and in that way only -- the article was correct.
@PacMonster0
@PacMonster0 Жыл бұрын
On top of this point I also wanted to point out Metatron was being a bit overly contrarian on that subject as well since he really didn't qualify his context for what he considers "exceedingly rare". We're talking about the whole of human history here and the fact that there's only a few hundred known battles documented really does confirm the statement that they were rare. It's absolutely true that we know about them today because they were the exception to commonplace warfare of the time that was more centered around invasions, skirmishes, or smaller positioning battles. I think he was just already in a "well they must be wrong" mindset and took exception at the term "exceedingly rare" because he thought it was too overly exaggerated a descriptor.
@Romczy
@Romczy Жыл бұрын
And again, there we go, application of modern standards to different time period. Presentism intensifies
@PacMonster0
@PacMonster0 Жыл бұрын
@@Romczy ...what is the "modern standards" that you're referring to here? Neither of us is referring to a situation from a "modern" perspective. How common or rare something is is based on the number of occurrences of that thing in the period of time you're discussing. Raph looking at a "long" wikipedia page as if to say "see, they weren't that rare" misses the context of the period of time that those battles were fought in. And Gregg's point was that many of the battles in that list were not the "large one army smashes into another large army" battles the article he was criticizing was talking about.
@miceliusbeverus6447
@miceliusbeverus6447 Жыл бұрын
First, remember the number of inhabitants of Earth was much smaller then. Second, if you were in the midst of this kind of brutal slashing event... How big would a fight need to be to make you think "oh holy crap"? 😏
@PacMonster0
@PacMonster0 Жыл бұрын
@@miceliusbeverus6447 "The number of inhabitants of Earth was much smaller then". That is completely irrelevant. Our best estimates of world population for Midieval period are still in the hundreds of millions of people. A 5 thousand soldier battle would *still* be considered small even by their standards. And if you were fighting on an open plain, then you absolutely would notice the small size of a force. Again, most conflicts in history were not large battles.
@josephwalukonis9934
@josephwalukonis9934 Жыл бұрын
Metatron, thank you for defending the history of the Husaria. Husaria is the latin term to what they were called at the time. Winged Husars is a modern term. Also, not all the Husaria wore wings. To the doubters out there they did charge formed infantry including pikes such as at the Battle of Kircholm in 1605. They were able to defeat the Swedish pikemen because their lances had a longer reach than the Swedish pikes. On the subject of swords the Husaria carried both sabres and straight bladed types which were used against armored opponents. They also carried war axes or war hammers and a pistol or two.
@drvian5660
@drvian5660 Жыл бұрын
"Elaborate decorations on helmet" It makes absolutely perfect sense for a commander (or a leader of a unit). Otherwise - how subordinates will know to whom address for orders? Or to report about enemy movements or other things? Those soldiers, who transfer commander's orders to battle units, later need to return to their leader and report. Having recognizable feature like exotic decorations on the helmet (instantly visible from afar), totally helps at locating commanding officer (ruler, samurai, knight)... Especially if said officer have a habit of getting into fights personally.
@drvian5660
@drvian5660 Жыл бұрын
Another point: Who knows, what those people believed in, when they decided to wear strange (even ridiculous from our point of view) costumes. Ancient celts believed, that gods created humans in gods image and form, so showing off naked body - is equal to venerating the gods, and that act should attract blessing and protection of higher beings. During ages people were using weapons (and armour) of bizarre designs, simply because they believed that those forms are sacred and holy. Also: war paint of american indigenous people or ancient picts, tattoos on warriors for celtic, african and maori cultures (and more). All of that, supposedly, enhance capabilities, bestow divine protection. There is no need to think that people from the ages past were stupid just because they believed in weird things, that people of today are somehow smarter. Modern people believe in things just as abnormal. For example: "man" can become a "woman" by saying he is a woman. That concept is not that different from belief that man can become a bear by wearing bear hide. Or get stronger by painting face in blue or red paint. Or becoming invulnerable by getting naked... or getting a tattoo.
@dariusz.9119
@dariusz.9119 Жыл бұрын
The sound of Winged Hussars was deafening. Horses that were not used to the sound were petrified or scared away and that gave them an advantage
@janwojciechowski7227
@janwojciechowski7227 Жыл бұрын
Hi! Great video, those people don"t know what they are writing about. As a polish guy I want to thank you for defending hussars. They were badass. On the other note - Honda Tadakatsu was like Red Baron.
@scottmiller6958
@scottmiller6958 Жыл бұрын
Martial arts are universally admired as a rare skill. Comedy is not so admired, but is a rare skill nonetheless. Not everyone can pull it off, least of all many serious scholars. But you NAILED it here! Kudos! LOL!😂
@nicklaserbeam
@nicklaserbeam Жыл бұрын
All swords are for stabbing just look at the orc swords from the Lord of the Rings movies. Perfect for stabbing.
@thechronicler1453
@thechronicler1453 Жыл бұрын
I really hope that’s a joke
@balintkovacs4089
@balintkovacs4089 Жыл бұрын
To be fair the Uruk-hai swords do have a beak/spike you can stab with despite their otherwise cleaver type blade. ^^
@staC-wh6ik
@staC-wh6ik Жыл бұрын
yeah, especially the ones from The Hobbit movies lol
@phildicks4721
@phildicks4721 Жыл бұрын
I believe Tokogawa Ieyasu had a set of battle armor made out of boiled cow hide, and a Kubuto with a steers horns on it to repay an insult. One of his enemies once called him the "Cow of Kanto", so when he led his armies against that enemy, he used that particular armor to throw his enemy's words back at him. As you said, it wasn't unusual for samurai, and especially high ranking samurai to wear elaborate armor to stand out in battle.
@happygamersloth9161
@happygamersloth9161 Жыл бұрын
I'm from Poland. I'm not that interested in history of my own country (diagrace I guess) but yeah, hussars are badass looking.
@Tovalokodonc
@Tovalokodonc Жыл бұрын
Polish Hussars*
@KalNertea
@KalNertea Жыл бұрын
In Poland we just call them husaria. I know that it was inspired by OG Hussars from Hungary, but you can't blame us for naming this formation in a way we learned whole life Poland used to be very close in heart with Hungary, that's why our nations learned from each other a lot We have saying in Poland "Pole and Hungarian, two brothers"
@kajus1402
@kajus1402 Жыл бұрын
To be fair, the Hussar wings are debated for the crown(i.e Polish) army, while also almost definitely unused by the ducal(i.e Lithuanian) army. There are some depictions of Polish Winged Hussars having them, while none exists for Ducal ones. Some have claimed that the wings were used for parades for example. There were other differences between ducal and crown winged hussars aswell(e.g crown Hussars were specially bread, ducal hussars used any horse they could get)
@wouter.de.ruiter
@wouter.de.ruiter Жыл бұрын
The wings on the Hussars and the antlers on the Samurai were definitely made to stun the enemy. They made the warrior in question literally drop-dead gorgeous, so rank after rank of the enemy would fall down at their feet, without them having to use their swords to kill them.
@matthagen67
@matthagen67 Жыл бұрын
Hussars were like Finaly Fantasy dragoons. They looked badass AF 🤘 They were Polish male "valkyries".
@Tovalokodonc
@Tovalokodonc Жыл бұрын
Hussars were originally Hungarian
@snakeace0
@snakeace0 Жыл бұрын
@@Tovalokodonc Yes but unlike the hungarian hussars, polish hussars were better trained and equipped.Poles took the concept of the light cavalry and turned it into a heavy cavalry shock troop. There is a reason people think of the winged hussars when reading "hussar", because they were far more successfull in battle than their hungarian counterparts, especially when outnumbered. And if we want to be pedantic, then technically hussars were originally comprised of serbian cavalry under hungarian royal rule.
@Tovalokodonc
@Tovalokodonc Жыл бұрын
@@snakeace0 Better trained? Maybe. Better equipped? How do you even measure that? They had different roles and tactics. Also, yeah they had glorious battles, which the winged hussars won heavily outnumbered, but also embarrassing defeats. If they were so succesful why were there no winged hussars still fighting in WW2? Why did all Napoleonic-era armies adopt Hungarian hussars instead of Polish hussars. And no. Hussars were Hungarian
@Intranetusa
@Intranetusa Жыл бұрын
One wonders at this point whether these writers are writing these articles to troll people like Metatron.
@krystianwojtas1032
@krystianwojtas1032 Жыл бұрын
I was said in school(polish btw) that hussar's wings made impaling sound made by feathers during a charge that scared the untrained horses, but I don't have any coverage on it
@Dario-uj6qo
@Dario-uj6qo 8 ай бұрын
"Historians": swords were desinged to stab Spears: are we a joke to you?
@leppeppel
@leppeppel Жыл бұрын
If Cracked listicles ever become too depressing, I'd love to see you review "Terry Jones' Medieval Lives"; it's an eight episode series debunking common myths about the lives of medieval people, such as peasants, knights, damsels, alchemists, monks, etc. I think most of it is pretty good, but there are times where he perpetuates counter-myths.
@OptimusMaximusNero
@OptimusMaximusNero Жыл бұрын
Article: "Swords weren't made to kill, duh!" Guts: "Clearly you lack some good knowledge to learn. Don't worry, my little friend shall illustrate you..." *Takes out the Dragon Slayer*
@indrickboreale7381
@indrickboreale7381 Жыл бұрын
Sword? More like a huge chunk of iron swinged into you
@Notmyname1593
@Notmyname1593 Жыл бұрын
On the note of recognizable decorations on battlesuits. I imagine in the heat of battle it is pretty useful to know which one is the guy you are taking orders from.
@biodreg1332
@biodreg1332 Жыл бұрын
Winged hussars' wings are controversial in Poland as well. Some historians claim that battle wings were much smaller than those used in military parades. Interestingly, winged hussars did carry special swords that were only for stabbing (koncerz). They used these swords when they run out of lances. There is a nice picture of a koncerz here: pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koncerz
@rcfokker1630
@rcfokker1630 Жыл бұрын
My first thought is that, if the two opponents are armored, then 'size and strength' might well be more important than skill. I can imagine the big guy simply steam-rolling his opponent. What do you think?
@valandil7454
@valandil7454 Жыл бұрын
I'm glad you have to actually go looking for these articles, they should be hard to find...for the sake of their audience 😒 Although Metratron I do believe they were applying a World War 2 concept to the Hussars and the Samurai who were famous for making themselves noticable on the battlefield. In World War 2 the carrying of swords became less preferable because the opposing forces were rumoured to be able to pick out enemy officers, it kind of applies to the Hussars and Samurai but I think they're forgetting that as you said the concept of Ransom protected most of the landed knights and wealthy people back then, also having joined in with a historical re-enactment I can tell you those outfits make you twice the size and scary as hell 😄 I can only imagine how frightening an armoured Samurai would be, the reason for most of them is to dehumanise whoever's wearing it, remember that the moment your opponent looks frightened of you most of the time you've already won, they're daring you to fight back not inviting you to play the imaginary hero. Context 😋
@valandil7454
@valandil7454 Жыл бұрын
​@@vominomi I think it's the usual thing where someone hears something that happened a few times so they decide that it's what happened all the time I'm convinced that taking things out of context is what the internet's about
@havoc1zero
@havoc1zero Жыл бұрын
“…Then the winged hussars arrived, coming down the mountainside…”
@-Master_Of_Disaster
@-Master_Of_Disaster 11 ай бұрын
Sabaton even made a song about the Winged Hussars. So it's impossible that they were anything else than just badass.
@WKogut
@WKogut Жыл бұрын
I'm Polish. I didn't click away. Kurwa.
@lakerfan2874
@lakerfan2874 Жыл бұрын
Article: "Hussars are idiots. Swords were made for stabbing." Sabaton: Then the Winged Hussars arrived.
@aidenowen9221
@aidenowen9221 Жыл бұрын
I choose to believe Metatron has breakfast in full plate armour with the frogmouth helm
@timesthree5757
@timesthree5757 Жыл бұрын
Oh the primary purpose of “insert deadly weapon” is to incapacitate not to kill argument. Heard it a million times. And furthermore Carthage must be destroyed.
@madbrosheo1514
@madbrosheo1514 Жыл бұрын
Lies are always more believable when you sprinkle in a touch of truth.
@rincontibio7664
@rincontibio7664 Жыл бұрын
"swords are for incapacitate" yes, you are incapacitated if you die
@Icegaze88
@Icegaze88 Жыл бұрын
1 second ago Hi Metatron, I really love your videos on historical weapons. Thanks for sharing them with us. I would like to ask if you can make a video on the concept of the elements associated with weapons. For instance which weapons best suit the essence of fire (i.e. aggressive slashes); which best suits the essence of lightning (i.e. speedy thrusts); which best suits the essence of stone / earth (i.e. strong blows), etc. Thanks in advance!
@kevinmorrice
@kevinmorrice Жыл бұрын
next the article writer will tell me chairs are meant for snowboarding not sitting
@kolbydavenport4696
@kolbydavenport4696 Жыл бұрын
I find it ironic that they say "swords are meant for stabbing not slashing" then say "instead of fencing think of boxing with giant knives" As in dont think of swords meant almost entirely for stabbing
@beeaye7944
@beeaye7944 Жыл бұрын
George Odour: "Imagine wearing flamboyant decorations into battle?!" EVERY soldier for the entirety of history right up until the 20th century: "Yeah, that's the point."
@chengkuoklee5734
@chengkuoklee5734 Жыл бұрын
The Art of Cool
@SpiderboyN2Jesus
@SpiderboyN2Jesus Жыл бұрын
"Swords were only meant to stun" Sure. And those big sharp knives in your kitchen? You thought they were for cutting a slab of beef? Nope. They're just for tenderizing it 🤪.
@woff1959
@woff1959 Жыл бұрын
Just a friendly correction: You wrote: "The early hussars were light cavalry units of exiled Serbian warriors who came to Poland as mercenaries in the early 16th century from Hungary." Stephan Báthory took 300 huszárs with him when he became Polish king, they were certainly not mercenaries, nor Serbs. The word huszár is first mentioned in 1409, and as a unit, they fought in King Matthias' army as light-armoured cavalry. There have always been light cavalry in Hungary's armies, as Dr. János B. Szabó has shown. Hope this helps in future!
@julesD0222
@julesD0222 Жыл бұрын
Exactly!
@Will_Parker
@Will_Parker Жыл бұрын
Probably half of determining who won an ancient battle was down to morale. Massive helms and wings made you look scarier and intimidating and a scared opponent is a lot easier to kill than a confident one.
@RodolfoDM
@RodolfoDM Жыл бұрын
I can imagine in a museum according to that article " so this falchion was sharp enough to cut the fingers of the wielder while he stabs the enemy with the broad edge, it was basically a short spear"
@alexandrepaulo266
@alexandrepaulo266 Жыл бұрын
I dont know why your videos didn't pop up in the notifications, I hope that didn't happen to alot of people, I was wondering why I hadnt seen anything pop up for a while, oh well at least I have 4 or 5 to see! Love your content, thank you :)
@sevenproxies4255
@sevenproxies4255 Жыл бұрын
I'd argue that a suit of full plate armour might've been on par with the contemporary price of a jaguar. A sword on the other hand, if well crafted would be in the pricerange of a really high end gaming PC
@thomasbraden8242
@thomasbraden8242 Жыл бұрын
Dude I love your take on articles. Keep up the awesome work.
@tynytian
@tynytian Жыл бұрын
That last line sums it up perfectly. If wearing such armor made it SOOOO easy to defeat them, then PROFESSIONAL WARRIORS wouldn't have done it. *mic drop
@AlbertoBertorelli1814
@AlbertoBertorelli1814 Жыл бұрын
man im glad you popped up on my home page again, forgot how great this channel is
@metatronyt
@metatronyt Жыл бұрын
Welcome back!
@noewolckers19
@noewolckers19 Жыл бұрын
I had some medival combat introduction lesson during college. And what I remembered from it is: slashing wounds while stabbing kills. And the second: in medival europe it was more profitable to neutralise an opponent (if he is a knight or noble) than to kill him so that you could collect a ransom.
@Goldenhawk583
@Goldenhawk583 Жыл бұрын
I can see how being seen and known on a battlefield, would work as a morale boost for your own troops, a rally point. The longer you are visible, the more boost your troops get that are fighting with you, and the more demoralized your opponent becomes for not having killed/ taken you early on.
@shelbyspeaks3287
@shelbyspeaks3287 Жыл бұрын
*metatron waking up in full attire
@carthago201
@carthago201 Жыл бұрын
"A hero leading a charge into the teeth of the enemy is an idiot." As someone who likes French medieval history, I agree with this statement.
@jarekwrzosek2048
@jarekwrzosek2048 Жыл бұрын
Actually, it is theorized, the Hussar wings HAD A PRACTICAL USE. Namely, Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth would often fight with Tartars of Crimean Khanate, who were known for their ambush tactics, as they threw arkans (a type of lasso) on enemy cavalrymen, and pull them off the sadle. The wings on hussar's saddle (there were two types of hussar wings, battle ones, mounted on the saddle, and parade wings mounted on the armor), would deflect the arkan, and if it cought on them, it would just slip out of Tartar's hand, or pull him down.
Were Medieval People ACTUALLY Dirty? The Truth From The Sources
22:00
I’m just a kid 🥹🥰 LeoNata family #shorts
00:12
LeoNata Family
Рет қаралды 16 МЛН
Sigma Girl Past #funny #sigma #viral
00:20
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 20 МЛН
ROCK PAPER SCISSOR! (55 MLN SUBS!) feat @PANDAGIRLOFFICIAL #shorts
00:31
4 Misconceptions about Medieval Shield Walls in Movies
13:29
SandRhoman History
Рет қаралды 1,1 МЛН
I HAD to Make a Response to This...
19:22
Metatron
Рет қаралды 393 М.
I Googled Myself...This is Wild
20:19
Metatron
Рет қаралды 84 М.
TOP 10 African Weapons! The Top 3 Are INSANE!
13:37
Metatron
Рет қаралды 153 М.
The Craziest British Officer chose this SWORD?
24:57
scholagladiatoria
Рет қаралды 80 М.
Why did MEDIEVAL KNIGHTS stop using SHIELDS?
30:22
scholagladiatoria
Рет қаралды 98 М.
Ancient VS Modern Democracy
19:25
Metatron
Рет қаралды 86 М.
I’m just a kid 🥹🥰 LeoNata family #shorts
00:12
LeoNata Family
Рет қаралды 16 МЛН